Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obie's incompetence may well be the reason there has been an inordinate exidous of senir General Staff officers. Who knows?Had he come forward with his concerns, he would have been branded a traitor, naturally. He would be another Edward Snowden. What happened to Stanley McChrystal when he said the same things about obama's incompetence?
How many people in the military, in government KNOW how bad obama is and don't say anything? They will never come forward to tell what they know or will wait until they have retired before they do.
By the same token, do you think Gates doesn't now have a great big target on his back right now? How feverishly do you imagine Holder's minions are working, trying to dig up any amount of dirt on him that they can?
The inordinate exodus has not been voluntary. obama has been quietly decapitating senior military for a long time. He's dismissed over 400 officers. They are given a choice, resign, retire or be fired. If they make too much of an issue, they are court martialed.
"high praise"
NO, Gates says she did her job effectively.
That is what she is supposed to do.
Well, half the board thinks she didn't - and therefore this is in fact high praise.
The Clintons are known for holding grudges against their political enemies. But according to a new book, their aides went so far as to build a formal spreadsheet rating their friends and foes.
The so-called "hit list" reportedly was entered into a Microsoft Excel document at the end of Hillary Clinton's unsuccessful 2008 presidential bid. In one draft, Democrats in Congress were even given a rating, from 1 to 7, with 7 being the worst.
The details were reported Monday in The Hill and Politico, excerpted from the forthcoming book, "HRC: State Secrets and the Rebirth of Hillary Clinton."
According to the report, Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass.; Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va.; Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa.; and Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., were among those to earn a score of 7 on the list.
The list of who's naughty and who's nice -- in their eyes -- was largely based on who endorsed then-candidate Barack Obama in 2008, who endorsed Clinton and who sat out the race.
Others to earn the Clintons' scorn were Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., and the late Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., who delivered a significant early endorsement to Obama in the 2008 race.
I listened to an interview with Gates and he criticized the hacks who have taken his quotes about Obama out of context.
The only person he is unequivocally critical of is Joe Biden. He slams Biden hard, saying Biden was wrong on every foreign policy issue of the last 40 years.
He did not mention Hillary in the interview, but if he praises her in the book, then I think we can see where Gates is going with this. I mentioned in the first topics about this book that Gates is a politician, and now it is starting to sound like he is helping shape a Hillary candidacy, and if so, that would require a take-down of Biden.
lets not forget it mosty dems who get the bullets in the head in this country huh?
Lee Harvey Oswald was a communist.
Malcom X was murdered by blacks.
Robert Kennedy, Serhan Serhan.
Gabby Gifford, left-wing nut-case.
Lincoln, Southern-Democrat.
Even MLK was shot by a Democrat.
With the exception of Oswald, most of the murderers were Conservative.
That's the way conservatives roll with political discourse. By use of bullets. Or what they call "Second Amendment Solutions".
"high praise"
NO, Gates says she did her job effectively.
That is what she is supposed to do.
Well, half the board thinks she didn't - and therefore this is in fact high praise.
"high praise"
NO, Gates says she did her job effectively.
That is what she is supposed to do.
Well, half the board thinks she didn't - and therefore this is in fact high praise.
The State Department and the DoD are two different animals. Politics plays a greater role in diplomacy than in military actions. That goes without saying. I'm sure Hillary is bright, sometimes funny, and compitent. I'm also sure she is vindictive, careless when it comes to security, and something of a heinous bitch.
Well, half the board thinks she didn't - and therefore this is in fact high praise.
The State Department and the DoD are two different animals. Politics plays a greater role in diplomacy than in military actions. That goes without saying. I'm sure Hillary is bright, sometimes funny, and compitent. I'm also sure she is vindictive, careless when it comes to security, and something of a heinous bitch.
Not believing the bit in the middle, but the other two are true from what I've been reading.
[ame=http://www.amazon.com/The-Clinton-Crack-Up-Presidents-After/dp/B007F89FFQ]The Clinton Crack-Up: The Boy President's Life After the White House: R. Tyrrell Jr.: Amazon.com: Books[/ame]
Lee Harvey Oswald was a communist.
Malcom X was murdered by blacks.
Robert Kennedy, Serhan Serhan.
Gabby Gifford, left-wing nut-case.
Lincoln, Southern-Democrat.
Even MLK was shot by a Democrat.
With the exception of Oswald, most of the murderers were Conservative.
That's the way conservatives roll with political discourse. By use of bullets. Or what they call "Second Amendment Solutions".
Democrats, communists, and non-whites.
None of this can be laid on the GOP's lap like you're attempting to.
With the exception of Oswald, most of the murderers were Conservative.
That's the way conservatives roll with political discourse. By use of bullets. Or what they call "Second Amendment Solutions".
Democrats, communists, and non-whites.
None of this can be laid on the GOP's lap like you're attempting to.
I posted Conservatives.
They come in all shades and political party affiliations.
But they generally are the same animal.
The State Department and the DoD are two different animals. Politics plays a greater role in diplomacy than in military actions. That goes without saying. I'm sure Hillary is bright, sometimes funny, and compitent. I'm also sure she is vindictive, careless when it comes to security, and something of a heinous bitch.
Not believing the bit in the middle, but the other two are true from what I've been reading.
[ame=http://www.amazon.com/The-Clinton-Crack-Up-Presidents-After/dp/B007F89FFQ]The Clinton Crack-Up: The Boy President's Life After the White House: R. Tyrrell Jr.: Amazon.com: Books[/ame]
One thing that Hillary and Obama have in common is lack of trust if not distain for the military. They feel diplomacy solves everything and military action is never a first option. Punishing political opponents is one thing, but bringing massive military might against an aggressor is frowned upon.
Why would one want a POTUS that only punishes Americans?
Not believing the bit in the middle, but the other two are true from what I've been reading.
The Clinton Crack-Up: The Boy President's Life After the White House: R. Tyrrell Jr.: Amazon.com: Books
One thing that Hillary and Obama have in common is lack of trust if not distain for the military. They feel diplomacy solves everything and military action is never a first option. Punishing political opponents is one thing, but bringing massive military might against an aggressor is frowned upon.
Why would one want a POTUS that only punishes Americans?
And that's a half truth.
Both are more pragmatic and hold that if diplomacy doesn't work, then a military option should be on the table.
Which is different from you folks..who really just want rivers of blood.
With the exception of Oswald, most of the murderers were Conservative.
That's the way conservatives roll with political discourse. By use of bullets. Or what they call "Second Amendment Solutions".
Democrats, communists, and non-whites.
None of this can be laid on the GOP's lap like you're attempting to.
I posted Conservatives.
They come in all shades and political party affiliations.
But they generally are the same animal.