FISA Firestorm: Sean Hannity Gives MAJOR Clue About “TICK TOCK” Set To Drop TOMORROW

Oh this is going to be good!. I've come to conclusions that Hannity had an inside source in the appropriately named White House. Nevertheless, Adam Schiff is in panic mode.

FISA Firestorm: Sean Hannity Gives MAJOR Clue About 'TICK TOCK' Set To Drop TOMORROW

Adam Schiff Goes Into Overdrive – Attacks POTUS Trump For Wanting the FISA Memo Released to Public
It's been four days since you predicted release of the memo "tomorrow."
This is just like waiting for that Special Counsel....Ruh Roooooh!
 
LOL..

The letter proving the FBI and DOJ knew that the FISA warrant was a set up and they lied to the court is going to leave a mark. Now Lynch, Comey, Brennen, and many others are in serious legal jeopardy. Felony and long prison sentences to boot..

The clock is about to run out on the deep state and democrats.
 
Oh this is going to be good!. I've come to conclusions that Hannity had an inside source in the appropriately named White House. Nevertheless, Adam Schiff is in panic mode.

FISA Firestorm: Sean Hannity Gives MAJOR Clue About 'TICK TOCK' Set To Drop TOMORROW

Adam Schiff Goes Into Overdrive – Attacks POTUS Trump For Wanting the FISA Memo Released to Public
Interesting....

Friends within the LE circles are telling me that high level folks are very nervous. The rumors are, there is a massive deep seated corruption problem in all four major agencies command staff (FBI, CIA, NSA, and DOJ) and this memo will force them to deal with it. Payoffs, threats, intentional destruction of evidence, illegal dissemination of FISA collected data and cover up....

Now more than ever I want to see this document.

If the command staff is as worried about this as much as I am told they are, we will be seeing resignations in an effort to keep from being forced into compulsory testimony as an employee.

Going to be an interesting week...

Barr's report should be a dandy and I hope we all get to read it.
 
Funny... the director of the FBI Christopher Wray testified to Congress yesterday that the FBI didn't do anything wrong when investigating the Trump campaign and Russia...
 
Oh this is going to be good!. I've come to conclusions that Hannity had an inside source in the appropriately named White House. Nevertheless, Adam Schiff is in panic mode.

FISA Firestorm: Sean Hannity Gives MAJOR Clue About 'TICK TOCK' Set To Drop TOMORROW

Adam Schiff Goes Into Overdrive – Attacks POTUS Trump For Wanting the FISA Memo Released to Public

So, we are now four days past "tomorrow", can you fill us in on what it was that dropped?
now we're well over a year past it.

hard to call just the left drama queens pushing for max emo effect when the right keeps doing shit like this too.
 
LOL..

The letter proving the FBI and DOJ knew that the FISA warrant was a set up and they lied to the court is going to leave a mark. Now Lynch, Comey, Brennen, and many others are in serious legal jeopardy. Felony and long prison sentences to boot..

The clock is about to run out on the deep state and democrats.
i'll wait for it to happen if it does. others seem to want to direct events to their own chosen outcome and it seldom works out well for them in the end.

unless they're just getting off on lucy pulling the ball away. again.
 
Funny... the director of the FBI Christopher Wray testified to Congress yesterday that the FBI didn't do anything wrong when investigating the Trump campaign and Russia...

He didn't say any such thing. He picked and said his words in a strategic manner.

Wray has to protect the integrity of the FBI and its employees. He's not going to help paint a negative picture
of the agency, as a whole. The bad apples, he has helped get rid of.

When he is discussing authorized surveillance, he is talking about following Agency procedure(s). Which, includes
following the law. If the FISA warrants, for example, were obtained by giving false information or by omitting required
information, they would be considered illegal, at this moment.

Wray just protected the Agency and its current employees from that group of 25 agents who have been fired, resigned
or demoted,who served under the previous Director.
 
Funny... the director of the FBI Christopher Wray testified to Congress yesterday that the FBI didn't do anything wrong when investigating the Trump campaign and Russia...

He didn't say any such thing. He picked and said his words in a strategic manner.

Wray has to protect the integrity of the FBI and its employees. He's not going to help paint a negative picture
of the agency, as a whole. The bad apples, he has helped get rid of.

When he is discussing authorized surveillance, he is talking about following Agency procedure(s). Which, includes
following the law. If the FISA warrants, for example, were obtained by giving false information or by omitting required
information, they would be considered illegal, at this moment.

Wray just protected the Agency and its current employees from that group of 25 agents who have been fired, resigned
or demoted,who served under the previous Director.


"Asked by Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., if he would say that the FBI is "spying" when it investigates suspected terrorists and mobsters while following "investigative policies and procedures," Wray replied, "Well, that's not the term I would use."

He added: "I believe that the FBI is engaged in investigative activity, and part of investigative activity includes surveillance activity of different shapes and sizes. And to me, the key question is making sure that it's done by the book, consistent with our lawful authorities. That's the key question. Different people use different colloquial phrases."


Wray declined to discuss in detail the FBI's investigation into the Trump campaign because of an ongoing Justice Department inspector general probe into the origins of the Russia inquiry. Barr has said he expects the watchdog report to be done in May or June.

But asked whether he was aware of evidence that the FBI had illegally spied on the Trump campaign, Wray said, "I don't think I personally have any evidence of that sort.""

Surveillance is not 'spying' and there's no evidence Trump campaign was illegally monitored, says FBI director

The FBI did their job investigating what they were supposed to, and did so "by the book."
 
Funny... the director of the FBI Christopher Wray testified to Congress yesterday that the FBI didn't do anything wrong when investigating the Trump campaign and Russia...

He didn't say any such thing. He picked and said his words in a strategic manner.

Wray has to protect the integrity of the FBI and its employees. He's not going to help paint a negative picture
of the agency, as a whole. The bad apples, he has helped get rid of.

When he is discussing authorized surveillance, he is talking about following Agency procedure(s). Which, includes
following the law. If the FISA warrants, for example, were obtained by giving false information or by omitting required
information, they would be considered illegal, at this moment.

Wray just protected the Agency and its current employees from that group of 25 agents who have been fired, resigned
or demoted,who served under the previous Director.


"Asked by Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., if he would say that the FBI is "spying" when it investigates suspected terrorists and mobsters while following "investigative policies and procedures," Wray replied, "Well, that's not the term I would use."

He added: "I believe that the FBI is engaged in investigative activity, and part of investigative activity includes surveillance activity of different shapes and sizes. And to me, the key question is making sure that it's done by the book, consistent with our lawful authorities. That's the key question. Different people use different colloquial phrases."


Wray declined to discuss in detail the FBI's investigation into the Trump campaign because of an ongoing Justice Department inspector general probe into the origins of the Russia inquiry. Barr has said he expects the watchdog report to be done in May or June.

But asked whether he was aware of evidence that the FBI had illegally spied on the Trump campaign, Wray said, "I don't think I personally have any evidence of that sort.""

Surveillance is not 'spying' and there's no evidence Trump campaign was illegally monitored, says FBI director

The FBI did their job investigating what they were supposed to, and did so "by the book."

It was by the book...ONLY, if the information given the FISA court followed correct procedure. (it was verified.) The Dossier still hasn't
been verified. They omitted informing the court that it was paid for by the DNC and Clinton Campaign.

Your final quote of his, he said..."I don't think I personally have any evidence of that sort." That is 100% spin. He doesn't personally have any
evidence of that sort, because he hasn't investigated it. And he can't investigate it, because the IG is investigating it. The IG's report will be here
within weeks. Then he'll tell us all the changes he has made to the agency after all of those who will have criminal referrals made against them,
were fired or resigned.

This is a Class B Western movie. There were 1,000 made and they all had the same story and endings.
 
Funny... the director of the FBI Christopher Wray testified to Congress yesterday that the FBI didn't do anything wrong when investigating the Trump campaign and Russia...

He didn't say any such thing. He picked and said his words in a strategic manner.

Wray has to protect the integrity of the FBI and its employees. He's not going to help paint a negative picture
of the agency, as a whole. The bad apples, he has helped get rid of.

When he is discussing authorized surveillance, he is talking about following Agency procedure(s). Which, includes
following the law. If the FISA warrants, for example, were obtained by giving false information or by omitting required
information, they would be considered illegal, at this moment.

Wray just protected the Agency and its current employees from that group of 25 agents who have been fired, resigned
or demoted,who served under the previous Director.


"Asked by Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., if he would say that the FBI is "spying" when it investigates suspected terrorists and mobsters while following "investigative policies and procedures," Wray replied, "Well, that's not the term I would use."

He added: "I believe that the FBI is engaged in investigative activity, and part of investigative activity includes surveillance activity of different shapes and sizes. And to me, the key question is making sure that it's done by the book, consistent with our lawful authorities. That's the key question. Different people use different colloquial phrases."


Wray declined to discuss in detail the FBI's investigation into the Trump campaign because of an ongoing Justice Department inspector general probe into the origins of the Russia inquiry. Barr has said he expects the watchdog report to be done in May or June.

But asked whether he was aware of evidence that the FBI had illegally spied on the Trump campaign, Wray said, "I don't think I personally have any evidence of that sort.""

Surveillance is not 'spying' and there's no evidence Trump campaign was illegally monitored, says FBI director

The FBI did their job investigating what they were supposed to, and did so "by the book."

It was by the book...ONLY, if the information given the FISA court followed correct procedure. (it was verified.) The Dossier still hasn't
been verified. They omitted informing the court that it was paid for by the DNC and Clinton Campaign.

Your final quote of his, he said..."I don't think I personally have any evidence of that sort." That is 100% spin. He doesn't personally have any
evidence of that sort, because he hasn't investigated it. And he can't investigate it, because the IG is investigating it. The IG's report will be here
within weeks. Then he'll tell us all the changes he has made to the agency after all of those who will have criminal referrals made against them,
were fired or resigned.

This is a Class B Western movie. There were 1,000 made and they all had the same story and endings.

He literally said he made sure it was done by the book. That means he investigated it... otherwise he wouldn't have said that.
 
Funny... the director of the FBI Christopher Wray testified to Congress yesterday that the FBI didn't do anything wrong when investigating the Trump campaign and Russia...

He didn't say any such thing. He picked and said his words in a strategic manner.

Wray has to protect the integrity of the FBI and its employees. He's not going to help paint a negative picture
of the agency, as a whole. The bad apples, he has helped get rid of.

When he is discussing authorized surveillance, he is talking about following Agency procedure(s). Which, includes
following the law. If the FISA warrants, for example, were obtained by giving false information or by omitting required
information, they would be considered illegal, at this moment.

Wray just protected the Agency and its current employees from that group of 25 agents who have been fired, resigned
or demoted,who served under the previous Director.


"Asked by Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., if he would say that the FBI is "spying" when it investigates suspected terrorists and mobsters while following "investigative policies and procedures," Wray replied, "Well, that's not the term I would use."

He added: "I believe that the FBI is engaged in investigative activity, and part of investigative activity includes surveillance activity of different shapes and sizes. And to me, the key question is making sure that it's done by the book, consistent with our lawful authorities. That's the key question. Different people use different colloquial phrases."


Wray declined to discuss in detail the FBI's investigation into the Trump campaign because of an ongoing Justice Department inspector general probe into the origins of the Russia inquiry. Barr has said he expects the watchdog report to be done in May or June.

But asked whether he was aware of evidence that the FBI had illegally spied on the Trump campaign, Wray said, "I don't think I personally have any evidence of that sort.""

Surveillance is not 'spying' and there's no evidence Trump campaign was illegally monitored, says FBI director

The FBI did their job investigating what they were supposed to, and did so "by the book."

It was by the book...ONLY, if the information given the FISA court followed correct procedure. (it was verified.) The Dossier still hasn't
been verified. They omitted informing the court that it was paid for by the DNC and Clinton Campaign.

Your final quote of his, he said..."I don't think I personally have any evidence of that sort." That is 100% spin. He doesn't personally have any
evidence of that sort, because he hasn't investigated it. And he can't investigate it, because the IG is investigating it. The IG's report will be here
within weeks. Then he'll tell us all the changes he has made to the agency after all of those who will have criminal referrals made against them,
were fired or resigned.

This is a Class B Western movie. There were 1,000 made and they all had the same story and endings.

He literally said he made sure it was done by the book. That means he investigated it... otherwise he wouldn't have said that.

He couldn't have insured it was done by the book. He wasn't there doing it at the time. How can he reach a conclusion on what Lynch was telling
Comey or vice-versa, other than just taking their word for it.
 
Funny... the director of the FBI Christopher Wray testified to Congress yesterday that the FBI didn't do anything wrong when investigating the Trump campaign and Russia...

He didn't say any such thing. He picked and said his words in a strategic manner.

Wray has to protect the integrity of the FBI and its employees. He's not going to help paint a negative picture
of the agency, as a whole. The bad apples, he has helped get rid of.

When he is discussing authorized surveillance, he is talking about following Agency procedure(s). Which, includes
following the law. If the FISA warrants, for example, were obtained by giving false information or by omitting required
information, they would be considered illegal, at this moment.

Wray just protected the Agency and its current employees from that group of 25 agents who have been fired, resigned
or demoted,who served under the previous Director.


"Asked by Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., if he would say that the FBI is "spying" when it investigates suspected terrorists and mobsters while following "investigative policies and procedures," Wray replied, "Well, that's not the term I would use."

He added: "I believe that the FBI is engaged in investigative activity, and part of investigative activity includes surveillance activity of different shapes and sizes. And to me, the key question is making sure that it's done by the book, consistent with our lawful authorities. That's the key question. Different people use different colloquial phrases."


Wray declined to discuss in detail the FBI's investigation into the Trump campaign because of an ongoing Justice Department inspector general probe into the origins of the Russia inquiry. Barr has said he expects the watchdog report to be done in May or June.

But asked whether he was aware of evidence that the FBI had illegally spied on the Trump campaign, Wray said, "I don't think I personally have any evidence of that sort.""

Surveillance is not 'spying' and there's no evidence Trump campaign was illegally monitored, says FBI director

The FBI did their job investigating what they were supposed to, and did so "by the book."

It was by the book...ONLY, if the information given the FISA court followed correct procedure. (it was verified.) The Dossier still hasn't
been verified. They omitted informing the court that it was paid for by the DNC and Clinton Campaign.

Your final quote of his, he said..."I don't think I personally have any evidence of that sort." That is 100% spin. He doesn't personally have any
evidence of that sort, because he hasn't investigated it. And he can't investigate it, because the IG is investigating it. The IG's report will be here
within weeks. Then he'll tell us all the changes he has made to the agency after all of those who will have criminal referrals made against them,
were fired or resigned.

This is a Class B Western movie. There were 1,000 made and they all had the same story and endings.

He literally said he made sure it was done by the book. That means he investigated it... otherwise he wouldn't have said that.

He couldn't have insured it was done by the book. He wasn't there doing it at the time. How can he reach a conclusion on what Lynch was telling
Comey or vice-versa, other than just taking their word for it.

Do you think they don't document this stuff? He is the director of the FBI and a Trump appointee. If you don't think Trump has been in his ear from the get-go, asking him to look into everything, then you aren't paying attention.
 
Still waiting for the H. Clinton Special Prosecutor. Still waiting for the FISA declassification. Still waiting for Mexico to pay for the wall. Still waiting for the border to be shut down. Still waiting for Obamacare to be replaced. Still waiting for the deficit to be eliminated. Still waiting for H. Clinton to be locked up.
 

Forum List

Back
Top