Florida Gov. DeSantis Has Just Signed A Bill Into Law That Would Allow Everyday Floridians To Sue Big Tech Platforms For Monetary Damages

[dblack]

Democrats running around screaming free markets! Free markets! Just unbelievable. Literally, as if they care about free markets.

They are just cheering because it's working, Republicans are being silenced.

And dblack doesn't see a problem

it’s not even about free markets. Free markets welcome the exchange of ideas, not censorship.

with that said, facebook is free in a free society to publish the content they want...with that said they should therefore be treated the same as everyone else in that business

Exchange of ideas like football players kneeling during the National Anthem? How did the right like that exchange of ideas?

The football players were only silenced AT WORK. No one silenced them other than that. Or proposed it.

Be more specific about the political protests you do at work

You mean like some are only silenced on Twitter or Facebook?

And ... Parlor ... Who was shut down by Google, not even their competitor. It's a clear anti-trust violation.

But you're here because you support free markets!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sure, that's what you care about!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LOLOL

Parler was not shut down by Google. Who knows why you keep repeating that kaz?

MSN

www.msn.com

That didn't shut Parler down, you fucking imbecile.

Right, a social media site just had to operate without being on phones. That's all.

OMG you're stupid. You aren't faking, you believe the propaganda. At least Goebbels knew it was propaganda

Faun is stupid, stupid is Faun ...

LOLOL

Dumbfuck, until Amazon took them down,, Parler was still accessible on phones. Just like USMB is.

You're a fucking retard.

So it's OK if Google only partially violates their rights?

And what "rights" are being violated?

 

[Faun]

Democrats running around screaming free markets! Free markets! Just unbelievable. Literally, as if they care about free markets.

They are just cheering because it's working, Republicans are being silenced.

And dblack doesn't see a problem

it’s not even about free markets. Free markets welcome the exchange of ideas, not censorship.

with that said, facebook is free in a free society to publish the content they want...with that said they should therefore be treated the same as everyone else in that business

Exchange of ideas like football players kneeling during the National Anthem? How did the right like that exchange of ideas?

The football players were only silenced AT WORK. No one silenced them other than that. Or proposed it.

Be more specific about the political protests you do at work

You mean like some are only silenced on Twitter or Facebook?

And ... Parlor ... Who was shut down by Google, not even their competitor. It's a clear anti-trust violation.

But you're here because you support free markets!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sure, that's what you care about!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LOLOL

Parler was not shut down by Google. Who knows why you keep repeating that kaz?

MSN

www.msn.com

That didn't shut Parler down, you fucking imbecile.

Right, a social media site just had to operate without being on phones. That's all.

OMG you're stupid. You aren't faking, you believe the propaganda. At least Goebbels knew it was propaganda

Faun is stupid, stupid is Faun ...

LOLOL

Dumbfuck, until Amazon took them down,, Parler was still accessible on phones. Just like USMB is.

You're a fucking retard.

So it's OK if Google only partially violates their rights?

Holyshit. Since when is getting an app on Google's playstore, a right???

You're batshit insane, fucking moron.

 

[meaner gene]

So it's OK if Google only partially violates their rights?

This is no different than forcing Kmart to carry Twinkies.

 

[bripat9643]

Nah. It's more fundamental than that. Something so fundamental, the founders saw no reason to call it out in the Constitution. We're talking about the freedom to say "no" - with or without a "good reason", with or without "transparency" or "consistency".

And Facebook et al still have the freedom to do so without transparency or consistency, but now individuals have a cause of action against Facebook if they do.

"Cause of action"? For what. Is it now illegal to be non-transparent and inconsistent? By what justification? Who's rights are being violated?

Beyond that, your excuses don't hold water:

The law, Florida Senate Bill 7072, provides several new checks on tech and social media companies. Among other things:

• Platforms cannot ban or deprioritize candidates for state office.
• Platforms cannot ban or deprioritize any news outlet meeting certain size requirements.
• Platforms must be transparent about moderation processes and give users notice of moderation actions.
• Users and the state will have the right to sue companies that violate the law. Statutory fines could be as high as $250,000 per day for some offenses.

Sorry, I don't want government sticking its dick into social media.

Deceptive Trade.

It's not government "sticking it's dick" into social media in any fashion different from government "sticking it's dick" into manufacturing by giving injured parties a cause of action for product liability.

Do you believe in tort liability or not?

This has nothing to do with tort liability. You're making excuses to justify statist mandates.

It has everything to do with tort liability, dumbfuck.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Right? Who da fuk needs a voice anyway (except you and big tech) ?!?!?!

Social media platforms are private property. You play by their rules or you don’t play at all.

Why is that so hard to understand?

Yeah...it'd be nice if that's all they wanted.

Meh...it's not. They want all opposition silenced. Why do you think they kicked Parler off the servers?
Why do you think they are trying to indict Trump?

Why is Fascism so hard for you to understand?

 

[bripat9643]

Democrats running around screaming free markets! Free markets! Just unbelievable. Literally, as if they care about free markets.

They are just cheering because it's working, Republicans are being silenced.

And dblack doesn't see a problem

it’s not even about free markets. Free markets welcome the exchange of ideas, not censorship.

with that said, facebook is free in a free society to publish the content they want...with that said they should therefore be treated the same as everyone else in that business

Exchange of ideas like football players kneeling during the National Anthem? How did the right like that exchange of ideas?

The football players were only silenced AT WORK. No one silenced them other than that. Or proposed it.

Be more specific about the political protests you do at work

You mean like some are only silenced on Twitter or Facebook?

And ... Parlor ... Who was shut down by Google, not even their competitor. It's a clear anti-trust violation.

But you're here because you support free markets!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sure, that's what you care about!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LOLOL

Parler was not shut down by Google. Who knows why you keep repeating that kaz?

MSN

www.msn.com

That didn't shut Parler down, you fucking imbecile.

Right, a social media site just had to operate without being on phones. That's all.

OMG you're stupid. You aren't faking, you believe the propaganda. At least Goebbels knew it was propaganda

Faun is stupid, stupid is Faun ...

LOLOL

Dumbfuck, until Amazon took them down,, Parler was still accessible on phones. Just like USMB is.

You're a fucking retard.

So it's OK if Google only partially violates their rights?

Holyshit. Since when is getting an app on Google's playstore, a right???

You're batshit insane, fucking moron.

Since Google claimed to be a common carrier, dumbass.

 

[bripat9643]

So it's OK if Google only partially violates their rights?

This is no different than forcing Kmart to carry Twinkies.

Of course it's different, douchebag.

 

[meaner gene]

Facebook gave the communist left and anti-Trumptards a beautiful fiefdom of unchallenged propaganda presented as "FACT," and now they have to tell the fucking truth and THAT pisses YOU off. Be honest.

Facebook accepted $100,000 in political ads paid in rubles.

 

[bripat9643]

"All rights have limits . . . if they belong to conservatives. It's outrageous that they think they're allowed the same freedoms we are!"

"Facebook is being completely fair and impartial and moral!! I KNOW they are, because they're doing what I want, and they TOLD me they were!! How dare you contradict my beloved masters!!"\

"You deserve to be silenced, because you refuse to follow orders and think what we're told to!!"

Just curious: Was it the lobotomy or the castration that made you such a puling little lackey?

Why is it that you guys always sound like people immersed in self-pity and victimhood with a persecution complex on top of it all? It's weird because it's just so damn common place among conservatives.

Says the party of woke victimhood.

Democrats built a party on victimhood. Their whining about it is classic.

Democrats are Nazis.

Goebbles: Accuse others of what you are

That's Mustang and the Democrats

LOL

Now that's funny in a thread about how conservatives are victims.

So just to be clear, you think stopping fraud is "victimhood."

My God your ass must just burn from the hypocrisy. You impeached the President TWICE for that accusation you stupid fuck

FAUX believe pointing out any crime committed by the leftwing is "victimhood."

LOLOL

There's no crime, fucking moron.

Sure there is.

 

[kaz]

And ... Parlor ... Who was shut down by Google, not even their competitor. It's a clear anti-trust violation.

But you're here because you support free markets!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sure, that's what you care about!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LOLOL

Parler was not shut down by Google. Who knows why you keep repeating that kaz?

MSN

www.msn.com

LOLOL

Retard, that only meant people could no longer reach Parler's site with their app. That didn't shut Parler down. Parler's website remained up and running. It was Amazon, not Google, who shut Parler down. For a brief period anyway, until Parler signed up with a new web host.

You're a flaming imbecile who's simply incapable of learning.

You always post like you're Rumpelstiltskin and someone just said your name. It's pretty funny. It's hard not to poke you just to make you react again. LOL

 

[bripat9643]

Facebook gave the communist left and anti-Trumptards a beautiful fiefdom of unchallenged propaganda presented as "FACT," and now they have to tell the fucking truth and THAT pisses YOU off. Be honest.

Facebook accepted $100,000 in political ads paid in rubles.

That doesn't alter what he posted, moron.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Nah. It's more fundamental than that. Something so fundamental, the founders saw no reason to call it out in the Constitution. We're talking about the freedom to say "no" - with or without a "good reason", with or without "transparency" or "consistency".

And Facebook et al still have the freedom to do so without transparency or consistency, but now individuals have a cause of action against Facebook if they do.

"Cause of action"? For what. Is it now illegal to be non-transparent and inconsistent? By what justification? Who's rights are being violated?

Beyond that, your excuses don't hold water:

The law, Florida Senate Bill 7072, provides several new checks on tech and social media companies. Among other things:

• Platforms cannot ban or deprioritize candidates for state office.
• Platforms cannot ban or deprioritize any news outlet meeting certain size requirements.
• Platforms must be transparent about moderation processes and give users notice of moderation actions.
• Users and the state will have the right to sue companies that violate the law. Statutory fines could be as high as $250,000 per day for some offenses.

Sorry, I don't want government sticking its dick into social media.

Deceptive Trade.

It's not government "sticking it's dick" into social media in any fashion different from government "sticking it's dick" into manufacturing by giving injured parties a cause of action for product liability.

Do you believe in tort liability or not?

This has nothing to do with tort liability. You're making excuses to justify statist mandates.

Kind of like you making excuses for and looking the other way, on the complete shitting on all opposing views via the biggest form of person-to-person communication since the fucking telephone. EVERY claim you make about this topic can come right back at you.

 

[meaner gene]

So it's OK if Google only partially violates their rights?

This is no different than forcing Kmart to carry Twinkies.

Of course it's different, douchebag.

It's not different. Kmart is open to the public (aka common carrier) and can't discriminate as such.

If you can force Google to carry Parlor, you can force K-mart to carry Twinkies.

 

[kaz]

Democrats running around screaming free markets! Free markets! Just unbelievable. Literally, as if they care about free markets.

They are just cheering because it's working, Republicans are being silenced.

And dblack doesn't see a problem

it’s not even about free markets. Free markets welcome the exchange of ideas, not censorship.

with that said, facebook is free in a free society to publish the content they want...with that said they should therefore be treated the same as everyone else in that business

Exchange of ideas like football players kneeling during the National Anthem? How did the right like that exchange of ideas?

The football players were only silenced AT WORK. No one silenced them other than that. Or proposed it.

Be more specific about the political protests you do at work

You mean like some are only silenced on Twitter or Facebook?

And ... Parlor ... Who was shut down by Google, not even their competitor. It's a clear anti-trust violation.

But you're here because you support free markets!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sure, that's what you care about!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LOLOL

Parler was not shut down by Google. Who knows why you keep repeating that kaz?

MSN

www.msn.com

That didn't shut Parler down, you fucking imbecile.

Right, a social media site just had to operate without being on phones. That's all.

OMG you're stupid. You aren't faking, you believe the propaganda. At least Goebbels knew it was propaganda

Faun is stupid, stupid is Faun ...

LOLOL

Dumbfuck, until Amazon took them down,, Parler was still accessible on phones. Just like USMB is.

You're a fucking retard.

Rumpelstiltskin! Can you freak out again now?

Remember I told you to talk to your mom about monitoring your sugar intake? Never mind, don't, it's too funny

 

[bripat9643]

Democrats running around screaming free markets! Free markets! Just unbelievable. Literally, as if they care about free markets.

They are just cheering because it's working, Republicans are being silenced.

And dblack doesn't see a problem

it’s not even about free markets. Free markets welcome the exchange of ideas, not censorship.

with that said, facebook is free in a free society to publish the content they want...with that said they should therefore be treated the same as everyone else in that business

Exchange of ideas like football players kneeling during the National Anthem? How did the right like that exchange of ideas?

The football players were only silenced AT WORK. No one silenced them other than that. Or proposed it.

Be more specific about the political protests you do at work

You mean like some are only silenced on Twitter or Facebook?

And ... Parlor ... Who was shut down by Google, not even their competitor. It's a clear anti-trust violation.

But you're here because you support free markets!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sure, that's what you care about!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LOLOL

Parler was not shut down by Google. Who knows why you keep repeating that kaz?

MSN

www.msn.com

LOLOL

Retard, that only meant people could no longer reach Parler's site with their app. That didn't shut Parler down. Parler's website remained up and running. It was Amazon, not Google, who shut Parler down. For a brief period anyway, until Parler signed up with a new web host.

You're a flaming imbecile who's simply incapable of learning.

You have to be the biggest dumbfuck in the known universe

 

[meaner gene]

Facebook accepted $100,000 in political ads paid in rubles.

That doesn't alter what he posted, moron.

It's why facebook started to control content.

 

[bripat9643]

So it's OK if Google only partially violates their rights?

This is no different than forcing Kmart to carry Twinkies.

Of course it's different, douchebag.

It's not different. Kmart is open to the public (aka common carrier) and can't discriminate as such.

If you can force Google to carry Parlor, you can force K-mart to carry Twinkies.

No, Kmart is not a common carrier. Being open to the public isn't how the term "common carrier" is defined.

 

[kaz]

That isn't an answer to the question.

Give examples of your political demonstrations you do at work. Go ...

Asked and answered. It's not my problem you're incapable of understanding my answer.

Bull shit. You never answered it, liar.

Give examples of your political demonstrations you do at work. Go ...

Asked and answered. It's not my problem you're incapable of understanding my answer.

Another lie. You're just squirming now.

Give examples of your political demonstrations you do at work. Go ...

Asked and answered. It's not my problem you're incapable of understanding my answer.

Apparently, the forum kazzer thinks if he keeps asking the same question over and over and over, he's gonna get a different answer.

Rumpelstiltskin!

Rumpelstiltskin!

 

[bripat9643]

Facebook accepted $100,000 in political ads paid in rubles.

That doesn't alter what he posted, moron.

It's why facebook started to control content.

No, it was because Democrats in Congress were screeching about all the anti-Democrat news that was being posted on Fecebook

 

[meaner gene]

Kind of like you making excuses for and looking the other way, on the complete shitting on all opposing views via the biggest form of person-to-person communication since the fucking telephone. EVERY claim you make about this topic can come right back at you.

Market size should not be the issue, as long as they are not using anti-competitive means. You can't force the biggest airline (which is a common carrier) to go to a city they don't want to go to.