Pop23
Gold Member
- Mar 28, 2013
- 26,685
- 4,383
Perhaps outlawing murder inducing prescription Meds is better than outlawing guns
Legalize pot and you end the opioid epidemic overnight.
^^^^^ Trying to save face. Cute
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Perhaps outlawing murder inducing prescription Meds is better than outlawing guns
Legalize pot and you end the opioid epidemic overnight.
You talk miles of bullshit without anything to back it up, fuck off, Mr. WolfTickets.
A) prove that 230K guns are stolen in the US every year.
Here's a link that says different:GUN WATCH: How Many Guns are Stolen and Destroyed each Year?
Perhaps outlawing murder inducing prescription Meds is better than outlawing guns
Legalize pot and you end the opioid epidemic overnight.
Overwhelmed? No
but as the numbers have gone up so too has the violent crime rate, and the gun crime rate, in spite of every law you all fantasize about, has skyrocketed.
Wrong, I responded to what Prohibition did
I din't take the discussion in that direction.
No, they get the guns from Venezuela.
This is well known
Why spend hundreds to thousands of dollars for a rifle from the US, when you can buy a fully automatic machine gun from Venezuela for a third the price?
Legalize ALL drugs and turn it into a medical problem instead of a legal problem and you end most violent crime as well..
Far better, and cheaper for society, and the people who want help can actually get it. It ends the prison/industrial complex as well. Win/win.
Wrong, I responded to what Prohibition did
Which was a non-sequitur because alcohol is something you consume, whereas guns are something you use to kill and/or maim.
So that's why bringing up Prohibition was a non-sequitur, whatabout, and distraction all rolled into one giant ball of shit.
I din't take the discussion in that direction.
Yes you did! That's exactly what you did. You tried to whatabout with Prohibition and because you assume everyone is just as lazy as you, didn't expect me to say that alcohol is a consumable and guns aren't.
No, they get the guns from Venezuela.
NO THEY FUCKING DON'T.
They get guns from the US...that's what Fast & Furious was all about and why Bush the Dumber started the program. Mexican cartels end up with US-made weapons. From where do US-made weapons come? From the US. Venezuela is at war with drug cartels in its own borders, why would they arm and supply Mexican Cartels? You make no sense.
This is well known
And that's usually red flag #1 that you're making shit up; you say it's "well known" which is right-wing code for "I just made that up".
Why spend hundreds to thousands of dollars for a rifle from the US, when you can buy a fully automatic machine gun from Venezuela for a third the price?
1. Venezuela isn't selling guns as a retailer in Mexico
2. You're gonna need to prove this assertion because it sounds made up
3. Our own ATF and DOJ say that American guns end up in the hands of cartels...from that link: More than 70,000 guns recovered from crime scenes in Mexico between 2009 and 2014 could be traced back to the United States, according to a new report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office. That represents 70 percent of all crime guns recovered and traced in Mexico during that period.
but we get five kids for months? hahahaahahahahaha thanks for your hypocrisy75 kids for 20 minutes
Overwhelmed? No
You wouldn't know that listening to your fellow Nazis in Europe talk about the immigrants.
but as the numbers have gone up so too has the violent crime rate, and the gun crime rate, in spite of every law you all fantasize about, has skyrocketed.
Yeah, poverty usually brings a crime component with it.
Fast and Furious was the only way those expensive weapons could get to Mexico, the American taxpayer PAID for them.
hey also claim that 200,000 some odd weapons are trafficked from the US, but provide no evidence to support that claim. There is no doubt that weapons are trafficked to Mexico, from the USA. But that number, based on observed data, is much lower than the claim.
No, it's their culture. They resort of violence far more than First World people do. It is as simple as that.
Overwhelmed? No
You wouldn't know that listening to your fellow Nazis in Europe talk about the immigrants.
but as the numbers have gone up so too has the violent crime rate, and the gun crime rate, in spite of every law you all fantasize about, has skyrocketed.
Yeah, poverty usually brings a crime component with it.
Fast and Furious was the only way those expensive weapons could get to Mexico, the American taxpayer PAID for them.
OMG...no you fool...those guns were getting into Mexico prior to the program. The entire point of the program was to find out how. Wow. Imagine how damaged your brain must be to think that no guns were getting into Mexico prior to F&F and that Venezuela (!) was the one supplying them.
Secondly, we've learned that 70% of all guns used in crimes in Mexico are traced back to the USA...so much for your Venezuela conspiracy theory.
hey also claim that 200,000 some odd weapons are trafficked from the US, but provide no evidence to support that claim. There is no doubt that weapons are trafficked to Mexico, from the USA. But that number, based on observed data, is much lower than the claim.
Well, considering that the GAO said 70,000 guns were recovered from crime scenes in Mexico that were traced back to the US, the 200,000 number isn't that hard to believe. 70% of all gun crimes in Mexico are done with US-made weapons. That's what the Government Accountability Office said in the article I linked.
No, it's their culture. They resort of violence far more than First World people do. It is as simple as that.
They resort to violence just as much as poor people do in Western countries. Crime and poverty are intrinsically linked.
For all the uproar, there have been how many school shootings involving teens? Three in ten years? Quite rare, I'd say.I understand where you're coming from now, Pop. It is absolutely true that those drugs can have side effects including suicidal/homicidal just-plain-nuts behavior. I saw it happen a couple of times to teen clients that had been switched to one of those anti depressants from the recommended one due to cost (Medicaid didn't want to pay for it). Every psychiatrist who has spoken about school shootings references the common denominator of depresssion; that's no secret and everyone is aware of it. Suicide and homicide are two sides of the same coin. I don't necessarily think the meds alone are the cause, though. The meds are present, if they are present, in an attempt to address the depression or behavior (trauma often manifests as ADHD) and it didn't work. When someone dies of cancer, they have chemo in their system, but the chemo didn't cause the death. You see what I mean?I'm not sure where this theory is coming from. I've known plenty of teens and young adults on ADHD and antidepressant medication and they weren't homicidal at all. Sometimes doctors attempt to medicate severe behavior problems that should probably be institutionalized for awhile, and maybe that makes it seem that people on medication go nuts. But I think it's more likely that the "nuts" just won out in those cases.Yeah, it's a good thing the once of us that were horribly bullied, were also NOT on antidepressants and/or ADHA medications. Hell, there might not be a single person left.
Better Apocalypse through pharmaceuticals is what I say!
No ones making it up:
Antidepressants Are a Prescription for Mass Shootings – Citizens Commission on Human Rights, CCHR
From the link:
Subsequently, mass shootings and other violent incidents started to be reported. More often than not, the common denominator was that the shooters were on an antidepressant, or withdrawing from one. This is not about an isolated incident or two but numerous shootings. The question is, during the past twenty years is the use of antidepressants here a coincidence or a causation?
There have been too many mass shootings for it just to be a coincidence. Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold killed twelve students and a teacher at Columbine High School. Eric was on Luvox, an antidepressant. The Virginia Tech shooter killed thirty-two people and he was on an antidepressant. While withdrawing from Prozac, Kip Kinkel murdered his mother and stepmother. He then shot twenty-two classmates and killed two. Jason Hoffman wounded five at his high school while he was on Effexor, also an antidepressant. James Holmes opened fire in a Colorado movie theater this past summer and killed twelve people and wounded fifty-eight. He was under the care of a psychiatrist but no information has been released as to what drug he must have been on.
Psychiatrists generally will tell you that these people were mentally ill and they weren’t treated in time or didn’t get enough help to prevent the tragedy. However, Dr. Peter Breggin, who is a psychiatrist, stated that depression rarely leads to violence and that it’s only since the SSRI’s came on the market that such mass shootings have taken place.
In a study of thirty-one drugs that are disproportionately linked to reports of violence toward others, five of the top ten are antidepressants. These are Prozac, Paxil, Luvox, Effexor and Pristiq. Two other drugs that are for treating ADHD are also in the top ten which means these are being given to children who could then become violent. One could conclude from this study alone that antidepressants cause both suicidal thoughts and violent behavior. This is a prescription for mass shootings.
No one can talk their way out of explaining how a person who is previously non-violent and given antidepressants suddenly becomes violent or suicidal. There are multiple cases of children who have committed suicide days after starting to take an antidepressant. In a YouTube video, various parents tell their story about what the antidepressants did to their kids.
My Son came to live with us when he was 15. He was on ADHA meds and was a complete basket case. Angry was not even close to the word anyone would use. Our Doctor weened him from them and within months he became a model young man.
I actually could have seen him go off half cocked one day. If he had been bullied during that time, all bets would have been off.
If Cruz, Lanza and the Columbine shooters were on meds, please link to that.
Yet, per the link, depression rarely causes violence. I think when you medicate a young, not fully developed brain, and that brain is affixed to someone undergoing years of bullying, you then have a recipe for murder.
Were Cruz, Lanza and the Columbine shooters on meds or coming off meds?
We have always known how. The supposed "idea was to track the guns. The problem being there was no effort to actually track the guns from point of source to cartel. .
There was no attempt at a chain of evidence. It was a farce. it was merely an effort to flood the cartels with US weapons so that the obummer admin could scream "we have to ban guns in america so that the mexicans won't get killed by them".
Fast and Furious was the only way those expensive weapons could get to Mexico, the American taxpayer PAID for them.
OMG...no you fool...those guns were getting into Mexico prior to the program. The entire point of the program was to find out how. Wow. Imagine how damaged your brain must be to think that no guns were getting into Mexico prior to F&F and that Venezuela (!) was the one supplying them.
Secondly, we've learned that 70% of all guns used in crimes in Mexico are traced back to the USA...so much for your Venezuela conspiracy theory.
hey also claim that 200,000 some odd weapons are trafficked from the US, but provide no evidence to support that claim. There is no doubt that weapons are trafficked to Mexico, from the USA. But that number, based on observed data, is much lower than the claim.
Well, considering that the GAO said 70,000 guns were recovered from crime scenes in Mexico that were traced back to the US, the 200,000 number isn't that hard to believe. 70% of all gun crimes in Mexico are done with US-made weapons. That's what the Government Accountability Office said in the article I linked.
Not even close dude. Not even close. Latin America has 9% of the worlds population but is responsible for 27% of the worlds murders. That is culture dude, and nothing more.
We have always known how. The supposed "idea was to track the guns. The problem being there was no effort to actually track the guns from point of source to cartel. .
I'm not saying it was a good plan, just that it was a plan. It was enough of a problem that they tried to figure out how it was happening. You can disagree with the tactics, but the goal was to figure out how US guns end up in Mexican cartels, and there's really no better way to figure that out than by trying to trace guns on their way there. If you have a better idea, I'd love to hear it.
There was no attempt at a chain of evidence. It was a farce. it was merely an effort to flood the cartels with US weapons so that the obummer admin could scream "we have to ban guns in america so that the mexicans won't get killed by them".
Will you stop with these whackadoo conspiracy theories. Firstly, the program started with Bush the Dumber, not Obama. Secondly, you may disagree with the tactics, but the goal was to find out how US guns end up in Mexican cartels.
Not even close dude. Not even close. Latin America has 9% of the worlds population but is responsible for 27% of the worlds murders. That is culture dude, and nothing more.
No, it's because of the steady supply of US guns that get into the region.