Finally...A Tiny Bit of Good News

Those years were golden compared to the morons we are cursed with now.

yep. unemployment 5% and jobs growing constantly.

But you do have a point, Bush did grow government jobs but didn't do so well in the private sector.... Unlike Obama.

yeah, right, obama with his 8% unemployment is definitely better than 5% bush :lol:
and 17 trillion in debt and counting
bush grew jobs in private sector three times faster than your obama will ever dream

and the swelling of the big government under obama is unprecedented.

but for you 8 is less than 5 :lol:
 
Last edited:
You can't be serious.

The first four years, this country was run by Cheney.

Iraq was a war crime.

A major one.

Yes indeed, and Obama perpetrated it. Can someone tell me why he felt he should continue the war for 5 more years?

1. The one in Afghanistan?

2. Because unlike what you folks have been constantly saying, Obama is not a radical.

3. Nothing he did, radically shifted away from the previous administration.

4. If anything changed it was done very gradually and by the book.

5. And with the advice of the generals on the ground.

6. By the way, I don't agree with Obama's Afghanistan policy at all.

7. He should have pulled out all US forces right away. The Biden solution was the one that made the most sense. Small special forces left behind to strike when necessary.

1. Yes, the one in Afghanistan too. Oh, look, we're still fighting it.

2. Did I read that right? Obama isn't a radical? Yeah, that statement speaks for itself.

3. You are correct, he's just as radical as Bush was.

4. You're kidding me right? By the book? He did nothing by the book, he tried to rewrite it.

5. When Patraeus asked him for 40,000 men in Iraq, Obama took his sweet time and only gave him 30,000. How was that adhering to the Generals on the ground? Oh and then he made an idiot of himself at West Point explaining his decision.

6. I have a hard time believing that, Sallow.

7. I wouldn't let Joe Biden anywhere near the Pentagon. Small groups of special forces can be easily overwhelmed. Remember what happened in Mogadishu?
 
Last edited:
Liz Chaney laid out a conservative agenda i.e. Freedom, small govt, against abortion, low taxes (did I cover it all?)

And had sharp critisizim for Obama. (Well then, can someone say landslide?)

Thats all you need, really.
 
See here is one who still slobbers over the Bush/Cheney years..told ya they were still around.

Those years were golden compared to the morons we are cursed with now.

yep. unemployment 5% and jobs growing constantly.

Yup- giant crony/corruption housing/real estate bubble and people buying on credit to keep the dream alive under BS voodoo...how'd that work out, hater dupe?:cuckoo:

OP- Then change the GD channel from the gloom and doom 24/7 Pub Propaganda Machine fcs....

Liz sounds like a liar sell out just like Darth- and Mom. A disgrace lol.
 
Last edited:
What war crime did Cheney commit? You are slandering the man I think you need to produce the evidence. Obama though it is clear he is definitely a war criminal. The drone program has killed thousands of innocents in ally countries and has killed Americans. Cheney did none of that.

You can't be serious.

The first four years, this country was run by Cheney.

Iraq was a war crime.

A major one.

It was a pre-emptive strike!!! Prove it wasn't self-defense!!! :laugh:

:razz:
 
What war crime did Cheney commit? You are slandering the man I think you need to produce the evidence. Obama though it is clear he is definitely a war criminal. The drone program has killed thousands of innocents in ally countries and has killed Americans. Cheney did none of that.

You can't be serious.

The first four years, this country was run by Cheney.

Iraq was a war crime.

A major one.

Really? Who is charging him with, other then you, war crimes? You may not have liked the Iraq war but it was sanctioned by Congress, as is the law, and the UN has not filed charges. Even if you hated the Iraq war it was war and how war is conducted is how people get charged with war crimes, not merely because they go to war. Hell using your logic Roosevelt was a war criminal for going to war in WW2.

Really?

The UN basically condemned it..and no one is going to charge the US with war crimes.

Be serious man.
 
Yes indeed, and Obama perpetrated it. Can someone tell me why he felt he should continue the war for 5 more years?

1. The one in Afghanistan?

2. Because unlike what you folks have been constantly saying, Obama is not a radical.

3. Nothing he did, radically shifted away from the previous administration.

4. If anything changed it was done very gradually and by the book.

5. And with the advice of the generals on the ground.

6. By the way, I don't agree with Obama's Afghanistan policy at all.

7. He should have pulled out all US forces right away. The Biden solution was the one that made the most sense. Small special forces left behind to strike when necessary.

1. Yes, the one in Afghanistan too. Oh, look, we're still fighting it.

2. Did I read that right? Obama isn't a radical? Yeah, that statement speaks for itself.

3. You are correct, he's just as radical as Bush was.

4. You're kidding me right? By the book? He did nothing by the book, he tried to rewrite it.

5. When Patraeus asked him for 40,000 men in Iraq, Obama took his sweet time and only gave him 30,000. How was that adhering to the Generals on the ground? Oh and then he made an idiot of himself at West Point explaining his decision.

6. I have a hard time believing that, Sallow.

7. I wouldn't let Joe Biden anywhere near the Pentagon. Small groups of special forces can be easily overwhelmed. Remember what happened in Mogadishu?

Look up Radical.

Okay?

Although I agree the Bush doctrine was extremely radical.

Everything else?

Gosh man..try less hyperbole.
 
Liz Chaney laid out a conservative agenda i.e. Freedom, small govt, against abortion, low taxes (did I cover it all?)

And had sharp critisizim for Obama. (Well then, can someone say landslide?)

Thats all you need, really.


Wow, it sounds like Liz Cheney is just as much a dumb-ass as Mike Enzi-----Mike Enzi the 8th most conservative Republican in the United States Senate. Thanks for the update.


Interactive: Sorting the Senate by Ideology - NationalJournal.com

Rank the entire 2012 Senate by partisan leanings and demographics

By Peter Bell
Updated: May 30, 2013 | 12:27 a.m.
February 21, 2013 | 7:00 a.m.

.photo.right{display:none;}

Who was the most liberal member of the Senate in 2012? The most conservative? How about the most conservative Democratic woman? Find the answers to these questions and others, and drill down to see how members rate in economic, social, and foreign policy with this interactive pictorial directory. Every member who received National Journal Vote Ratings scores is included.





.
 
Yes indeed, and Obama perpetrated it. Can someone tell me why he felt he should continue the war for 5 more years?

1. The one in Afghanistan?

2. Because unlike what you folks have been constantly saying, Obama is not a radical.

3. Nothing he did, radically shifted away from the previous administration.

4. If anything changed it was done very gradually and by the book.

5. And with the advice of the generals on the ground.

6. By the way, I don't agree with Obama's Afghanistan policy at all.

7. He should have pulled out all US forces right away. The Biden solution was the one that made the most sense. Small special forces left behind to strike when necessary.

1. Yes, the one in Afghanistan too. Oh, look, we're still fighting it.

2. Did I read that right? Obama isn't a radical? Yeah, that statement speaks for itself.

3. You are correct, he's just as radical as Bush was.

4. You're kidding me right? By the book? He did nothing by the book, he tried to rewrite it.

5. When Patraeus asked him for 40,000 men in Iraq, Obama took his sweet time and only gave him 30,000. How was that adhering to the Generals on the ground? Oh and then he made an idiot of himself at West Point explaining his decision.

6. I have a hard time believing that, Sallow.

7. I wouldn't let Joe Biden anywhere near the Pentagon. Small groups of special forces can be easily overwhelmed. Remember what happened in Mogadishu?

Remember what happened in Abbottabad?

Going big cost us Over half a trillion dollars, almost 20,000 casualties, and yet-----and yet, Seal team 6's tactics completed the mission the "go big" strategy could not. -pewsh!-
.
 
1. The one in Afghanistan?

2. Because unlike what you folks have been constantly saying, Obama is not a radical.

3. Nothing he did, radically shifted away from the previous administration.

4. If anything changed it was done very gradually and by the book.

5. And with the advice of the generals on the ground.

6. By the way, I don't agree with Obama's Afghanistan policy at all.

7. He should have pulled out all US forces right away. The Biden solution was the one that made the most sense. Small special forces left behind to strike when necessary.

1. Yes, the one in Afghanistan too. Oh, look, we're still fighting it.

2. Did I read that right? Obama isn't a radical? Yeah, that statement speaks for itself.

3. You are correct, he's just as radical as Bush was.

4. You're kidding me right? By the book? He did nothing by the book, he tried to rewrite it.

5. When Patraeus asked him for 40,000 men in Iraq, Obama took his sweet time and only gave him 30,000. How was that adhering to the Generals on the ground? Oh and then he made an idiot of himself at West Point explaining his decision.

6. I have a hard time believing that, Sallow.

7. I wouldn't let Joe Biden anywhere near the Pentagon. Small groups of special forces can be easily overwhelmed. Remember what happened in Mogadishu?

Remember what happened in Abbottabad?

Going big cost us Over half a trillion dollars, almost 20,000 casualties, and yet-----and yet, Seal team 6's tactics completed the mission the "go big" strategy could not. -pewsh!-
.

Sigh, I was referring to the Blackhawk Down incident which occurred in 1993 under then President Clinton. What on Earth are you talking about? Abbottabad has nothing to do with what I just said.
 
How so? She is trying to win a seat held by a Republican.... In Wyoming.
What's her last name again?
She has a better chance of pissing off republicans.
Depends. Is she Democratic Party Lite, like most of the GOP; or is she conservative?

It doesn't matter, Ronald Reagan himself would have a hard time beating Enzi. He is well respected and he gets a lot of support from oil and coal. When Gillette is the new coal capital of the US, a newcomer isn't going to beat someone like that. The man's own son works or did work for a coal company.
And Enzi has done quite a bit for the coal industry there. Gillette isn't like the east coast either, coal is thriving there...
You should see what some have to pay for an apartment there.

And republicans have already started to support him.

Don't get me wrong it would be great to have a woman in Wyoming, but she probably won't win. I think she knows this too. She is just trying to get out there.
 
She will have a tough time against Senator Mike Enzi. Given Enzi voted against the amnesty bill, he has secured his senate seat. It would be nice if Cheney could get some recognition out of this, the move to Arizona and run against Jeff is a Flake. They don't get any more blue than Fake (letter "L" purposely left out).
 

Forum List

Back
Top