Flynn Admitted to Lying Under Oath

[colfax_m]

You have a law degree?
Do yourself a favor and go read the link-

Guilty Pleas – Post-Sentencing Plea Withdrawal: Suppression of Material Exculpatory Impeachment Evidence – Statutory Basis

State v. Kevin Harris, 2004 WI 64, affirming as modified 2003 WI App 144, 266 Wis. 2d 200, 667 N.W.2d 813 For Harris: Steven A. Koch Issue/Holding: ¶34 We recognize that in the constitutional context, the Brady requirement of materiality is dependent upon whether the suppressed evidence...

www.wisconsinappeals.net

They have no statutory or constitutional obligation before a guilty plea to turn over discovery that helps the defendant (“exculpatory evidence”),
Structuring Pre-Plea Criminal Discovery - Northwestern ...
scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu › viewcontent

scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu › viewcontent
PDF

Brady Rule

The Brady Rule, named after Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), requires prosecutors to disclose materially exculpatory evidence in the government's possession to the defense. A "Brady material" or evidence the prosecutor is required to disclose under this rule includes any evidence favorable to the accused--evidence that goes towards negating a defendant's guilt, that would reduce a defendant's potential sentence, or evidence going to the credibility of a witness.

If the prosecution does not disclose material exculpatory evidence under this rule, and prejudice has ensued, the evidence will be suppressed. The evidence will be suppressed regardless of whether the prosecutor knew the evidence was in his or her possession, or whether or not the prosecutor intentionally or inadvertently withheld the evidence from the defense.

Further, in cases subsequent to Brady, the Supreme Court has eliminated the requirement for a defendant to have requested a favorable information, stating that the Prosecution has a constitutional duty to disclose, that is triggered by the potential impact of favorable but undisclosed evidence See Kyles v. Whitley 514 U.S. 419, 434 (1955); United States. v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985).

Brady rule

www.law.cornell.edu

What’s funny is Sullivan had told the prosecutors if they had any exculpatory evidence they needed to turn it over. They didn’t.
Mueller prosecutor withdraws from Flynn case after ...
Mueller prosecutor withdraws from Flynn case after questions surface concerning his compliance with court order
Van Grack has long informed Sullivan that the government's so-called "Brady" obligations, referring to prosecutors' duty to turn over exculpatory materials to defendants, have been met.

There’s been no hearing or ruling that has held the Brady rule was violated. Furthermore, the Trump hack that took the reigns from the prosecutors who had worked the case for years doesn’t even allege that’s the case.

 

[Oddball]

Hey....Guess what, moonbat freaks and deep state ass swabs.....

 

[lantern2814]

President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.

Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.

These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.

So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.

Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.

They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.

There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.

President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.

Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.

These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.

So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.

Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.

They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.

There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.

_______
"General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury..."

Your disqualifying ignorance on the matter is shown by your statement highlighted above.

This post is pure TDS. No facts, just rabid hate driving you to the point of psychopathology.

Get Help.

You're right, he wasn't convicted by a jury - he went ahead and plead guilty. Twice.

Your automated Trump Defense Syndrome is duly noted.

And your complete lack of honesty, integrity, and any sort of actual knowledge of the event being discussed are duly noted. Then again I’ve proven you a lying ignorant bitch multiple times. Now to slap you again. Coerced confessions aren’t valid. You lose. Again.

Coerced confessions aren’t valid. No one coerced Flynn.

Another ignorant lib. They threatened his son. That’s called coercion. Try learning something.

 

[excalibur]

He pled that he lied to agents, that is not lying under oath (perjury).

It’s extremely similar.

Not.

 

[colfax_m]

President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.

Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.

These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.

So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.

Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.

They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.

There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.

President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.

Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.

These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.

So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.

Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.

They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.

There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.

_______
"General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury..."

Your disqualifying ignorance on the matter is shown by your statement highlighted above.

This post is pure TDS. No facts, just rabid hate driving you to the point of psychopathology.

Get Help.

You're right, he wasn't convicted by a jury - he went ahead and plead guilty. Twice.

Your automated Trump Defense Syndrome is duly noted.

And your complete lack of honesty, integrity, and any sort of actual knowledge of the event being discussed are duly noted. Then again I’ve proven you a lying ignorant bitch multiple times. Now to slap you again. Coerced confessions aren’t valid. You lose. Again.

Coerced confessions aren’t valid. No one coerced Flynn.

Remember this little ditty from 2017?

"With Special Counsel Robert Mueller expected to indict both Michael T. Flynn, President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser, and Flynn’s son, Michael G. Flynn, in connection with the investigation into Russia’s intervention in the 2016 election, speculation is mounting as to whether the elder Flynn will plead guilty to help his son, and in the process help himself. The elder Flynn’s lawyers recently stopped communicating with the President’s legal defense team, which some interpret as Flynn preparing to cooperate with Mueller. While Flynn certainly is focused on his own potential liability, that his son is a “subject” of the investigation places the elder Flynn in the difficult position of cooperating and accepting criminal culpability, rather than fight, in order possibly to prevent his son from being prosecuted."

Will Michael Flynn Plead Guilty And Cooperate To Protect His Son?

With Michael T. Flynn facing possible indictment, Special Counsel Mueller likely is using the threat of also prosecuting Flynn’s son for leverage. This Wall Street prosecution tested tactic from Enron and Drexel may result in a guilty plea, with the question cooperation against whom.

www.forbes.com

And let's be clear, this was that puke Andrew Weisman.....And like the dishonest piece of shit he is, this threat of his won't stand, and the whole house of cards you Democrats put this country through will crash down....If there is any Justice, then the whole lot of you dishonest shitheads will never be elected again to a major office.

Flynn should feel ashamed that he drug his son into his corrupt little lobbying business. It’s his fault that they faced legal ramifications for their shitty schemes. I don’t feel bad for them. Not one bit. Why should I? They made their bed.

There is no justice. Not when friends of Trump are treated differently than anyone else. You think the FBI would go easy on you for lying to them? Hell no. But they’ll go easy on Flynn because that’s what the corrupt boss wants.

Don’t you dare pretend to care about justice. That ship sailed a long time ago when you elected Trump.

 

[colfax_m]

President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.

Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.

These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.

So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.

Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.

They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.

There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.

President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.

Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.

These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.

So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.

Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.

They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.

There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.

_______
"General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury..."

Your disqualifying ignorance on the matter is shown by your statement highlighted above.

This post is pure TDS. No facts, just rabid hate driving you to the point of psychopathology.

Get Help.

You're right, he wasn't convicted by a jury - he went ahead and plead guilty. Twice.

Your automated Trump Defense Syndrome is duly noted.

And your complete lack of honesty, integrity, and any sort of actual knowledge of the event being discussed are duly noted. Then again I’ve proven you a lying ignorant bitch multiple times. Now to slap you again. Coerced confessions aren’t valid. You lose. Again.

Coerced confessions aren’t valid. No one coerced Flynn.

Another ignorant lib. They threatened his son. That’s called coercion. Try learning something.

What did they threaten him with?

 

[excalibur]

He pled that he lied to agents, that is not lying under oath (perjury).

It's a felony to lie to FBI agents. No one has to be under oath.

Learn the law.

I made no such statement, learn how to read.

I simply pointed out that Flynn was not accused nor pled to perjury, that he pled to lying to agents.

Dismissed!

 

[Dr Grump]

Barr will intercede any day now and remove him from the case same as he did the corrupt prosecutor.

Yeah, who needs a DOJ? USSC for that matter. Just let Barr be the sole arbiter of everything.

 

[colfax_m]

He pled that he lied to agents, that is not lying under oath (perjury).

It’s extremely similar.

Not.

Go on. Tell me all about the differences.

 

[excalibur]

He pled that he lied to agents, that is not lying under oath (perjury).

It’s extremely similar.

Technically it's a violation of 18 USC 1001, false information in an official government matter.

If you lie to a federal agent and are convicted for a violation of 18 U.S. C. § 1001, you can be fined and sentenced to federal prison for up to five years

And? What I said is factual. He was not charged with perjury nor pled to perjury.

 

[excalibur]

He pled that he lied to agents, that is not lying under oath (perjury).

It’s extremely similar.

Not.

Go on. Tell me all about the differences.

LOL

Different statutes, different proofs needed.

Stay safe!

 

[Dr Grump]

that he pled to lying to agents.

And that's all that matters.

 

[excalibur]

He pled that he lied to agents, that is not lying under oath (perjury).

It's a felony to lie to FBI agents. No one has to be under oath.

Learn the law.

You know Flynn was a lifelong Democrat don't you? Why the hard on to destroy the man?

Whatever that means.

We know Øbama hated Flynn.

 

[colfax_m]

He pled that he lied to agents, that is not lying under oath (perjury).

It’s extremely similar.

Not.

Go on. Tell me all about the differences.

LOL

Different statutes, different proofs needed.

Stay safe!

Different statutes sure. What’s different about the proofs?

 

[Dr Grump]

Give it up.
You guys are beneath the lowest scum I've ever known.

That must be pretty low then. Because if you support Trump, you are literally surrounded by scum. On a daily basis.

 

[WillPower]

It's a felony to lie to FBI agents. No one has to be under oath.

Learn the law.

Bullshit...you can tell them you murdered your wife with a smile and before you're Mirandized, they can't do shit.....Flynn was never advised of his rights....."anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law". If he had been, those two stooges from the FBI would have gone out that door a lot faster than they came in.

YOU learn the law, fool.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

It's over and the left loons look ridiculous...again.

Now turn the tables and go after the conspirators

 

[lantern2814]

President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.

Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.

These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.

So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.

Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.

They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.

There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.

President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.

Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.

These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.

So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.

Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.

They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.

There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.

_______
"General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury..."

Your disqualifying ignorance on the matter is shown by your statement highlighted above.

This post is pure TDS. No facts, just rabid hate driving you to the point of psychopathology.

Get Help.

You're right, he wasn't convicted by a jury - he went ahead and plead guilty. Twice.

Your automated Trump Defense Syndrome is duly noted.

And your complete lack of honesty, integrity, and any sort of actual knowledge of the event being discussed are duly noted. Then again I’ve proven you a lying ignorant bitch multiple times. Now to slap you again. Coerced confessions aren’t valid. You lose. Again.

Coerced confessions aren’t valid. No one coerced Flynn.

Another ignorant lib. They threatened his son. That’s called coercion. Try learning something.

What did they threaten him with?

My God, you truly are this fucking stupid. Mueller and company threatened Flynn’s son with bogus additional charges existing only in Mueller’s dementia. Things he gave IMMUNITY to the Podesta boys for. Your utter idiocy is appalling.

 

[Dr Grump]

It's over and the left loons look ridiculous...again.

Now turn the tables and go after the conspirators

Are you saying Flynn was such a piss weak general person that he folded like a broken deck chair when the FBI questioned him??

 

[colfax_m]

It's a felony to lie to FBI agents. No one has to be under oath.

Learn the law.

Bullshit...you can tell them you murdered your wife with a smile and before you're Mirandized, they can't do shit.....Flynn was never advised of his rights....."anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law". If he had been, those two stooges from the FBI would have gone out that door a lot faster than they came in.

YOU learn the law, fool.

Please never give legal advice to anyone. You’re going to get someone hurt.