bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,318
- 2,180
JoeB has the utra righty neo-con and the libertarian, too, on the run.
So the senile moron and the psychotic Stalinist agree with each other?
Who would ever have thunk it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
JoeB has the utra righty neo-con and the libertarian, too, on the run.
[
Joe's supposedly an "Eisenhower Republican" I think more of an Obama liberal
When Eisenhower became President... we were in a war... he kept wartime level spending in peace time, invested in the largest public works project in history.
He also initiated the first version of Medicare, fought for civil rights and voting rights, and resisted the crazies in his party who wanted to go back to isolationism and deregulation.
Oh, yeah, and he told the Zionists to pound sand when they tried to seize the Suez Canal.
This is when Republicans weren't the party of Crazy...
Aside from the civil rights part, what you listed above defines "crazy."
Foreign Aid we spend lbout 50 billion. (38 in economic assistance, 15 in military assistance).If given a choice between cutting social security (which people have already paid into, but funds were diverted to pay for wars and tax cuts for rich people) and taxing the rich to pay their fair share, you'd cut social security.
Why is always a choice of cutting social security?
There are so many other things that could easily be cut:
Foreign Aid
Aid to rebuild Iraq and Afghanistan
Stop the the War in Afghanistan
Cut out the Contractors who are doing the work of the US Military for 10x the pay scale.
The list is endless
Except all of those things are barely a drop in the bucket.
Now, we could spend smarter on defense, to be sure, but if you want to seriously cut, the big targets are Medicaid, Social Security and Medicare.
I didn't "create" any of your selfish delusions.
You know what I've been doing?
I have worked saved and sacrificed for years to get where I am and that people like you who didn't do what I did think you have a right to my property is utterly disgusting.
Get out in the fucking world and make your own way you lazy sheep.
You know what, I've been working since I was 16, thank you. I'll be 51 in May. Worked two jobs and joined the National Guard to pay for college. Spent six years active duty military.
Just because you were a little luckier (and honestly, I doubt you make much more money than I do), does not make you more virtuous than working folks who worked all their lives, but had the bad luck to run against someone with more greed than ethics in their life.
YOU DID BUILD THIS. When you allowed income inequality to happen on the scale it has happened in the last 30 years in this country, you pretty much cemented a character like Obama would get elected.
Obama couldn't have gotten elected 20 years ago. I certainly wouldn't have voted for him 20 years ago.
But I did this time.
I didn't "create" any of your selfish delusions.
You know what I've been doing?
I have worked saved and sacrificed for years to get where I am and that people like you who didn't do what I did think you have a right to my property is utterly disgusting.
Get out in the fucking world and make your own way you lazy sheep.
You know what, I've been working since I was 16, thank you. I'll be 51 in May. Worked two jobs and joined the National Guard to pay for college. Spent six years active duty military.
what do you want a fucking cookie?
Just because you were a little luckier (and honestly, I doubt you make much more money than I do), does not make you more virtuous than working folks who worked all their lives, but had the bad luck to run against someone with more greed than ethics in their life.
Funny how I've noticed the harder I work the "luckier" I get. It's typical of a failure to chalk other's successes up to luck though.
YOU DID BUILD THIS. When you allowed income inequality to happen on the scale it has happened in the last 30 years in this country, you pretty much cemented a character like Obama would get elected.
Obama couldn't have gotten elected 20 years ago. I certainly wouldn't have voted for him 20 years ago.
But I did this time.
Sorry but I've been too busy working my ass off and saving money so that I could start my own business to be jealous of everyone who made more money than me.
You should try it someday you might then realize that the only one to blame for your situation is you
Do you have proof of that?
My point is, old folks are eating dog food, but a lot of them don't because we have food stamps, social security and other programs to take care of them after they've worked hard all their lives, which is what EVERY civilized society does.
The notion that we should let them starve because a Rich Person really deserves that private jet is just fucking crazy.
Whose notion is that? You Joe live in a world that doesn't exist in this country, you've been sucked into this world because of hate and your personal misery get some help man
It's what you fools are advocating.
If given a choice between cutting social security (which people have already paid into, but funds were diverted to pay for wars and tax cuts for rich people) and taxing the rich to pay their fair share, you'd cut social security.
JoeB has the utra righty neo-con and the libertarian, too, on the run.
So the senile moron and the psychotic Stalinist agree with each other?
Who would ever have thunk it?
[
Joe's supposedly an "Eisenhower Republican" I think more of an Obama liberal
Under Eisenhower, federal spending peaked at 18.8 percent of GDP in fiscal year 1954 and again in fiscal 1959. When Eisenhower left office in fiscal 1961, federal spending was 18.4 percent of GDP--a 9.8 percent drop from when he took office.
When Eisenhower became President... we were in a war... he kept wartime level spending in peace time, invested in the largest public works project in history.
He also initiated the first version of Medicare, fought for civil rights and voting rights, and resisted the crazies in his party who wanted to go back to isolationism and deregulation.
Oh, yeah, and he told the Zionists to pound sand when they tried to seize the Suez Canal.
This is when Republicans weren't the party of Crazy...
SS is just fine because it takes in more than it pays out. The problem is the neo-con dems and pubs who take it for other stupid things, like wars.
We the People paid our SS and Medicare. It is not going anywhere.
You know what, I've been working since I was 16, thank you. I'll be 51 in May. Worked two jobs and joined the National Guard to pay for college. Spent six years active duty military.
what do you want a fucking cookie?
Funny how I've noticed the harder I work the "luckier" I get. It's typical of a failure to chalk other's successes up to luck though.
YOU DID BUILD THIS. When you allowed income inequality to happen on the scale it has happened in the last 30 years in this country, you pretty much cemented a character like Obama would get elected.
Obama couldn't have gotten elected 20 years ago. I certainly wouldn't have voted for him 20 years ago.
But I did this time.
Sorry but I've been too busy working my ass off and saving money so that I could start my own business to be jealous of everyone who made more money than me.
You should try it someday you might then realize that the only one to blame for your situation is you
Guy, I'm not the one who crashed the economy. I'm not the one who shipped all the good paying factory jobs to third world shitholes. That would be the idiots you worship.
But given your statement you spend "half your time correcting your employees fuckups", I kind of suspect your business won't be around all that long.
Hey, maybe you should offer them vacation.
The GOP is part of trillion dollar debts, too.
Dems rebuilt Europe and Japan, with some GOP help.
Americans have demonstrated they are not too concerned about Obama' culpability as their eyes turn towards the ultra rights and the libertarians.
Umm.....Social Security has to be reformed, it is unsustainable if left as is. Most people will get much more out then they ever paid in, reform man get it? And it was LBJ who made it possible to steal all our Social Security money to spend on other crap, not any Republican. Taxing more is not going to do anything to address our psyical problems, we spend too much money
Umm.....Social Security has to be reformed, it is unsustainable if left as is. Most people will get much more out then they ever paid in, reform man get it? And it was LBJ who made it possible to steal all our Social Security money to spend on other crap, not any Republican. Taxing more is not going to do anything to address our psyical problems, we spend too much money
No, taxing will make sure we are bringing in enough revenues.
Here's the thing about you tax cutters. You've actually made government MORE popular. Look at all teh goodies we get, and we don't have to pay for it. Awesome. Cutting the spending should have been done before cutting the taxes.
Incidently, the only reason why Social Security is "unsustainable" is because the money we should have been setting aside was used for other things.
I agree, it needs reforms. But it shouldn't be reformed because the rich won't pay their fair share.
You are an economic illiterate. Raising taxes (especially in a poor economy) results in less tax revenue overall.
The GOP is part of trillion dollar debts, too.
Dems rebuilt Europe and Japan, with some GOP help.
Americans have demonstrated they are not too concerned about Obama' culpability as their eyes turn towards the ultra rights and the libertarians.
America rebuilt Europe it wasnt done by party, everyone paid get it? Of course all politicians are responsible for our debt, but we are not doing anything about it are we?
The GOP is part of trillion dollar debts, too.
Dems rebuilt Europe and Japan, with some GOP help.
Americans have demonstrated they are not too concerned about Obama' culpability as their eyes turn towards the ultra rights and the libertarians.