Free birth control

[pwjohn]

"free"? LOL

How many times do we have to point out to dumb as a brick liberals that this shit is not free.

You're the one being "dumb as a brick". People that support these programs know they are paid for by taxes. We also know that these preventative programs save considerable taxpayer money.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So stop LYING its not free. Here's an idea keep your dick in your pants, your legs closed if you can't afford your own damn birth control. God its like being swarmed by blood sucking vampire bats having to pay for everyone's 'free' shit.

All great advice. But what do you do when the enivitable kicks you in the balls?

 

[Conservative65]

http://www.bustle.com/articles/9528...riment-proves-the-whole-country-needs-free-bc

They did it in Colorado, seems it reduced abortions, reduced unwanted pregnancies, reduced healthcare spending etc.

"According to a study published in October 2014, unintended pregnancies dropped in the state by 40 percent from 2009-2013, and abortion fell by 42 percent over the same period."

"The program saved the state millions in public health coverage for unintended pregnancies, further proving the well-known fact that preventative care is cost-effective and sensible health policy."

Question, what did Republicans do to a program that saves money, reduces problems, and reduces abortion?

"Colorado Republicans succeeded in shooting it down, leaving the program in peril."

The question is, WHY???? Why would someone take something that WORKS on many levels and destroy it just so they can go around preaching their nonsense to others? They want to stop abortion, well this reduces abortion, but without abortion they've got nothing to get people hysterical about, so no one would vote for them if abortion isn't an issue.

Economics 101 - nothing is free.

You liberals need to understand what it means to be personally responsible. You pay for your own sex life. If I have to pay for it then I should be able to stick in in the Ho also if I want.

I understand you point but state it differently. If I didn't get it from her, it's not my place to pay for the results.

 

[Conservative65]

"free"? LOL

How many times do we have to point out to dumb as a brick liberals that this shit is not free.

You're the one being "dumb as a brick". People that support these programs know they are paid for by taxes. We also know that these preventative programs save considerable taxpayer money.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So stop LYING its not free. Here's an idea keep your dick in your pants, your legs closed if you can't afford your own damn birth control. God its like being swarmed by blood sucking vampire bats having to pay for everyone's 'free' shit.

All great advice. But what do you do when the enivitable kicks you in the balls?

What do you mean by the inevitable?

 

[Billy000]

Cons on here sound so dumb when they point out the obvious. Yes, obviously this program is paid for through taxes.

We know that. We're not the ones calling it free.

It's ANOTHER program where the one making the choice doesn't pay the price for the choice and someone not making it is. Typical socialist bullshit.

Ok what you're too thick to understand is, just because we call it free, it doesn't mean we are not aware it is still paid for with revenue. You think you sound intelligent when you say this but really it's just stupid to point out the obvious.

 

[ogibillm]

OR they can just control themselves hell why not just give out Heroin for free too.

Don't give them any ideas

hey if you could show me that giving out heroin would be a net gain for the community I'd be open to it

I would be for it too. At your expense.

you seem to be having a rough time with a simple concept.

the point of the op is a cheap and easy outlay now means years and years of savings.

that makes it the fiscally conservative choice.

I'm having a rough time with a simple concept? Your perception is questionable.

I'm all for your cheap and easy outlay. You pay for it.

we're all paying for more now

 

[Yousaidwhat]

"free"? LOL

How many times do we have to point out to dumb as a brick liberals that this shit is not free.

You're the one being "dumb as a brick". People that support these programs know they are paid for by taxes. We also know that these preventative programs save considerable taxpayer money.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So stop LYING its not free. Here's an idea keep your dick in your pants, your legs closed if you can't afford your own damn birth control. God its like being swarmed by blood sucking vampire bats having to pay for everyone's 'free' shit.

All great advice. But what do you do when the enivitable kicks you in the balls?

You get out of bed and pay for your decision?

 

[oreo]

http://www.bustle.com/articles/9528...riment-proves-the-whole-country-needs-free-bc

They did it in Colorado, seems it reduced abortions, reduced unwanted pregnancies, reduced healthcare spending etc.

"According to a study published in October 2014, unintended pregnancies dropped in the state by 40 percent from 2009-2013, and abortion fell by 42 percent over the same period."

"The program saved the state millions in public health coverage for unintended pregnancies, further proving the well-known fact that preventative care is cost-effective and sensible health policy."

Question, what did Republicans do to a program that saves money, reduces problems, and reduces abortion?

"Colorado Republicans succeeded in shooting it down, leaving the program in peril."

The question is, WHY???? Why would someone take something that WORKS on many levels and destroy it just so they can go around preaching their nonsense to others? They want to stop abortion, well this reduces abortion, but without abortion they've got nothing to get people hysterical about, so no one would vote for them if abortion isn't an issue.

I live in Colorado. This program was privately funded, as your article states. So it was never a State funded program. So I am not certain what Republicans in the state had to do with shutting it down--especially since we have had a Democrat governor for the last several years.

PLEASE EXPLAIN:

We all can agree that birth control contraceptives are a much better more efficient way at preventing unwanted pregnancies, than abortions.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

Don't give them any ideas

hey if you could show me that giving out heroin would be a net gain for the community I'd be open to it

I would be for it too. At your expense.

you seem to be having a rough time with a simple concept.

the point of the op is a cheap and easy outlay now means years and years of savings.

that makes it the fiscally conservative choice.

I'm having a rough time with a simple concept? Your perception is questionable.

I'm all for your cheap and easy outlay. You pay for it.

we're all paying for more now

Like I said. Bread lines soup kitchens and basic medical care.

Mom and dad do the dishes and you sweep the floor.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

http://www.bustle.com/articles/9528...riment-proves-the-whole-country-needs-free-bc

They did it in Colorado, seems it reduced abortions, reduced unwanted pregnancies, reduced healthcare spending etc.

"According to a study published in October 2014, unintended pregnancies dropped in the state by 40 percent from 2009-2013, and abortion fell by 42 percent over the same period."

"The program saved the state millions in public health coverage for unintended pregnancies, further proving the well-known fact that preventative care is cost-effective and sensible health policy."

Question, what did Republicans do to a program that saves money, reduces problems, and reduces abortion?

"Colorado Republicans succeeded in shooting it down, leaving the program in peril."

The question is, WHY???? Why would someone take something that WORKS on many levels and destroy it just so they can go around preaching their nonsense to others? They want to stop abortion, well this reduces abortion, but without abortion they've got nothing to get people hysterical about, so no one would vote for them if abortion isn't an issue.

I live in Colorado. This program was privately funded, as your article states. So it was never a State funded program. So I am not certain what Republicans in the state had to do with shutting it down--especially since we have had a Democrat governor for the last several years.

PLEASE EXPLAIN:

I will most certainly get behind private funding.

 

[pwjohn]

"free"? LOL

How many times do we have to point out to dumb as a brick liberals that this shit is not free.

You're the one being "dumb as a brick". People that support these programs know they are paid for by taxes. We also know that these preventative programs save considerable taxpayer money.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So stop LYING its not free. Here's an idea keep your dick in your pants, your legs closed if you can't afford your own damn birth control. God its like being swarmed by blood sucking vampire bats having to pay for everyone's 'free' shit.

All great advice. But what do you do when the enivitable kicks you in the balls?

What do you mean by the inevitable?

Really?

 

[Conservative65]

How many times do we have to point out to dumb as a brick liberals that this shit is not free.

You're the one being "dumb as a brick". People that support these programs know they are paid for by taxes. We also know that these preventative programs save considerable taxpayer money.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So stop LYING its not free. Here's an idea keep your dick in your pants, your legs closed if you can't afford your own damn birth control. God its like being swarmed by blood sucking vampire bats having to pay for everyone's 'free' shit.

All great advice. But what do you do when the enivitable kicks you in the balls?

What do you mean by the inevitable?

Really?

It could be taken several ways. Care to explain. If you can't, that's OK.

 

[Conservative65]

Cons on here sound so dumb when they point out the obvious. Yes, obviously this program is paid for through taxes.

We know that. We're not the ones calling it free.

It's ANOTHER program where the one making the choice doesn't pay the price for the choice and someone not making it is. Typical socialist bullshit.

Ok what you're too thick to understand is, just because we call it free, it doesn't mean we are not aware it is still paid for with revenue. You think you sound intelligent when you say this but really it's just stupid to point out the obvious.

If you know it costs and still call it free, it makes you a dumbass.

 

[whitehall]

Sticking a free IUD up a teenager's vagina is not the solution to abortion, it's a favor to liberal men and boys who prey on teenage girls. We need to take a look at the motivation for on demand abortion, selling body parts and the free IUD's for (poor and ignorant) teens movement. It obviously ain't aimed at women's physical and mental health issues. It's easy to see that the abortion on demand and free IUD's for teenage girls is motivated by organized crime and created by liberal men to absolve their responsibilities when they ruin the lives of vulnerable girls and turn teenagers into sluts.

 

[ogibillm]

OR they can just control themselves hell why not just give out Heroin for free too.

Don't give them any ideas

hey if you could show me that giving out heroin would be a net gain for the community I'd be open to it

I would be for it too. At your expense.

you seem to be having a rough time with a simple concept.

the point of the op is a cheap and easy outlay now means years and years of savings.

that makes it the fiscally conservative choice.

You ignore other options. It's not an either/or. It's a neither/nor.

The fiscally conservative choice is to expect those who made the choice to pay for the choice. Anything that involves one person told to butt out of the choice being forced to pay for it when the one making it won't isn't conservative or fiscally responsible.

yep, thats the ideal, but it's not based in reality. society isn't going to start turning its back on kids and deadbeats aren't going to suddenly go the way of the do-do.

which leaves us with a choice of paying a little now or quite a lot later. which do you choose?

 

[Conservative65]

That is a solution. Quit offsetting the costs of those that continue to have or have kids they can't afford. Is your solution to enable them to keep doing what they're doing by providing them with funding to make choices for which they take no personal responsibility?

while an interesting philosophical debate it's not the world we live in.

we don't turn our backs on kids that through no fault of their own were born to parents either unwilling or unable to care for them.

They have parents. It is their responsibility.

sure is. and ideally every parent would take responsibility and work hard to provide their kid with all they need.

but that's not reality. the reality is the state picks up a lot of the tab

Not reality?

When my first child came along I met reality. The State never picked up my tab.

super. you aren't everyone.

No, I'm not everyone. I'm just one person that does for his kids what he's supposed to do and expect others to do the same, nothing more.

 

[Conservative65]

Don't give them any ideas

hey if you could show me that giving out heroin would be a net gain for the community I'd be open to it

I would be for it too. At your expense.

you seem to be having a rough time with a simple concept.

the point of the op is a cheap and easy outlay now means years and years of savings.

that makes it the fiscally conservative choice.

You ignore other options. It's not an either/or. It's a neither/nor.

The fiscally conservative choice is to expect those who made the choice to pay for the choice. Anything that involves one person told to butt out of the choice being forced to pay for it when the one making it won't isn't conservative or fiscally responsible.

yep, thats the ideal, but it's not based in reality. society isn't going to start turning its back on kids and deadbeats aren't going to suddenly go the way of the do-do.

which leaves us with a choice of paying a little now or quite a lot later. which do you choose?

I choose to let them do without and so how quickly they learn. I don't have a problem with that since I don't owe anyone anything in life. If you think it's owed to them, pick up the part the government forces me to pay and prove you truly care.

 

[pwjohn]

You're the one being "dumb as a brick". People that support these programs know they are paid for by taxes. We also know that these preventative programs save considerable taxpayer money.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So stop LYING its not free. Here's an idea keep your dick in your pants, your legs closed if you can't afford your own damn birth control. God its like being swarmed by blood sucking vampire bats having to pay for everyone's 'free' shit.

All great advice. But what do you do when the enivitable kicks you in the balls?

What do you mean by the inevitable?

Really?

It could be taken several ways. Care to explain. If you can't, that's OK.

You truly have proven yourself a deeply stupid man with that assinine comment/question of yours. It's that light at the end of the tunnel coming at ya at a 100 or more.

 

[Billy000]

Cons on here sound so dumb when they point out the obvious. Yes, obviously this program is paid for through taxes.

We know that. We're not the ones calling it free.

It's ANOTHER program where the one making the choice doesn't pay the price for the choice and someone not making it is. Typical socialist bullshit.

Ok what you're too thick to understand is, just because we call it free, it doesn't mean we are not aware it is still paid for with revenue. You think you sound intelligent when you say this but really it's just stupid to point out the obvious.

If you know it costs and still call it free, it makes you a dumbass.

Gee well it's still free to the women who use it huh?

 

[Billy000]

Cons on here sound so dumb when they point out the obvious. Yes, obviously this program is paid for through taxes.

We know that. We're not the ones calling it free.

It's ANOTHER program where the one making the choice doesn't pay the price for the choice and someone not making it is. Typical socialist bullshit.

Ok what you're too thick to understand is, just because we call it free, it doesn't mean we are not aware it is still paid for with revenue. You think you sound intelligent when you say this but really it's just stupid to point out the obvious.

If you know it costs and still call it free, it makes you a dumbass.

The same logic applies when you idiots say tax cuts are free.

 

[Conservative65]

Cons on here sound so dumb when they point out the obvious. Yes, obviously this program is paid for through taxes.

We know that. We're not the ones calling it free.

It's ANOTHER program where the one making the choice doesn't pay the price for the choice and someone not making it is. Typical socialist bullshit.

Ok what you're too thick to understand is, just because we call it free, it doesn't mean we are not aware it is still paid for with revenue. You think you sound intelligent when you say this but really it's just stupid to point out the obvious.

If you know it costs and still call it free, it makes you a dumbass.

The same logic applies when you idiots say tax cuts are free.

I notice the lower income groups that actually pay income taxes didn't mind having their rates cut under Bush.

Tax cuts don't fall under that same concept. Tax cuts reduce the money the government has so it can't spend on things for which it has no authority.