Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thats not entirely untrueHere's another moron who believes Lost Cause revisionism.
Nope, it was about slavery.
It was about the fear that black people, once freed, would avenge themselves on white people.
When that didn't happen, then all the Confederate Veteran's groups all decided that they needed to rationalize what they did.
The country would have been better off if it had split.Ummm?
'Right' about what?
Explain yourself.
If you are telling the forum that your ancestors fought and killed Union soldiers of the United States of America in a war the leaders of your ancestors started in their desire to sunder those United States.....well, yeah, secessionist, insurrectionists, traitors....comes to mind."It does make me angry when you smear my ancestors as traitors or worse.."
The country would have been better off if it had split.
If the south won and carved out the Confederate States of America, slavery would have died anyway. It was too expensive and would not have survived the Industrial revolution in any case. Not being devastated by war, the South would have been very wealthy. The northern mills would have been forced to negotiate fairly in direct competition with Europe.Explain yourself.
The man’s body?We can't. It's privately owned on private property. That is not the case here.
Or if we had razed the south completely and made you play nice with your former property.The country would have been better off if it had split.
Decency and honor?If the south won and carved out the Confederate States of America, slavery would have died anyway. It was too expensive and would not have survived the Industrial revolution in any case. Not being devastated by war, the South would have been very wealthy. The northern mills would have been forced to negotiate fairly in direct competition with Europe.
A southern culture of decency and honor might still have tendrils today that could fight off the degenerate and woke. Likely blacks would not be running the great cities of the south into the ground. Yes. It is a shame that the wrong side won.
Or, if Lincoln had lived the former slaves would have been rounded up and sent back to Africa. Every, last, one.Or if we had razed the south completely and made you play nice with your former property.
We could be a century and a half further than we are.
A people of courtliness and gentility.Decency and honor?
Jim Crow and his fellow sophisticates would be so proud of you.
Can’t get past your sense of supremacy huh. Can’t stop yourself from feeling that you have some god given authority to round up free American citizens and send them away. Still on the wrong side of humanity.Or, if Lincoln had lived the former slaves would have been rounded up and sent back to Africa. Every, last, one.
To fellow whites at least.A people of courtliness and gentility.
Well, I'm not Abraham Lincoln. He was the one who was for the great round up and repatriation. Had he lived, he would have had the authority. He was an abolitionist, completely against slavery. He also felt that blacks and whites were so different that coexistence would never be possible. Is Lincoln wrong? Judging from the number of black people demanding safe spaces free of all whites, black people today agree with Lincoln.Can’t get past your sense of supremacy huh. Can’t stop yourself from feeling that you have some god given authority to round up free American citizens and send them away. Still on the wrong side of humanity.
You are no one of consequence and it never would have happened.
Revisionist nonsense.Well, I'm not Abraham Lincoln. He was the one who was for the great round up and repatriation. Had he lived, he would have had the authority. He was an abolitionist, completely against slavery. He also felt that blacks and whites were so different that coexistence would never be possible. Is Lincoln wrong? Judging from the number of black people demanding safe spaces free of all whites, black people today agree with Lincoln.
History you don't like.Revisionist nonsense.
www.history.com
Who will always be remembered as decent, honorable, men.Oh my, what a little hissy fit. I'd thisbhissy fit really because we are taking down statues of spaver traitors?
/——/ I have a history book that reprinted newspapers prior to the CW on both sides. It was tariffs and states rights.See, you are making my point.
The real historical revisionism was the people who put up the statues.
It was ALWAYS about slavery.
Then after the war, the folks in the South were kind of embarrassed, so you got all the bullshit about states rights and tariffs that you were taught and they talked about the "Lost Cause" and put up statues to all the racists and traitors.
Now we are correcting the record. Fuck your feelings.
Yes, I come from a long line of ConfederatesIf you are telling the forum that your ancestors fought and killed Union soldiers of the United States of America in a war the leaders of your ancestors started in their desire to sunder those United States.....well, yeah, secessionist, insurrectionists, traitors....comes to mind.
That's on them. It ain't on you. It ain't on me. It's on them. They made a difficult but poor choice.
You are the revisionist
For 110 years historians and common people knew that the war was about far more than just race
Then the lib revisionists came along
