Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gun nut? Thanks again for proving your idiocy. I am a "rights nut." ALL of our rights deserve protection from assholes like you.
Stupid, there are no "rights. There are privileges the rest of society thinks you should have. Any fool who thinks he has rights needs to look up "Japanese-Americans, 1942".
Now, the question is, should you be allowed the privilege of owning a military grade weapon? Well, no. Not in most cases. you certainly don't need one to protect your home in the unlikely event of a crime. Even ignoring the reality a gun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill a household member than a bad guy. A regular gun is perfectly adequate for you to kill your housemate in that argument over who drank the last can of Milwaukee's Best.
There is simply no good reason for a guy like Joker Holmes to be able to buy a military grade weapon and a 100 round clip.
What is the line? Oh yeah, that's right. If you don't want to have a gun, don't buy one.
And watch out, I heard there are packs of feral guns roaming the countryside, and there's one in your backyard
Actually, what I had in my condo complex was a neighbor who shot out into the parking lot in a suicide attempt before doing it right a few weeks later.
If the cops had taken his gun then, he might still be alive today.
There is simply no good reason for a guy like Joker Holmes to be able to buy a military grade weapon and a 100 round clip.
I see the lobotomy reversal procedure failed. The internment of Japanese Americans during war was considered (at the time) to be constitutional, however erroneous the reasons were, try that today and see what happens........... It has nothing to do with US citizens having only "privileges" and not rights. You seem to be under the delusion that the Constitution and Bill of Rights is the government telling us what rights we have not the actual fact that those documents tell the government what it can and cannot do where those "natural" rights are concerned.Gun nut? Thanks again for proving your idiocy. I am a "rights nut." ALL of our rights deserve protection from assholes like you.
Stupid, there are no "rights. There are privileges the rest of society thinks you should have. Any fool who thinks he has rights needs to look up "Japanese-Americans, 1942".
Now, the question is, should you be allowed the privilege of owning a military grade weapon? Well, no. Not in most cases. you certainly don't need one to protect your home in the unlikely event of a crime. Even ignoring the reality a gun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill a household member than a bad guy. A regular gun is perfectly adequate for you to kill your housemate in that argument over who drank the last can of Milwaukee's Best.
There is simply no good reason for a guy like Joker Holmes to be able to buy a military grade weapon and a 100 round clip.
Oh, there are no rights? Again, you show just how ignorant you really are. Ever hear of the Bill of Rights?
Thankfully it is not up to a dumbass like you to determine anything for somebody else. That is a personal decision that has nothing to do with you because we have individual freedom in THIS country. If you don't like our rights and our freedoms, maybe you'd be happier living somewhere else. Believe me, NOBODY would miss your smelly arse.
A guy like him, huh? How would anyone KNOW what kind of guy he was? What if he went and bought rat poison from the hardware store or something? Then killed someone or multiple people? What other things would you like to BAN, you traitorous bitch?
Oh, there are no rights? Again, you show just how ignorant you really are. Ever hear of the Bill of Rights?
Sure I have. And it has nothing to do with the point I made, which you were clearly too stupid to understand.
Okay, let's try this again. Japanese Americans, 1942. They committed no crimes. They were rounded up, incarcerated, their property was taken, the courts ignored their pleas even though what was done to them was a clear violation of their "rights". At the time, people didn't care. The Japanese had bombed Pearl Harbor. Of course, we need to lock them up!
Thankfully it is not up to a dumbass like you to determine anything for somebody else. That is a personal decision that has nothing to do with you because we have individual freedom in THIS country. If you don't like our rights and our freedoms, maybe you'd be happier living somewhere else. Believe me, NOBODY would miss your smelly arse.
Stupid, 32,000 gun deaths and 78,000 gun injuries and 300,000 gun crimes make it my business.
A guy like him, huh? How would anyone KNOW what kind of guy he was? What if he went and bought rat poison from the hardware store or something? Then killed someone or multiple people? What other things would you like to BAN, you traitorous bitch?
Uh, within hours of the shooting, everyone who knew Holmes said they knew the guy was crazy. the same for Cho, or Loughner, or Lanza, or pretty much every other nut who went on a shooting spree. Shit, Holmes own mother broke bad on him.
And, no, he simply would not have been able to do the kind of damage he did with that AR-15 with a box of rat poison.
I see the lobotomy reversal procedure failed. The internment of Japanese Americans during war was considered (at the time) to be constitutional, however erroneous the reasons were, try that today and see what happens........... It has nothing to do with US citizens having only "privileges" and not rights. You seem to be under the delusion that the Constitution and Bill of Rights is the government telling us what rights we have not the actual fact that those documents tell the government what it can and cannot do where those "natural" rights are concerned.
As for your "opinion" on military grade weapons........ SCOTUS obviously disagrees with you as do most Americans. Oh well.
I see the lobotomy reversal procedure failed. The internment of Japanese Americans during war was considered (at the time) to be constitutional, however erroneous the reasons were, try that today and see what happens........... It has nothing to do with US citizens having only "privileges" and not rights. You seem to be under the delusion that the Constitution and Bill of Rights is the government telling us what rights we have not the actual fact that those documents tell the government what it can and cannot do where those "natural" rights are concerned.
Actually, we are doing the same kinds of things today, to Muslims. We haven't learned a fucking thing.
No, the thing is, that I tired to get across StupidL was that a majority decided the Japanese had no "rights", not the "government", which is really us.
As for your "opinion" on military grade weapons........ SCOTUS obviously disagrees with you as do most Americans. Oh well.
Again, Heller is a 5-4 decision based on fanciful reasoning. Scalia takes a dirt nap, and "militias" get "Well-regulated" and we'll all be better off for it.
I see the lobotomy reversal procedure failed. The internment of Japanese Americans during war was considered (at the time) to be constitutional, however erroneous the reasons were, try that today and see what happens........... It has nothing to do with US citizens having only "privileges" and not rights. You seem to be under the delusion that the Constitution and Bill of Rights is the government telling us what rights we have not the actual fact that those documents tell the government what it can and cannot do where those "natural" rights are concerned.
Actually, we are doing the same kinds of things today, to Muslims. We haven't learned a fucking thing.
No, the thing is, that I tired to get across StupidL was that a majority decided the Japanese had no "rights", not the "government", which is really us.
As for your "opinion" on military grade weapons........ SCOTUS obviously disagrees with you as do most Americans. Oh well.
Again, Heller is a 5-4 decision based on fanciful reasoning. Scalia takes a dirt nap, and "militias" get "Well-regulated" and we'll all be better off for it.
I see the lobotomy reversal procedure failed. The internment of Japanese Americans during war was considered (at the time) to be constitutional, however erroneous the reasons were, try that today and see what happens........... It has nothing to do with US citizens having only "privileges" and not rights. You seem to be under the delusion that the Constitution and Bill of Rights is the government telling us what rights we have not the actual fact that those documents tell the government what it can and cannot do where those "natural" rights are concerned.
Actually, we are doing the same kinds of things today, to Muslims. We haven't learned a fucking thing.
No, the thing is, that I tired to get across StupidL was that a majority decided the Japanese had no "rights", not the "government", which is really us.
As for your "opinion" on military grade weapons........ SCOTUS obviously disagrees with you as do most Americans. Oh well.
Again, Heller is a 5-4 decision based on fanciful reasoning. Scalia takes a dirt nap, and "militias" get "Well-regulated" and we'll all be better off for it.
We are doing the same things to Muslims??!! Wonder where the internment camps are......... oh yeah war combatants held in Gitmo....... That's your evidence.......I see the lobotomy reversal procedure failed. The internment of Japanese Americans during war was considered (at the time) to be constitutional, however erroneous the reasons were, try that today and see what happens........... It has nothing to do with US citizens having only "privileges" and not rights. You seem to be under the delusion that the Constitution and Bill of Rights is the government telling us what rights we have not the actual fact that those documents tell the government what it can and cannot do where those "natural" rights are concerned.
Actually, we are doing the same kinds of things today, to Muslims. We haven't learned a fucking thing.
No, the thing is, that I tired to get across StupidL was that a majority decided the Japanese had no "rights", not the "government", which is really us.
As for your "opinion" on military grade weapons........ SCOTUS obviously disagrees with you as do most Americans. Oh well.
Again, Heller is a 5-4 decision based on fanciful reasoning. Scalia takes a dirt nap, and "militias" get "Well-regulated" and we'll all be better off for it.
You have YET to make any kind of valid point whatsoever. Just a bunch of paranoid blathering is all we can get out of you. Like you've been told before, there are at least TWICE as many DGU than crimes committed with guns. How many more times do you need to be given the information before it sinks into your thick retard skull?
Oh? Within HOURS after the crime? You see? Do you see how retarded you really are? You dumb arse, there is no way (if said person has on CRIMINAL RECORD) that anyone would know they are going to shoot someone.
Not only that, but your constant references to "mass shootings" are meaningless since they make up LESS THAN 1% of all homicides.
Why are you not complaining about black on black gang violence which is, by FAR, a bigger problem. Why? Because you are a dumb fool, that's why.
We are doing the same things to Muslims??!! Wonder where the internment camps are......... oh yeah war combatants held in Gitmo....... That's your evidence.......
Again, no one really gives a rats ass about your "opinion" on SCOTUS and history (prior to the 1900s) shows the decision was anything but fanciful, it shows it was a return to original intent, not your modern interpretation.
Katrina von Communist-the foxy fabian who should be obscene and not heard. The people who brought that suit should have been bankrupted for filing a bogus suit. their claim was that the AR-15 has no legitimate purpose. that alone is a bald faced lie that should have subjected the lawyers to "rule 11" sanctions
Yes, totally bankrupt greiving parents for asking a sensible question like,
"Why was the crazy fucker who thought he was the Joker allowed to buy a military grade weapon?"
You guys might have to be worried that now people see what these laws are like... and question them. Even Chris the gun nut didn't know there was a liability protection for gun makers and sellers.
Uuummmm, where did you get the idea I said Gitmo was a good thing? Oh yeah, your deluded thinking won't let you see past your own nose. Got it.We are doing the same things to Muslims??!! Wonder where the internment camps are......... oh yeah war combatants held in Gitmo....... That's your evidence.......
Again, no one really gives a rats ass about your "opinion" on SCOTUS and history (prior to the 1900s) shows the decision was anything but fanciful, it shows it was a return to original intent, not your modern interpretation.
You think what we are doing at Gitmo is a good thing? Are you fucking retarded? Hey, I'm sure the torture and lack of habeus corpus is going to look really good in the history books.
Actually, the modern interprestation is Heller. Even in the 19th century, they had gun control. Which is why 5 homicides a year in Dodge City or Tombstone was a record. the Sheriff would collect the guns before anyone came into town.
That's not a sensible question. Looking to find fault, following up a chain to find a weak link, why not just blame the Pope or the Dalai Lama for not praying hard enough, or better yet, why not blame the Colorado Rockies for not hitting enough home runs to distract people from going to the movies so they never see Batman or get any ideas they're the Joker in real life to begin with. Could always just chalk it up to global warming and/or climate change, if only there were no cars in the world the shooter would never have made it to the scene of the crime. You maybe need a degree in Chaos Theory to sort this one out
Uuummmm, where did you get the idea I said Gitmo was a good thing? Oh yeah, your deluded thinking won't let you see past your own nose. Got it.
As for the so called evidence you presented (Dodge City and Tombstone) that was local control, not federal, remember we're talking Federal and the Constitution so your misapplied definition of modern falls woefully short, not to mention the law in those town came around long after the founding fathers were dead and buried, oops.
Try reading what constituted "militia" to the founding fathers, try reading (first colonial) then state laws in the late 1700s, early 1800s requiring all males of age to own because they were part of the militia. History is your friend, try learning it in it's entirety, not just those aspects you can skew to suit your world view.
Again your misapplied "logic" is nothing more than opinion, an opinion that is patently obviously in the minority of some who live in fear. Maybe we should create a Nerf world in a bubble for ya surrounded by government officials who control your every breathing moment where you can feel safe and sound.
dont confuse a background check with a background investigation
But why aren't we doing background investigations?
The Media was able to find out Joker Holmes was batshit crazy within a day of the shooting. The same with Loughner, or Cho, or Lanza.
It wasn't like their insanity was a secret. IN Holmes case, his university was in the process of expelling him for his mental issues.
Now, finding it hard to believe any of these guys were brilliant at hiding their issues. But it really should be on the gun industry to make sure these guys can't get guns.
After Timothy McVeigh did his thing, the manufacturers of fertilizers put in a whole series of checks to monitor who was buying their product and reporting anything suspicious to the government. After 9-11, we did a whole lot of things to make the airports more secure.
But guns? Meh, let's slap the grieving parents of someone killed by a madman who was able to buy a gun with a quarter million dollar penalty for wanting their day in court.
Okay....... What kinda drugs are you taking?Uuummmm, where did you get the idea I said Gitmo was a good thing? Oh yeah, your deluded thinking won't let you see past your own nose. Got it.
The part where you implied they weren't as bad as WWII interment camps and called the people in them "enemy combantants".
As for the so called evidence you presented (Dodge City and Tombstone) that was local control, not federal, remember we're talking Federal and the Constitution so your misapplied definition of modern falls woefully short, not to mention the law in those town came around long after the founding fathers were dead and buried, oops.
But that was the point. Heller invalidated LOCAL ordinances. Ones the people of DC and Chicago voted on.
Try reading what constituted "militia" to the founding fathers, try reading (first colonial) then state laws in the late 1700s, early 1800s requiring all males of age to own because they were part of the militia. History is your friend, try learning it in it's entirety, not just those aspects you can skew to suit your world view.
Again your misapplied "logic" is nothing more than opinion, an opinion that is patently obviously in the minority of some who live in fear. Maybe we should create a Nerf world in a bubble for ya surrounded by government officials who control your every breathing moment where you can feel safe and sound.
Okay, so your bizarre interpretation of history aside, on what planet does Joker Holmes constitute a well regulated militia?
Because, really, we need laws that reflect the here and now, not what some slave rapist thought 200 years ago.
