Five years of President Obama

[jon_berzerk]

As far as the stock market.
I love the fact that i am making money in my IRA account.
I don't like the fact that I needed to withdraw from it for the first time in 30 years
to cover my out of pocket expenses due to ObamaCare.

I love the fact that i am making money in my IRA account.
I don't like the fact that I needed to withdraw from it for the first time in 30 years

which isnt a bad idea

considering the prezbo has his eye

on nationalizing retirement accounts

 

[bedowin62]

obama's unemployment number is GARBAGE; and even SOME left-wingers are intellectually honest enough to admit it doesnt count MILLIONS who have left the workforce altogether


idiots and hypocrites

So that number's significant now?

Funny it wasn't when Reagan, Bush and Bush II were President.

It was when Clinton and Obama sat in the chair.

Funny that.

And you do know baked in those numbers are people that are retiring, right?

YAWN
because it was never as altered under them; prove me wrong

oh and it wasnt as high either

we have the lowest rate of Labor Force participation in FORTY YEARS

so maybe you should try counting back to forty before using the pathetic Bush and Reagan rants

the rate of babey boomers retirng has remained constant for a decade

you're a loser who lies to himself

 

[Sallow]

Black ue is in the double digits, why are liberals so racist?

Why'd you bring that up?

I thought you guys thought of everyone as just "Americans".

Seems that's not really the case, is it?

WE do think of every bdoy as American

but YOU DONT
that's why you elected the first "Black" President based n nothing but his skin color

What's a "bdoy"?

And I voted Obama because he represented my viewpoint.

His skin color was..and is of no relevance to me.

Besides..he's half Irish. And likes beer. I'm a quarter Irish and like beer.

 

[bedowin62]

retiring baby boomers have NOTHING to do with obama's low rate of labor force participation

if anything older people are healthier now; and PUTTING OFF RETIREMENT IF they already have a job

libs are losers who lie to themselves

 

[bedowin62]

Why'd you bring that up?

I thought you guys thought of everyone as just "Americans".

Seems that's not really the case, is it?

WE do think of every bdoy as American

but YOU DONT
that's why you elected the first "Black" President based n nothing but his skin color

What's a "bdoy"?

And I voted Obama because he represented my viewpoint.

His skin color was..and is of no relevance to me.

Besides..he's half Irish. And likes beer. I'm a quarter Irish and like beer.

he was nominated based on his color; that's why even hillary became a "racist" in the Dem primaries

 

[Geaux4it]

As far as the stock market.
I love the fact that i am making money in my IRA account.
I don't like the fact that I needed to withdraw from it for the first time in 30 years
to cover my out of pocket expenses due to ObamaCare.

I love the fact that i am making money in my IRA account.
I don't like the fact that I needed to withdraw from it for the first time in 30 years

which isnt a bad idea

considering the prezbo has his eye

on nationalizing retirement accounts

For real.. That's my my reload bench stays active. Come after my 401K and lead will fly

-Geaux

 

[Sallow]

obama's unemployment number is GARBAGE; and even SOME left-wingers are intellectually honest enough to admit it doesnt count MILLIONS who have left the workforce altogether


idiots and hypocrites

So that number's significant now?

Funny it wasn't when Reagan, Bush and Bush II were President.

It was when Clinton and Obama sat in the chair.

Funny that.

And you do know baked in those numbers are people that are retiring, right?

YAWN
because it was never as altered under them; prove me wrong

oh and it wasnt as high either

we have the lowest rate of Labor Force participation in FORTY YEARS

so maybe you should try counting back to forty before using the pathetic Bush and Reagan rants

the rate of babey boomers retirng has remained constant for a decade

you're a loser who lies to himself

That's got to be the funniest thing ever. They all hit retirement age at the same time.



And I'm the one with a job.

Get your resume out there..dude.

I am sure you can find something.

 

[mudwhistle]

the idiotic left says repubs not passing Dems "jobs bills" means they arent serious about jobs.

but Democrat "jobs bills" dont create jobs; especially not ones that last

where are the 7 milllion jobs obama claims to have created in spite of republican "obstruction"?
where are the stimulus jobs? do they still exist?
why are left-wing nutjobs asking republicans to create jobs Dems claim to have already created?

idiots and hypocrites

Name a problem and I can name a Democrat response that seems to intentionally make it worse.

A nut-case kills a bunch of kids. The Dems blame the gun. They refuse to increase security in schools because that would mean armed guards would be protecting our kids, yet they insist on using armed security to protect themselves.

They complain about outsourcing, yet they push for ever increasing wages and benefits, are downright hostile to businesses, and claim they are evil for their desire to make a profit.

They claim income-inequality is a major problem yet Obama continues to pump $85billion into the market per mo. This is essentially corporate welfare for the rich.

They say we have an immigration problem yet Obama refuses to enforce current immigration laws and claims any state that does is acting discriminatory.

They claim we need to cut defense, yet forgets to mention that he already cut defense to the tune of billions of dollars already but refuses to cut entitlements, so he proposes more and more defense cuts irregardless of national security.

Name an issue that Democrats haven't made worse.

 

[Geaux4it]

So that number's significant now?

Funny it wasn't when Reagan, Bush and Bush II were President.

It was when Clinton and Obama sat in the chair.

Funny that.

And you do know baked in those numbers are people that are retiring, right?

YAWN
because it was never as altered under them; prove me wrong

oh and it wasnt as high either

we have the lowest rate of Labor Force participation in FORTY YEARS

so maybe you should try counting back to forty before using the pathetic Bush and Reagan rants

the rate of babey boomers retirng has remained constant for a decade

you're a loser who lies to himself

That's got to be the funniest thing ever. They all hit retirement age at the same time.



And I'm the one with a job.

Get your resume out there..dude.

I am sure you can find something.

I would rather blame it on the weather

-Geaux

 

[Faun]

isnt the Left saying "government" has been reduced under obama?

well despite the fact that the lying; idiotic Left implies that obama reduced the size of the FEDERAL government; which isnt true; it has been state governments that have shrunk; DESPITE STIMULUS FUNDS.
Repubs at the State level predicted this; and it CAME TRUE. the Stimulus funds came with strings attached; which amounted to un-funded mandates (COSTS) on states

why do left-wingers come here an tell half a story?

idiots and hypocrites

This is as rightarded as when you idiotically claimed Obama's policies were to blame for the millions of jobs lost during 2008, before he even became president.
It is not a lie that the federal government hss decreased under Obama. The one lying is actually you, by denying that it has.

Jan/2009: 2,772,000
Jan/2014: 2,707,000

BLS: Federal Employment

when did i claim obama was responsible for job losses before he was president you mindless moron?

I don't blame you for trying to pretend you're not ad dumb as your posts indicate, but regrettably ...

http://www.usmessageboard.com/8654095-post54.html

and it IS a lie to say the federal gov has shrunk under obama; it's GROWN BY 5%

ur a joke

Well I gave you the link to show the size of the federal government has shrunk. I can't you're anathema to numbers.

 

[jon_berzerk]

As far as the stock market.
I love the fact that i am making money in my IRA account.
I don't like the fact that I needed to withdraw from it for the first time in 30 years
to cover my out of pocket expenses due to ObamaCare.

I love the fact that i am making money in my IRA account.
I don't like the fact that I needed to withdraw from it for the first time in 30 years

which isnt a bad idea

considering the prezbo has his eye

on nationalizing retirement accounts

For real.. That's my my reload bench stays active. Come after my 401K and lead will fly

-Geaux

count your lucky stars

that he doesnt have the votes to pass myra

or your 401k would have been converted to government bonds by now

 

[Stephanie]

I love the fact that i am making money in my IRA account.
I don't like the fact that I needed to withdraw from it for the first time in 30 years

which isnt a bad idea

considering the prezbo has his eye

on nationalizing retirement accounts

For real.. That's my my reload bench stays active. Come after my 401K and lead will fly

-Geaux

count your lucky stars

that he doesnt have the votes to pass myra

or your 401k would have been converted to government bonds by now

and people like luddy and sallow would be Hailing Obama for it

 

[Faun]

obama's unemployment number is GARBAGE; and even SOME left-wingers are intellectually honest enough to admit it doesnt count MILLIONS who have left the workforce altogether


idiots and hypocrites

So that number's significant now?

Funny it wasn't when Reagan, Bush and Bush II were President.

It was when Clinton and Obama sat in the chair.

Funny that.

And you do know baked in those numbers are people that are retiring, right?

YAWN
because it was never as altered under them; prove me wrong

oh and it wasnt as high either

we have the lowest rate of Labor Force participation in FORTY YEARS

so maybe you should try counting back to forty before using the pathetic Bush and Reagan rants

the rate of babey boomers retirng has remained constant for a decade

you're a loser who lies to himself

What do you think the LFPR indicates about the economy?

 

[natstew]

Republicans have done nothing to aid the US economic survival or recovery.

Why should we believe that will ever change?

Nonsense. The GOP blocked much of Obama's agenda after 2010. Not coincidentally the period when recovery started. You should thank the GOP for aiding recovery, despite holding only thge House.

They shut down government and cost the economy 25 billion dollars.

I don't know how that "aids" anything.

There you go lying again. The Republicans passed a Bill that would have kept the Government open and the Democrats in the Senate killed it. Now that's the Democrats shutting down the Government, any way you spin it! You're so effing dishonest! How can you sleep at night? Effing psychopathic liar!

 

[bedowin62]

So that number's significant now?

Funny it wasn't when Reagan, Bush and Bush II were President.

It was when Clinton and Obama sat in the chair.

Funny that.

And you do know baked in those numbers are people that are retiring, right?

YAWN
because it was never as altered under them; prove me wrong

oh and it wasnt as high either

we have the lowest rate of Labor Force participation in FORTY YEARS

so maybe you should try counting back to forty before using the pathetic Bush and Reagan rants

the rate of babey boomers retirng has remained constant for a decade

you're a loser who lies to himself

That's got to be the funniest thing ever. They all hit retirement age at the same time.



And I'm the one with a job.

Get your resume out there..dude.

I am sure you can find something.

they have been retiring at a steady rate

again you're lying to YOURSELF; so keep laughing

there is no sudden uptick in the rate of retiring baby boomers that explains obama's 40 year low Labor Market rate of participation


try again

 

[bedowin62]

So that number's significant now?

Funny it wasn't when Reagan, Bush and Bush II were President.

It was when Clinton and Obama sat in the chair.

Funny that.

And you do know baked in those numbers are people that are retiring, right?

YAWN
because it was never as altered under them; prove me wrong

oh and it wasnt as high either

we have the lowest rate of Labor Force participation in FORTY YEARS

so maybe you should try counting back to forty before using the pathetic Bush and Reagan rants

the rate of babey boomers retirng has remained constant for a decade

you're a loser who lies to himself

What do you think the LFPR indicates about the economy?

just what it says dork; that people arent participating in the labor force; ABLE-BODIED PEOPLE.


but the RECORD NUMBERS ON WELFARE AND DISABILITY CANT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT LOL!

it has to be retiring boomers; lol what self-deceiving idiots libs are

 

[bedowin62]

For Some, Retirement Is Out of Reach. For Others, Boring ...



www.nytimes.com/.../when-retirement-seems-impossi...

The New York Times





Jan 31, 2014 - So if there is a reduction in force, and you are older and not a big ... Many baby boomers cite financial concerns as the main reason they aren't ...



the very un-right wing NY Times has noted if anything baby boomers are DELAYING retirement. SO retiring workers doesnt explain obama's 40-year low in Labor Market participation

try again

 

[Stephanie]

Five years with the Obama

 

[jon_berzerk]

For real.. That's my my reload bench stays active. Come after my 401K and lead will fly

-Geaux

count your lucky stars

that he doesnt have the votes to pass myra

or your 401k would have been converted to government bonds by now

and people like luddy and sallow would be Hailing Obama for it

in goosestep fashion

 

[Faun]

YAWN
because it was never as altered under them; prove me wrong

oh and it wasnt as high either

we have the lowest rate of Labor Force participation in FORTY YEARS

so maybe you should try counting back to forty before using the pathetic Bush and Reagan rants

the rate of babey boomers retirng has remained constant for a decade

you're a loser who lies to himself

What do you think the LFPR indicates about the economy?

just what it says dork; that people arent participating in the labor force; ABLE-BODIED PEOPLE.


but the RECORD NUMBERS ON WELFARE AND DISABILITY CANT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT LOL!

it has to be retiring boomers; lol what self-deceiving idiots libs are

Moron, the vast majority of those folks choose not to work. That includes housewives, househusbands, students, retirees, welfare recipients, disability recipients, etc...

at any rate, your idiocy aside, I asked you what that number says about the economy any your weak response was that it shows how many people aren't working. What's bad about that, especially given that most of those folks don't want to work.