Finally: President Trump calls Mueller’s Investigation Illegal

[The Purge]

There’s an old Chinese blessing (or curse, depending on the “source”) which says: may you live in interesting times. And interesting times we live in my friends, at least from the news-cycle perspective. If you remember the Mueller investigation, which started almost 2 years ago, well, its aim was to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with those pesky russkies in what has been largely described by the talking heads in the fake news corporate left-mainstream-media as “Russia Collusion”. Forget about the fact that “collusion” is not illegal, but concentrate on the main issue: Mueller’s DEM filled investigation team was supposed to find out who did what with whom from Russia, or something along these lines. After tens of millions of dollars (taxpayer money obviously) spent on smoke and mirrors, and countless lives ruined by this so-called “independent” investigation (Flynn, Manafort et al), there is zero (as in 0) evidence with regard to any “Russian collusion” in the 2016 campaign. At least on Trump’s part.

And today, the POTUS drew a line in the sand and said: enough is enough. He also stated clearly what many people were already saying from the beginning: Mueller’s investigation is illegal. Here’s from an interview with Rudi Giuliani, Trump’s attorney, who revealed that Donald Trump’s legal team is working at a rebuttal to counter (preemptively) a possible negative report from Mueller’s team:

(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...

The President is going to have to take decisive action at some point. By that, I mean firing Sessions, Rosenstein and/or Mueller, and/or shutting down the special prosecutor investigation entirely (which presumably would send ongoing prosecutions to local US Attorney offices, and have Democrats and their lap dog media on a RANT that we have not seen before).

He may be waiting until after the mid-term election. Or he may be waiting until after the horrible Paul Ryan is gone and a new Congress sworn in. He may be waiting to see if the GOP holds the House.. But I don’t think remaining a punching bag and guessing as to Mueller’s intentions is a good strategy.

Illegal, eh? How? What law is being violated?

Or is Trump making stuff up yet again?

You need a crime to investigate for a special prosecutor, THERE IS NO CRIME...EVEN if there was collusion, that is not a crime!

Idiot.

You don’t need a crime. Only a reasonable suspicion of a crime.

And “collusion” is your word, not a word found anywhere in the order to place Mueller in the role of Special Counsel...

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download

Collusion is not a crime but bandied about by DemonRATS as if it was, baby deer! Neither is obstruction when the Constitution gives the power to the president to fire any member of the executive without having to give Cause

 

[Faun]

There’s an old Chinese blessing (or curse, depending on the “source”) which says: may you live in interesting times. And interesting times we live in my friends, at least from the news-cycle perspective. If you remember the Mueller investigation, which started almost 2 years ago, well, its aim was to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with those pesky russkies in what has been largely described by the talking heads in the fake news corporate left-mainstream-media as “Russia Collusion”. Forget about the fact that “collusion” is not illegal, but concentrate on the main issue: Mueller’s DEM filled investigation team was supposed to find out who did what with whom from Russia, or something along these lines. After tens of millions of dollars (taxpayer money obviously) spent on smoke and mirrors, and countless lives ruined by this so-called “independent” investigation (Flynn, Manafort et al), there is zero (as in 0) evidence with regard to any “Russian collusion” in the 2016 campaign. At least on Trump’s part.

And today, the POTUS drew a line in the sand and said: enough is enough. He also stated clearly what many people were already saying from the beginning: Mueller’s investigation is illegal. Here’s from an interview with Rudi Giuliani, Trump’s attorney, who revealed that Donald Trump’s legal team is working at a rebuttal to counter (preemptively) a possible negative report from Mueller’s team:

(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...

The President is going to have to take decisive action at some point. By that, I mean firing Sessions, Rosenstein and/or Mueller, and/or shutting down the special prosecutor investigation entirely (which presumably would send ongoing prosecutions to local US Attorney offices, and have Democrats and their lap dog media on a RANT that we have not seen before).

He may be waiting until after the mid-term election. Or he may be waiting until after the horrible Paul Ryan is gone and a new Congress sworn in. He may be waiting to see if the GOP holds the House.. But I don’t think remaining a punching bag and guessing as to Mueller’s intentions is a good strategy.

Illegal, eh? How? What law is being violated?

Or is Trump making stuff up yet again?

You need a crime to investigate for a special prosecutor, THERE IS NO CRIME...EVEN if there was collusion, that is not a crime!

Idiot.

You don’t need a crime. Only a reasonable suspicion of a crime.

And “collusion” is your word, not a word found anywhere in the order to place Mueller in the role of Special Counsel...

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download

Collusion is not a crime but bandied about by DemonRATS as if it was, baby deer! Neither is obstruction when the Constitution gives the power to the president to fire any member of the executive without having to give Cause

Again, you were the one who used the word. The order to install a Special Counsel did not.

And if Trump could fire Mueller he would. He either believes he can’t or he doesn’t have the balls.

 

[The Purge]

There’s an old Chinese blessing (or curse, depending on the “source”) which says: may you live in interesting times. And interesting times we live in my friends, at least from the news-cycle perspective. If you remember the Mueller investigation, which started almost 2 years ago, well, its aim was to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with those pesky russkies in what has been largely described by the talking heads in the fake news corporate left-mainstream-media as “Russia Collusion”. Forget about the fact that “collusion” is not illegal, but concentrate on the main issue: Mueller’s DEM filled investigation team was supposed to find out who did what with whom from Russia, or something along these lines. After tens of millions of dollars (taxpayer money obviously) spent on smoke and mirrors, and countless lives ruined by this so-called “independent” investigation (Flynn, Manafort et al), there is zero (as in 0) evidence with regard to any “Russian collusion” in the 2016 campaign. At least on Trump’s part.

And today, the POTUS drew a line in the sand and said: enough is enough. He also stated clearly what many people were already saying from the beginning: Mueller’s investigation is illegal. Here’s from an interview with Rudi Giuliani, Trump’s attorney, who revealed that Donald Trump’s legal team is working at a rebuttal to counter (preemptively) a possible negative report from Mueller’s team:

(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...

The President is going to have to take decisive action at some point. By that, I mean firing Sessions, Rosenstein and/or Mueller, and/or shutting down the special prosecutor investigation entirely (which presumably would send ongoing prosecutions to local US Attorney offices, and have Democrats and their lap dog media on a RANT that we have not seen before).

He may be waiting until after the mid-term election. Or he may be waiting until after the horrible Paul Ryan is gone and a new Congress sworn in. He may be waiting to see if the GOP holds the House.. But I don’t think remaining a punching bag and guessing as to Mueller’s intentions is a good strategy.

Illegal, eh? How? What law is being violated?

Or is Trump making stuff up yet again?

You need a crime to investigate for a special prosecutor, THERE IS NO CRIME...EVEN if there was collusion, that is not a crime!

Conspiracy against the United States is a crime. And Trump admitting that his campaign colluded with the Russians when he confessed that the reason his campaign officials met with a Russian operative was to get information on Hillary.

With Trump's campaign well aware that the information was to come from 'high level' sources as part of the Russian government's efforts to aid Trump. This while the Russian government was attacking the United States to (you guessed it) aid Trump.

With Trump lying repeatedly about his campaign's collusion with the Russians. And compelling others to lie about his campaign's collision. And trying to stop the investigation into the that collusion.

Nothing an innocent man would do.

Plus, the Spanish authorities turned over wire taps of Don Jr. setting up yet ANOTHER secret meeting with the Russians, this time with Russian Intelligence Handler Alexander Torshin.

The evidence that Trump's campaign colluded with the Russians is overwhelming. Which is why republicans are so desperate to shut the investigation down.

There’s an old Chinese blessing (or curse, depending on the “source”) which says: may you live in interesting times. And interesting times we live in my friends, at least from the news-cycle perspective. If you remember the Mueller investigation, which started almost 2 years ago, well, its aim was to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with those pesky russkies in what has been largely described by the talking heads in the fake news corporate left-mainstream-media as “Russia Collusion”. Forget about the fact that “collusion” is not illegal, but concentrate on the main issue: Mueller’s DEM filled investigation team was supposed to find out who did what with whom from Russia, or something along these lines. After tens of millions of dollars (taxpayer money obviously) spent on smoke and mirrors, and countless lives ruined by this so-called “independent” investigation (Flynn, Manafort et al), there is zero (as in 0) evidence with regard to any “Russian collusion” in the 2016 campaign. At least on Trump’s part.

And today, the POTUS drew a line in the sand and said: enough is enough. He also stated clearly what many people were already saying from the beginning: Mueller’s investigation is illegal. Here’s from an interview with Rudi Giuliani, Trump’s attorney, who revealed that Donald Trump’s legal team is working at a rebuttal to counter (preemptively) a possible negative report from Mueller’s team:

(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...

The President is going to have to take decisive action at some point. By that, I mean firing Sessions, Rosenstein and/or Mueller, and/or shutting down the special prosecutor investigation entirely (which presumably would send ongoing prosecutions to local US Attorney offices, and have Democrats and their lap dog media on a RANT that we have not seen before).

He may be waiting until after the mid-term election. Or he may be waiting until after the horrible Paul Ryan is gone and a new Congress sworn in. He may be waiting to see if the GOP holds the House.. But I don’t think remaining a punching bag and guessing as to Mueller’s intentions is a good strategy.

Illegal, eh? How? What law is being violated?

Or is Trump making stuff up yet again?

You need a crime to investigate for a special prosecutor, THERE IS NO CRIME...EVEN if there was collusion, that is not a crime!

Conspiracy against the United States is a crime. And Trump admitting that his campaign colluded with the Russians when he confessed that the reason his campaign officials met with a Russian operative was to get information on Hillary.

With Trump's campaign well aware that the information was to come from 'high level' sources as part of the Russian government's efforts to aid Trump. This while the Russian government was attacking the United States to (you guessed it) aid Trump.

With Trump lying repeatedly about his campaign's collusion with the Russians. And compelling others to lie about his campaign's collision. And trying to stop the investigation into the that collusion.

Nothing an innocent man would do.

Plus, the Spanish authorities turned over wire taps of Don Jr. setting up yet ANOTHER secret meeting with the Russians, this time with Russian Intelligence Handler Alexander Torshin.

The evidence that Trump's campaign colluded with the Russians is overwhelming. Which is why republicans are so desperate to shut the investigation down.

Have a link to that supposed collusion CRIME or just MORE BS with NO EVIDENCE....WAITING!

BTW the REAL COLLUSION with Russia is the RUSSIAN PREPARED DOSSIER that Hillary bought through her lawyer Perkins Coie.....

Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier
Washington Post
View attachment 214062
Oct 24, 2017 · Elias and his law firm, Perkins Coie, retained the company in April 2016 on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the DNC. Before that

LOLOLOL

Sure didn’t take long term get you to derail your own thread to make this about Hillary.

Always was about Hildebeast, and mulatto....the cover up is deep, just waiting for ONE to crack after midterms when Trump can rid himself of Sessions and go after you Anti-Americans! Time is on OUR side not yours

 

[WEATHER53]

Illegal as in first of several steps to Over.

 

[Faun]

Illegal, eh? How? What law is being violated?

Or is Trump making stuff up yet again?

You need a crime to investigate for a special prosecutor, THERE IS NO CRIME...EVEN if there was collusion, that is not a crime!

Conspiracy against the United States is a crime. And Trump admitting that his campaign colluded with the Russians when he confessed that the reason his campaign officials met with a Russian operative was to get information on Hillary.

With Trump's campaign well aware that the information was to come from 'high level' sources as part of the Russian government's efforts to aid Trump. This while the Russian government was attacking the United States to (you guessed it) aid Trump.

With Trump lying repeatedly about his campaign's collusion with the Russians. And compelling others to lie about his campaign's collision. And trying to stop the investigation into the that collusion.

Nothing an innocent man would do.

Plus, the Spanish authorities turned over wire taps of Don Jr. setting up yet ANOTHER secret meeting with the Russians, this time with Russian Intelligence Handler Alexander Torshin.

The evidence that Trump's campaign colluded with the Russians is overwhelming. Which is why republicans are so desperate to shut the investigation down.

Illegal, eh? How? What law is being violated?

Or is Trump making stuff up yet again?

You need a crime to investigate for a special prosecutor, THERE IS NO CRIME...EVEN if there was collusion, that is not a crime!

Conspiracy against the United States is a crime. And Trump admitting that his campaign colluded with the Russians when he confessed that the reason his campaign officials met with a Russian operative was to get information on Hillary.

With Trump's campaign well aware that the information was to come from 'high level' sources as part of the Russian government's efforts to aid Trump. This while the Russian government was attacking the United States to (you guessed it) aid Trump.

With Trump lying repeatedly about his campaign's collusion with the Russians. And compelling others to lie about his campaign's collision. And trying to stop the investigation into the that collusion.

Nothing an innocent man would do.

Plus, the Spanish authorities turned over wire taps of Don Jr. setting up yet ANOTHER secret meeting with the Russians, this time with Russian Intelligence Handler Alexander Torshin.

The evidence that Trump's campaign colluded with the Russians is overwhelming. Which is why republicans are so desperate to shut the investigation down.

Have a link to that supposed collusion CRIME or just MORE BS with NO EVIDENCE....WAITING!

BTW the REAL COLLUSION with Russia is the RUSSIAN PREPARED DOSSIER that Hillary bought through her lawyer Perkins Coie.....

Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier
Washington Post
View attachment 214062
Oct 24, 2017 · Elias and his law firm, Perkins Coie, retained the company in April 2016 on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the DNC. Before that

LOLOLOL

Sure didn’t take long term get you to derail your own thread to make this about Hillary.

Always was about Hildebeast, and mulatto....the cover up is deep, just waiting for ONE to crack after midterms when Trump can rid himself of Sessions and go after you Anti-Americans! Time is on OUR side not yours

LOL

You keep waiting.....

 

[The Purge]

There’s an old Chinese blessing (or curse, depending on the “source”) which says: may you live in interesting times. And interesting times we live in my friends, at least from the news-cycle perspective. If you remember the Mueller investigation, which started almost 2 years ago, well, its aim was to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with those pesky russkies in what has been largely described by the talking heads in the fake news corporate left-mainstream-media as “Russia Collusion”. Forget about the fact that “collusion” is not illegal, but concentrate on the main issue: Mueller’s DEM filled investigation team was supposed to find out who did what with whom from Russia, or something along these lines. After tens of millions of dollars (taxpayer money obviously) spent on smoke and mirrors, and countless lives ruined by this so-called “independent” investigation (Flynn, Manafort et al), there is zero (as in 0) evidence with regard to any “Russian collusion” in the 2016 campaign. At least on Trump’s part.

And today, the POTUS drew a line in the sand and said: enough is enough. He also stated clearly what many people were already saying from the beginning: Mueller’s investigation is illegal. Here’s from an interview with Rudi Giuliani, Trump’s attorney, who revealed that Donald Trump’s legal team is working at a rebuttal to counter (preemptively) a possible negative report from Mueller’s team:

(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...

The President is going to have to take decisive action at some point. By that, I mean firing Sessions, Rosenstein and/or Mueller, and/or shutting down the special prosecutor investigation entirely (which presumably would send ongoing prosecutions to local US Attorney offices, and have Democrats and their lap dog media on a RANT that we have not seen before).

He may be waiting until after the mid-term election. Or he may be waiting until after the horrible Paul Ryan is gone and a new Congress sworn in. He may be waiting to see if the GOP holds the House.. But I don’t think remaining a punching bag and guessing as to Mueller’s intentions is a good strategy.

Illegal, eh? How? What law is being violated?

Or is Trump making stuff up yet again?

You need a crime to investigate for a special prosecutor, THERE IS NO CRIME...EVEN if there was collusion, that is not a crime!

Idiot.

You don’t need a crime. Only a reasonable suspicion of a crime.

And “collusion” is your word, not a word found anywhere in the order to place Mueller in the role of Special Counsel...

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download

Collusion is not a crime but bandied about by DemonRATS as if it was, baby deer! Neither is obstruction when the Constitution gives the power to the president to fire any member of the executive without having to give Cause

Again, you were the one who used the word. The order to install a Special Counsel did not.

And if Trump could fire Mueller he would. He either believes he can’t or he doesn’t have the balls.

Even the NY Times has you wrong again@

Opinion | Of Course Trump Can Fire Mueller. He Shouldn't.
The New York Times

Apr 13, 2018 · President Trump this week claimed the power to fire the special counsel, Robert Mueller, “ directly.” In response, the Senate Judiciary

 

[frigidweirdo]

There’s an old Chinese blessing (or curse, depending on the “source”) which says: may you live in interesting times. And interesting times we live in my friends, at least from the news-cycle perspective. If you remember the Mueller investigation, which started almost 2 years ago, well, its aim was to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with those pesky russkies in what has been largely described by the talking heads in the fake news corporate left-mainstream-media as “Russia Collusion”. Forget about the fact that “collusion” is not illegal, but concentrate on the main issue: Mueller’s DEM filled investigation team was supposed to find out who did what with whom from Russia, or something along these lines. After tens of millions of dollars (taxpayer money obviously) spent on smoke and mirrors, and countless lives ruined by this so-called “independent” investigation (Flynn, Manafort et al), there is zero (as in 0) evidence with regard to any “Russian collusion” in the 2016 campaign. At least on Trump’s part.

And today, the POTUS drew a line in the sand and said: enough is enough. He also stated clearly what many people were already saying from the beginning: Mueller’s investigation is illegal. Here’s from an interview with Rudi Giuliani, Trump’s attorney, who revealed that Donald Trump’s legal team is working at a rebuttal to counter (preemptively) a possible negative report from Mueller’s team:

(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...

The President is going to have to take decisive action at some point. By that, I mean firing Sessions, Rosenstein and/or Mueller, and/or shutting down the special prosecutor investigation entirely (which presumably would send ongoing prosecutions to local US Attorney offices, and have Democrats and their lap dog media on a RANT that we have not seen before).

He may be waiting until after the mid-term election. Or he may be waiting until after the horrible Paul Ryan is gone and a new Congress sworn in. He may be waiting to see if the GOP holds the House.. But I don’t think remaining a punching bag and guessing as to Mueller’s intentions is a good strategy.

But he doesn't have a problem with Congressmen doing illegal things, but he has a problem with Mueller doing non-illegal things which he claims are illegal.

 

[The Purge]

Then he should be investigating Hildeeast, the DNC and the corrupt and known liat the FBO & DOJ ...and

Lawmakers Make Criminal Referral on Clinton, Comey, Lynch to DOJ on Steele Dossier
Sara A. Carter
And Jeff Sessions is SITTING ON THIS! HEVSHOULD BE INVESTIGATING THESE CRIMINAL REFERALS....after the RED WAVE in the Nov. Election the shit will hit the fan for you corrupt, treasonous and evil Democrats

He's already got Trump. And he will finish with Trump. As for other investigations, there are none. You live in a world of make believe, and that's on you.

And they already have Mueller for his collusion with Hilary and the DNC on Uranium 1....wait till after Nov. For that shoe to drop!

No one is waiting on that because there is nothing to see. Shep Smith has torn that entire narrative apart.

Shep Smith is a flaming homo with a vendata against anything pro Trump. Taken with a grain of salt@

Translation: you can’t refute a word he said.

Your tacit admission wasn’t really necessary but thanks just the same.

Truth hurts you....perhaps your a doe in bucks clothing!

 

[Faun]

Illegal, eh? How? What law is being violated?

Or is Trump making stuff up yet again?

You need a crime to investigate for a special prosecutor, THERE IS NO CRIME...EVEN if there was collusion, that is not a crime!

Idiot.

You don’t need a crime. Only a reasonable suspicion of a crime.

And “collusion” is your word, not a word found anywhere in the order to place Mueller in the role of Special Counsel...

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download

Collusion is not a crime but bandied about by DemonRATS as if it was, baby deer! Neither is obstruction when the Constitution gives the power to the president to fire any member of the executive without having to give Cause

Again, you were the one who used the word. The order to install a Special Counsel did not.

And if Trump could fire Mueller he would. He either believes he can’t or he doesn’t have the balls.

Even the NY Times has you wrong again@

Opinion | Of Course Trump Can Fire Mueller. He Shouldn't.
The New York Times
View attachment 214700
Apr 13, 2018 · President Trump this week claimed the power to fire the special counsel, Robert Mueller, “ directly.” In response, the Senate Judiciary

Wut??

I said either Trump believes he can’t fire Mueller or he doesn’t have the balls to do it .... where does that opinion piece state otherwise??

 

[The Purge]

There’s an old Chinese blessing (or curse, depending on the “source”) which says: may you live in interesting times. And interesting times we live in my friends, at least from the news-cycle perspective. If you remember the Mueller investigation, which started almost 2 years ago, well, its aim was to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with those pesky russkies in what has been largely described by the talking heads in the fake news corporate left-mainstream-media as “Russia Collusion”. Forget about the fact that “collusion” is not illegal, but concentrate on the main issue: Mueller’s DEM filled investigation team was supposed to find out who did what with whom from Russia, or something along these lines. After tens of millions of dollars (taxpayer money obviously) spent on smoke and mirrors, and countless lives ruined by this so-called “independent” investigation (Flynn, Manafort et al), there is zero (as in 0) evidence with regard to any “Russian collusion” in the 2016 campaign. At least on Trump’s part.

And today, the POTUS drew a line in the sand and said: enough is enough. He also stated clearly what many people were already saying from the beginning: Mueller’s investigation is illegal. Here’s from an interview with Rudi Giuliani, Trump’s attorney, who revealed that Donald Trump’s legal team is working at a rebuttal to counter (preemptively) a possible negative report from Mueller’s team:

(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...

The President is going to have to take decisive action at some point. By that, I mean firing Sessions, Rosenstein and/or Mueller, and/or shutting down the special prosecutor investigation entirely (which presumably would send ongoing prosecutions to local US Attorney offices, and have Democrats and their lap dog media on a RANT that we have not seen before).

He may be waiting until after the mid-term election. Or he may be waiting until after the horrible Paul Ryan is gone and a new Congress sworn in. He may be waiting to see if the GOP holds the House.. But I don’t think remaining a punching bag and guessing as to Mueller’s intentions is a good strategy.

But he doesn't have a problem with Congressmen doing illegal things, but he has a problem with Mueller doing non-illegal things which he claims are illegal.

Has there been a guilty verdict....didn't think so.

 

[The Purge]

You need a crime to investigate for a special prosecutor, THERE IS NO CRIME...EVEN if there was collusion, that is not a crime!

Idiot.

You don’t need a crime. Only a reasonable suspicion of a crime.

And “collusion” is your word, not a word found anywhere in the order to place Mueller in the role of Special Counsel...

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download

Collusion is not a crime but bandied about by DemonRATS as if it was, baby deer! Neither is obstruction when the Constitution gives the power to the president to fire any member of the executive without having to give Cause

Again, you were the one who used the word. The order to install a Special Counsel did not.

And if Trump could fire Mueller he would. He either believes he can’t or he doesn’t have the balls.

Even the NY Times has you wrong again@

Opinion | Of Course Trump Can Fire Mueller. He Shouldn't.
The New York Times
View attachment 214700
Apr 13, 2018 · President Trump this week claimed the power to fire the special counsel, Robert Mueller, “ directly.” In response, the Senate Judiciary

Wut??

I said either Trump believes he can’t fire Mueller or he doesn’t have the balls to do it .... where does that opinion piece state otherwise??

Well then, if you didn't understand it there are dozen more articles saying he can fire Mueller...look them up and learn something

 

[radical right]

Collusion is not a crime but bandied about by DemonRATS as if it was, baby deer! Neither is obstruction when the Constitution gives the power to the president to fire any member of the executive without having to give Cause

That is where you made your mistake. It is like the sign at area 51 that says "deadly force authorized" thinking that a guard can execute trespassers that wander past the warning sign..

 

[Faun]

He's already got Trump. And he will finish with Trump. As for other investigations, there are none. You live in a world of make believe, and that's on you.

And they already have Mueller for his collusion with Hilary and the DNC on Uranium 1....wait till after Nov. For that shoe to drop!

No one is waiting on that because there is nothing to see. Shep Smith has torn that entire narrative apart.

Shep Smith is a flaming homo with a vendata against anything pro Trump. Taken with a grain of salt@

Translation: you can’t refute a word he said.

Your tacit admission wasn’t really necessary but thanks just the same.

Truth hurts you....perhaps yitr a does in bucks clothing!

”ytir a does?”

I certainly hope you’re not suffering a stroke while you’re typing here. Assuming you’re not, your attack on Smith didn’t actually refute a single word he said.

And you’re stuck with the reality that the vast majority of money contributed to the Clinton Foundation game from a Canadian, not from Russians; and it came years before the Uranium One deal and years before Hillary was Secryof State.

It must suck to put all your hopes into the delusions you post.

 

[The Purge]

Collusion is not a crime but bandied about by DemonRATS as if it was, baby deer! Neither is obstruction when the Constitution gives the power to the president to fire any member of the executive without having to give Cause

That is where you made your mistake. It is like the sign at area 51 that says "deadly force authorized" thinking that a guard can execute trespassers that wander past the warning sign..

You mean they can't?

 

[The Purge]

And they already have Mueller for his collusion with Hilary and the DNC on Uranium 1....wait till after Nov. For that shoe to drop!

No one is waiting on that because there is nothing to see. Shep Smith has torn that entire narrative apart.

Shep Smith is a flaming homo with a vendata against anything pro Trump. Taken with a grain of salt@

Translation: you can’t refute a word he said.

Your tacit admission wasn’t really necessary but thanks just the same.

Truth hurts you....perhaps yitr a does in bucks clothing!

”ytir a does?”

I certainly hope you’re not suffering a stroke while you’re typing here. Assuming you’re not, your attack on Smith didn’t actually refute a single word he said.

And you’re stuck with the reality that the vast majority of money contributed to the Clinton Foundation game from a Canadian, not from Russians; and it came years before the Uranium One deal and years before Hillary was Secryof State.

It must suck to put all your hopes into the delusions you post.

Large fingers. Small android. Glad to see you deflect, as you usually do!

 

[Faun]

Idiot.

You don’t need a crime. Only a reasonable suspicion of a crime.

And “collusion” is your word, not a word found anywhere in the order to place Mueller in the role of Special Counsel...

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download

Collusion is not a crime but bandied about by DemonRATS as if it was, baby deer! Neither is obstruction when the Constitution gives the power to the president to fire any member of the executive without having to give Cause

Again, you were the one who used the word. The order to install a Special Counsel did not.

And if Trump could fire Mueller he would. He either believes he can’t or he doesn’t have the balls.

Even the NY Times has you wrong again@

Opinion | Of Course Trump Can Fire Mueller. He Shouldn't.
The New York Times
View attachment 214700
Apr 13, 2018 · President Trump this week claimed the power to fire the special counsel, Robert Mueller, “ directly.” In response, the Senate Judiciary

Wut??

I said either Trump believes he can’t fire Mueller or he doesn’t have the balls to do it .... where does that opinion piece state otherwise??

Well then, if you didn't understand it there are dozen more articles saying he can fire Mueller...look them up and learn something

Then they too agree with me that Trump hasn’t fired Mueller because he either doesn’t believe he can or because he lacks the balls to do it.

How many articles do you need to prove that wrong?

 

[The Purge]

Collusion is not a crime but bandied about by DemonRATS as if it was, baby deer! Neither is obstruction when the Constitution gives the power to the president to fire any member of the executive without having to give Cause

Again, you were the one who used the word. The order to install a Special Counsel did not.

And if Trump could fire Mueller he would. He either believes he can’t or he doesn’t have the balls.

Even the NY Times has you wrong again@

Opinion | Of Course Trump Can Fire Mueller. He Shouldn't.
The New York Times
View attachment 214700
Apr 13, 2018 · President Trump this week claimed the power to fire the special counsel, Robert Mueller, “ directly.” In response, the Senate Judiciary

Wut??

I said either Trump believes he can’t fire Mueller or he doesn’t have the balls to do it .... where does that opinion piece state otherwise??

Well then, if you didn't understand it there are dozen more articles saying he can fire Mueller...look them up and learn something

Then they too agree with me that Trump hasn’t fired Mueller because he either doesn’t believe he can or because he lacks the balls to do it.

How many articles do you need to prove that wrong?

You dont fire a leftist scumbag 60 days before an election...even a pea brain, like you should realize that!

 

[Faun]

No one is waiting on that because there is nothing to see. Shep Smith has torn that entire narrative apart.

Shep Smith is a flaming homo with a vendata against anything pro Trump. Taken with a grain of salt@

Translation: you can’t refute a word he said.

Your tacit admission wasn’t really necessary but thanks just the same.

Truth hurts you....perhaps yitr a does in bucks clothing!

”ytir a does?”

I certainly hope you’re not suffering a stroke while you’re typing here. Assuming you’re not, your attack on Smith didn’t actually refute a single word he said.

And you’re stuck with the reality that the vast majority of money contributed to the Clinton Foundation game from a Canadian, not from Russians; and it came years before the Uranium One deal and years before Hillary was Secryof State.

It must suck to put all your hopes into the delusions you post.

Large fingers. Small android. Glad to see you deflect, as you usually do!

LOLOL

Your desperation is noted and laughed at as you zeroed in on that part of my post while completely ignoring where I destroyed your nonsense about the Uranium One deal.

 

[Faun]

Again, you were the one who used the word. The order to install a Special Counsel did not.

And if Trump could fire Mueller he would. He either believes he can’t or he doesn’t have the balls.

Even the NY Times has you wrong again@

Opinion | Of Course Trump Can Fire Mueller. He Shouldn't.
The New York Times
View attachment 214700
Apr 13, 2018 · President Trump this week claimed the power to fire the special counsel, Robert Mueller, “ directly.” In response, the Senate Judiciary

Wut??

I said either Trump believes he can’t fire Mueller or he doesn’t have the balls to do it .... where does that opinion piece state otherwise??

Well then, if you didn't understand it there are dozen more articles saying he can fire Mueller...look them up and learn something

Then they too agree with me that Trump hasn’t fired Mueller because he either doesn’t believe he can or because he lacks the balls to do it.

How many articles do you need to prove that wrong?

You dont fire a leftist scumbag 60 days before an election...even a pea brain, like you should realize that!

Idiot.... he could have done it 6 months ago.

Which again leaves us with one of two options... either he believes he can’t or he lacks the balls to do it.

Which is it?

 

[Dragonlady]

There’s an old Chinese blessing (or curse, depending on the “source”) which says: may you live in interesting times. And interesting times we live in my friends, at least from the news-cycle perspective. If you remember the Mueller investigation, which started almost 2 years ago, well, its aim was to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with those pesky russkies in what has been largely described by the talking heads in the fake news corporate left-mainstream-media as “Russia Collusion”. Forget about the fact that “collusion” is not illegal, but concentrate on the main issue: Mueller’s DEM filled investigation team was supposed to find out who did what with whom from Russia, or something along these lines. After tens of millions of dollars (taxpayer money obviously) spent on smoke and mirrors, and countless lives ruined by this so-called “independent” investigation (Flynn, Manafort et al), there is zero (as in 0) evidence with regard to any “Russian collusion” in the 2016 campaign. At least on Trump’s part.

And today, the POTUS drew a line in the sand and said: enough is enough. He also stated clearly what many people were already saying from the beginning: Mueller’s investigation is illegal. Here’s from an interview with Rudi Giuliani, Trump’s attorney, who revealed that Donald Trump’s legal team is working at a rebuttal to counter (preemptively) a possible negative report from Mueller’s team:

(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...

The President is going to have to take decisive action at some point. By that, I mean firing Sessions, Rosenstein and/or Mueller, and/or shutting down the special prosecutor investigation entirely (which presumably would send ongoing prosecutions to local US Attorney offices, and have Democrats and their lap dog media on a RANT that we have not seen before).

He may be waiting until after the mid-term election. Or he may be waiting until after the horrible Paul Ryan is gone and a new Congress sworn in. He may be waiting to see if the GOP holds the House.. But I don’t think remaining a punching bag and guessing as to Mueller’s intentions is a good strategy.

Illegal, eh? How? What law is being violated?

Or is Trump making stuff up yet again?

The guy who claimed that Chinese invented global warming and Obama wiretapped Trump tower.....making shit up?

Wiretapping: The U.S. government under President Obama wiretapped former Trump campaign Chair Paul Manafort in New York's Trump Tower under "secret court orders before and after the election," CNN reported, citing "three sources familiar with the investigation." Assuming CNN's report is true, it means President Trump, who was ridiculed earlier this year for claiming that his iconic building had been wiretapped, has been massively vindicated. But don't hold your breath waiting for an apology.

There’s an old Chinese blessing (or curse, depending on the “source”) which says: may you live in interesting times. And interesting times we live in my friends, at least from the news-cycle perspective. If you remember the Mueller investigation, which started almost 2 years ago, well, its aim was to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with those pesky russkies in what has been largely described by the talking heads in the fake news corporate left-mainstream-media as “Russia Collusion”. Forget about the fact that “collusion” is not illegal, but concentrate on the main issue: Mueller’s DEM filled investigation team was supposed to find out who did what with whom from Russia, or something along these lines. After tens of millions of dollars (taxpayer money obviously) spent on smoke and mirrors, and countless lives ruined by this so-called “independent” investigation (Flynn, Manafort et al), there is zero (as in 0) evidence with regard to any “Russian collusion” in the 2016 campaign. At least on Trump’s part.

And today, the POTUS drew a line in the sand and said: enough is enough. He also stated clearly what many people were already saying from the beginning: Mueller’s investigation is illegal. Here’s from an interview with Rudi Giuliani, Trump’s attorney, who revealed that Donald Trump’s legal team is working at a rebuttal to counter (preemptively) a possible negative report from Mueller’s team:

(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...

The President is going to have to take decisive action at some point. By that, I mean firing Sessions, Rosenstein and/or Mueller, and/or shutting down the special prosecutor investigation entirely (which presumably would send ongoing prosecutions to local US Attorney offices, and have Democrats and their lap dog media on a RANT that we have not seen before).

He may be waiting until after the mid-term election. Or he may be waiting until after the horrible Paul Ryan is gone and a new Congress sworn in. He may be waiting to see if the GOP holds the House.. But I don’t think remaining a punching bag and guessing as to Mueller’s intentions is a good strategy.

Illegal, eh? How? What law is being violated?

Or is Trump making stuff up yet again?

The guy who claimed that Chinese invented global warming and Obama wiretapped Trump tower.....making shit up?

Wiretapping: The U.S. government under President Obama wiretapped former Trump campaign Chair Paul Manafort in New York's Trump Tower under "secret court orders before and after the election," CNN reported, citing "three sources familiar with the investigation." Assuming CNN's report is true, it means President Trump, who was ridiculed earlier this year for claiming that his iconic building had been wiretapped, has been massively vindicated. But don't hold your breath waiting for an apology.

Obama White House Wiretapped Trump, Then Lied About It: CNN | Stock News & Stock Market Analysis - IBD

Now asswipe will come back and say the CORRUPT FBI,/DOJ said there was no wiretap....again, asking US!B jury, whoro you believe after all the lies brought out in subcommittee testimony...?Keep going, we will rename you Skyhook, as you post with facts hung on thin air!

Talk about a post that’s very light on facts.

Trump claimed that the Obama Administration wiretapped his campaign in Trump Tower. That was a lie.

The FBI wiretapped Paul Manifort’s apartment in Trump Tower before Manifort’s joined the Trump Campaign. They stopped the wiretap while Trump was with the campaign and then reapplied for a warrant after he left the campaign.

They were gathering evidence for the indictments he was recently charged and convicted of.

Lovely to see you parroting Dumb Donald’s “Collusion is not illegal” line. Collusion is just another word for “Conspiracy” and a conspiracy to commit a crime, like stealing stuff from your opponent’s office files and publishing their private correspondence is definitely illegal.