Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis To Sign Bill Banning Social Media ‘Deplatforming’

Facebook owns the site
They make the rules

If you can’t follow the rules, you get banned
Just like USMB

Except the rules only apply to those to the right of Mao.

Standard Disclaimer: Don't Taz Me Del is probably a mod for Facebook...
 
While I enjoy the predictable shrieks of outrage from the usual suspects when their sacred ox is gored, the government cannot legally compel nor prevent speech and this will fail. The same will happen to New York's attempt to both compel a photographer to post speech on her web site and prevent her from posting speech on her web site. Government simply must not be allowed to monkey with speech. This is an overreach.
Thank you hadit!

their legal approach should be regulators, breaking up monopo!ies, much like the AT&T monopoly was broken apart when we were all younger....

it probably should have been done a few years ago.

the lack of competition has hurt and slowed progress and protection for consumers and the monopoly has left people with no where to go, imho.

as example, facebook takes all of your info, personal info and likes and sells it to a gazillion advertisers and makes billions in profit.... Shouldn't the consumer be opt-out , and be given a choice to opt in.... to all of this tracking and ad bombardment, for a cut of Facebook's profits?

If there was real competition, another firm's social media platform, may offer that as an incentive to use their site over another's?
 
Why would anyone think that section 230 -- a liability shield that applies to the entire internet -- is really a Stalinist mandate allowing the government to force people to broadcast whatever Theparty demands? That makes no sense. It's just a liability shield.

:lol:

You're such a fucking moron.

230 does NOT apply to:

Fox.Com
CNN.com
NBC.COM
Newsmax.com
Towhall.com
ABC.com
NY Times.com

etc.

You really are dumb as dogshit. Perhaps one less quart of vodka each day would help you be more coherent? I mean, it couldn't hurt...
 
If you invite someone in, that does not remove your right to ask them to leave when you so choose.

Kind of like if you open a lunch counter and a black person walks in, you democrats have the "right" to make them leave?

You Nazis are up to your same old shit. Zero difference.
 
republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

I'm thinking youre a little confused how the 1st A works,,,
Nope. You are.
and yet you failed to explain why I'm wrong,,

the 1st is meant for the people not companies,,
your right wing supreme court ruled Corporations, are people....
that was a bad call on their part,, and you need to learn what right and left is in this country cause thats not rightwing
Agree, but I do know who is right wing on the supreme court! :)
 
If you invite someone in, that does not remove your right to ask them to leave when you so choose.

Kind of like if you open a lunch counter and a black person walks in, you democrats have the "right" to make them leave?

You Nazis are up to your same old shit. Zero difference.
It is exactly the same principle. And this is why libertarians* have traditionally opposed the "protected classes/public accommodations" approach to civil rights.

*libertarian - words mean what people mean when they use them. If you think "libertarian" in any way, even remotely, characterizes Trump or his moron throng - then I am NOT a "libertarian".
 
republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

I'm thinking youre a little confused how the 1st A works,,,
Nope. You are.
and yet you failed to explain why I'm wrong,,

the 1st is meant for the people not companies,,
You are dumber than dirt. And wrong.
 
So many Trump cult First Amendment haters here. They really do all think that the government has the right to force anyone to say whatever TheParty wants them to say.

Stalin would be so proud of the Trump cultists here.

They're "libertarians"! Didn't you get the memo?
Hey, are we going to live by campaign finance laws or not?

Most of them are statist nonsense. Certainly not "libertarian".

FB wants to act like a publisher with the protections of a provider. Fuck that shit.

Just fucking repeal 230 and stop using it as an excuse for heavy handed government mandates.



If the owners of a website are going to become legally liable for what their members post on their board, the owners will heavily censor the content on their sites to not be sued.

If anyone actually believes that the owners of a website are going to take a risk of being sued because of what someone else posts on their website, I've got some beautiful ocean beach front property in Colorado to sell you.

In fact, repealing 230, can get the owners of US Message Board sued. With all the posts of veiled threats to kill people, all the verbal abuse and threats, the owners of this website will be liable for that and can be sued.

If people think that censorship is bad now, repealing 230 will make it much worse.
 
republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

I'm thinking youre a little confused how the 1st A works,,,
Nope. You are.
and yet you failed to explain why I'm wrong,,

the 1st is meant for the people not companies,,
You are dumber than dirt. And wrong.
you may want to defend big corps. but I wont,,
 
So many Trump cult First Amendment haters here. They really do all think that the government has the right to force anyone to say whatever TheParty wants them to say.

Stalin would be so proud of the Trump cultists here.

They're "libertarians"! Didn't you get the memo?
Hey, are we going to live by campaign finance laws or not?

Most of them are statist nonsense. Certainly not "libertarian".

FB wants to act like a publisher with the protections of a provider. Fuck that shit.

Just fucking repeal 230 and stop using it as an excuse for heavy handed government mandates.



If the owners of a website are going to become legally liable for what their members post on their board, the owners will heavily censor the content on their sites to not be sued.

If anyone actually believes that the owners of a website are going to take a risk of being sued because of what someone else posts on their website, I've got some beautiful ocean beach front property in Colorado to sell you.

If people think that censorship is bad now, repealing 230 will make it much worse.
its not censorship if theyre a publisher,,,
 
It is exactly the same principle. And this is why libertarians* have traditionally opposed the "protected classes/public accommodations" approach to civil rights.

*libertarian - words mean what people mean when they use them. If you think "libertarian" in any way, even remotely, characterizes Trump or his moron throng - then I am NOT a "libertarian".

When I use "libertarian" I mean it in the way Murray Rothbard and Harry Browne did.

As opposed to your Kim Jong Il version....

Of course the issue is you only oppose PA laws when applied to the Reich - otherwise you fully support them.
 
republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

I'm thinking youre a little confused how the 1st A works,,,
Nope. You are.
and yet you failed to explain why I'm wrong,,

the 1st is meant for the people not companies,,
You are dumber than dirt. And wrong.
you may want to defend big corps. but I wont,,
That is literally the opposite of my point. Congratulations. You're a fucking superstar. I don't know why I bother with you dip shits...
 
republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

I'm thinking youre a little confused how the 1st A works,,,
Nope. You are.
and yet you failed to explain why I'm wrong,,

the 1st is meant for the people not companies,,
You are dumber than dirt. And wrong.
you may want to defend big corps. but I wont,,
That is literally the opposite of my point. Congratulations. You're a fucking superstar. I don't know why I bother with you dip shits...
its what youre doing,,
 

Forum List

Back
Top