Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This too will be subject to a prompt review possibly via a habeas writ.
As well it should; the Defendant will need to be both remorseful, and honest, this time. The false claim of a lost passport, and claim of indigent status, while having $130,000 in the bank, cannot be explained away with "it slipped my mind".
Habeas corpus: you have the body.
This too will be subject to a prompt review possibly via a habeas writ.
Could you try that again in English for the peanut gallery.
>>>>
This too will be subject to a prompt review possibly via a habeas writ.
Could you try that again in English for the peanut gallery.
>>>>
It was in English. The GREAT Writ of Habeas Corpus is called the GREAT Writ for a reason. It's mentioned specifically, in fact, in the Constitution. It's history is legendary.
In the context of a bail matter, all it means is that the change in Z's bail status is not necessarily a done deal. It might be. But first (if the accused files the right bail review application), the aggrieved defendant could compel a court to address the action of the bail setting court.
BOND IS REVOKED!
Zimmerman is headed back to the Slammer.
This is STILL going.
C'mon people the doctors said Zimmerman had a broken nose and there are photos of his bloody head.
At the very least we know he was attacked, shit or get off the pot already.
he might still be guilty of murder but you can't ignore this evidence of Zimmerman being physically assulted out of a blind allegiance to the position that he is guilty and the stand your ground law is bad.
Actually, all YOU'VE read is the report from the Zimmerman family doctor.
No one denies there was a fight, or that Zimmerman got bruised up with some lumps....but the ACTUAL wounds were FAR from the devastating "GASHES" that the Zimmerman camp initially attested to. His "busted nose" was not that severe, nor were the head wounds, which were quickly treated and settled WITHOUT STITCHES by the time the police station surveillance pics were released.
Again, this DOES NOT PROVE THAT MARTIN WAS THE AGGRESSOR.
This is STILL going.
C'mon people the doctors said Zimmerman had a broken nose and there are photos of his bloody head.
At the very least we know he was attacked, shit or get off the pot already.
he might still be guilty of murder but you can't ignore this evidence of Zimmerman being physically assulted out of a blind allegiance to the position that he is guilty and the stand your ground law is bad.
Actually, all YOU'VE read is the report from the Zimmerman family doctor.
No one denies there was a fight, or that Zimmerman got bruised up with some lumps....but the ACTUAL wounds were FAR from the devastating "GASHES" that the Zimmerman camp initially attested to. His "busted nose" was not that severe, nor were the head wounds, which were quickly treated and settled WITHOUT STITCHES by the time the police station surveillance pics were released.
Again, this DOES NOT PROVE THAT MARTIN WAS THE AGGRESSOR.
Lol, his broken nose and gashes to his head werent that severe, lololol.
So how badly does a thug have to pound you into the ground before you can shoot the peice of shit?
Fuck you and your commie bastard soul; WE ALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO DFEFEND OUR OWN LIVES.
If GZ gets prison, you havent seen the shit that will come from that one, bitch.
This too will be subject to a prompt review possibly via a habeas writ.
He WILL receive another bond hearing, dear soul.
He WILL receive another bond hearing, dear soul.
He should not have been charged to start with, so dont yell for GZ to swing from a rope and then act like he is getting a fair shake.
This is STILL going.
C'mon people the doctors said Zimmerman had a broken nose and there are photos of his bloody head.
At the very least we know he was physically assulted, shit or get off the pot already.
he might still be guilty of murder but you can't ignore this evidence of Zimmerman being physically assulted out of a blind allegiance to the position that he is guilty and the stand your ground law is bad.
Actually, all YOU'VE read is the report from the Zimmerman family doctor.
No one denies there was a fight, or that Zimmerman got bruised up with some lumps....but the ACTUAL wounds were FAR from the devastating "GASHES" that the Zimmerman camp initially attested to. His "busted nose" was not that severe, nor were the head wounds, which were quickly treated and settled WITHOUT STITCHES by the time the police station surveillance pics were released.
Again, this DOES NOT PROVE THAT MARTIN WAS THE AGGRESSOR.
Could you try that again in English for the peanut gallery.
>>>>
It was in English. The GREAT Writ of Habeas Corpus is called the GREAT Writ for a reason. It's mentioned specifically, in fact, in the Constitution. It's history is legendary.
In the context of a bail matter, all it means is that the change in Z's bail status is not necessarily a done deal. It might be. But first (if the accused files the right bail review application), the aggrieved defendant could compel a court to address the action of the bail setting court.
Yes, and Habeas Corpus means, "you have the body". He should be entitled to another bond hearing, and if he has learned his lesson, bond will be set. but withholding relevant information, or LYING as it is known, is not the way to impress a Court. Along with the $130,000 he had, his TWO passports are also a matter to be addressed.
As for the passports, if he had two he most definitely should have revealed that fact.
He WILL receive another bond hearing, dear soul.
He should not have been charged to start with, so dont yell for GZ to swing from a rope and then act like he is getting a fair shake.
You are Wolfinger? If not, you do not have access to all the evidence that led to the very conservative A. Corey filing 2nd degree murder.* The pro killer crowd must have cried when Rolling, Wournos, and Bundy were executed. Do you have pictures of them on your walls?
*The Criminal Punishment Code in Florida might be termed draconian; passed by a Republican legislature, and supported 100% by Jeb! Bush. More executions, longer sentences, and more crimes classified as felonies. There used to be guidelines for minimums and maximums. NOW, one can get the MAXIMUM for every crime. First time offenders can get the same 5 years for a 3rd degree felony, as can an individual committing their fifth 3rd degree burglary.
BOND IS REVOKED!
Zimmerman is headed back to the Slammer.
I pray that one day God teaches you why the right of self-defense is so precious.
Fucktard.
It was in English. The GREAT Writ of Habeas Corpus is called the GREAT Writ for a reason. It's mentioned specifically, in fact, in the Constitution. It's history is legendary.
In the context of a bail matter, all it means is that the change in Z's bail status is not necessarily a done deal. It might be. But first (if the accused files the right bail review application), the aggrieved defendant could compel a court to address the action of the bail setting court.
Yes, and Habeas Corpus means, "you have the body". He should be entitled to another bond hearing, and if he has learned his lesson, bond will be set. but withholding relevant information, or LYING as it is known, is not the way to impress a Court. Along with the $130,000 he had, his TWO passports are also a matter to be addressed.
As for the passports, if he had two he most definitely should have revealed that fact.
As for the money, the way it was being collected and the use to which it was to be put could explain why he did not include it as his own available assets. AGain, though, the Court might be able to sort that out.
My guess is that at his next hearing he is indeed going to have a thorny time 'splainin' himself. But if a new bail is set, assuming the amount is within the bounds of reason, all those yahoos cheering that the man is about to be incarcerated will end up disappointed. Because it is very likely that Zimmerman will once again be out on bail.
It is fascinating to watch all the yahoos hackle and cackle over the incarceration of a person who is entitled, in the eyes of the law, to a presumption of innocence. They have already convicted him in their churlish little minds. And while they are free to presume him guilty, it would certainly make mores sense to withhold judgment until ALL of the evidence is available and considered -- possibly even with a fair,open and objective mind.
Actually, all YOU'VE read is the report from the Zimmerman family doctor.
No one denies there was a fight, or that Zimmerman got bruised up with some lumps....but the ACTUAL wounds were FAR from the devastating "GASHES" that the Zimmerman camp initially attested to. His "busted nose" was not that severe, nor were the head wounds, which were quickly treated and settled WITHOUT STITCHES by the time the police station surveillance pics were released.
Again, this DOES NOT PROVE THAT MARTIN WAS THE AGGRESSOR.
Lol, his broken nose and gashes to his head werent that severe, lololol.
So how badly does a thug have to pound you into the ground before you can shoot the peice of shit?
Fuck you and your commie bastard soul; WE ALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO DFEFEND OUR OWN LIVES.
If GZ gets prison, you havent seen the shit that will come from that one, bitch.
He WILL receive another bond hearing, dear soul.
This is STILL going.
C'mon people the doctors said Zimmerman had a broken nose and there are photos of his bloody head.
At the very least we know he was physically assulted, shit or get off the pot already.
he might still be guilty of murder but you can't ignore this evidence of Zimmerman being physically assulted out of a blind allegiance to the position that he is guilty and the stand your ground law is bad.
Actually, all YOU'VE read is the report from the Zimmerman family doctor.
No one denies there was a fight, or that Zimmerman got bruised up with some lumps....but the ACTUAL wounds were FAR from the devastating "GASHES" that the Zimmerman camp initially attested to. His "busted nose" was not that severe, nor were the head wounds, which were quickly treated and settled WITHOUT STITCHES by the time the police station surveillance pics were released.
Again, this DOES NOT PROVE THAT MARTIN WAS THE AGGRESSOR.
Where did I say that martin was the aggressor? that is a red herring statement.
re-read my post.
