Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just hit the local metal supplier's scrap and "shorts" pile. 1/4" round stock (brass or steel) can be made into .22, .223, and .25 rounds. 3/8" can be used for pretty much anything from a .270 to a .38 Special (including the common 9mm and .357 Magnum). Anything bigger than that, you need half-inch. A good machinist can make the bar stock into bullets or casings. That's how my uncle makes casings for his elephant gun...he turns down 5/8" stock. (It's a .577 Nitro.)
What kind of a nutjob hunts elephants?
I'm guessing that most criminals and dumb people won't be smart enough to make their own bullets. So it definitely helps to outlaw bullets.
He doesn't hunt elephants...he just likes his Holland & Holland.
What kind of a nutjob hunts elephants?
I'm guessing that most criminals and dumb people won't be smart enough to make their own bullets. So it definitely helps to outlaw bullets.
He doesn't hunt elephants...he just likes his Holland & Holland.
someone must hunt elephants
i have an extra nice pair of boots
made of elephant hide
He doesn't hunt elephants...he just likes his Holland & Holland.
someone must hunt elephants
i have an extra nice pair of boots
made of elephant hide
back to Mark Kelly
according to Arizona bill HB 2455 voluntarily turned in firearms (the ar-15)
are to be treated as assets and must be sold to the public
--LOL
bill passed the house now on to the Senate
Bill Tracking
Do you get followed around by dung beetles?What kind of a nutjob hunts elephants?
I'm guessing that most criminals and dumb people won't be smart enough to make their own bullets. So it definitely helps to outlaw bullets.
He doesn't hunt elephants...he just likes his Holland & Holland.
someone must hunt elephants
i have an extra nice pair of boots
made of elephant hide
Gabby Giffords' Husband Buys AR-15
ya sure you were going to give it up.
why, if it weren't for hypocrisy, you dems would have no principles at all.
Do you get followed around by dung beetles?He doesn't hunt elephants...he just likes his Holland & Holland.
someone must hunt elephants
i have an extra nice pair of boots
made of elephant hide
.577 Nitro! What a beast!Just hit the local metal supplier's scrap and "shorts" pile. 1/4" round stock (brass or steel) can be made into .22, .223, and .25 rounds. 3/8" can be used for pretty much anything from a .270 to a .38 Special (including the common 9mm and .357 Magnum). Anything bigger than that, you need half-inch. A good machinist can make the bar stock into bullets or casings. That's how my uncle makes casings for his elephant gun...he turns down 5/8" stock. (It's a .577 Nitro.)
What kind of a nutjob hunts elephants?
I'm guessing that most criminals and dumb people won't be smart enough to make their own bullets. So it definitely helps to outlaw bullets.
He doesn't hunt elephants...he just likes his Holland & Holland.
Nothin to see here, move along!
Really? Got a link (other than some right wing blog site) that proves that Giffords' husband is buying an AR-15?
Yeah..................I know...................both of them are gun owners, they've already stated as much, but my question is, do you think either of them would support magazines that have more than 10 rounds each?
[Really? Got a link (other than some right wing blog site) that proves that Giffords' husband is buying an AR-15?]
hows this
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?....215073368547929.71130.163148530407080&type=1
Really? Got a link (other than some right wing blog site) that proves that Giffords' husband is buying an AR-15?
Yeah..................I know...................both of them are gun owners, they've already stated as much, but my question is, do you think either of them would support magazines that have more than 10 rounds each?
[Really? Got a link (other than some right wing blog site) that proves that Giffords' husband is buying an AR-15?]
hows this
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?....215073368547929.71130.163148530407080&type=1
Wow those comments on his page are priceless. Everyone is tearing him a new one for this political stunt, which is nothing more than an effort to take away our 2nd amendment rights.
By David Codrea
12 March, 2013
Dear Capt. Kelly,
Houston, we have a problem: Your story makes no sense.
Youre against rifles like the semiautomatic AR-15, which look like weapons of war, when you know full well the military doesnt use them, but instead uses the select fire-capable M16. Yet you go to a dealer to buy a .45, a sidearm, which was actually, in your words, designed for the military. Im not following your logic here.
You say as you were leaving the gun store, you noticed a used AR-15 and bought that, too. You then complain about your background check, and use that to attack private sales which dont undergo background checks. Im not following your logic here.
You say you have not taken possession of the gun yet, but when you do will turn it over to the Tucson Police. Why? If you wanted to buy them a gun, you could have just given them the money. If you wanted to prove how easy undocumented sales are, you could have bought one privately and taken possession of it instead of going through the trouble of proving youre not a prohibited person. Im not following your logic here.
The most troubling thing is, you didnt admit that was your intent until after your purchase had been reported by alternative media and people were commenting on what appears to be hypocrisy of the highest order, compounded with implausible excuse-making. You then told CNN that making a Facebook announcement was something you and your people had a plan for, but you didnt know when, like its some kind of big decision you have to consult a team on. Im not following your logic here.
(Excerpt)
Read more:
Mark Kelly?s story on AR-15 purchase prompts skeptical open letter - National gun rights | Examiner.com
By David Codrea
12 March, 2013
Dear Capt. Kelly,
Houston, we have a problem: Your story makes no sense.
Youre against rifles like the semiautomatic AR-15, which look like weapons of war, when you know full well the military doesnt use them, but instead uses the select fire-capable M16. Yet you go to a dealer to buy a .45, a sidearm, which was actually, in your words, designed for the military. Im not following your logic here.
You say as you were leaving the gun store, you noticed a used AR-15 and bought that, too. You then complain about your background check, and use that to attack private sales which dont undergo background checks. Im not following your logic here.
You say you have not taken possession of the gun yet, but when you do will turn it over to the Tucson Police. Why? If you wanted to buy them a gun, you could have just given them the money. If you wanted to prove how easy undocumented sales are, you could have bought one privately and taken possession of it instead of going through the trouble of proving youre not a prohibited person. Im not following your logic here.
The most troubling thing is, you didnt admit that was your intent until after your purchase had been reported by alternative media and people were commenting on what appears to be hypocrisy of the highest order, compounded with implausible excuse-making. You then told CNN that making a Facebook announcement was something you and your people had a plan for, but you didnt know when, like its some kind of big decision you have to consult a team on. Im not following your logic here.
(Excerpt)
Read more:
Mark Kelly?s story on AR-15 purchase prompts skeptical open letter - National gun rights | Examiner.com
Do as I say, not as I do.
Gabby Giffords' Husband Buys AR-15
ya sure you were going to give it up.
why, if it weren't for hypocrisy, you dems would have no principles at all.
Well, I would say that any political aspirations he may have had, have been totally pissed down the toilet.By David Codrea
12 March, 2013
Dear Capt. Kelly,
Houston, we have a problem: Your story makes no sense.
Youre against rifles like the semiautomatic AR-15, which look like weapons of war, when you know full well the military doesnt use them, but instead uses the select fire-capable M16. Yet you go to a dealer to buy a .45, a sidearm, which was actually, in your words, designed for the military. Im not following your logic here.
You say as you were leaving the gun store, you noticed a used AR-15 and bought that, too. You then complain about your background check, and use that to attack private sales which dont undergo background checks. Im not following your logic here.
You say you have not taken possession of the gun yet, but when you do will turn it over to the Tucson Police. Why? If you wanted to buy them a gun, you could have just given them the money. If you wanted to prove how easy undocumented sales are, you could have bought one privately and taken possession of it instead of going through the trouble of proving youre not a prohibited person. Im not following your logic here.
The most troubling thing is, you didnt admit that was your intent until after your purchase had been reported by alternative media and people were commenting on what appears to be hypocrisy of the highest order, compounded with implausible excuse-making. You then told CNN that making a Facebook announcement was something you and your people had a plan for, but you didnt know when, like its some kind of big decision you have to consult a team on. Im not following your logic here.
(Excerpt)
Read more:
Mark Kelly?s story on AR-15 purchase prompts skeptical open letter - National gun rights | Examiner.com
