FIX News ignoring Stormy law suit against Trump

[JimH52]

A consensual blowjob is not even close to buying off hookers

in. the. oval. office. while. he. was. president. and. married.

D e f l e c t. M u c h ?

Suddenly go puritan much?

The Party of the Pervert is now proud of adultery....amazing!

The evangelical side of the party had a choice, vote for a guy who's a cad but will leave them alone, or vote for a woman who's an opportunist that will try to destroy everything they hold important.

The libertarian side of the party had no such conundrum. Trump has so many enemies he can't get away with the type of shit you useful idiots would let Clinton get away with.

Vote for a devout Methodist or a known...lifelong philandering pervert....Gotcha

 

[TheOldSchool]

Yeah? Nothing compared to buying and paying off prostitutes while your wife is pregnant.

Wow, talk about spinning, you cheap dime store hack.

He got blown in the Oval Office on government time by a freaking Long Island "5" intern.

His wife was probably in the same freaking building.

But his politics are cool, so you didn't care. He lied under oath and you didn't care.

Lied under oath?

The millions spent on the Whitewater investigation ends in success! The President lied about getting a BJ!

Meanwhile Trump is buying hookers left and right, paying them off with hush money while cheating on yet another pregnant wife, having prostitutes piss on him in Moscow, getting sued by street walkers... the lion of the GOP

Did he lie under oath or not, Yes or No?

And see, you can't even be honest when you think you have an easy basket. She wasn't a hooker, she was a porn star.

You give a woman $130,000 for sex, then sorry buddy, that’s a hooker

So some rich guy gives a hot woman a $100k engagement ring that woman's a hooker as well?

Trump is engaged to Stormy??? SCANDAL!

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Are they really that slow? I can't find a word about it on their web site...

Only the psycho left cares. Bill Clinton receiving BJs IN THE WHITE HOUSE was a private matter to the left, so this is nothing.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Why are dems so interested in Trumps sex life? Are they jealous they're not getting banged in the arse hole by the orange clown?

 

[bodecea]

Trump wasn't president then so why report it?

Because if any other politician were sued by a hooker they cheated on their wife with, they’d immediately have to resign

The GOP no longer has a soul. They don't care about morals anymore.

They never did...it was always lip-service.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Trump wasn't president then so why report it?

Because if any other politician were sued by a hooker they cheated on their wife with, they’d immediately have to resign

The GOP no longer has a soul. They don't care about morals anymore.

They never did...it was always lip-service.

Isn't that what Monica did to Clinton?

 

[usmbguest5318]

The actual lawsuit itself really doesn't deserve much public discussion.

• The claim that the contract (the NDA) is void is highly dubious.
• Far more credible is the claim that the contract is, by dint of one or more facts of Trump's (his attorney's) behavior subsequent to the contract's having been signed and treated as though it was valid, voidable, entirely or in part.

As goes the matter of Trump philandering, well that's not a criminal matter and, frankly, it's really a matter to be addressed between him, Daniels and Mrs. Trump. What remains to be seen is how Melania Trump responds to what now cannot credibly be denied -- that Donald did indeed, while she was caring for their newborn son, have some sort of sexual congress with at least one woman.

It seems to me, at least re: the suit's germanity as a matter of public conversation, the lawsuit is little other than a vehicle for extending Daniels' "fifteen minutes of fame." That is what it is. I won't chide Daniels for enjoying the spotlight. I will, however, accord to Daniels my derision for actively seeking the spotlight in the self aggrandizing way she has. Her taking that tack belies the fact that, at heart, she is nothing other than a crassly plebeian "social climber."


More important, as far as I'm concerned, is the criminal question her lawsuit raises: Was the hush money paid to prevent politically deleterious information from coming to light in advance of the 2016. That is well worth covering by any organization that considers itself a legitimate news outlet. It is because if the payout was made with that as part or all of its intent, doing so was illegal because the manner in which the payment was made, and that it was made, would have violated federal election laws. The timing of Trump and Daniel's intimacy and the intervening decade before the contract was effected makes it very hard to think that keeping secret the affair -- something that some, likely many, people would have considered material information about Trump -- was not part or all of the intent for the contract and the manner in which it was executed.

Stormy just wants to tell her story....Maybe Falwell Jr or Franklin Graham will give her a few minutes on Sunday?

Stormy just wants to tell her story....

I happen to think that is the primary impetus for the suit, that and to have a means to answer credibly the question she couldn't otherwise speak to: Did she sleep with Trump? She's now, for all intents and purposes, indicated in the text of her lawsuit that she did. I doubt that even Daniels would lie to a court and risk incarceration by having done so in the sworn averrances of her lawsuit. It's one thing to say "sh*t" in public, to news people and so on. It's wholly another to say those same things to a jurist when they are in fact not factually true.

 

[martybegan]

She's the 3rd? wife.... lol you really don't think she expects this crap?

Maybe he is lining up number four....the next one might be too much for the old fart....

It's the Hollywood way.

Now its the REPUBLICAN WAY! Congrats!

Oh yeah, progressives are paragons of marital loyalty.

Paging harvey Weinstein....

A guy that the left immediately condemned. Meanwhile Trump is sitting pretty among you rubes. Hell, the GOP even lionized a pedophile in Alabama!

Only when it came out in the open. People on your side protected his ass for decades because his politics were good and his $$ was green.

20 years later when it entered the press isn't immediately.

LOL.

 

[JimH52]

You guys sound Proud of your Pervert in Chief! Yup....the Trumpization of the GOP....

 

[martybegan]

in. the. oval. office. while. he. was. president. and. married.

D e f l e c t. M u c h ?

Suddenly go puritan much?

The Party of the Pervert is now proud of adultery....amazing!

The evangelical side of the party had a choice, vote for a guy who's a cad but will leave them alone, or vote for a woman who's an opportunist that will try to destroy everything they hold important.

The libertarian side of the party had no such conundrum. Trump has so many enemies he can't get away with the type of shit you useful idiots would let Clinton get away with.

Vote for a devout Methodist or a known...lifelong philandering pervert....Gotcha

Hillary is about as devout as a rock.

Even a hack like you can't believe that.

 

[martybegan]

Wow, talk about spinning, you cheap dime store hack.

He got blown in the Oval Office on government time by a freaking Long Island "5" intern.

His wife was probably in the same freaking building.

But his politics are cool, so you didn't care. He lied under oath and you didn't care.

Lied under oath?

The millions spent on the Whitewater investigation ends in success! The President lied about getting a BJ!

Meanwhile Trump is buying hookers left and right, paying them off with hush money while cheating on yet another pregnant wife, having prostitutes piss on him in Moscow, getting sued by street walkers... the lion of the GOP

Did he lie under oath or not, Yes or No?

And see, you can't even be honest when you think you have an easy basket. She wasn't a hooker, she was a porn star.

You give a woman $130,000 for sex, then sorry buddy, that’s a hooker

So some rich guy gives a hot woman a $100k engagement ring that woman's a hooker as well?

Trump is engaged to Stormy??? SCANDAL!

Nice dodge of the question, jackass.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Where is fox gonna find the time when they’re busy covering the stories about Hillary and Obama (with Russian help) spying on the trump campaign that the DeMSM ignores?
Since the OP doesn’t consult FNC, OAN, et al, it’s obvious he’s getting his info from Democrat propagandists.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Maybe he is lining up number four....the next one might be too much for the old fart....

It's the Hollywood way.

Now its the REPUBLICAN WAY! Congrats!

Oh yeah, progressives are paragons of marital loyalty.

Paging harvey Weinstein....

A guy that the left immediately condemned. Meanwhile Trump is sitting pretty among you rubes. Hell, the GOP even lionized a pedophile in Alabama!

Only when it came out in the open. People on your side protected his ass for decades because his politics were good and his $$ was green.

20 years later when it entered the press isn't immediately.

LOL.

yeah they “protected” him, until they found out what he was doing. What a retarded comment you posted.

 

[JimH52]

The actual lawsuit itself really doesn't deserve much public discussion.

• The claim that the contract (the NDA) is void is highly dubious.
• Far more credible is the claim that the contract is, by dint of one or more facts of Trump's (his attorney's) behavior subsequent to the contract's having been signed and treated as though it was valid, voidable, entirely or in part.

As goes the matter of Trump philandering, well that's not a criminal matter and, frankly, it's really a matter to be addressed between him, Daniels and Mrs. Trump. What remains to be seen is how Melania Trump responds to what now cannot credibly be denied -- that Donald did indeed, while she was caring for their newborn son, have some sort of sexual congress with at least one woman.

It seems to me, at least re: the suit's germanity as a matter of public conversation, the lawsuit is little other than a vehicle for extending Daniels' "fifteen minutes of fame." That is what it is. I won't chide Daniels for enjoying the spotlight. I will, however, accord to Daniels my derision for actively seeking the spotlight in the self aggrandizing way she has. Her taking that tack belies the fact that, at heart, she is nothing other than a crassly plebeian "social climber."


More important, as far as I'm concerned, is the criminal question her lawsuit raises: Was the hush money paid to prevent politically deleterious information from coming to light in advance of the 2016. That is well worth covering by any organization that considers itself a legitimate news outlet. It is because if the payout was made with that as part or all of its intent, doing so was illegal because the manner in which the payment was made, and that it was made, would have violated federal election laws. The timing of Trump and Daniel's intimacy and the intervening decade before the contract was effected makes it very hard to think that keeping secret the affair -- something that some, likely many, people would have considered material information about Trump -- was not part or all of the intent for the contract and the manner in which it was executed.

Stormy just wants to tell her story....Maybe Falwell Jr or Franklin Graham will give her a few minutes on Sunday?

Stormy just wants to tell her story....

I happen to think that is the primary impetus for the suit, that and to have a means to answer credibly the question she couldn't otherwise speak to: Did she sleep with Trump? She's now, for all intents and purposes, indicated in the text of her lawsuit that she did. I doubt that even Daniels would lie to a court and risk incarceration by having done so in the sworn averrances of her lawsuit. It's one thing to say "sh*t" in public, to news people and so on. It's wholly another to say those same things to a jurist when they are in fact not factually true.

She will be on all the news channels....except maybe FIX news...Melania will need to control Barron's TV viewing. The little prince may be shocked

 

[JimH52]

Where is fox gonna find the time when they’re busy covering the stories about Hillary and Obama (with Russian help) spying on the trump campaign that the DeMSM ignores?
Since the OP doesn’t consult FNC, OAN, et al, it’s obvious he’s getting his info from Democrat propagandists.

All the while....trump refuses to implement sanctions on Russia....his mentor state.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Lied under oath?

The millions spent on the Whitewater investigation ends in success! The President lied about getting a BJ!

Meanwhile Trump is buying hookers left and right, paying them off with hush money while cheating on yet another pregnant wife, having prostitutes piss on him in Moscow, getting sued by street walkers... the lion of the GOP

Did he lie under oath or not, Yes or No?

And see, you can't even be honest when you think you have an easy basket. She wasn't a hooker, she was a porn star.

You give a woman $130,000 for sex, then sorry buddy, that’s a hooker

So some rich guy gives a hot woman a $100k engagement ring that woman's a hooker as well?

Trump is engaged to Stormy??? SCANDAL!

Nice dodge of the question, jackass.

No, giving your future wife a ring doesn’t make her a hooker. Holy crap, you’re on a roll. Retarded comment after retarded comment.

 

[JimH52]

D e f l e c t. M u c h ?

Suddenly go puritan much?

The Party of the Pervert is now proud of adultery....amazing!

The evangelical side of the party had a choice, vote for a guy who's a cad but will leave them alone, or vote for a woman who's an opportunist that will try to destroy everything they hold important.

The libertarian side of the party had no such conundrum. Trump has so many enemies he can't get away with the type of shit you useful idiots would let Clinton get away with.

Vote for a devout Methodist or a known...lifelong philandering pervert....Gotcha

Hillary is about as devout as a rock.

Even a hack like you can't believe that.

Yeah... You prefer the Pervert...

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Where is fox gonna find the time when they’re busy covering the stories about Hillary and Obama (with Russian help) spying on the trump campaign that the DeMSM ignores?
Since the OP doesn’t consult FNC, OAN, et al, it’s obvious he’s getting his info from Democrat propagandists.

All the while....trump refuses to implement sanctions on Russia....his mentor state.

Why should he since they didn’t do anything influential? Ask Obama. He said the Russians can’t impact our elections because they aren’t centralized enough.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Are they really that slow? I can't find a word about it on their web site...

They're that dishonest and cowardly.

Rightwing credo: if you can't lie about it, ignore it.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Are they really that slow? I can't find a word about it on their web site...

Maybe if you got the Maddow cum out of your mouth long enough you'd find it:

I didn't find a word, I found an entire VIDEO:

Stormy Daniels scandal: What to know

Yea, FNC really trying to hide it. Stupid fucking liberals.