S.J.
Platinum Member
- Nov 28, 2012
- 37,666
- 7,629
Yeah, you go with that. He had his hands on her tits. Clowning around or not, that's sexual assault, idiot.Look at you, Wry. You should be embarrassed at this feeble attempt to equate the two. No similarities whatsoever. You have a Democrat Senator sexually assaulting an unconscious woman and a Congressman (exposing Dem corruption) who is being accused of 'witnessing' sexual assault. The first one comes with indisputable evidence and the second one is an allegation with no evidence. Even YOU should be able to do better than that.Look at you, Wry. You should be embarrassed at this feeble attempt to equate the two. No similarities whatsoever. You have a Democrat Senator sexually assaulting an unconscious woman and a Congressman (exposing Dem corruption) who is being accused of 'witnessing' sexual assault. The first one comes with indisputable evidence and the second one is an allegation with no evidence. Even YOU should be able to do better than that.
LIAR There was no sexual assault, he was clowning around. Claiming that photo is proof of a sexual assault is ridiculous. Did Sen. Franken try to pay someone to cover up this photo. or even try to deny it?