G.W. Bush EFFED Up Things So Much With Iraq That Even Republicans Are War Weary

[g5000]

http://www.usmessageboard.com/middle-east-general/28297-must-invade-iran-now.html <---2006 USMB topic



.

 

[g5000]

http://www.usmessageboard.com/military/49681-our-president-has-to-invade-iran-and-now.html <---- 2007 USMB topic


the evil of Iran why we must attack <---- 2007 USMB topic

More USMB topics:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/iran/55226-you-ready-to-attack-iran.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/247424-war-with-iran.html

Take Action Against Syria and Iran - Now

 

[g5000]

So...no. Not war weariness.

Obama derangement syndrome turning the previously bloodthirsty into Russian and Iranian and Syrian useful idiots.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Stop bringing up Bush all the time....Now lets talk about Jimmy Carter

 

[g5000]

Stop bringing up Bush all the time....Now lets talk about Jimmy Carter

I am bringing evidence of hypocrisy. Sorry if that hurts.

 

[Stephanie]

remember how the left accused Bush of MAKING MORE TERRORIST with his war in Iraq?

well all of sudden that saying flew out their asses when it comes to Obama...he can screw up the whole middle east and all we is, crickets chirping

Obama has become a regular KILLING MACHINE and now War Monger...his base applaud him

 

[Redfish]

Stop bringing up Bush all the time....Now lets talk about Jimmy Carter

I am bringing evidence of hypocrisy. Sorry if that hurts.

the hypocrisy is coming from the anti-war left wingers who were calling for Bush's impeachment over Iraq and are now in full support of Obama's desire to invade Syria (without UN approval or support from any allies)

you left wing assholes are so transparent in your worship of the kenyan messiah that it makes me vomit.

 

[Stephanie]

So...no. Not war weariness.

Obama derangement syndrome turning the previously bloodthirsty into Russian and Iranian and Syrian useful idiots.

good grief, you must of worn yourself after all that...we will bow at your every word from now on...and I won't ever again accuse you of being a piss drinker

what a show you put on though, didn't mean a whole but, but you think it's because the Dear Leader is a Democrat and NOT BECAUSE the people DON'T TRUST him to take our MILITARY to war, that is your opinion...

 

[Redfish]

remember how the left accused Bush of MAKING MORE TERRORIST with his war in Iraq?

well all of sudden that saying flew out their asses when it comes to Obama...he can screw up the whole middle east and all we is, crickets chirping

Obama has become a regular KILLING MACHINE and now War Monger...his base applaud him

You expect them to criticize the first black president, the hero of chicago, the great savior of the poor and downtroden?

 

[Yurt]

- Republicans are historically war weary

- Everyone should be war weary

- Right or wrong, Iraq is a better country today (much better than Syria)

- Though misguided, Bush II got the support of Congress and many, many other willing partners around the world unlike the flip floping Obama/Kerry/Clinton/Pelosi/etc

- The entire Middle East is a craphole no matter who is or has been in charge in America and it's not our fault

- President Obama is flailing because he is and always has been clueless about the world

- I got stung by a bee today. How the Hell did a bee get into my house...

WHAT

THE

FUCK????

How can these people be so damn dumb????

The Reagan policies caused concern about the US overseas, but it was nothing compared to the disaster that was Bush.
To me, the most hilarious is the billion dollars Iraq has demanded to "fix" Baghdad.

The city released a statement saying “The U.S. forces changed this beautiful city to a camp in an ugly and destructive way, which reflected deliberate ignorance and carelessness about the simplest forms of public taste . . . Due to the huge damage, leading to a loss the Baghdad municipality cannot afford . . . we demand the American side apologize to Baghdad’s people and pay back these expenses.”

Baghdad demands $1 billion from US and apology

That's just one city. And these dumb ass right wingers think Iraq was a success when they threw shoes at our president and the guy that did it became a national hero.

Only the American right wing is so fucked up they look at a massive failure and terrible insults and see "success". That's how deluded they are. I honestly don't know how these people can be so stupid. It astounds me.

proof rdean supports cruel dictators like saddam

how sad, but not surprising

 

[ClosedCaption]

Stop bringing up Bush all the time....Now lets talk about Jimmy Carter

I am bringing evidence of hypocrisy. Sorry if that hurts.

I just got here...

 

[Missourian]

People really need to spend less time worrying about who's consistent or inconsistent

and more time worrying about what is the right thing to do.

Consistency tells the tale.

It shows you folks true motivations.

All the people who claimed to be against Iraq but support bombing Syria, what has changed?

The ONLY thing that is different is that their guy is in charge now.

Republicans can at least claim that we've learned from the past 10 years that our military interventionism in the Middle East has not produced results worthy of the costs.

WE OUSTED A DICTATOR, toppled his regime and executed him at least in part over his use of chemical weapons.

If that didn't send everyone the message, what do you think a couple days of bombing will accomplish?

Then you MUST contend with the doctrine of unintended consequences!

Obama says "Oh, we'll just lob some cruise missiles in there and we'll wipe our hands of the matter."

That's amateur hour thinking at best.

This thing could boil over in a hillbilly heartbeat.

Military action is a HUGE risk, magnified 100 times in the Middle East.

Obama sound like a child playing with his army men.

I don't see the benefit, but the risk is enormous.

We would be fools to engage in this course to assuage the ego of a president with a big mouth.

Here's the $64,000 question.

Who on the left would have supported bombing Syria if Obama hadn't painted himself in a corner with his red line drawing?

My informed guess is....zero.

 

[Missourian]

Here is a good question for both sides to this argument.

It separates the people from the sheeple.

Now, close your eyes and ask yourselves this question, would you support bombing Syria if Obama opposed it but Republicans supported it?

I don't expect you to honest with us, but I do expect you to be honest with yourselves.

 

[bendog]

I don't see it so much as politics ... though the gop is at war with itself with the neocons v. the TPM. Some dem pols support obama, but even Kerry and Clinton initially supported Iraq.

But BushI and Slick enforced the no flys preventing more attacks by Saddam against the kurds and shiaa.

 

[Missourian]

Obama has turned out to be a BIGGER war monger than Bush..

and now his cult members have to spin that...so now it's because of Bush Americans are against Obama going to war with Syria..

what a frikken joker you Obamabots are

but notice how all them ANTI-WAR people are now not SAYING A WORD...no protesting, no code pinkeos, etc etc

just MAKING EXCUSES for it

Why are you such a RANCID little partisan liar?

I watched Code Pink members being escorted out of the hearing yesterday on live TV while Kerry spoke.

See?

You are THEE worse poster on this board...bar none.

On Breitbart...

I did a Google News search for the last week "Code Pink".

Bloomberg was the only mainstream news source that I could find that picked it up.

No ABC, no NBC, no CBS, not Huffington Post...

That is what Stephanie is saying...

When it was Iraq, Code Pink protests got at a minimum a mention and a clip on nightly broadcast news.

With a Democrat President, one mainstream news source ran one story on it.

https://www.google.com/search?q=cod...lla:en-US:official&safe=off&tbm=nws&tbs=qdr:w

 

[Stephanie]

Here is a good question for both sides to this argument.

It separates the people from the sheeple.

Now, close your eyes and ask yourselves this question, would you support bombing Syria if Obama opposed it but Republicans supported it?

I don't expect you to honest with us, but I do expect you to be honest with yourselves.

good question , but don't expect the newly minted warmongers from on the left to answer

 

[Oldstyle]

Because of Bush II and his MASSIVE and CONSTANT lies to push the country into an unecessary war with the wrong country that not only cost countless of lives but left us near total financial collapse he's left the country with pretty much ZERO credibility.

No one wants to hear anything about war anymore, they're just sick of it. Can't believe anything anyone in the government says about it.

Thanks to G.W. Bush.

Good job!



*SMH*

You know what, Marc? I used to think W's Middle Eastern strategy was confused but then Barry took over and made Bush look like a member of the political Mensa society. Blaming George W. Bush for the ongoing cluster fuck that is our present day foreign policy is laughable. Barack Obama doesn't have a CLUE what he's doing! He's gone from winning a Nobel Peace Prize and being idolized around the world to being an international buffoon in just five short years.

 

[Kondor3]

Here is a good question for both sides to this argument.

It separates the people from the sheeple.

Now, close your eyes and ask yourselves this question, would you support bombing Syria if Obama opposed it but Republicans supported it?

I don't expect you to honest with us, but I do expect you to be honest with yourselves.

good question , but don't expect the newly minted warmongers from on the left to answer

Not to add more gasoline to the fire, but, I must admit, that observation (and that bit of follow-up) resonated with me as probably being accurate...

 

[rdean]

You know why this is hilarious? Republican will believe Weasel Zippers and blogs and conspiracy, but they won't believe George W. Bush when he says no WMD's were found.

He bet his place in history on finding WMD's and found none and admits it. In multiple interviews. But right wingers only want to believe the lies. When the guy finally comes clean, they won't believe the truth.

I find that absolutely hilarious don't you guys?

 

[rdean]

People really need to spend less time worrying about who's consistent or inconsistent

and more time worrying about what is the right thing to do.

Consistency tells the tale.

It shows you folks true motivations.

All the people who claimed to be against Iraq but support bombing Syria, what has changed?

The ONLY thing that is different is that their guy is in charge now.

Republicans can at least claim that we've learned from the past 10 years that our military interventionism in the Middle East has not produced results worthy of the costs.

WE OUSTED A DICTATOR, toppled his regime and executed him at least in part over his use of chemical weapons.

If that didn't send everyone the message, what do you think a couple days of bombing will accomplish?

Then you MUST contend with the doctrine of unintended consequences!

Obama says "Oh, we'll just lob some cruise missiles in there and we'll wipe our hands of the matter."

That's amateur hour thinking at best.

This thing could boil over in a hillbilly heartbeat.

Military action is a HUGE risk, magnified 100 times in the Middle East.

Obama sound like a child playing with his army men.

I don't see the benefit, but the risk is enormous.

We would be fools to engage in this course to assuage the ego of a president with a big mouth.

Here's the $64,000 question.

Who on the left would have supported bombing Syria if Obama hadn't painted himself in a corner with his red line drawing?

My informed guess is....zero.

Why didn't you "oust" the dictator in North Korea. He built nuclear weapons.

Why not Castro?

And why is Iraq now a friend of Iran?

Which is better? A dictator or a hard right wing Muslim theocracy?

I'll tell you. Better is not being tricked into Iraq over fake WMD's which apparently Syria actually has. We know there were no WMD's in Iraq. Bush has told us several times there were none. You guys believed him when he lied and now refuse to believe him when he tells the truth. Hilarious!