Chemical bonding is biogenesis.Yes, its one of the most tested laws in the sciences, the law of biogenesis, as well established as any of the other laws we have in physics.
Life is a lot deeper than you give it credit for.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Chemical bonding is biogenesis.Yes, its one of the most tested laws in the sciences, the law of biogenesis, as well established as any of the other laws we have in physics.
Chemical bonding is biogenesis.
Its my only reaction to inanities like "Chemical bonding is biogenesis" and "chaos has nothing to do with determinism", these absurdities do not deserve to be taken seriously. If you want to be taken seriously don't speak as if your under the influence of LSD. It's stoned hippies that make these kinds of statements, a scientifically educated person never would.That's 100% expected coming from you.
What you don't know is nucleotides are just carbon and ammonia. And glycine is nylon. Look it up. It's called Nylon-2 in DuPont's vocabulary.
I don't expect you to take me seriously.Its my only reaction to inanities like "Chemical bonding is biogenesis" and "chaos has nothing to do with determinism", these absurdities do not deserve to be taken seriously. If you want to be taken seriously don't speak as if your under the influence of LSD. It's stoned hippies that make these kinds of statements, a scientifically educated person never would.
As you wish.I don't expect you to take me seriously.
I think you're incapable of taking science seriously.
You're an old dog and all you know is old tricks.
False. There was no contradiction.You just contradicted yourself, so I did need to state the obvious.![]()
No, it's a definition of a word. There is no such law, and you are saying very dumb things.Yes, its one of the most tested laws in the sciences, the law of biogenesis, as well established as any of the other laws we have in physics.
It's law if no counter examples can be demonstrated just as Newton's laws of motion are laws because no counter examples can be demonstrated.No, it's a definition of a word. There is no such law, and you are saying very dumb things.
Scientific laws or laws of science are statements, based on repeated experiments or observations, that describe or predict a range of natural phenomena.[1]
Well that's the dumbest thing said in this thread yet.It's law if no counter examples can be demonstrated
Calling it selection says otherwise despite your other comments. It's chemistry and chance.False. There was no contradiction.
False. Calling it selection is factual. Selection does not only happen in biological evolution.Calling it selection says otherwise despite your other comments. It's chemistry and chance.