Gay wedding cakes at Muslim bakeries.

[

Really...where are the lawsuits of two gays or lesbian suing a muslim merchant for failure to accommodate a "gay wedding" order?]

LOL- how ironic coming from the queen of lies. The OP is a right wing lie attacking both gays and muslims. Fake News created by the right- to make it appears Muslims bakeries were refusing to bake gay wedding cakes and that gays didn't care.

But of course the video is a lie.

And the Conservatives in this thread?

Not one has condemned those lies.

Conservatives created the concept of Fake News- and are the ones creating Fake News.

And Conservatives cheer those lies on.

Why don't you just admit that anything about Islam, but kissing their asses, is unpleasant for you?

There's been a Left-Islam alliance for years. Some call it an 'Unholy Alliance.' The alliance is especially strong in Western Europe. Leftists there, truly hate Christians and are very quick to defend Muslims at every turn. I suspect the alliance was formed based on a mutual hatred of Christians.

They teamed-up to destroy Christianity. And they've been pretty successful at doing that in Western Europe. Christianity is rapidly going extinct there. Meanwhile, Islam is quickly replacing it. But i truly believe one day the Left will regret destroying Christianity there. Many Europeans are already regretting it. Let's just hope & pray the American Left is stopped, before they destroy Christianity here at home.
 
You're full of shit. If there's one thing queers don't respect, it's the rights of Christians.

Really? Got examples? What "rights" don't "queers" respect?

They don't respect the right not to associate with people you don't want to associate with.

You mean like Christians, blacks, women, people from other countries, etc?

Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination because of race, color, religion, or national origin in certain places of public accommodation, such as hotels, restaurants, and places of entertainment. The Department of Justice can bring a lawsuit under Title II when there is reason to believe that a person has engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination in violation of Title II. The Department can obtain injunctive, but not monetary, relief in such cases. Individuals can also file suit to enforce their rights under Title II and other federal and state statutes may also provide remedies for discrimination in places of public accommodation.

Did you read your own post?

Yes, and? Bripat said that "queers" don't respect people's "right" not to associate with people they don't want to associate with. Obviously, if Public Accommodation laws are his arbiter for that, then Christians, blacks, Asians, Latinos, Jews, women, veterans, etc also must not respect people's "right" not to associate with people they don't want to, right?

Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964prohibits discrimination because of race, color, religion, or national origin”

Where is sexual orientation?
 
Really? Got examples? What "rights" don't "queers" respect?

They don't respect the right not to associate with people you don't want to associate with.

You mean like Christians, blacks, women, people from other countries, etc?

Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination because of race, color, religion, or national origin in certain places of public accommodation, such as hotels, restaurants, and places of entertainment. The Department of Justice can bring a lawsuit under Title II when there is reason to believe that a person has engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination in violation of Title II. The Department can obtain injunctive, but not monetary, relief in such cases. Individuals can also file suit to enforce their rights under Title II and other federal and state statutes may also provide remedies for discrimination in places of public accommodation.

Did you read your own post?

Yes, and? Bripat said that "queers" don't respect people's "right" not to associate with people they don't want to associate with. Obviously, if Public Accommodation laws are his arbiter for that, then Christians, blacks, Asians, Latinos, Jews, women, veterans, etc also must not respect people's "right" not to associate with people they don't want to, right?

Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964prohibits discrimination because of race, color, religion, or national origin”

Where is sexual orientation?

It is in state law. You don't support states rights?
 
Really? Got examples? What "rights" don't "queers" respect?

They don't respect the right not to associate with people you don't want to associate with.

You mean like Christians, blacks, women, people from other countries, etc?

Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination because of race, color, religion, or national origin in certain places of public accommodation, such as hotels, restaurants, and places of entertainment. The Department of Justice can bring a lawsuit under Title II when there is reason to believe that a person has engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination in violation of Title II. The Department can obtain injunctive, but not monetary, relief in such cases. Individuals can also file suit to enforce their rights under Title II and other federal and state statutes may also provide remedies for discrimination in places of public accommodation.

Did you read your own post?

Yes, and? Bripat said that "queers" don't respect people's "right" not to associate with people they don't want to associate with. Obviously, if Public Accommodation laws are his arbiter for that, then Christians, blacks, Asians, Latinos, Jews, women, veterans, etc also must not respect people's "right" not to associate with people they don't want to, right?

Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964prohibits discrimination because of race, color, religion, or national origin”

Where is sexual orientation?
Some state PA laws also include sexual orientation...not all tho....like Michigan where those videos were filmed.
 
They don't respect the right not to associate with people you don't want to associate with.

You mean like Christians, blacks, women, people from other countries, etc?

Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination because of race, color, religion, or national origin in certain places of public accommodation, such as hotels, restaurants, and places of entertainment. The Department of Justice can bring a lawsuit under Title II when there is reason to believe that a person has engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination in violation of Title II. The Department can obtain injunctive, but not monetary, relief in such cases. Individuals can also file suit to enforce their rights under Title II and other federal and state statutes may also provide remedies for discrimination in places of public accommodation.

Did you read your own post?

Yes, and? Bripat said that "queers" don't respect people's "right" not to associate with people they don't want to associate with. Obviously, if Public Accommodation laws are his arbiter for that, then Christians, blacks, Asians, Latinos, Jews, women, veterans, etc also must not respect people's "right" not to associate with people they don't want to, right?

Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964prohibits discrimination because of race, color, religion, or national origin”

Where is sexual orientation?

It is in state law. You don't support states rights?

You didn't with SSM
 
Really...where are the lawsuits of two gays or lesbian suing a muslim merchant for failure to accommodate a "gay wedding" order?]

LOL- how ironic coming from the queen of lies. The OP is a right wing lie attacking both gays and muslims. Fake News created by the right- to make it appears Muslims bakeries were refusing to bake gay wedding cakes and that gays didn't care.

But of course the video is a lie.

And the Conservatives in this thread?

Not one has condemned those lies.

Conservatives created the concept of Fake News- and are the ones creating Fake News.

And Conservatives cheer those lies on.
A clear indication that the fundie muslims and the fundie christians have even more in common....both believe it's totally acceptable to lie on behalf of their "cause".


Ya gotta wonder how Sara Huckleberry Sandbag squares lying daily with her extra bucket of Christianity...
 
You mean like Christians, blacks, women, people from other countries, etc?

Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination because of race, color, religion, or national origin in certain places of public accommodation, such as hotels, restaurants, and places of entertainment. The Department of Justice can bring a lawsuit under Title II when there is reason to believe that a person has engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination in violation of Title II. The Department can obtain injunctive, but not monetary, relief in such cases. Individuals can also file suit to enforce their rights under Title II and other federal and state statutes may also provide remedies for discrimination in places of public accommodation.

Did you read your own post?

Yes, and? Bripat said that "queers" don't respect people's "right" not to associate with people they don't want to associate with. Obviously, if Public Accommodation laws are his arbiter for that, then Christians, blacks, Asians, Latinos, Jews, women, veterans, etc also must not respect people's "right" not to associate with people they don't want to, right?

Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964prohibits discrimination because of race, color, religion, or national origin”

Where is sexual orientation?

It is in state law. You don't support states rights?

You didn't with SSM

Yup
 
You mean like Christians, blacks, women, people from other countries, etc?

Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination because of race, color, religion, or national origin in certain places of public accommodation, such as hotels, restaurants, and places of entertainment. The Department of Justice can bring a lawsuit under Title II when there is reason to believe that a person has engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination in violation of Title II. The Department can obtain injunctive, but not monetary, relief in such cases. Individuals can also file suit to enforce their rights under Title II and other federal and state statutes may also provide remedies for discrimination in places of public accommodation.

Did you read your own post?

Yes, and? Bripat said that "queers" don't respect people's "right" not to associate with people they don't want to associate with. Obviously, if Public Accommodation laws are his arbiter for that, then Christians, blacks, Asians, Latinos, Jews, women, veterans, etc also must not respect people's "right" not to associate with people they don't want to, right?

Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964prohibits discrimination because of race, color, religion, or national origin”

Where is sexual orientation?

It is in state law. You don't support states rights?

You didn't with SSM

And you don't have to with PA laws. You can have them struck down at the Federal level...but you're not trying to. Ya'll are just trying to get a special anti gay carve out.
 
Did you read your own post?

Yes, and? Bripat said that "queers" don't respect people's "right" not to associate with people they don't want to associate with. Obviously, if Public Accommodation laws are his arbiter for that, then Christians, blacks, Asians, Latinos, Jews, women, veterans, etc also must not respect people's "right" not to associate with people they don't want to, right?

Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964prohibits discrimination because of race, color, religion, or national origin”

Where is sexual orientation?

It is in state law. You don't support states rights?

You didn't with SSM

And you don't have to with PA laws. You can have them struck down at the Federal level...but you're not trying to. Ya'll are just trying to get a special anti gay carve out.

I simply pointed out your hypocrisy, Seabitch
 
You mean like Christians, blacks, women, people from other countries, etc?

Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination because of race, color, religion, or national origin in certain places of public accommodation, such as hotels, restaurants, and places of entertainment. The Department of Justice can bring a lawsuit under Title II when there is reason to believe that a person has engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination in violation of Title II. The Department can obtain injunctive, but not monetary, relief in such cases. Individuals can also file suit to enforce their rights under Title II and other federal and state statutes may also provide remedies for discrimination in places of public accommodation.

Did you read your own post?

Yes, and? Bripat said that "queers" don't respect people's "right" not to associate with people they don't want to associate with. Obviously, if Public Accommodation laws are his arbiter for that, then Christians, blacks, Asians, Latinos, Jews, women, veterans, etc also must not respect people's "right" not to associate with people they don't want to, right?

Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964prohibits discrimination because of race, color, religion, or national origin”

Where is sexual orientation?

It is in state law. You don't support states rights?

You didn't with SSM
You ever read the U.S. Constitution Supremacy Clause?
 
Yes, and? Bripat said that "queers" don't respect people's "right" not to associate with people they don't want to associate with. Obviously, if Public Accommodation laws are his arbiter for that, then Christians, blacks, Asians, Latinos, Jews, women, veterans, etc also must not respect people's "right" not to associate with people they don't want to, right?

Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964prohibits discrimination because of race, color, religion, or national origin”

Where is sexual orientation?

It is in state law. You don't support states rights?

You didn't with SSM

And you don't have to with PA laws. You can have them struck down at the Federal level...but you're not trying to. Ya'll are just trying to get a special anti gay carve out.

I simply pointed out your hypocrisy, Seabitch
Look who thinks the U.S. Constitution is "hypocrisy"....typical trampanzee belief.
 
Yes, and? Bripat said that "queers" don't respect people's "right" not to associate with people they don't want to associate with. Obviously, if Public Accommodation laws are his arbiter for that, then Christians, blacks, Asians, Latinos, Jews, women, veterans, etc also must not respect people's "right" not to associate with people they don't want to, right?

Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964prohibits discrimination because of race, color, religion, or national origin”

Where is sexual orientation?

It is in state law. You don't support states rights?

You didn't with SSM

And you don't have to with PA laws. You can have them struck down at the Federal level...but you're not trying to. Ya'll are just trying to get a special anti gay carve out.

I simply pointed out your hypocrisy, Seabitch

I'm not a fervent and ardent supporter of states rights, you are. I'm not the hypocrite here, ScuzzyIrishLard.
 
Ya gotta wonder how Sara Huckleberry Sandbag squares lying daily with her extra bucket of Christianity...

She's a pip alright - time for that Huckleberry Christmas Photo!

Hey - wonder if David Huckleberry has tortured and killed anymore dogs at Boy Scout Camp lately?

huckabee.jpeg
 
There's no doubt most Leftists respect and tolerate Muslims' religious beliefs and practices far more than they do Christians'. They treat the two very differently. That's especially true in Western Europe. It's about an alliance they formed years ago. It was formed based on their mutual hatred of Christians. It's an 'Unholy Alliance.' They won't admit to the alliance, but it is real.

I really do believe Western Europeans especially, are gonna regret allowing their Left to destroy the Christian Church. The Churches now sit empty while the Mosques are filled to capacity. Christians have proven to be far more tolerant of Leftist beliefs and practices. So they will regret that alliance at some point. And now, all we can do is hope & pray the American Left isn't successful in destroying the Christian Church here at home. Keep praying folks. God bless. :)
 
There's no doubt most Leftists respect and tolerate Muslims' religious beliefs and practices far more than they do Christians'. They treat the two very differently. That's especially true in Western Europe. It's about an alliance they formed years ago. It was formed based on their mutual hatred of Christians. It's an 'Unholy Alliance.' They won't admit to the alliance, but it is real.

I really do believe Western Europeans especially, are gonna regret allowing their Left to destroy the Christian Church. The Churches now sit empty while the Mosques are filled to capacity. Christians have proven to be far more tolerant of Leftist beliefs and practices. So they will regret that alliance at some point. And now, all we can do is hope & pray the American Left isn't successful in destroying the Christian Church here at home. Keep praying folks. God bless. :)

What a silly post. There is no War on Christians, on Christmas, on the Christian church or anything else Christian or Catholic. If church attendance is down it has absolutely nothing to do with "Leftists". Perhaps some churches need to be more tolerant and accepting. Maybe they need to reach into the community more than they have of late. Please stop playing victim. :rolleyes-41:

OReilly-WarOnChristmas.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top