Finally: President Trump calls Mueller’s Investigation Illegal

[The Purge]

And they already have Mueller for his collusion with Hilary and the DNC on Uranium 1....wait till after Nov. For that shoe to drop!

No one is waiting on that because there is nothing to see. Shep Smith has torn that entire narrative apart.

Shep Smith is a flaming homo with a vendata against anything pro Trump. Taken with a grain of salt@

Translation: you can’t refute a word he said.

Your tacit admission wasn’t really necessary but thanks just the same.

Truth hurts you....perhaps yitr a does in bucks clothing!

”ytir a does?”

I certainly hope you’re not suffering a stroke while you’re typing here. Assuming you’re not, your attack on Smith didn’t actually refute a single word he said.

And you’re stuck with the reality that the vast majority of money contributed to the Clinton Foundation game from a Canadian, not from Russians; and it came years before the Uranium One deal and years before Hillary was Secryof State.

It must suck to put all your hopes into the delusions you post.

Please your getting dumber with each post!
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
The New York Times

Apr 23, 2015 · As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three ... Uranium investors gave millions to the Clinton Foundation while ..

 

[Faun]

There’s an old Chinese blessing (or curse, depending on the “source”) which says: may you live in interesting times. And interesting times we live in my friends, at least from the news-cycle perspective. If you remember the Mueller investigation, which started almost 2 years ago, well, its aim was to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with those pesky russkies in what has been largely described by the talking heads in the fake news corporate left-mainstream-media as “Russia Collusion”. Forget about the fact that “collusion” is not illegal, but concentrate on the main issue: Mueller’s DEM filled investigation team was supposed to find out who did what with whom from Russia, or something along these lines. After tens of millions of dollars (taxpayer money obviously) spent on smoke and mirrors, and countless lives ruined by this so-called “independent” investigation (Flynn, Manafort et al), there is zero (as in 0) evidence with regard to any “Russian collusion” in the 2016 campaign. At least on Trump’s part.

And today, the POTUS drew a line in the sand and said: enough is enough. He also stated clearly what many people were already saying from the beginning: Mueller’s investigation is illegal. Here’s from an interview with Rudi Giuliani, Trump’s attorney, who revealed that Donald Trump’s legal team is working at a rebuttal to counter (preemptively) a possible negative report from Mueller’s team:

(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...

The President is going to have to take decisive action at some point. By that, I mean firing Sessions, Rosenstein and/or Mueller, and/or shutting down the special prosecutor investigation entirely (which presumably would send ongoing prosecutions to local US Attorney offices, and have Democrats and their lap dog media on a RANT that we have not seen before).

He may be waiting until after the mid-term election. Or he may be waiting until after the horrible Paul Ryan is gone and a new Congress sworn in. He may be waiting to see if the GOP holds the House.. But I don’t think remaining a punching bag and guessing as to Mueller’s intentions is a good strategy.

But he doesn't have a problem with Congressmen doing illegal things, but he has a problem with Mueller doing non-illegal things which he claims are illegal.

Has there been a guilty verdict....didn't think so.

So what’s illegal about Mueller’s investigation?

 

[The Purge]

There’s an old Chinese blessing (or curse, depending on the “source”) which says: may you live in interesting times. And interesting times we live in my friends, at least from the news-cycle perspective. If you remember the Mueller investigation, which started almost 2 years ago, well, its aim was to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with those pesky russkies in what has been largely described by the talking heads in the fake news corporate left-mainstream-media as “Russia Collusion”. Forget about the fact that “collusion” is not illegal, but concentrate on the main issue: Mueller’s DEM filled investigation team was supposed to find out who did what with whom from Russia, or something along these lines. After tens of millions of dollars (taxpayer money obviously) spent on smoke and mirrors, and countless lives ruined by this so-called “independent” investigation (Flynn, Manafort et al), there is zero (as in 0) evidence with regard to any “Russian collusion” in the 2016 campaign. At least on Trump’s part.

And today, the POTUS drew a line in the sand and said: enough is enough. He also stated clearly what many people were already saying from the beginning: Mueller’s investigation is illegal. Here’s from an interview with Rudi Giuliani, Trump’s attorney, who revealed that Donald Trump’s legal team is working at a rebuttal to counter (preemptively) a possible negative report from Mueller’s team:

(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...

The President is going to have to take decisive action at some point. By that, I mean firing Sessions, Rosenstein and/or Mueller, and/or shutting down the special prosecutor investigation entirely (which presumably would send ongoing prosecutions to local US Attorney offices, and have Democrats and their lap dog media on a RANT that we have not seen before).

He may be waiting until after the mid-term election. Or he may be waiting until after the horrible Paul Ryan is gone and a new Congress sworn in. He may be waiting to see if the GOP holds the House.. But I don’t think remaining a punching bag and guessing as to Mueller’s intentions is a good strategy.

Illegal, eh? How? What law is being violated?

Or is Trump making stuff up yet again?

The guy who claimed that Chinese invented global warming and Obama wiretapped Trump tower.....making shit up?

Wiretapping: The U.S. government under President Obama wiretapped former Trump campaign Chair Paul Manafort in New York's Trump Tower under "secret court orders before and after the election," CNN reported, citing "three sources familiar with the investigation." Assuming CNN's report is true, it means President Trump, who was ridiculed earlier this year for claiming that his iconic building had been wiretapped, has been massively vindicated. But don't hold your breath waiting for an apology.

There’s an old Chinese blessing (or curse, depending on the “source”) which says: may you live in interesting times. And interesting times we live in my friends, at least from the news-cycle perspective. If you remember the Mueller investigation, which started almost 2 years ago, well, its aim was to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with those pesky russkies in what has been largely described by the talking heads in the fake news corporate left-mainstream-media as “Russia Collusion”. Forget about the fact that “collusion” is not illegal, but concentrate on the main issue: Mueller’s DEM filled investigation team was supposed to find out who did what with whom from Russia, or something along these lines. After tens of millions of dollars (taxpayer money obviously) spent on smoke and mirrors, and countless lives ruined by this so-called “independent” investigation (Flynn, Manafort et al), there is zero (as in 0) evidence with regard to any “Russian collusion” in the 2016 campaign. At least on Trump’s part.

And today, the POTUS drew a line in the sand and said: enough is enough. He also stated clearly what many people were already saying from the beginning: Mueller’s investigation is illegal. Here’s from an interview with Rudi Giuliani, Trump’s attorney, who revealed that Donald Trump’s legal team is working at a rebuttal to counter (preemptively) a possible negative report from Mueller’s team:

(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...

The President is going to have to take decisive action at some point. By that, I mean firing Sessions, Rosenstein and/or Mueller, and/or shutting down the special prosecutor investigation entirely (which presumably would send ongoing prosecutions to local US Attorney offices, and have Democrats and their lap dog media on a RANT that we have not seen before).

He may be waiting until after the mid-term election. Or he may be waiting until after the horrible Paul Ryan is gone and a new Congress sworn in. He may be waiting to see if the GOP holds the House.. But I don’t think remaining a punching bag and guessing as to Mueller’s intentions is a good strategy.

Illegal, eh? How? What law is being violated?

Or is Trump making stuff up yet again?

The guy who claimed that Chinese invented global warming and Obama wiretapped Trump tower.....making shit up?

Wiretapping: The U.S. government under President Obama wiretapped former Trump campaign Chair Paul Manafort in New York's Trump Tower under "secret court orders before and after the election," CNN reported, citing "three sources familiar with the investigation." Assuming CNN's report is true, it means President Trump, who was ridiculed earlier this year for claiming that his iconic building had been wiretapped, has been massively vindicated. But don't hold your breath waiting for an apology.

Obama White House Wiretapped Trump, Then Lied About It: CNN | Stock News & Stock Market Analysis - IBD

Now asswipe will come back and say the CORRUPT FBI,/DOJ said there was no wiretap....again, asking US!B jury, whoro you believe after all the lies brought out in subcommittee testimony...?Keep going, we will rename you Skyhook, as you post with facts hung on thin air!

Talk about a post that’s very light on facts.

Trump claimed that the Obama Administration wiretapped his campaign in Trump Tower. That was a lie.

The FBI wiretapped Paul Manifort’s apartment in Trump Tower before Manifort’s joined the Trump Campaign. They stopped the wiretap while Trump was with the campaign and then reapplied for a warrant after he left the campaign.

They were gathering evidence for the indictments he was recently charged and convicted of.

Lovely to see you parroting Dumb Donald’s “Collusion is not illegal” line. Collusion is just another word for “Conspiracy” and a conspiracy to commit a crime, like stealing stuff from your opponent’s office files and publishing their private correspondence is definitely illegal.

So they could tap into Msnaford and get his conversations with Trump just a smart way around an illegal tap of Trump!...What crime, another figment of the deranged left!

 

[The Purge]

There’s an old Chinese blessing (or curse, depending on the “source”) which says: may you live in interesting times. And interesting times we live in my friends, at least from the news-cycle perspective. If you remember the Mueller investigation, which started almost 2 years ago, well, its aim was to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with those pesky russkies in what has been largely described by the talking heads in the fake news corporate left-mainstream-media as “Russia Collusion”. Forget about the fact that “collusion” is not illegal, but concentrate on the main issue: Mueller’s DEM filled investigation team was supposed to find out who did what with whom from Russia, or something along these lines. After tens of millions of dollars (taxpayer money obviously) spent on smoke and mirrors, and countless lives ruined by this so-called “independent” investigation (Flynn, Manafort et al), there is zero (as in 0) evidence with regard to any “Russian collusion” in the 2016 campaign. At least on Trump’s part.

And today, the POTUS drew a line in the sand and said: enough is enough. He also stated clearly what many people were already saying from the beginning: Mueller’s investigation is illegal. Here’s from an interview with Rudi Giuliani, Trump’s attorney, who revealed that Donald Trump’s legal team is working at a rebuttal to counter (preemptively) a possible negative report from Mueller’s team:

(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...

The President is going to have to take decisive action at some point. By that, I mean firing Sessions, Rosenstein and/or Mueller, and/or shutting down the special prosecutor investigation entirely (which presumably would send ongoing prosecutions to local US Attorney offices, and have Democrats and their lap dog media on a RANT that we have not seen before).

He may be waiting until after the mid-term election. Or he may be waiting until after the horrible Paul Ryan is gone and a new Congress sworn in. He may be waiting to see if the GOP holds the House.. But I don’t think remaining a punching bag and guessing as to Mueller’s intentions is a good strategy.

But he doesn't have a problem with Congressmen doing illegal things, but he has a problem with Mueller doing non-illegal things which he claims are illegal.

Has there been a guilty verdict....didn't think so.

So what’s illegal about Mueller’s investigation?

Was Robert Mueller's Appointment Illegal? One Expert Thinks So
Newsweek

Oct 30, 2017 · Was Robert Mueller illegally hired as special counsel in the Russia investigation

 

[Faun]

No one is waiting on that because there is nothing to see. Shep Smith has torn that entire narrative apart.

Shep Smith is a flaming homo with a vendata against anything pro Trump. Taken with a grain of salt@

Translation: you can’t refute a word he said.

Your tacit admission wasn’t really necessary but thanks just the same.

Truth hurts you....perhaps yitr a does in bucks clothing!

”ytir a does?”

I certainly hope you’re not suffering a stroke while you’re typing here. Assuming you’re not, your attack on Smith didn’t actually refute a single word he said.

And you’re stuck with the reality that the vast majority of money contributed to the Clinton Foundation game from a Canadian, not from Russians; and it came years before the Uranium One deal and years before Hillary was Secryof State.

It must suck to put all your hopes into the delusions you post.

Please your getting dumber with each post!
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
The New York Times
View attachment 214701
Apr 23, 2015 · As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three ... Uranium investors gave millions to the Clinton Foundation while ..

LOLOL

Dumbfuck ... that article confirms what I said.... almost all of the money given to the Clinton foundation came from a Canadian, not from Russians. And it almost all came years before the Uranium One deal and before Hillary was Secretary of State.

I think it’s hysterical how you keep posting articles that corroborate what I say and utterly destroy your own bullshit claims.

 

[Dragonlady]

There’s an old Chinese blessing (or curse, depending on the “source”) which says: may you live in interesting times. And interesting times we live in my friends, at least from the news-cycle perspective. If you remember the Mueller investigation, which started almost 2 years ago, well, its aim was to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with those pesky russkies in what has been largely described by the talking heads in the fake news corporate left-mainstream-media as “Russia Collusion”. Forget about the fact that “collusion” is not illegal, but concentrate on the main issue: Mueller’s DEM filled investigation team was supposed to find out who did what with whom from Russia, or something along these lines. After tens of millions of dollars (taxpayer money obviously) spent on smoke and mirrors, and countless lives ruined by this so-called “independent” investigation (Flynn, Manafort et al), there is zero (as in 0) evidence with regard to any “Russian collusion” in the 2016 campaign. At least on Trump’s part.

And today, the POTUS drew a line in the sand and said: enough is enough. He also stated clearly what many people were already saying from the beginning: Mueller’s investigation is illegal. Here’s from an interview with Rudi Giuliani, Trump’s attorney, who revealed that Donald Trump’s legal team is working at a rebuttal to counter (preemptively) a possible negative report from Mueller’s team:

(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...

The President is going to have to take decisive action at some point. By that, I mean firing Sessions, Rosenstein and/or Mueller, and/or shutting down the special prosecutor investigation entirely (which presumably would send ongoing prosecutions to local US Attorney offices, and have Democrats and their lap dog media on a RANT that we have not seen before).

He may be waiting until after the mid-term election. Or he may be waiting until after the horrible Paul Ryan is gone and a new Congress sworn in. He may be waiting to see if the GOP holds the House.. But I don’t think remaining a punching bag and guessing as to Mueller’s intentions is a good strategy.

Illegal, eh? How? What law is being violated?

Or is Trump making stuff up yet again?

The guy who claimed that Chinese invented global warming and Obama wiretapped Trump tower.....making shit up?

Wiretapping: The U.S. government under President Obama wiretapped former Trump campaign Chair Paul Manafort in New York's Trump Tower under "secret court orders before and after the election," CNN reported, citing "three sources familiar with the investigation." Assuming CNN's report is true, it means President Trump, who was ridiculed earlier this year for claiming that his iconic building had been wiretapped, has been massively vindicated. But don't hold your breath waiting for an apology.

There’s an old Chinese blessing (or curse, depending on the “source”) which says: may you live in interesting times. And interesting times we live in my friends, at least from the news-cycle perspective. If you remember the Mueller investigation, which started almost 2 years ago, well, its aim was to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with those pesky russkies in what has been largely described by the talking heads in the fake news corporate left-mainstream-media as “Russia Collusion”. Forget about the fact that “collusion” is not illegal, but concentrate on the main issue: Mueller’s DEM filled investigation team was supposed to find out who did what with whom from Russia, or something along these lines. After tens of millions of dollars (taxpayer money obviously) spent on smoke and mirrors, and countless lives ruined by this so-called “independent” investigation (Flynn, Manafort et al), there is zero (as in 0) evidence with regard to any “Russian collusion” in the 2016 campaign. At least on Trump’s part.

And today, the POTUS drew a line in the sand and said: enough is enough. He also stated clearly what many people were already saying from the beginning: Mueller’s investigation is illegal. Here’s from an interview with Rudi Giuliani, Trump’s attorney, who revealed that Donald Trump’s legal team is working at a rebuttal to counter (preemptively) a possible negative report from Mueller’s team:

(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...

The President is going to have to take decisive action at some point. By that, I mean firing Sessions, Rosenstein and/or Mueller, and/or shutting down the special prosecutor investigation entirely (which presumably would send ongoing prosecutions to local US Attorney offices, and have Democrats and their lap dog media on a RANT that we have not seen before).

He may be waiting until after the mid-term election. Or he may be waiting until after the horrible Paul Ryan is gone and a new Congress sworn in. He may be waiting to see if the GOP holds the House.. But I don’t think remaining a punching bag and guessing as to Mueller’s intentions is a good strategy.

Illegal, eh? How? What law is being violated?

Or is Trump making stuff up yet again?

The guy who claimed that Chinese invented global warming and Obama wiretapped Trump tower.....making shit up?

Wiretapping: The U.S. government under President Obama wiretapped former Trump campaign Chair Paul Manafort in New York's Trump Tower under "secret court orders before and after the election," CNN reported, citing "three sources familiar with the investigation." Assuming CNN's report is true, it means President Trump, who was ridiculed earlier this year for claiming that his iconic building had been wiretapped, has been massively vindicated. But don't hold your breath waiting for an apology.

Obama White House Wiretapped Trump, Then Lied About It: CNN | Stock News & Stock Market Analysis - IBD

Now asswipe will come back and say the CORRUPT FBI,/DOJ said there was no wiretap....again, asking US!B jury, whoro you believe after all the lies brought out in subcommittee testimony...?Keep going, we will rename you Skyhook, as you post with facts hung on thin air!

Talk about a post that’s very light on facts.

Trump claimed that the Obama Administration wiretapped his campaign in Trump Tower. That was a lie.

The FBI wiretapped Paul Manifort’s apartment in Trump Tower before Manifort’s joined the Trump Campaign. They stopped the wiretap while Trump was with the campaign and then reapplied for a warrant after he left the campaign.

They were gathering evidence for the indictments he was recently charged and convicted of.

Lovely to see you parroting Dumb Donald’s “Collusion is not illegal” line. Collusion is just another word for “Conspiracy” and a conspiracy to commit a crime, like stealing stuff from your opponent’s office files and publishing their private correspondence is definitely illegal.

So they could tap into Msnaford and get his conversations with Trump just a smart way around an illegal tap of Trump!...What crime, another figment of the deranged left!

No you stupid Russian. They did not have Manifort’s phone tapped when he was working for Trump. They had it tapped before he worked for Trump and cut the surveillance during the time he worked for Trump.

There was no surveillance of the Trump Campaign.

Both Paige and Manifort had their surveillance cut during the time they worked for Trump.

Like the FBI went out of its way to NOT spy on the Trump campaign.

 

[The Purge]

Shep Smith is a flaming homo with a vendata against anything pro Trump. Taken with a grain of salt@

Translation: you can’t refute a word he said.

Your tacit admission wasn’t really necessary but thanks just the same.

Truth hurts you....perhaps yitr a does in bucks clothing!

”ytir a does?”

I certainly hope you’re not suffering a stroke while you’re typing here. Assuming you’re not, your attack on Smith didn’t actually refute a single word he said.

And you’re stuck with the reality that the vast majority of money contributed to the Clinton Foundation game from a Canadian, not from Russians; and it came years before the Uranium One deal and years before Hillary was Secryof State.

It must suck to put all your hopes into the delusions you post.

Please your getting dumber with each post!
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
The New York Times
View attachment 214701
Apr 23, 2015 · As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three ... Uranium investors gave millions to the Clinton Foundation while ..

LOLOL

Dumbfuck ... that article confirms what I said.... almost all of the money given to the Clinton foundation came from a Canadian, not from Russians. And it almost all came years before the Uranium One deal and before Hillary was Secretary of State.

I think it’s hysterical how you keep posting articles that corroborate what I say and utterly destroy your own bullshit claims.

I think it your derangement that makes you think the way you do!Did the Russians give the foundation MILLIONS?....I didnt specify who gave them the most I simply said the Russians gave clinton millions after uranium 1....and they did....Think you need a glass of warm milk and bed!

 

[radical right]

Well then, if you didn't understand it there are dozen more articles saying he can fire Mueller...look them up and learn something

Nader v. Bork, 366 F. Supp. 104 (D.D.C. 1973)

366 F. Supp. 104 (1973)
Ralph NADER et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
Robert H. BORK, Acting Attorney General of the United States, Defendant.
Civ. A. No. 1954-73.
United States District Court, District of Columbia.
November 14, 1973.

GESELL, District Judge.

This is a declaratory judgment and injunction action arising out of the discharge of Archibald Cox from the office of Watergate Special Prosecutor. Defendant Robert H. Bork was the Acting Attorney General who discharged Mr. Cox.

FINAL ORDER AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
(5) The Court declares that Archibald Cox, appointed Watergate Special Prosecutor pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 0.37 (1973), was illegally discharged from that office.

 

[Faun]

There’s an old Chinese blessing (or curse, depending on the “source”) which says: may you live in interesting times. And interesting times we live in my friends, at least from the news-cycle perspective. If you remember the Mueller investigation, which started almost 2 years ago, well, its aim was to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with those pesky russkies in what has been largely described by the talking heads in the fake news corporate left-mainstream-media as “Russia Collusion”. Forget about the fact that “collusion” is not illegal, but concentrate on the main issue: Mueller’s DEM filled investigation team was supposed to find out who did what with whom from Russia, or something along these lines. After tens of millions of dollars (taxpayer money obviously) spent on smoke and mirrors, and countless lives ruined by this so-called “independent” investigation (Flynn, Manafort et al), there is zero (as in 0) evidence with regard to any “Russian collusion” in the 2016 campaign. At least on Trump’s part.

And today, the POTUS drew a line in the sand and said: enough is enough. He also stated clearly what many people were already saying from the beginning: Mueller’s investigation is illegal. Here’s from an interview with Rudi Giuliani, Trump’s attorney, who revealed that Donald Trump’s legal team is working at a rebuttal to counter (preemptively) a possible negative report from Mueller’s team:

(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...

The President is going to have to take decisive action at some point. By that, I mean firing Sessions, Rosenstein and/or Mueller, and/or shutting down the special prosecutor investigation entirely (which presumably would send ongoing prosecutions to local US Attorney offices, and have Democrats and their lap dog media on a RANT that we have not seen before).

He may be waiting until after the mid-term election. Or he may be waiting until after the horrible Paul Ryan is gone and a new Congress sworn in. He may be waiting to see if the GOP holds the House.. But I don’t think remaining a punching bag and guessing as to Mueller’s intentions is a good strategy.

But he doesn't have a problem with Congressmen doing illegal things, but he has a problem with Mueller doing non-illegal things which he claims are illegal.

Has there been a guilty verdict....didn't think so.

So what’s illegal about Mueller’s investigation?

Was Robert Mueller's Appointment Illegal? One Expert Thinks So
Newsweek

Oct 30, 2017 · Was Robert Mueller illegally hired as special counsel in the Russia investigation

Ah, great.... another opinion that went down in flames...

President Donald Trump doesn't need to worry about the indictment against his former campaign chairman by special counsel Robert Mueller for one big reason: Mueller's appointment to the Russia probe isn't constitutional, one legal scholar is arguing.​

That indictment is now a conviction with sentencing to follow. Looks like that one scholar was wrong, eh?

 

[Dale Smith]

Shep Smith is a flaming homo with a vendata against anything pro Trump. Taken with a grain of salt@

Translation: you can’t refute a word he said.

Your tacit admission wasn’t really necessary but thanks just the same.

Truth hurts you....perhaps yitr a does in bucks clothing!

”ytir a does?”

I certainly hope you’re not suffering a stroke while you’re typing here. Assuming you’re not, your attack on Smith didn’t actually refute a single word he said.

And you’re stuck with the reality that the vast majority of money contributed to the Clinton Foundation game from a Canadian, not from Russians; and it came years before the Uranium One deal and years before Hillary was Secryof State.

It must suck to put all your hopes into the delusions you post.

Please your getting dumber with each post!
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
The New York Times
View attachment 214701
Apr 23, 2015 · As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three ... Uranium investors gave millions to the Clinton Foundation while ..

LOLOL

Dumbfuck ... that article confirms what I said.... almost all of the money given to the Clinton foundation came from a Canadian, not from Russians. And it almost all came years before the Uranium One deal and before Hillary was Secretary of State.

I think it’s hysterical how you keep posting articles that corroborate what I say and utterly destroy your own bullshit claims.

ROTFLMAO!!!!!! A Canadian "company" that was a front for Russian oligarchs and the state department under the Hildebeast (that received a cool 145 million dollars to her slush fund cleverly disguised as a charitable foundation) didn't have a clue about who REALLY stood to benefit from it? Robert Mueller carrying a sample to Canada by way of Moscow didn't REALLY understand what the real deal was?

HOLY shit, lil faun, you can't bullshit your way out of this regardless of the bluster, ya little poseur.

 

[The Purge]

Illegal, eh? How? What law is being violated?

Or is Trump making stuff up yet again?

The guy who claimed that Chinese invented global warming and Obama wiretapped Trump tower.....making shit up?

Wiretapping: The U.S. government under President Obama wiretapped former Trump campaign Chair Paul Manafort in New York's Trump Tower under "secret court orders before and after the election," CNN reported, citing "three sources familiar with the investigation." Assuming CNN's report is true, it means President Trump, who was ridiculed earlier this year for claiming that his iconic building had been wiretapped, has been massively vindicated. But don't hold your breath waiting for an apology.

Illegal, eh? How? What law is being violated?

Or is Trump making stuff up yet again?

The guy who claimed that Chinese invented global warming and Obama wiretapped Trump tower.....making shit up?

Wiretapping: The U.S. government under President Obama wiretapped former Trump campaign Chair Paul Manafort in New York's Trump Tower under "secret court orders before and after the election," CNN reported, citing "three sources familiar with the investigation." Assuming CNN's report is true, it means President Trump, who was ridiculed earlier this year for claiming that his iconic building had been wiretapped, has been massively vindicated. But don't hold your breath waiting for an apology.

Obama White House Wiretapped Trump, Then Lied About It: CNN | Stock News & Stock Market Analysis - IBD

Now asswipe will come back and say the CORRUPT FBI,/DOJ said there was no wiretap....again, asking US!B jury, whoro you believe after all the lies brought out in subcommittee testimony...?Keep going, we will rename you Skyhook, as you post with facts hung on thin air!

Talk about a post that’s very light on facts.

Trump claimed that the Obama Administration wiretapped his campaign in Trump Tower. That was a lie.

The FBI wiretapped Paul Manifort’s apartment in Trump Tower before Manifort’s joined the Trump Campaign. They stopped the wiretap while Trump was with the campaign and then reapplied for a warrant after he left the campaign.

They were gathering evidence for the indictments he was recently charged and convicted of.

Lovely to see you parroting Dumb Donald’s “Collusion is not illegal” line. Collusion is just another word for “Conspiracy” and a conspiracy to commit a crime, like stealing stuff from your opponent’s office files and publishing their private correspondence is definitely illegal.

So they could tap into Msnaford and get his conversations with Trump just a smart way around an illegal tap of Trump!...What crime, another figment of the deranged left!

No you stupid Russian. They did not have Manifort’s phone tapped when he was working for Trump. They had it tapped before he worked for Trump and cut the surveillance during the time he worked for Trump.

There was no surveillance of the Trump Campaign.

Both Paige and Manifort had their surveillance cut during the time they worked for Trump.

Like the FBI went out of its way to NOT spy on the Trump campaign.

And you know this as a fact, after they already had his phone tapped....The FBI doesn't lie, ask Comey, you dummy!

 

[Dragonlady]

The guy who claimed that Chinese invented global warming and Obama wiretapped Trump tower.....making shit up?

Wiretapping: The U.S. government under President Obama wiretapped former Trump campaign Chair Paul Manafort in New York's Trump Tower under "secret court orders before and after the election," CNN reported, citing "three sources familiar with the investigation." Assuming CNN's report is true, it means President Trump, who was ridiculed earlier this year for claiming that his iconic building had been wiretapped, has been massively vindicated. But don't hold your breath waiting for an apology.

The guy who claimed that Chinese invented global warming and Obama wiretapped Trump tower.....making shit up?

Wiretapping: The U.S. government under President Obama wiretapped former Trump campaign Chair Paul Manafort in New York's Trump Tower under "secret court orders before and after the election," CNN reported, citing "three sources familiar with the investigation." Assuming CNN's report is true, it means President Trump, who was ridiculed earlier this year for claiming that his iconic building had been wiretapped, has been massively vindicated. But don't hold your breath waiting for an apology.

Obama White House Wiretapped Trump, Then Lied About It: CNN | Stock News & Stock Market Analysis - IBD

Now asswipe will come back and say the CORRUPT FBI,/DOJ said there was no wiretap....again, asking US!B jury, whoro you believe after all the lies brought out in subcommittee testimony...?Keep going, we will rename you Skyhook, as you post with facts hung on thin air!

Talk about a post that’s very light on facts.

Trump claimed that the Obama Administration wiretapped his campaign in Trump Tower. That was a lie.

The FBI wiretapped Paul Manifort’s apartment in Trump Tower before Manifort’s joined the Trump Campaign. They stopped the wiretap while Trump was with the campaign and then reapplied for a warrant after he left the campaign.

They were gathering evidence for the indictments he was recently charged and convicted of.

Lovely to see you parroting Dumb Donald’s “Collusion is not illegal” line. Collusion is just another word for “Conspiracy” and a conspiracy to commit a crime, like stealing stuff from your opponent’s office files and publishing their private correspondence is definitely illegal.

So they could tap into Msnaford and get his conversations with Trump just a smart way around an illegal tap of Trump!...What crime, another figment of the deranged left!

No you stupid Russian. They did not have Manifort’s phone tapped when he was working for Trump. They had it tapped before he worked for Trump and cut the surveillance during the time he worked for Trump.

There was no surveillance of the Trump Campaign.

Both Paige and Manifort had their surveillance cut during the time they worked for Trump.

Like the FBI went out of its way to NOT spy on the Trump campaign.

And you know this as a fact, after they already had his phone tapped....The FBI doesn't lie, ask Comey, you dummy!

Yes, this is a published and confirmed fact. There was no surveillance of the Trump campaign. Trump made that up.

 

[Faun]

No one is waiting on that because there is nothing to see. Shep Smith has torn that entire narrative apart.

Shep Smith is a flaming homo with a vendata against anything pro Trump. Taken with a grain of salt@

Translation: you can’t refute a word he said.

Your tacit admission wasn’t really necessary but thanks just the same.

Truth hurts you....perhaps yitr a does in bucks clothing!

”ytir a does?”

I certainly hope you’re not suffering a stroke while you’re typing here. Assuming you’re not, your attack on Smith didn’t actually refute a single word he said.

And you’re stuck with the reality that the vast majority of money contributed to the Clinton Foundation game from a Canadian, not from Russians; and it came years before the Uranium One deal and years before Hillary was Secryof State.

It must suck to put all your hopes into the delusions you post.

Please your getting dumber with each post!
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
The New York Times
View attachment 214701
Apr 23, 2015 · As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three ... Uranium investors gave millions to the Clinton Foundation while ..

”Please your getting dumber with each post!”

LOLOLOLOL

I love posts like that which write the jokes themselves.

 

[The Purge]

There’s an old Chinese blessing (or curse, depending on the “source”) which says: may you live in interesting times. And interesting times we live in my friends, at least from the news-cycle perspective. If you remember the Mueller investigation, which started almost 2 years ago, well, its aim was to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with those pesky russkies in what has been largely described by the talking heads in the fake news corporate left-mainstream-media as “Russia Collusion”. Forget about the fact that “collusion” is not illegal, but concentrate on the main issue: Mueller’s DEM filled investigation team was supposed to find out who did what with whom from Russia, or something along these lines. After tens of millions of dollars (taxpayer money obviously) spent on smoke and mirrors, and countless lives ruined by this so-called “independent” investigation (Flynn, Manafort et al), there is zero (as in 0) evidence with regard to any “Russian collusion” in the 2016 campaign. At least on Trump’s part.

And today, the POTUS drew a line in the sand and said: enough is enough. He also stated clearly what many people were already saying from the beginning: Mueller’s investigation is illegal. Here’s from an interview with Rudi Giuliani, Trump’s attorney, who revealed that Donald Trump’s legal team is working at a rebuttal to counter (preemptively) a possible negative report from Mueller’s team:

(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...

The President is going to have to take decisive action at some point. By that, I mean firing Sessions, Rosenstein and/or Mueller, and/or shutting down the special prosecutor investigation entirely (which presumably would send ongoing prosecutions to local US Attorney offices, and have Democrats and their lap dog media on a RANT that we have not seen before).

He may be waiting until after the mid-term election. Or he may be waiting until after the horrible Paul Ryan is gone and a new Congress sworn in. He may be waiting to see if the GOP holds the House.. But I don’t think remaining a punching bag and guessing as to Mueller’s intentions is a good strategy.

But he doesn't have a problem with Congressmen doing illegal things, but he has a problem with Mueller doing non-illegal things which he claims are illegal.

Has there been a guilty verdict....didn't think so.

So what’s illegal about Mueller’s investigation?

Was Robert Mueller's Appointment Illegal? One Expert Thinks So
Newsweek

Oct 30, 2017 · Was Robert Mueller illegally hired as special counsel in the Russia investigation

Ah, great.... another opinion that went down in flames...

President Donald Trump doesn't need to worry about the indictment against his former campaign chairman by special counsel Robert Mueller for one big reason: Mueller's appointment to the Russia probe isn't constitutional, one legal scholar is arguing.​

That indictment is now a conviction with sentencing to follow. Looks like that one scholar was wrong, eh?

And Manafort has given up WHAT about Trump?....A really bad case of TDS from baby deer@

 

[The Purge]

Shep Smith is a flaming homo with a vendata against anything pro Trump. Taken with a grain of salt@

Translation: you can’t refute a word he said.

Your tacit admission wasn’t really necessary but thanks just the same.

Truth hurts you....perhaps yitr a does in bucks clothing!

”ytir a does?”

I certainly hope you’re not suffering a stroke while you’re typing here. Assuming you’re not, your attack on Smith didn’t actually refute a single word he said.

And you’re stuck with the reality that the vast majority of money contributed to the Clinton Foundation game from a Canadian, not from Russians; and it came years before the Uranium One deal and years before Hillary was Secryof State.

It must suck to put all your hopes into the delusions you post.

Please your getting dumber with each post!
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
The New York Times
View attachment 214701
Apr 23, 2015 · As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three ... Uranium investors gave millions to the Clinton Foundation while ..

”Please your getting dumber with each post!”

LOLOLOLOL

I love posts like that which write the jokes themselves.

Well YOU ARE the entertainment for tonight, as you usually are with your deranged rants, and antics!

 

[The Purge]

Well then, if you didn't understand it there are dozen more articles saying he can fire Mueller...look them up and learn something

Nader v. Bork, 366 F. Supp. 104 (D.D.C. 1973)

366 F. Supp. 104 (1973)
Ralph NADER et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
Robert H. BORK, Acting Attorney General of the United States, Defendant.
Civ. A. No. 1954-73.
United States District Court, District of Columbia.
November 14, 1973.

GESELL, District Judge.

This is a declaratory judgment and injunction action arising out of the discharge of Archibald Cox from the office of Watergate Special Prosecutor. Defendant Robert H. Bork was the Acting Attorney General who discharged Mr. Cox.

FINAL ORDER AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
(5) The Court declares that Archibald Cox, appointed Watergate Special Prosecutor pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 0.37 (1973), was illegally discharged from that office.

Seems THE PRESIDENT didn't fire him....new case!

 

[Faun]

Translation: you can’t refute a word he said.

Your tacit admission wasn’t really necessary but thanks just the same.

Truth hurts you....perhaps yitr a does in bucks clothing!

”ytir a does?”

I certainly hope you’re not suffering a stroke while you’re typing here. Assuming you’re not, your attack on Smith didn’t actually refute a single word he said.

And you’re stuck with the reality that the vast majority of money contributed to the Clinton Foundation game from a Canadian, not from Russians; and it came years before the Uranium One deal and years before Hillary was Secryof State.

It must suck to put all your hopes into the delusions you post.

Please your getting dumber with each post!
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
The New York Times
View attachment 214701
Apr 23, 2015 · As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three ... Uranium investors gave millions to the Clinton Foundation while ..

LOLOL

Dumbfuck ... that article confirms what I said.... almost all of the money given to the Clinton foundation came from a Canadian, not from Russians. And it almost all came years before the Uranium One deal and before Hillary was Secretary of State.

I think it’s hysterical how you keep posting articles that corroborate what I say and utterly destroy your own bullshit claims.

I think it your derangement that makes you think the way you do!Did the Russians give the foundation MILLIONS?....I didnt specify who gave them the most I simply said the Russians gave clinton millions after uranium 1....and they did....Think you need a glass of warm milk and bed!

Aww, you poor thing. The article you posted doesn’t state anywhere that Russians gave the Clintons millions.

 

[The Purge]

Wiretapping: The U.S. government under President Obama wiretapped former Trump campaign Chair Paul Manafort in New York's Trump Tower under "secret court orders before and after the election," CNN reported, citing "three sources familiar with the investigation." Assuming CNN's report is true, it means President Trump, who was ridiculed earlier this year for claiming that his iconic building had been wiretapped, has been massively vindicated. But don't hold your breath waiting for an apology.
Wiretapping: The U.S. government under President Obama wiretapped former Trump campaign Chair Paul Manafort in New York's Trump Tower under "secret court orders before and after the election," CNN reported, citing "three sources familiar with the investigation." Assuming CNN's report is true, it means President Trump, who was ridiculed earlier this year for claiming that his iconic building had been wiretapped, has been massively vindicated. But don't hold your breath waiting for an apology.

Obama White House Wiretapped Trump, Then Lied About It: CNN | Stock News & Stock Market Analysis - IBD

Now asswipe will come back and say the CORRUPT FBI,/DOJ said there was no wiretap....again, asking US!B jury, whoro you believe after all the lies brought out in subcommittee testimony...?Keep going, we will rename you Skyhook, as you post with facts hung on thin air!

Talk about a post that’s very light on facts.

Trump claimed that the Obama Administration wiretapped his campaign in Trump Tower. That was a lie.

The FBI wiretapped Paul Manifort’s apartment in Trump Tower before Manifort’s joined the Trump Campaign. They stopped the wiretap while Trump was with the campaign and then reapplied for a warrant after he left the campaign.

They were gathering evidence for the indictments he was recently charged and convicted of.

Lovely to see you parroting Dumb Donald’s “Collusion is not illegal” line. Collusion is just another word for “Conspiracy” and a conspiracy to commit a crime, like stealing stuff from your opponent’s office files and publishing their private correspondence is definitely illegal.

So they could tap into Msnaford and get his conversations with Trump just a smart way around an illegal tap of Trump!...What crime, another figment of the deranged left!

No you stupid Russian. They did not have Manifort’s phone tapped when he was working for Trump. They had it tapped before he worked for Trump and cut the surveillance during the time he worked for Trump.

There was no surveillance of the Trump Campaign.

Both Paige and Manifort had their surveillance cut during the time they worked for Trump.

Like the FBI went out of its way to NOT spy on the Trump campaign.

And you know this as a fact, after they already had his phone tapped....The FBI doesn't lie, ask Comey, you dummy!

Yes, this is a published and confirmed fact. There was no surveillance of the Trump campaign. Trump made that up.

Turley: Trump Was Correct When He Said Campaign Was Under Surveillance ...
RealClearPolitics › video › 2018/05/21


8:04


UPLOADED BY:
Fox News

POSTED:
May 21, 2018

 

[radical right]

That is where you made your mistake. It is like the sign at area 51 that says "deadly force authorized" thinking that a guard can execute trespassers that wander past the warning sign..

You mean they can't?

Rules of engagement.

 

[kiwiman127]

Enough said.
Trump-appointed judge rules Mueller investigation is constitutional
Another thread failure.