Finally...Realization! Now...Apologize!

Ummm...what point are you attempting to make?

You just highlighted what I am saying: non-compliant plans were sold after 2010.

If you sell a non-compliant plan after 2010, it will not be grandfathered, therefore, it will be cancelled.

Now, why did companies sell non-compliant plans without telling the buyers that they would not be able to keep them when the law kicks in?
WHY are you asking me to explain YOUR LINK to you? You were quite giddy to post it...SO...EXPLAIN IT to the rest of the class.
I did. Sorry you don't understand it, but I wouldn't keep advertising your ignorance if I were you. :lol:
So? Educate the rest of the class. I read it...YOU didn't. Want to continue your lie?
 
We can take it one at a time, though:

Why did companies issue non-compliant policies after March 2010 without informing their buyers that these policies would be cancelled once the law kicked in?

Answer that, then we can proceed.

Because there were doubts as to the Constitutionality of ObamaCare?

It's a Tax/Mandate/Not at Tax

Remember?
That doesn't explain why they didn't tell their customers that the policy would be cancelled, should the law take effect.

Why didn't they?

And how is that Obama's fault?
 
We can take it one at a time, though:

Why did companies issue non-compliant policies after March 2010 without informing their buyers that these policies would be cancelled once the law kicked in?

Answer that, then we can proceed.

Because there were doubts as to the Constitutionality of ObamaCare?

It's a Tax/Mandate/Not at Tax

Remember?
That doesn't explain why they didn't tell their customers that the policy would be cancelled, should the law take effect.

Why didn't they?

And how is that Obama's fault?
Obama LIED. He stated you can keep your policies...PERIOD. You can keep your doctors...PERIOD.


The Insurance companies read the thing and COMPLIED with the law. YOU perpetuate the lie and BLAME THEM for compliance.

Truth has no agenda, Obama does. Democrats DO. And YOU perpetuate it by twisting logic into a pretzel as cover. Means YOU and truth are not friends.
Learn it, Live It, KNOW it. YOU are as big a liar...or stupid. And NO...you have no third option.
 
7. ... talks with Iran over its nuclear program could come to a head this week, and Obama’s weakness at home will make him more desperate for a deal, even a bad one. He already was prepared to lift some sanctions for mere promises, and a frantic John Kerry was trying to stop Israeli complaints about the talks. In fact, the secretary of state told congressional skeptics that they should “stop listening to Israel,”....

8. .... Saudi Arabia has given up on Obama and is talking to Pakistan about buying nuclear weapons. And Egypt’s generals are moving closer to Russia, a result of Obama’s preference for the Muslim Brotherhood.


Isn't it odd that now after Obama's "RED LINE" was crossed? Russia now has more credibility in the ME region than we do? And funny a Socialist nation as France, was enough to put what Kerry/Obama were trying to do to an end?

This is Carter diplomacy on steroids.
 
7. ... talks with Iran over its nuclear program could come to a head this week, and Obama’s weakness at home will make him more desperate for a deal, even a bad one. He already was prepared to lift some sanctions for mere promises, and a frantic John Kerry was trying to stop Israeli complaints about the talks. In fact, the secretary of state told congressional skeptics that they should “stop listening to Israel,”....

8. .... Saudi Arabia has given up on Obama and is talking to Pakistan about buying nuclear weapons. And Egypt’s generals are moving closer to Russia, a result of Obama’s preference for the Muslim Brotherhood.


Isn't it odd that now after Obama's "RED LINE" was crossed? Russia now has more credibility in the ME region than we do? And funny a Socialist nation as France, was enough to put what Kerry/Obama were trying to do to an end?

This is Carter diplomacy on steroids.
Wrong thread, dumbass. :lol:
 
7. ... talks with Iran over its nuclear program could come to a head this week, and Obama’s weakness at home will make him more desperate for a deal, even a bad one. He already was prepared to lift some sanctions for mere promises, and a frantic John Kerry was trying to stop Israeli complaints about the talks. In fact, the secretary of state told congressional skeptics that they should “stop listening to Israel,”....

8. .... Saudi Arabia has given up on Obama and is talking to Pakistan about buying nuclear weapons. And Egypt’s generals are moving closer to Russia, a result of Obama’s preference for the Muslim Brotherhood.


Isn't it odd that now after Obama's "RED LINE" was crossed? Russia now has more credibility in the ME region than we do? And funny a Socialist nation as France, was enough to put what Kerry/Obama were trying to do to an end?

This is Carter diplomacy on steroids.
Wrong thread, dumbass. :lol:

Ohhhh....to be able to tap into the synapses of the Obama voters who just realized what a scam they were stupid enough to endorse!
That moment when the epiphany occurred! Bet there was enough detonation to power a medium sized city!





1. "Hours after President Obama stumbled through his retreat on ObamaCare last week, a liberal friend was telling me how disappointed she is in him. The insurance debacle, she said with resignation, was the final straw and led her to conclude he lacks the right stuff to be a good president.

2. Poll after poll shows that millions of former Obama-bots now concede he is not worthy of their trust and are stampeding off the bus.

3. Even The New York Times editorial page stirred...“incompetence.”





4. .... America is moving away from a national nightmare, when nonbelievers in the Church of Dear Leader were labeled racists and fascists. The freedom to disagree is coming back.

5. The rot from his reign of error runs deep and Politico magazine is fleshing out details of two disturbing patterns. It says Obama rarely meets with his cabinet secretaries and is deeply estranged from top military leaders.

6. Despite his desperate bid to keep his party in line, public fury broke the dam among Democrats, and 39 in the House joined Republicans to pass a bill allowing canceled plans to be offered to all consumers. Obama is so politically toxic that the ranks of party rebels are likely to grow ....






7. ... talks with Iran over its nuclear program could come to a head this week, and Obama’s weakness at home will make him more desperate for a deal, even a bad one. He already was prepared to lift some sanctions for mere promises, and a frantic John Kerry was trying to stop Israeli complaints about the talks. In fact, the secretary of state told congressional skeptics that they should “stop listening to Israel,”....

8. .... Saudi Arabia has given up on Obama and is talking to Pakistan about buying nuclear weapons. And Egypt’s generals are moving closer to Russia, a result of Obama’s preference for the Muslim Brotherhood.





9. The stubborn backdrop to these problems is the economy that won’t grow. Four and one-half years after the recession ended, jobs and incomes inch up too slowly,...

10. History teaches that a weak president can be more dangerous than a strong one. The grabbing at straws and phantom progress to conceal a lack of real leadership provokes distrust among honest citizens and gives dishonest ones a license to steal. Something similar is happening on the foreign stage as our friends lose heart and our adversaries gain courage."
The wheels have fallen off the Obama bandwagon | New York Post





Go back to 2008!

C'mon.....who was correct all along????

That's right....the Right!


Apologize you Leftists!!!

Synthia? I accept YOUR SURRENDER. Wrong thread? SHIT MAN...YOU didn't read the OP. Son? Just go away...the farther, the better...
 
We can take it one at a time, though:

Why did companies issue non-compliant policies after March 2010 without informing their buyers that these policies would be cancelled once the law kicked in?

Answer that, then we can proceed.

Because there were doubts as to the Constitutionality of ObamaCare?

It's a Tax/Mandate/Not at Tax

Remember?
That doesn't explain why they didn't tell their customers that the policy would be cancelled, should the law take effect.

Why didn't they?

And how is that Obama's fault?

Were they supposed to have a crystal ball to know the SCOTUS Ruling 2 years later?

But for Obama blackmailing Roberts it would have been ruled unconstitutional
 
The government didn't cancel anyone's plans, the insurance companies did.

In compliance with the ACA, Synth. Educate yourself.
Because they issued plans after March, 2010 that didn't comply.

And they knew at the time they would have to cancel them, but didn't tell the buyers.

But that's Obama's fault? :lol:

Do you have any clue what you're talking about? Republicans were shouting at the top of their lungs for more than four years that this was going to happen. So when 5.4 million people lose their insurance, is it their fault? Bush's fault? Insurers fault? None of the above. Its the Democrat's fault. It's Obama's fault, and it will be his fault when his law dies on the operating table.
 
In compliance with the ACA, Synth. Educate yourself.
Because they issued plans after March, 2010 that didn't comply.

And they knew at the time they would have to cancel them, but didn't tell the buyers.

But that's Obama's fault? :lol:

Do you have any clue what you're talking about? Republicans were shouting at the top of their lungs for more than four years that this was going to happen. So when 5.4 million people lose their insurance, is it their fault? Bush's fault? Insurers fault? None of the above. Its the Democrat's fault. It's Obama's fault, and it will be his fault when his law dies on the operating table.
That 5.4M number is just the tip of the proverbial iceberg...it WILL get worse...by design.
 
In compliance with the ACA, Synth. Educate yourself.
Because they issued plans after March, 2010 that didn't comply.

And they knew at the time they would have to cancel them, but didn't tell the buyers.

But that's Obama's fault? :lol:

Do you have any clue what you're talking about? Republicans were shouting at the top of their lungs for more than four years that this was going to happen. So when 5.4 million people lose their insurance, is it their fault? Bush's fault? Insurers fault? None of the above. Its the Democrat's fault. It's Obama's fault, and it will be his fault when his law dies on the operating table.


Bingo!
 
I accept your surrender.

Typical shithead. Didn't READ the op. Synthia? Gotta lose those blinders eventually.
No, I don't read cut/paste hack jobs.

I can see why you changed subject from Obamacare, though! :lol:

Keep trying to save your own ass. Not many but the perpetually ignorant as YOU buy into it.
icon14.gif
 
Because they issued plans after March, 2010 that didn't comply.

And they knew at the time they would have to cancel them, but didn't tell the buyers.

But that's Obama's fault? :lol:

Do you have any clue what you're talking about? Republicans were shouting at the top of their lungs for more than four years that this was going to happen. So when 5.4 million people lose their insurance, is it their fault? Bush's fault? Insurers fault? None of the above. Its the Democrat's fault. It's Obama's fault, and it will be his fault when his law dies on the operating table.


Bingo!
Odd you dismiss that...NOT. Continue to swim with the rest of the shrimp in the bucket.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top