Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Democrat party is the victim party, so why aren't you attacking Democrats?LOLSays the party of woke victimhood.Why is it that you guys always sound like people immersed in self-pity and victimhood with a persecution complex on top of it all? It's weird because it's just so damn common place among conservatives.
"All rights have limits . . . if they belong to conservatives. It's outrageous that they think they're allowed the same freedoms we are!"
"Facebook is being completely fair and impartial and moral!! I KNOW they are, because they're doing what I want, and they TOLD me they were!! How dare you contradict my beloved masters!!"\
"You deserve to be silenced, because you refuse to follow orders and think what we're told to!!"
Just curious: Was it the lobotomy or the castration that made you such a puling little lackey?
Democrats built a party on victimhood. Their whining about it is classic.
Democrats are Nazis.
Goebbles: Accuse others of what you are
That's Mustang and the Democrats
Now that's funny in a thread about how conservatives are victims.
Noting in there about being a common carrier, fucking moron.
Only if you're deliberately trying not to find it, fucking moron:
In dismissing the case on 18 May, US District Judge Nicholas Garaufis upheld Facebook’s argument that the company was protected by the Communications Decency Act, which says certain Internet services are not liable for content created by a third party.
Dictatorship of the PlutariatYou forget to mention that they're only stopping speech on property that they own and operate.Of course it is a restriction of freedom of speech. It is outright stopping speech.
I knew you were going to say that. They are entitled to rule 230 protection only if they are a common carrier. Do you imagine CNN is entitled to rule 230 protection?That's not calling themselves a common carrier, ya fucking moron. That's them claiming rule 230 protection.Only if you're deliberately trying not to find it, fucking moron:LOLOLHere's the lawsuit I am referring to, you fucking douchebag.I think I see why fucking moron didn't respond to this post of mine. Fucking moron, is this the lawsuit of which you speak...?In which post did you include that?Wrong. I posted the lawsuit where the claimed they were exempt because they were a common carrier.You keep saying that but you're utterly refusing to quote them saying that.Right. They claim to be a "common carrier," short bus. That means they aren't allowed to discriminate.Wrong.For the same reason AT&T can not.Why not? It’s their website.They can't discriminate based on idelogy alone, nor should they be allowed to.
You're a proven liar and it appears you're reluctant to quote them because you're lying again.
Florida Gov. DeSantis Has Just Signed A Bill Into Law That Would Allow Everyday Floridians To Sue Big Tech Platforms For Monetary Damages
Harping on irrelevant trivialities is FAUX's favorite tactic. Fucking moron, how did you not understand it's not defamation in any terms? What? Both Libel and Slander are forms of defamation. And neither apply here. Banning a member for violating the terms of service is not defamation...www.usmessageboard.com
Billion-dollar Israeli lawsuit against Facebook thrown out
Noting in there about being a common carrier, fucking moron.
In dismissing the case on 18 May, US District Judge Nicholas Garaufis upheld Facebook’s argument that the company was protected by the Communications Decency Act, which says certain Internet services are not liable for content created by a third party.
Stop kazzing. Claiming conservatives are wrongfully banned from posting on Twitter and Facebook is crying victimhood.LOLSays the party of woke victimhood.Why is it that you guys always sound like people immersed in self-pity and victimhood with a persecution complex on top of it all? It's weird because it's just so damn common place among conservatives.
"All rights have limits . . . if they belong to conservatives. It's outrageous that they think they're allowed the same freedoms we are!"
"Facebook is being completely fair and impartial and moral!! I KNOW they are, because they're doing what I want, and they TOLD me they were!! How dare you contradict my beloved masters!!"\
"You deserve to be silenced, because you refuse to follow orders and think what we're told to!!"
Just curious: Was it the lobotomy or the castration that made you such a puling little lackey?
Democrats built a party on victimhood. Their whining about it is classic.
Democrats are Nazis.
Goebbles: Accuse others of what you are
That's Mustang and the Democrats
Now that's funny in a thread about how conservatives are victims.
So just to be clear, you think stopping fraud is "victimhood."
My God your ass must just burn from the hypocrisy. You impeached the President TWICE for that accusation you stupid fuck
I sure wasn't expecting you to be embarassed about posting your idiocies.So? Were you expecting a cookie?I posted the OP, jackass.Fucking moron, see if you can pay attention for more than a nanosecond.... this thread is about conservative victimhood.The Democrat party is the victim party, so why aren't you attacking Democrats?LOL
Now that's funny in a thread about how conservatives are victims.
Faun is wrong, as always, dumbass.Noting in there about being a common carrier, fucking moron.Only if you're deliberately trying not to find it, fucking moron:
In dismissing the case on 18 May, US District Judge Nicholas Garaufis upheld Facebook’s argument that the company was protected by the Communications Decency Act, which says certain Internet services are not liable for content created by a third party.
Section 230 is not about common carrier.
Faun is right, their claim of common carrier status was not given merit.
The Chinese are building ships every several weeks. Semantics mean nothing in death.The federal government is not allowed to compete with private industry. They can't set up a military base that builds ships.If we built military bases that could build naval ships cheaper in those hated southern states, then we should. We need fifty frigates easily. We need fifty destroyers easily. We need a dozen aircraft carriers easily With smaller ones part of the agenda. Go from there.
LOLOLYou mean like some are only silenced on Twitter or Facebook?Exchange of ideas like football players kneeling during the National Anthem? How did the right like that exchange of ideas?it’s not even about free markets. Free markets welcome the exchange of ideas, not censorship.
Democrats running around screaming free markets! Free markets! Just unbelievable. Literally, as if they care about free markets.
They are just cheering because it's working, Republicans are being silenced.
And dblack doesn't see a problem
with that said, facebook is free in a free society to publish the content they want...with that said they should therefore be treated the same as everyone else in that business
The football players were only silenced AT WORK. No one silenced them other than that. Or proposed it.
Be more specific about the political protests you do at work
And ... Parlor ... Who was shut down by Google, not even their competitor. It's a clear anti-trust violation.
But you're here because you support free markets!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sure, that's what you care about!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Parler was not shut down by Google. Who knows why you keep repeating that kaz?
Dictatorship of the PlutariatYou forget to mention that they're only stopping speech on property that they own and operate.Of course it is a restriction of freedom of speech. It is outright stopping speech.
Giving even a private entity absolute power over its customers is the same as Communist dictatorship, with the same slippery reasoning that the Communists used.
So any time someone complains about an injustice, he's crying victimhood? How about when Blacks whine that they are mistreated by the police? How about when queers complain that they aren't allowed to get married?Stop kazzing. Claiming conservatives are wrongfully banned from posting on Twitter and Facebook is crying victimhood.LOLSays the party of woke victimhood.Why is it that you guys always sound like people immersed in self-pity and victimhood with a persecution complex on top of it all? It's weird because it's just so damn common place among conservatives.
"All rights have limits . . . if they belong to conservatives. It's outrageous that they think they're allowed the same freedoms we are!"
"Facebook is being completely fair and impartial and moral!! I KNOW they are, because they're doing what I want, and they TOLD me they were!! How dare you contradict my beloved masters!!"\
"You deserve to be silenced, because you refuse to follow orders and think what we're told to!!"
Just curious: Was it the lobotomy or the castration that made you such a puling little lackey?
Democrats built a party on victimhood. Their whining about it is classic.
Democrats are Nazis.
Goebbles: Accuse others of what you are
That's Mustang and the Democrats
Now that's funny in a thread about how conservatives are victims.
So just to be clear, you think stopping fraud is "victimhood."
My God your ass must just burn from the hypocrisy. You impeached the President TWICE for that accusation you stupid fuck
Who knows where you think fraud fits into that?
Here's rule 230, fucking moron...I knew you were going to say that. They are entitled to rule 230 protection only if they are a common carrier. Do you imagine CNN is entitled to rule 230 protection?That's not calling themselves a common carrier, ya fucking moron. That's them claiming rule 230 protection.Only if you're deliberately trying not to find it, fucking moron:LOLOLHere's the lawsuit I am referring to, you fucking douchebag.I think I see why fucking moron didn't respond to this post of mine. Fucking moron, is this the lawsuit of which you speak...?In which post did you include that?Wrong. I posted the lawsuit where the claimed they were exempt because they were a common carrier.You keep saying that but you're utterly refusing to quote them saying that.Right. They claim to be a "common carrier," short bus. That means they aren't allowed to discriminate.Wrong.For the same reason AT&T can not.Why not? It’s their website.They can't discriminate based on idelogy alone, nor should they be allowed to.
You're a proven liar and it appears you're reluctant to quote them because you're lying again.
Florida Gov. DeSantis Has Just Signed A Bill Into Law That Would Allow Everyday Floridians To Sue Big Tech Platforms For Monetary Damages
Harping on irrelevant trivialities is FAUX's favorite tactic. Fucking moron, how did you not understand it's not defamation in any terms? What? Both Libel and Slander are forms of defamation. And neither apply here. Banning a member for violating the terms of service is not defamation...
Billion-dollar Israeli lawsuit against Facebook thrown out
Noting in there about being a common carrier, fucking moron.
In dismissing the case on 18 May, US District Judge Nicholas Garaufis upheld Facebook’s argument that the company was protected by the Communications Decency Act, which says certain Internet services are not liable for content created by a third party.
Here's a clue for you: pretending to be a dumbass is not a convincing argument.
The federal government is not allowed to compete with private industry. They can't set up a military base that builds ships.
You were wrong about sec 230, and you're wrong about government competition.The government competes with private industry all the time, numskull.
That didn't shut Parler down, you fucking imbecile.LOLOLYou mean like some are only silenced on Twitter or Facebook?Exchange of ideas like football players kneeling during the National Anthem? How did the right like that exchange of ideas?it’s not even about free markets. Free markets welcome the exchange of ideas, not censorship.
Democrats running around screaming free markets! Free markets! Just unbelievable. Literally, as if they care about free markets.
They are just cheering because it's working, Republicans are being silenced.
And dblack doesn't see a problem
with that said, facebook is free in a free society to publish the content they want...with that said they should therefore be treated the same as everyone else in that business
The football players were only silenced AT WORK. No one silenced them other than that. Or proposed it.
Be more specific about the political protests you do at work
And ... Parlor ... Who was shut down by Google, not even their competitor. It's a clear anti-trust violation.
But you're here because you support free markets!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sure, that's what you care about!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Parler was not shut down by Google. Who knows why you keep repeating that kaz?
MSN
www.msn.com
Asked and answered. It's not my problem you're incapable of understanding my answer.You poor kazzer, you're delusional. WTF does wearing red have anything to do with anything. As far as my employer, I keep my work separate from my politics.I think some folks didn't like it....what's your point? I am not seeing the connection here. Facebook is free to have requirements of their employees as well. Facebook employees can sue Facebook....just like Kap was free to sue the NFL.
what we however is talking about something different all together. We are talking about consumers being able to sue Facebook. Just like consumers are free to sue the New Yorker, or NY Times....why do you continue to think that Facebook should be immune, be treated differently and get better protections?
Faun screams Republicans suck at every other employee and customer who wears anything red. His boss is fine with that, right Faun?
That isn't an answer to the question.
Give examples of your political demonstrations you do at work. Go ...
This thread is about DeSantis' law, not you fantasizing about gay sex.I sure wasn't expecting you to be embarassed about posting your idiocies.So? Were you expecting a cookie?I posted the OP, jackass.Fucking moron, see if you can pay attention for more than a nanosecond.... this thread is about conservative victimhood.The Democrat party is the victim party, so why aren't you attacking Democrats?LOL
Now that's funny in a thread about how conservatives are victims.
Gotta agree with that since Faun's avatar is his Saturday night role play gay sex suit
CNN is a content producer. They are not cover. 230 covers the carriers (not common carriers) of content.I knew you were going to say that. They are entitled to rule 230 protection only if they are a common carrier. Do you imagine CNN is entitled to rule 230 protection?
Here's a clue for you: pretending to be a dumbass is not a convincing argument.
Asked and answered. It's not my problem you're incapable of understanding my answer.Asked and answered. It's not my problem you're incapable of understanding my answer.You poor kazzer, you're delusional. WTF does wearing red have anything to do with anything. As far as my employer, I keep my work separate from my politics.I think some folks didn't like it....what's your point? I am not seeing the connection here. Facebook is free to have requirements of their employees as well. Facebook employees can sue Facebook....just like Kap was free to sue the NFL.
what we however is talking about something different all together. We are talking about consumers being able to sue Facebook. Just like consumers are free to sue the New Yorker, or NY Times....why do you continue to think that Facebook should be immune, be treated differently and get better protections?
Faun screams Republicans suck at every other employee and customer who wears anything red. His boss is fine with that, right Faun?
That isn't an answer to the question.
Give examples of your political demonstrations you do at work. Go ...
Bull shit. You never answered it, liar.
Give examples of your political demonstrations you do at work. Go ...
