Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,100
3) The article makes no mention if the woman qualifies for a federal subsidy which will pay for most, if not all, of her new policy. The video DOES say she is eligible for subsidies. So she may end up actually paying LESS for her insurance. And she will have a better policy than her old one..
Enough of this BS... A Single person age 40 making $35,000 or more a year gets a tax credit of $0.00
A Married couple making more than $61,000 per year does not qualify for for a tax credit either.
So again the working middle class is screwed not to mention there appears to be a marriage penalty associated with the tax credit but that is normal for the Dem to penalize those that are married.
Figure out your own tax credit here:
Subsidy Calculator | The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation
According to your link, a single mother of 2 children who earns $35,000 would have a $5,739 annual premium and would receive a $3,220 subsidy. This works out to her share being $209 a month.
A couple earning $61,000 a year with 2 children would have a $8,267 annual premium, with a $3,197 subsidy. That works out to $422.50 a month.
Median household income is about $50,000.
Both of those policies are far, far cheaper than what an employer would be paying for health insurance for those two families.
Stop with your dipshit thinking.
The cost of those policies does not change just because there are subsidies attached, all that changes is who pays the cost.