Garland will probably indict Trump just before the election

[Coyote]

Opinion:
Garland will probably indict Trump a week or two before the election.
The Democrats are attempting to provoke GOP voters into political violence to scare people.
It doesn't matter if Trump can beat the indictment.
Their purpose for the indictment is to taint the election.
Don't take the bait.
Garland wants to interfere with the election.

That’s what Comey did to Clinton.

 

[scruffy]

Can anyone imagine the big October surprise to learn that Russia is in possession of some of the missing documents?

It wouldn't surprise me at all if the FBI weenies who stole them from the Donald, turned around and sold them to a foreign power.

Will the American people believe and trust the FBI/DOJ, or will they trust Trump?
LOL

The FBI has proven itself to be hopelessly corrupt.

I don't think any American really trusts politicians. I might be wrong... am I?

 

[Rambunctious]

Thanks for your opinion. But it really is going to boil down to who is believed and trusted.

Well not you if you still believe the Trump and Russia collusion hoax....
At this point with what we know.... I don't know how anyone can still believe that FBI scandalous hoax....

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Thanks for your opinion. But it really is going to boil down to who is believed and trusted

The people will be fed their propaganda. It's up to them to do the research and find the truth. It won't come from our media or govt.

 

[Rambunctious]

That’s what Comey did to Clinton.

Comey was trying to assist her but he is a big goof and so he screwed the pooch.....

 

[dudmuck]

Garland has got to come up with a charge for a Grand Jury to indict him on, and he is failing miserably at every turn.

the laws cited in the search warrant is a good start.

But the empty folders... The most reasonable inference is that Donald Trump disposed of those classified documents after unlawfully taking them from the White House. Which means he should probably be arrested immediately, if national security is to still exist.

 

[MarathonMike]

Opinion:
Garland will probably indict Trump a week or two before the election.
The Democrats are attempting to provoke GOP voters into political violence to scare people.
It doesn't matter if Trump can beat the indictment.
Their purpose for the indictment is to taint the election.
Don't take the bait.
Garland wants to interfere with the election.

Oh for sure. Team China just pushed in all their chips on this FBI raid stunt. They would love to indict Trump, but they need a major distraction for the upcoming elections because they have f**Kd Up literally everything both foreign and domestic.

 

[Coyote]

Comey was trying to assist her but he is a big goof and so he screwed the pooch.....

No. He absolutely wasn’t. He broke long established protocol by announcing he was reopening an investigation shortly before Election Day. Can’t spin that one

 

[excalibur]

Garland has got to come up with a charge for a Grand Jury to indict him on, and he is failing miserably at every turn.

Garland and his crew didn't realize that the Presidential Records Act (PRA) has no enforcement provision. They used the PRA as the excuse for the warrant and then finally realized too late there was no enforcement provision in the PRA.

Now they are attempting to use another statute to justify their farce of a raid. They can't do that though, and this too they should know.

 

[excalibur]

Comey was trying to assist her but he is a big goof and so he screwed the pooch.....

Comey also removed classified documents (took then with him) but he's never been charged

 

[Pete7469]

But a grand jury can indict a ham sandwich.

Not a crackhead or a criminal traitor though....

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

View attachment 691686

Actually, Sailor boy is right for a changes. The Grand Jury must indict. But common sense should inform you that Garland will either ask them to hold off until after the election, or keep it sealed until then. The last thing that Garland wants is to bolster the claims that it is a political move.

 

[scruffy]

Actually, Sailor boy is right for a changes. The Grand Jury must indict. But common sense should inform you that Garland will either ask them to hold off until after the election, or keep it sealed until then. The last thing that Garland wants is to bolster the claims that it is a political move.

Too late. Garland's boss kinda screwed that one up last night.

 

[Pete7469]

Comey was trying to assist her but he is a big goof and so he screwed the pooch.....

Comey had an affair with Chelsea?

 

[Leo123]

I think it's more likely that Garland and the FBI will be content with the damage they've already done to Trump's reputation.

The chances of a Dem win is high enough that Trump won't be a threat due to the R's losing power.

Then there are nearly another 2 years to destroy Trump with the evidence against him.

Can anybody honestly believe that Trump can get himself out of the treason hole he's dug?

Buy a new crystal ball, yours is broken.

 

[Pete7469]

Actually, Sailor boy is right for a changes. The Grand Jury must indict. But common sense should inform you that Garland will either ask them to hold off until after the election, or keep it sealed until then. The last thing that Garland wants is to bolster the claims that it is a political move.

Complete bullshit.

Regressive cocksuckers like this traitor are constantly trying to find things wrong with America, and the "solution" is always worse than the perceived problem.

Leftist filth like this assfuck are an answer to a question no one asked.

We need pieces of shit like this traitor like we need taste buds in our assholes.


.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Garland and his crew didn't realize that the Presidential Records Act (PRA) has no enforcement provision. They used the PRA as the excuse for the warrant and then finally realized too late there was no enforcement provision in the PRA.

Now they are attempting to use another statute to justify their farce of a raid. They can't do that though, and this too they should know.

What is the Presidential Records Act?

Former President Trump announced on Monday that FBI officials executed a search warrant at his Mar-a-Lago residence, a dramatic step he called “not necessary or appropriate.” Eric Trump, one of the…

thehill.com

U.S. code says that “Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined” $2,000, up to three years in prison or “shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.”

What is the Espionage Act?

Anyone convicted of violating the law could face a fine or up to 10 years in prison.

thehill.com

The unsealing of the search warrant that the FBI executed at former President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago property revealed that the agency believes Trump may have violated the Espionage Act of 1917, among other potential crimes.

The warrant was made public on Friday after the Justice Department filed a motion to request that it be unsealed. Attorney General Merrick Garland said he made the decision given the intense public interest in the situation and because Trump chose to publicly reveal that the search occurred.

 

[Dragonlady]

Opinion:
Garland will probably indict Trump a week or two before the election.
The Democrats are attempting to provoke GOP voters into political violence to scare people.
It doesn't matter if Trump can beat the indictment.
Their purpose for the indictment is to taint the election.
Don't take the bait.
Garland wants to interfere with the election.

You're projecting what Trump tried to do with Hunter's Laptop in the 2020 Presidential election.

Donald Trump isn't on the ballot in this election, so it's the perfect time to indict him.

If Trump didn't want to be indicted, he should have returned the documents the first half dozen times they asked. Then it wouldn't have dragged out for so long.

And what was in the 47 empty Top Secret folders? And where is that stuff now?

 

[Dragonlady]

Complete bullshit.

Regressive cocksuckers like this traitor are constantly trying to find things wrong with America, and the "solution" is always worse than the perceived problem.

Leftist filth like this assfuck are an answer to a question no one asked.

We need pieces of shit like this traitor like we need taste buds in our assholes.


.

Hey everybody, Pete knows his SHIT and his ASSHOLES.

Too bad that's all he knows.

 

[Pete7469]

No. He absolutely wasn’t. He broke long established protocol by announcing he was reopening an investigation shortly before Election Day. Can’t spin that one

His minions should have charged her for the crimes he testified in congress she was guilty of, but he asserted no DA would pursue the case.

Which is absurd.

DA's regularly pursue cases they have no hope in hell of winning otherwise Zimmerman, Rittenhouse and Randy Weaver would be unknown.