Donald Trump could face All-Black appeals court in Manhattan

[eagle1462010]

Sentencing is on July 11th, 2024
Trump if elected can't take office before January 20th 2025.
There is no statute under which any elected office changes conditions of imprisonment.

And? Govt jobs getting fired replaced gonna be Epic

 

[meaner gene]

Federal supremacy, the president cannot be beholden to any one state.

That doesn't apply retroactively.
It means they can't throw a sitting president in prison.
But that doesn't mean a person serving a prison sentence when elected president, has to be released.

 

[Rogue AI]

That doesn't apply retroactively.
It means they can't throw a sitting president in prison.
But that doesn't mean a person serving a prison sentence when elected president, has to be released.

Of course the president would have to be released. Nor could he be beholden to any conditions of any one state while serving as president. You folks should ditch your prison fantasies.

 

[meaner gene]

That's not true, NY would have no ability to enforce any conditions on the president.

While it is true that NY can't impost any NEW conditions upon the president. The conditions they imposed on citizen Trump, remain in place, as there is no law that lifts, changes or invalidates conditions already in place.

 

[Rogue AI]

While it is true that NY can't impost any NEW conditions upon the president. The conditions they imposed on citizen Trump, remain in place, as there is no law that lifts, changes or invalidates conditions already in place.

You're living in fantasy land if you believe that. NY could not stop the president from violating their 'conditions'.

 

[eagle1462010]

You're living in fantasy land if you believe that. NY could not stop the president from violating their 'conditions'.

Come to deep red state. We declare Sanctuary from New York

 

[Lisa558]

That doesn't apply retroactively.
It means they can't throw a sitting president in prison.
But that doesn't mean a person serving a prison sentence when elected president, has to be released.

Your TDS has you in Lalaland. How could someone go to prison for paying an NDA when the NY prosecutor didn’t even imprison the illegal lowlifes who went on a violent attack against NYC cops?

You don’t think this uneven application of the law, where violent scumbags get put back on the street and a non-violent Trump convicted of a sham felony (ooops….34) gets sent to prison would not set off a revolution not seen since France, 1784?

There’s only so much decent Americans can take.

 

[meaner gene]

Of course the president would have to be released. Nor could he be beholden to any conditions of any one state while serving as president. You folks should ditch your prison fantasies.

The founding fathers never envisioned this situation, so they didn't put anything in place to decriminalize a person upon election to any office.
They originally wrote into the constitution that the president would be elected by the decisions of the peoples representatives, and not the people themselves. Thus preventing the current situation from being possible.

 

[meaner gene]

You're living in fantasy land if you believe that. NY could not stop the president from violating their 'conditions'.

So a sitting president doesn't have to pay state income tax, or state property tax, or any state fees, such as for a drivers license? Since they can't enforce any action against the president?

 

[Rogue AI]

The founding fathers never envisioned this situation, so they didn't put anything in place to decriminalize a person upon election to any office.
They originally wrote into the constitution that the president would be elected by the decisions of the peoples representatives, and not the people themselves. Thus preventing the current situation from being possible.

That doesn't even make sense. This 'situation' is manufactured banana republic silliness that has no place in our country. The Founders themselves committed numerous crimes creating and executing the revolution. In fact, they decriminalized themselves. Try harder.

 

[Rogue AI]

So a sitting president doesn't have to pay state income tax, or state property tax, or any state fees, such as for a drivers license? Since they can't enforce any action against the president?

None of those are remotely similar to the topic at hand. Try again.

 

[meaner gene]

That doesn't even make sense. This 'situation' is manufactured banana republic silliness that has no place in our country. The Founders themselves committed numerous crimes creating and executing the revolution. In fact, they decriminalized themselves. Try harder.

They also put in place a constitution that would prevent someone foreign or domestic from being crowned like a king to lead the country.

 

[meaner gene]

None of those are remotely similar to the topic at hand. Try again.

Sure it is. If the states can't impose upon a sitting president, and they can't punish a sitting president, or take any actions civil or criminal against a sitting president, what can they do if the president stops paying his state taxes?

Nothing?

Explain how that works.

 

[Rogue AI]

Sure it is. If the states can't impose upon a sitting president, and they can't punish a sitting president, or take any actions civil or criminal against a sitting president, what can they do if the president stops paying his state taxes?

Nothing?

Explain how that works.

Find out yourself, it has nothing to do with the topic.

 

[Rogue AI]

They also put in place a constitution that would prevent someone foreign or domestic from being crowned like a king to lead the country.

What are you implying?

 

[meaner gene]

Find out yourself, it has nothing to do with the topic.

Well, the topic implying the NY court of appeals could put together an appeal panel of five black women is purely a matter of statistical probability of 20,349 to 1

 

[Lisa558]

They also put in place a constitution that would prevent someone foreign or domestic from being crowned like a king to lead the country.

Yes, that’s so we wouldn’t end up with a Biden, who defies the Scotus and then brags about it, or an Obama, who takes what should be a treaty and labels it a “deal” - with an enemy country, no less! - in order to avoid having to pass it through Congress.

You Dems are completely deluded.

 

[meaner gene]

Yes, that’s so we wouldn’t end up with a Biden, who defies the Scotus and then brags about it, or an Obama, who takes what should be a treaty and labels it a “deal” - with an enemy country, no less! - in order to avoid having to pass it through Congress.

You Dems are completely deluded.

You forgot about Obamacare being a tax.

 

[eagle1462010]

You forgot about Obamacare being a tax.

No longer mandatory huh? Oops