GHook93
Aristotle
- Apr 22, 2007
- 20,150
- 3,524
OK I will answer respectful!
If any boat tries to dock any country without permission, they are sure to get boarded and arrested. EVERY COUNTRY without exception. Upon boarding those ships, if the police are attacked, then they will be met with force. Interesting note: that all five other ships were boarded and none resisted and no incidents.
If any boat tries to dock any country without permission, they are sure to get boarded and arrested. EVERY COUNTRY without exception. Upon boarding those ships, if the police are attacked, then they will be met with force. Interesting note: that all five other ships were boarded and none resisted and no incidents.
All "Free Gaza" boats are government inspected at the port of departure as requested by the movement to ensure there are no weapons. Israel knows this.
BTW, if Israel requested to inspect the cargo in international waters by unarmed inspectors, the request would probably be honored.
NO country would rely on other countries doing their inspections for them. NO COUNTRY. Nevertheless, after departure the Flortilla could have easily met up with another boat at sea and stocked it with arms, terrorist, missiles, bombs or anything!
Also no country in the WORLD would rely on 3rd parties for inspection.
You make unreasonable demands on Israel and pass them off as reasonable. You call for Israel's destruction and make it like your unbaised. Your a hack and a douche bag.
since my last post last night, this thread seems to have gone the way of most threads on volatile breaking stories on this board --- partisan squabbling rather than meticulous fact gathering, objective commentary and respectful, intelligent debate.
doesn't happen here much. in my quick reread, your posts look to be some of the only ones still containing any useful facts and you don't often fall out of the boat when your dander gets raised.
we don't agree on a whole lot but at least you communicate intelligently and respectfully with me. i appreciate that.
i'm starting to wonder about what tinmore's motivations are myself.
he posts articles that are useful and relevant and then doesn't actually comment on the events, but does get into that fuck you, fuck you back shit that disintegrates these discussions. when i ask him a question in a thread, i'd have to go back and look to see if he has ever answered.
as for what this thread is supposed to be about, this is beginning to look like benny and his thugs got sucker punched by this activist group.
a group of unarmed protesters provokes an armed response for the media effect --- right out of the anti-terrorism response recommendations that came out of the rand corporation in the 80's (one of the authors was brian jenkins, noted "security" consultant)