Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And your complete lack of honesty, integrity, and any sort of actual knowledge of the event being discussed are duly noted. Then again I’ve proven you a lying ignorant bitch multiple times. Now to slap you again. Coerced confessions aren’t valid. You lose. Again.You're right, he wasn't convicted by a jury - he went ahead and plead guilty. Twice.President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.
They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia._______President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.
They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.
"General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury..."
Your disqualifying ignorance on the matter is shown by your statement highlighted above.
This post is pure TDS. No facts, just rabid hate driving you to the point of psychopathology.
Get Help.
Your automated Trump Defense Syndrome is duly noted.
Sidney Powell did nothing but make a fool of herself and get slapped down by the judge after filing ridiculous motions.If he got the best deal possible, how is it that Sidney Powell got him a better one?...DUUUUUH!They were going to get Flynn the best deal possible. In fact, they were going to get Flynn out of any jail time.If they had done what they were paid to do, Flynn wouldn't have been in this mess and needed to fire them.....DUUUUH!His defense team was doing exactly what they’re paid to do. No one would have predicted that Trump would have been able to get a corrupt prosecutor put in place to drop the charges.Oh fuck me running....You're not a co-conspirator when you're the one being railroaded by your own supposed "defense" team.He has a very convincing case for legal malpractice by his original "defense" team who conned him to copping the plea.
Actually that would be a huge kettle of fish to make that allegation.
Then they committed a fucking felony....They can be added to the list of defendants, when Flynn files all the suits against the goons who violated his civil and constitutional rights.
Felonies that Flynn was a co-conspirator in.
If Flynn lied because his lawyers convinced him to, then he conspired with his lawyers to perjure himself. That's three more felonies than he was originally charged with.
You're just making this shit up as you go, aren't ya?
Fuck my life.
So Flynn shouldn’t have said the first lie. Cry me a river.
Flynn lost his job for telling Pence the first lie. He faced going to jail for telling the same lie to the FBI.
You have a law degree?
Do yourself a favor and go read the link-
Guilty Pleas – Post-Sentencing Plea Withdrawal: Suppression of Material Exculpatory Impeachment Evidence – Statutory Basis
State v. Kevin Harris, 2004 WI 64, affirming as modified 2003 WI App 144, 266 Wis. 2d 200, 667 N.W.2d 813 For Harris: Steven A. Koch Issue/Holding: ¶34 We recognize that in the constitutional context, the Brady requirement of materiality is dependent upon whether the suppressed evidence...www.wisconsinappeals.net
You really are dumber than a goddamn bag of hammers.Sidney Powell did nothing but make a fool of herself and get slapped down by the judge after filing ridiculous motions.If he got the best deal possible, how is it that Sidney Powell got him a better one?...DUUUUUH!They were going to get Flynn the best deal possible. In fact, they were going to get Flynn out of any jail time.If they had done what they were paid to do, Flynn wouldn't have been in this mess and needed to fire them.....DUUUUH!His defense team was doing exactly what they’re paid to do. No one would have predicted that Trump would have been able to get a corrupt prosecutor put in place to drop the charges.Oh fuck me running....You're not a co-conspirator when you're the one being railroaded by your own supposed "defense" team.He has a very convincing case for legal malpractice by his original "defense" team who conned him to copping the plea.
Actually that would be a huge kettle of fish to make that allegation.
Then they committed a fucking felony....They can be added to the list of defendants, when Flynn files all the suits against the goons who violated his civil and constitutional rights.
Felonies that Flynn was a co-conspirator in.
If Flynn lied because his lawyers convinced him to, then he conspired with his lawyers to perjure himself. That's three more felonies than he was originally charged with.
You're just making this shit up as you go, aren't ya?
Fuck my life.
Flynn got charges dropped because Billy Barr made it happen.
What’s wrong with unmasking Flynn’s name in his conversations with Kislyak?President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.
They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.
Being made public now, that Biden was the person who "unmasked" Flynn....There's your nominee....Corrupt asshole.
Coerced confessions aren’t valid. No one coerced Flynn.And your complete lack of honesty, integrity, and any sort of actual knowledge of the event being discussed are duly noted. Then again I’ve proven you a lying ignorant bitch multiple times. Now to slap you again. Coerced confessions aren’t valid. You lose. Again.You're right, he wasn't convicted by a jury - he went ahead and plead guilty. Twice.President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.
They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia._______President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.
They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.
"General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury..."
Your disqualifying ignorance on the matter is shown by your statement highlighted above.
This post is pure TDS. No facts, just rabid hate driving you to the point of psychopathology.
Get Help.
Your automated Trump Defense Syndrome is duly noted.
What’s wrong with unmasking Flynn’s name in his conversations with Kislyak?President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.
They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.
Being made public now, that Biden was the person who "unmasked" Flynn....There's your nominee....Corrupt asshole.
Wow...Really? You people are sick.
False statements and perjury have basically the same elements, just in a different venue. They have identical penalties.
So, when was the plea accepted? ‘Splain that?Flynn has not been sentenced. The judge cannot have accepted his plea bargain if he has not been sentenced. What part of that do you not get?From your OWN FUCKING LINK:No, all of them should be able to change their plea before sentencing, and they routinely ARE allow to do so. This is not just about Flynn.Only for those defendants who want to change their plea, like Flynn.Then you need to throw out every single guilty plea don't you?
.
Ok so they should all be allowed to just change their plea.
After pleading twice.
Or just Flynn?
Government cannot abuse citizens and coerce them into guilty pleas, then point to the plea as evidence of guilt. That is completely asinine.
.
No. They are not routinely allowed to do so.
Judges allow defendants to withdraw guilty pleas only in limited situations.
Withdrawing a Guilty Plea
Judges allow defendants to withdraw guilty pleas in only limited situations.www.nolo.com
Pre-Sentence Withdrawal
A defendant can typically withdraw a guilty plea that a judge hasn’t yet accepted. Also, defendants who have pleaded but not yet been sentenced can sometimes get out of their deals, particularly when the judge rejects the negotiated agreement pursuant to which the defendant pleaded. (The prosecution can sometimes back out of a deal, too.)
For example, if Clay pleads guilty to bribery in exchange for the prosecution’s agreement to a three-years-or-less sentence, but the judge indicates an intention to sentence him to five years, he can probably withdraw the plea.
You are better than this. Quit letting your Trump hatred blind you.
.
Oh. And let's actually look at what you quoted (but maybe didn't actually read?) and put it in terms of Flynn's case (tone down your automatic Trump Defense System please).
First: Did the Judge accept Flynn's guilty plea?
Second: did you take note of certain terms - "sometimes" and "when the judge rejects the negotiated agreement pursuant to which the defendant pleaded"
.
That part about it not being accepted until he is sentenced.
How Judges Accept and Reject Plea Deals
The lawyers agreeing to a deal isn't the end of the story: Judges have to stamp plea agreements.
A plea bargain (or plea deal) occurs when the prosecution and defense negotiate and agree upon the appropriate resolution of a criminal case. There are several types of plea bargain (see What are the different kinds of plea bargaining?), but no agreement is binding until the parties present it to a judge who approves it.
Presenting the Plea to the Judge
To evaluate a proposed plea bargain, the judge must know all the terms of the deal, including any future conditions or unusual aspects. For example, if Donnie Defendant is offered a lighter sentence in return for future testimony against a codefendant, the parties must make this condition clear to the judge when presenting the terms of the plea. Similarly, the parties would have to inform the judge if there is anything unusual in how he is to complete his sentence—for example, if the terms of the plea require him to perform 600 hours of community service, but only on weekends.
Judicial Discretion in Evaluating Plea Deals
A judge has discretion to decide whether to accept or reject a plea agreement. To make that decision, the judge evaluates whether the punishment is appropriate in light of the seriousness of the charges, the defendant’s character, and the defendant’s prior criminal record.
Other factors to consider include:
Deciding on the Plea
- the underlying facts of the case (or factual basis for the plea)
- the interests of the victim (although a court can accept or reject a plea agreement without the victim’s approval), and
- the interests of the general public.
While plea procedure varies from judge to judge and jurisdiction to jurisdiction, judges must always decide whether to accept the plea terms before the defendant actually enters the plea.
When judges decide on a proposed plea bargain, they may be able to
In some jurisdictions, if the prosecution and the defendant agree to a sentence and the judge accepts the negotiated plea, that judge must accept the entire agreement, including the agreed-upon sentence. In other jurisdictions, even when accepting a plea agreement, the judge isn't required to accept the sentencing recommendation. Some jurisdictions require that the accused be given the opportunity to withdraw the plea if the judge doesn’t follow the sentencing recommendation. (See Withdrawing a Guilty Plea.)
- accept the terms of the plea agreement
- reject the terms of the agreement
- defer the decision until considering the presentence report
- accept the plea agreement on certain terms, but reject the negotiated sentence (called a partially negotiated plea in some jurisdictions), or
- suggest that the defendant plead without a negotiated agreement (if, for example, the judge is inclined to give a lighter sentence than the plea deal calls for).
When judges refuse a proposed plea bargain, they must follow their jurisdiction’s procedure, which usually requires that they identify on the record the reasons for not accepting the deal.
If the Judge Accepts the Plea
Once the judge accepts the defendant’s guilty or no contest plea and enters a conviction, that judge can’t later overturn the plea agreement. However, when the parties agree upon a negotiated plea that requires that the defendant perform certain conditions, the court retains jurisdiction until the conditions are satisfied. If the defendant doesn’t satisfy the conditions, the judge can reject the plea and resentence the defendant. An example is a defendant who, in order to receive community service instead of jail time, agreed to but failed to complete the assigned service.
You have a law degree?
Do yourself a favor and go read the link-
Guilty Pleas – Post-Sentencing Plea Withdrawal: Suppression of Material Exculpatory Impeachment Evidence – Statutory Basis
State v. Kevin Harris, 2004 WI 64, affirming as modified 2003 WI App 144, 266 Wis. 2d 200, 667 N.W.2d 813 For Harris: Steven A. Koch Issue/Holding: ¶34 We recognize that in the constitutional context, the Brady requirement of materiality is dependent upon whether the suppressed evidence...
They have no statutory or constitutional obligation before a guilty plea to turn over discovery that helps the defendant (“exculpatory evidence”),
Structuring Pre-Plea Criminal Discovery - Northwestern ...
scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu › viewcontent
scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu › viewcontent
Not my fault you don’t know what you’re talking about.You really are dumber than a goddamn bag of hammers.Sidney Powell did nothing but make a fool of herself and get slapped down by the judge after filing ridiculous motions.If he got the best deal possible, how is it that Sidney Powell got him a better one?...DUUUUUH!They were going to get Flynn the best deal possible. In fact, they were going to get Flynn out of any jail time.If they had done what they were paid to do, Flynn wouldn't have been in this mess and needed to fire them.....DUUUUH!His defense team was doing exactly what they’re paid to do. No one would have predicted that Trump would have been able to get a corrupt prosecutor put in place to drop the charges.Oh fuck me running....You're not a co-conspirator when you're the one being railroaded by your own supposed "defense" team.He has a very convincing case for legal malpractice by his original "defense" team who conned him to copping the plea.
Actually that would be a huge kettle of fish to make that allegation.
Then they committed a fucking felony....They can be added to the list of defendants, when Flynn files all the suits against the goons who violated his civil and constitutional rights.
Felonies that Flynn was a co-conspirator in.
If Flynn lied because his lawyers convinced him to, then he conspired with his lawyers to perjure himself. That's three more felonies than he was originally charged with.
You're just making this shit up as you go, aren't ya?
Fuck my life.
Flynn got charges dropped because Billy Barr made it happen.
View attachment 335657
I was right...He is just making the shit up as he goes along....Whatta douchebagge.You have a law degree?
Do yourself a favor and go read the link-
Guilty Pleas – Post-Sentencing Plea Withdrawal: Suppression of Material Exculpatory Impeachment Evidence – Statutory Basis
State v. Kevin Harris, 2004 WI 64, affirming as modified 2003 WI App 144, 266 Wis. 2d 200, 667 N.W.2d 813 For Harris: Steven A. Koch Issue/Holding: ¶34 We recognize that in the constitutional context, the Brady requirement of materiality is dependent upon whether the suppressed evidence...
They have no statutory or constitutional obligation before a guilty plea to turn over discovery that helps the defendant (“exculpatory evidence”),
Structuring Pre-Plea Criminal Discovery - Northwestern ...
scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu › viewcontent
scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu › viewcontent
Libs are grasping now...
"The Brady Rule, named after Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), requires prosecutors to disclose materially exculpatory evidence in the government's possession to the defense. A "Brady material" or evidence the prosecutor is required to disclose under this rule includes any evidence favorable to the accused--evidence that goes towards negating a defendant's guilt, that would reduce a defendant's potential sentence, or evidence going to the credibility of a witness."
Brady rule
www.law.cornell.edu
Being made public now, that Biden was the person who "unmasked" Flynn....There's your nominee....Corrupt asshole.
The only problem with that is that the Vice President has no legal authority to "declassify" or "unmask" any material from the NSA.
He can only make the same request as anybody else, and it's up to the NSA (head of the original classifying agency)
Top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of former national security adviser Michael Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.
The list was declassified in recent days by Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell and then sent to GOP Sens. Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson, who made the documents public. The roster features top-ranking figures including then-Vice President Joe Biden -- a detail already being raised by the Trump campaign in the bare-knuckle 2020 presidential race where Biden is now the Democrats' presumptive nominee.
The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.
I think you know very well where I was going with that Postman...But hey, when caught having to defend a corrupt asshole like Joe Biden, use semantics.
I know exactly what I'm talking about, hammerhead.Not my fault you don’t know what you’re talking about.You really are dumber than a goddamn bag of hammers.Sidney Powell did nothing but make a fool of herself and get slapped down by the judge after filing ridiculous motions.If he got the best deal possible, how is it that Sidney Powell got him a better one?...DUUUUUH!They were going to get Flynn the best deal possible. In fact, they were going to get Flynn out of any jail time.If they had done what they were paid to do, Flynn wouldn't have been in this mess and needed to fire them.....DUUUUH!His defense team was doing exactly what they’re paid to do. No one would have predicted that Trump would have been able to get a corrupt prosecutor put in place to drop the charges.Oh fuck me running....You're not a co-conspirator when you're the one being railroaded by your own supposed "defense" team.He has a very convincing case for legal malpractice by his original "defense" team who conned him to copping the plea.
Actually that would be a huge kettle of fish to make that allegation.
Then they committed a fucking felony....They can be added to the list of defendants, when Flynn files all the suits against the goons who violated his civil and constitutional rights.
Felonies that Flynn was a co-conspirator in.
If Flynn lied because his lawyers convinced him to, then he conspired with his lawyers to perjure himself. That's three more felonies than he was originally charged with.
You're just making this shit up as you go, aren't ya?
Fuck my life.
Flynn got charges dropped because Billy Barr made it happen.
View attachment 335657
Since you had ZERO chance of a conviction in a real trial, of course your heroes had to threaten Flynn’s son. You had ZERO evidence that would have stood up under any scrutiny. Your hot air is overpowering here’s. As is your total lack of knowledge of the event being discussed.Sure. Whatever you say dude. But I'm going to wait the indictments if you don't mind.
So as long as they get away with it, no problemo.....duly noted.
Guilt is not determined by popular opinion or messageboards. If there is enough evidence to merit charges that are prosecutable, then it will go forward. Otherwise you are just blowing hot air.
Brady RuleYou have a law degree?
Do yourself a favor and go read the link-
Guilty Pleas – Post-Sentencing Plea Withdrawal: Suppression of Material Exculpatory Impeachment Evidence – Statutory Basis
State v. Kevin Harris, 2004 WI 64, affirming as modified 2003 WI App 144, 266 Wis. 2d 200, 667 N.W.2d 813 For Harris: Steven A. Koch Issue/Holding: ¶34 We recognize that in the constitutional context, the Brady requirement of materiality is dependent upon whether the suppressed evidence...
They have no statutory or constitutional obligation before a guilty plea to turn over discovery that helps the defendant (“exculpatory evidence”),
Structuring Pre-Plea Criminal Discovery - Northwestern ...
scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu › viewcontent
scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu › viewcontent
The defense is entitled to all the evidence before he agrees to a plea, you fucking moron.You have a law degree?
Do yourself a favor and go read the link-
Guilty Pleas – Post-Sentencing Plea Withdrawal: Suppression of Material Exculpatory Impeachment Evidence – Statutory Basis
State v. Kevin Harris, 2004 WI 64, affirming as modified 2003 WI App 144, 266 Wis. 2d 200, 667 N.W.2d 813 For Harris: Steven A. Koch Issue/Holding: ¶34 We recognize that in the constitutional context, the Brady requirement of materiality is dependent upon whether the suppressed evidence...
They have no statutory or constitutional obligation before a guilty plea to turn over discovery that helps the defendant (“exculpatory evidence”),
Structuring Pre-Plea Criminal Discovery - Northwestern ...
scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu › viewcontent
scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu › viewcontent
I know exactly what I'm talking about, hammerhead.Not my fault you don’t know what you’re talking about.You really are dumber than a goddamn bag of hammers.Sidney Powell did nothing but make a fool of herself and get slapped down by the judge after filing ridiculous motions.If he got the best deal possible, how is it that Sidney Powell got him a better one?...DUUUUUH!They were going to get Flynn the best deal possible. In fact, they were going to get Flynn out of any jail time.If they had done what they were paid to do, Flynn wouldn't have been in this mess and needed to fire them.....DUUUUH!His defense team was doing exactly what they’re paid to do. No one would have predicted that Trump would have been able to get a corrupt prosecutor put in place to drop the charges.Oh fuck me running....You're not a co-conspirator when you're the one being railroaded by your own supposed "defense" team.He has a very convincing case for legal malpractice by his original "defense" team who conned him to copping the plea.
Actually that would be a huge kettle of fish to make that allegation.
Then they committed a fucking felony....They can be added to the list of defendants, when Flynn files all the suits against the goons who violated his civil and constitutional rights.
Felonies that Flynn was a co-conspirator in.
If Flynn lied because his lawyers convinced him to, then he conspired with his lawyers to perjure himself. That's three more felonies than he was originally charged with.
You're just making this shit up as you go, aren't ya?
Fuck my life.
Flynn got charges dropped because Billy Barr made it happen.
View attachment 335657
Now go play on the freeway.
Coerced confessions aren’t valid. No one coerced Flynn.And your complete lack of honesty, integrity, and any sort of actual knowledge of the event being discussed are duly noted. Then again I’ve proven you a lying ignorant bitch multiple times. Now to slap you again. Coerced confessions aren’t valid. You lose. Again.You're right, he wasn't convicted by a jury - he went ahead and plead guilty. Twice.President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.
They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia._______President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.
They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.
"General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury..."
Your disqualifying ignorance on the matter is shown by your statement highlighted above.
This post is pure TDS. No facts, just rabid hate driving you to the point of psychopathology.
Get Help.
Your automated Trump Defense Syndrome is duly noted.
www.forbes.com
