Food Stamp Capital of the US - White and Republican

And the fools will continue to vote republican even though it's the republicans who are more likely to cut off their food stamps.

Are they poor because they're stupid or stupid because they're poor?

It's pretty clear they're poor because obama shut down their lively hood.
 

I hate to be critical but I don't see how this can be the highest use of food stamps considering this is a rural area which is sparse populated.
This is the only time Dembulbs will use per capita numbers


Ok, let's not use per capita numbers.

SNAPCharts1_1.png
 

I hate to be critical but I don't see how this can be the highest use of food stamps considering this is a rural area which is sparse populated.
This is the only time Dembulbs will use per capita numbers


Ok, let's not use per capita numbers.

SNAPCharts1_1.png

How about we use percentages? Those being the true indicators.
 
In a coal town, that THE Obama declared war on?

Whoodathunk?
:cuckoo:
Really? Do you have a link that shows Obama declaring war on that town? Didn't think so. Just another delusional, well-trained nutter.
“So if somebody wants to build a coal power plant, they can. It’s just that it will bankrupt them because they are going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being emitted.”

Or lose out to cheaper natural gas that happens to meet emissions standards.
 

I hate to be critical but I don't see how this can be the highest use of food stamps considering this is a rural area which is sparse populated.
This is the only time Dembulbs will use per capita numbers


Ok, let's not use per capita numbers.

SNAPCharts1_1.png

How about we use percentages? Those being the true indicators.

You mean like the forty percent shown?
 
In a coal town, that THE Obama declared war on?

Whoodathunk?
:cuckoo:




Republicans are full of excuses. I thought people on food stamps were just lazy?

See how quickly that changed when facts are presented?


It
Yes, t
In a coal town, that THE Obama declared war on?

Whoodathunk?
:cuckoo:

Republicans are full of excuses. I thought people on food stamps were just lazy?

See how quickly that changed when facts are presented?
The facts are you assholes drove these people into the poor house. They were productive members of society until you nimrods decided to attack their livlihood.

Then you have the fucking gall to come on here and crow about how a repub town is the food stamp capital of the country KNOWING that you destroyed their livelihood.

What fucking pricks you all are.

links showing that to be the case in this county all within the last six years?

It's in the article the dipshit OP posted.
Commonly referred to as "self ownage"

It says nothing about policy being responsible. You said nothing.
 

I hate to be critical but I don't see how this can be the highest use of food stamps considering this is a rural area which is sparse populated.
This is the only time Dembulbs will use per capita numbers


Ok, let's not use per capita numbers.

SNAPCharts1_1.png

How about we use percentages? Those being the true indicators.

You mean like the forty percent shown?

You're kidding right?
How about in your infinite wisdom you post up the percentage of blacks on welfare or snap and the percentage of whites?
We both know the numbers wont be to your liking.
 
I hate to be critical but I don't see how this can be the highest use of food stamps considering this is a rural area which is sparse populated.
This is the only time Dembulbs will use per capita numbers


Ok, let's not use per capita numbers.

SNAPCharts1_1.png

How about we use percentages? Those being the true indicators.

You mean like the forty percent shown?

You're kidding right?
How about in your infinite wisdom you post up the percentage of blacks on welfare or snap and the percentage of whites?
We both know the numbers wont be to your liking.

It's on the graph professor.
If you are trying to make the point that more blacks receive assistance than whites, don't bother. The US taxpayer still spends more on whites.
 
"The decline in the profits from coal,..."
A Left-Statist (read Democratic) policy goal.

"The decline in the profits from... tobacco and..."
A Left-Statist (read Democratic) policy goal.

"The decline in the profits from... lumber industries led to a harsh toll being taken on the community."
A Left-Statist (read Democratic) policy goal.

"Cale Turner, county executive of Owsley County told ABC back in 2010 that economic hardships have led to a high incidence of drug addiction."
Ah, there's your Right-Statist (read Republican) connection.
 
In a coal town, that THE Obama declared war on?

Whoodathunk?
:cuckoo:




Republicans are full of excuses. I thought people on food stamps were just lazy?

See how quickly that changed when facts are presented?


It
Yes, t
In a coal town, that THE Obama declared war on?

Whoodathunk?
:cuckoo:

Republicans are full of excuses. I thought people on food stamps were just lazy?

See how quickly that changed when facts are presented?
The facts are you assholes drove these people into the poor house. They were productive members of society until you nimrods decided to attack their livlihood.

Then you have the fucking gall to come on here and crow about how a repub town is the food stamp capital of the country KNOWING that you destroyed their livelihood.

What fucking pricks you all are.

links showing that to be the case in this county all within the last six years?

It's in the article the dipshit OP posted.
Commonly referred to as "self ownage"

It says nothing about policy being responsible. You said nothing.

So you really think the schmuck who wrote this hack piece is going to come right out and say it was obamas policies that caused it?

We both know thats the case and if you'd like I can post up a shit load of videos proving that fact.

Still want to deny it?
 
This is the only time Dembulbs will use per capita numbers


Ok, let's not use per capita numbers.

SNAPCharts1_1.png

How about we use percentages? Those being the true indicators.

You mean like the forty percent shown?

You're kidding right?
How about in your infinite wisdom you post up the percentage of blacks on welfare or snap and the percentage of whites?
We both know the numbers wont be to your liking.

It's on the graph professor.
If you are trying to make the point that more blacks receive assistance than whites, don't bother. The US taxpayer still spends more on whites.

Hmmm,another lefty who doesnt understand percentages.
Color me surprised.
 
In a coal town, that THE Obama declared war on?

Whoodathunk?
:cuckoo:




Republicans are full of excuses. I thought people on food stamps were just lazy?

See how quickly that changed when facts are presented?


It
Yes, t
Republicans are full of excuses. I thought people on food stamps were just lazy?

See how quickly that changed when facts are presented?
The facts are you assholes drove these people into the poor house. They were productive members of society until you nimrods decided to attack their livlihood.

Then you have the fucking gall to come on here and crow about how a repub town is the food stamp capital of the country KNOWING that you destroyed their livelihood.

What fucking pricks you all are.

links showing that to be the case in this county all within the last six years?

It's in the article the dipshit OP posted.
Commonly referred to as "self ownage"

It says nothing about policy being responsible. You said nothing.

So you really think the schmuck who wrote this hack piece is going to come right out and say it was obamas policies that caused it?

We both know thats the case and if you'd like I can post up a shit load of videos proving that fact.

Still want to deny it?

We both don't know.

US Coal Industry Gears Up For Another Tumultuous Year As Cheap Natural Gas Tougher Regulations Shrink Demand
 
When herewego doesnt have an answer he likes to use the "Do you really think" tactic of question that alludes and suggests but has no proof of anything
 
Ok, let's not use per capita numbers.

SNAPCharts1_1.png

How about we use percentages? Those being the true indicators.

You mean like the forty percent shown?

You're kidding right?
How about in your infinite wisdom you post up the percentage of blacks on welfare or snap and the percentage of whites?
We both know the numbers wont be to your liking.

It's on the graph professor.
If you are trying to make the point that more blacks receive assistance than whites, don't bother. The US taxpayer still spends more on whites.

Hmmm,another lefty who doesnt understand percentages.
Color me surprised.

There is nothing to understand. Whites cost more than any other race regardless of the percentage of users for each race.
 
How about we use percentages? Those being the true indicators.

You mean like the forty percent shown?

You're kidding right?
How about in your infinite wisdom you post up the percentage of blacks on welfare or snap and the percentage of whites?
We both know the numbers wont be to your liking.

It's on the graph professor.
If you are trying to make the point that more blacks receive assistance than whites, don't bother. The US taxpayer still spends more on whites.

Hmmm,another lefty who doesnt understand percentages.
Color me surprised.

There is nothing to understand. Whites cost more than any other race regardless of the percentage of users for each race.

You're a tad confused and it's obvious percentages are a challenge
 
You mean like the forty percent shown?

You're kidding right?
How about in your infinite wisdom you post up the percentage of blacks on welfare or snap and the percentage of whites?
We both know the numbers wont be to your liking.

It's on the graph professor.
If you are trying to make the point that more blacks receive assistance than whites, don't bother. The US taxpayer still spends more on whites.

Hmmm,another lefty who doesnt understand percentages.
Color me surprised.

There is nothing to understand. Whites cost more than any other race regardless of the percentage of users for each race.

You're a tad confused and percentages obvious challenge you

In you mind it's worse that more blacks receive assistance than whites costing the most. Obviously you don't understand percentages when a smaller group uses more but the larger group is much larger. If you think the US spends too much on SNAP than your beef is with the most expensive group.
 
You're kidding right?
How about in your infinite wisdom you post up the percentage of blacks on welfare or snap and the percentage of whites?
We both know the numbers wont be to your liking.

It's on the graph professor.
If you are trying to make the point that more blacks receive assistance than whites, don't bother. The US taxpayer still spends more on whites.

Hmmm,another lefty who doesnt understand percentages.
Color me surprised.

There is nothing to understand. Whites cost more than any other race regardless of the percentage of users for each race.

You're a tad confused and percentages obvious challenge you

In you mind it's worse that more blacks receive assistance than whites costing the most. Obviously you don't understand percentages when a smaller group uses more but the larger group is much larger. If you think the US spends too much on SNAP than your beef is with the most expensive group.

Percentages, fool. Learn them and then get back to me
 
Republicans are full of excuses. I thought people on food stamps were just lazy?

See how quickly that changed when facts are presented?


It
Yes, t
The facts are you assholes drove these people into the poor house. They were productive members of society until you nimrods decided to attack their livlihood.

Then you have the fucking gall to come on here and crow about how a repub town is the food stamp capital of the country KNOWING that you destroyed their livelihood.

What fucking pricks you all are.

links showing that to be the case in this county all within the last six years?

It's in the article the dipshit OP posted.
Commonly referred to as "self ownage"

It says nothing about policy being responsible. You said nothing.

So you really think the schmuck who wrote this hack piece is going to come right out and say it was obamas policies that caused it?

We both know thats the case and if you'd like I can post up a shit load of videos proving that fact.

Still want to deny it?

We both don't know.

US Coal Industry Gears Up For Another Tumultuous Year As Cheap Natural Gas Tougher Regulations Shrink Demand

What is it with liberals and links? They post em up to refute yet they always end up slapping themselves upside the head?
Your link says it's also the fault of strict new regulations regarding coal fired plants.
And to top it off the only reason we have more NG is because of the dreaded fracturing process which you liberals abhor.
Do you morons ever think anything through?
 

Forum List

Back
Top