Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.
The FBI couldn't go after Flynns son, unless Flynn brought his son into a co-conspiracy of lawbreaking with his father. How else would Flynn have known his son was vulnerable to FBI prosecution.He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after.
And that being so, why did Flynn get his own son involved in breaking the law?
Flynn, literally broke no laws.
Have you been in a coma for awhile?
President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.
They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia._______President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.
They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.
"General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury..."
Your disqualifying ignorance on the matter is shown by your statement highlighted above.
This post is pure TDS. No facts, just rabid hate driving you to the point of psychopathology.
Get Help.
We should go back to the days before Brown v. Mississippi, right?President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Excuse me.
You conveniently fail to mention that the VP has recently said he was not sure Flynn lied to him. Back in January of 2017, he was being told by Seditionists and Coup Plotters like Sally Yates that he might have lied based on the transcript of the Ambassador's phone call...but he had not seen that phone call transcript, nor the FBI Agents first report of what Flynn told them--which was that they didn't think he lied, and their first written report is NOW MISSING.
But, more importantly, you confuse alledged Lies. Even if Flynn lied to the VP, which is not a crime....it only got him fired...and had nothing to do with the crime of lying to the FBI, which he was charged with almost a year later---under the Mueller Inquisition of All Republicans.
You have it all jumbled up, and you seem hopelessly confused.
At issue today is that Flynn was effectively tortured into pleading guilty to a crime he likely didn't commit.
Yes, he pled Guilty, but it was to keep his family from going bankrupt and under the threat of the Goons going after his son for some unrelated bullshit having to do with Turkey.
It was psychological, emotional, financial TORTURE---by our own Government...and it is not less effective than physical torture---such as what was done to a Black kid being beaten in a Mississippi jail until HE confessed to a crime he didn't commit back in the 1950's.
Obviously you would have a different opinion of THAT guilty plea, obtained by physical torture, than you do about the kind of torture a 33 year combat general went through. But there is really no difference to a Fair Minded Person, as opposed to a Blind Partisan.
Flynn finally got a lawyer willing to address this injustice...like the ACLU came along and addressed the injustice going on in Mississippi. It is inconvenient for you to see the injustice to General Flynn in the same light, but it is essentially the same kind of injustice....and it is about to be set right. Deal with it, ye Blind Partisan.
The justice dept said the retired General was intentionally entrapped by slick agents in the FBI under orders by the Obama administration. Didn't agents swear under oath when they obtained the fraudulent FISA warrant? I guess it's a felony to lie to the FBI but it isn't against the law when they lie to us.
Sounds like the FBI lied to Trump about Flynn lying, which makes both of those statements proper in their appropriate context.
... He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. ...
We should go back to the days before Brown v. Mississippi, right?President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Beat those black dudes into pleading guilty, then point to their guilty plea as evidence of their guilt?
Sound good to you?
.
_____Excuse me.
You conveniently fail to mention that the VP has recently said he was not sure Flynn lied to him. Back in January of 2017, he was being told by Seditionists and Coup Plotters like Sally Yates that he might have lied based on the transcript of the Ambassador's phone call...but he had not seen that phone call transcript, nor the FBI Agents first report of what Flynn told them--which was that they didn't think he lied, and their first written report is NOW MISSING.
The problem with that view is that Mike Pence went on meet the press a few days after talking to General Flynn, and assured the country that according to what Flynn told him, that he did not talk to the Russian Ambassador about sanctions.
The NSA transcript showed that Flynn talked about sanctions, and the president fired Flynn because he lied to Mike Pence, claiming he didn't talk to Kislyiak about sanctions.
No matter if you think the FBI tricked Flynn into lying to them, Mike Pence was still lied to by Flynn.
Only for those defendants who want to change their plea, like Flynn.Then you need to throw out every single guilty plea don't you?
The justice dept said the retired General was intentionally entrapped by slick agents in the FBI under orders by the Obama administration. Didn't agents swear under oath when they obtained the fraudulent FISA warrant? I guess it's a felony to lie to the FBI but it isn't against the law when they lie to us.
They definitely can lie to us
The lying to the FISA court is, or should be, problematic.
You're right, he wasn't convicted by a jury - he went ahead and plead guilty. Twice.
Your automated Trump Defense Syndrome is duly noted.
Excuse me.
You conveniently fail to mention that the VP has recently said he was not sure Flynn lied to him. Back in January of 2017, he was being told by Seditionists and Coup Plotters like Sally Yates that he might have lied based on the transcript of the Ambassador's phone call...but he had not seen that phone call transcript, nor the FBI Agents first report of what Flynn told them--which was that they didn't think he lied, and their first written report is NOW MISSING.
The problem with that view is that Mike Pence went on meet the press a few days after talking to General Flynn, and assured the country that according to what Flynn told him, that he did not talk to the Russian Ambassador about sanctions.
The NSA transcript showed that Flynn talked about sanctions, and the president fired Flynn because he lied to Mike Pence, claiming he didn't talk to Kislyiak about sanctions.
No matter if you think the FBI tricked Flynn into lying to them, Mike Pence was still lied to by Flynn.
The crazy thing is it's all well documented...and they still deny it.
Only for those defendants who want to change their plea, like Flynn.Then you need to throw out every single guilty plea don't you?
.
... He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. ...
There was no trial, thus no jury. He copped a plea.
Maybe you could get some knowledge about the matter before commenting on it?
You mean he was forced? He said he wasn't. Several times. In fact an examination of the questions and questioning would show he was given every opportunity to tell the truth.
But he didn't.
