Getting To The Bottom Of It

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
125,093
60,647
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
1. While I admit it to be wishful thinking, if one could examine the two sides of the political divide logically, without the emotion,....everyone would be conservative.
But, I'll construct the argument any way.

It boils down to this: the Left wants to beat, coerce, force everyone to do what they say....the Right just wants to be left alone.



2. The history of every Leftist iteration involves gulags, concentration camps, re-education camps, psychiatric hospitals, mass murder, starvation, right down to bureaucratic over regulation, huge fines and the loss of one's livelihood.

Obey, obey, obey

It explains the affinity of Liberalism and Islamofascism....both are about 'submission.'



3.The Left makes arguments such as this: how to provide for the lowest 20% of earners if we don't force everyone else into progressive taxation, ObamaCare, etc., because everyone knows how selfish and greedy the 'wealthy' are.

Here is the Democrat torch-bearer doing just that:
"During the confirmation hearings for Representative Tom Price’s appointment as Health and Human Services Secretary, Bernie Sanders took aim at Price’s claim that America is fundamentally compassionate. “No, we are not a compassionate society … In terms of our relationship with poor and working people, our record is worse than virtually any other country on earth,” the junior senator from Vermont claimed."
Bernie Is Blind to Compassion without Compulsion | Christopher Machold


4. What if I could prove the Marxist Democrat....is that redundant?...incorrect?

Easily done.

"...the question of whether Americans act compassionately is distinct, and one Sen. Sanders gets wrong. Americans as private moral individuals are rife with the virtue of compassion. And this is not in spite of our wealth and relative freedom, as some might suggest, but because of it.
Sen. Rand Paul, for his part, addressed Sanders’ claim with statistics. At $400 billion dollars in 2014, and similar numbers annually, private individuals and organizations donated more than the GDP of many nations." Ibid.


5. "Even “ordinary” people, those who don’t make on their own more than some countries, also display these virtues. Sanders, for his part, wouldn’t dare deny this. After all, he bragged frequently on the campaign trail about the “small donations” from regular working-class Americans that drove his campaign. In fact, not only is charitable giving steadily increasing, but a large majority of it is driven by individuals rather than foundations or corporations.

But if both the “one percent” and the rest of us — the so-called “donating public” — are giving in massive amounts to all sorts of charitable causes, .... then where does the disagreement lie on whether American society is compassionate?" Ibid.



Isn't it past time for the simpletons who accept Leftist propaganda to begin questioning it???
Or....maybe that explains the recent election.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
 
6. When Americans, most especially those on the Right- as studies have verified- and ".... have the opportunity and disposition to act ethically according to the classical virtues of faith, hope, love, justice, courage, temperance, and prudence"....they do so in abundance.

It is also bourgeois love to care for employees and partners and colleagues and customers and fellow citizens, to wish all of humankind well, to seek God, finding human and transcendent connection in the marketplace ...

When Americans " have the opportunity and disposition to act ethically according to the classical virtues of faith, hope, love, justice, courage, temperance, and prudence.." evidence proves that they do just that.



7. People helping each other is anathema to Liberalism, Progressivism, Leftism....only government should be allowed to design and operate 'welfare' progerams.


Here is the Democrat response to individual giving:

".... President Obama’s push to scale back the nearly century-old tax deduction on donations that the charities say is crucial for their financial health." White House, nonprofit groups battle over charitable deductions

and...

"Obama Budget Again Calls for Limit to Charitable Deduction" Obama Budget Again Calls for Limit to Charitable Deduction


Why?
Why prevent individuals from helping others???




Because the Left wishes to eradicate every bourgeois trait.....charity, religion, families.....leaving only government.


"And it's not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion..."
Barack Hussein Obama
 
8. As proven above, Marxist Bernie couldn't be more wrong.
If Bernie were given an enema, he could be buried in a matchbox. Americans are generous to a flaw.


What is the explanation for the Marxists, Democrats, Liberals, Progressives, wanting to
a. deny how charitable and caring the American public is
and
b. shut down any welfare, charity, help from any other than the government?


Evidently it is all about controlling what other people do.

This is why Leftists want to put your life under the control of bureaucrats, technocrats, experts, and agencies.


Woodrow Wilson wrote in “The State,” 1889, that "Government does now whatever experience permits or the times demand." His writings attack the Constitution, and the ideas of natural and individual rights. Along with Frank J. Goodnow, they pioneered the concept of the ‘administrative state,’ which separated the administration of government from the limitations of constitutional government. "American Progressivism

This is not how the Founders designed America.
 
9. “Progressives looked to insulate administrators not only from the chief executive, but from politics altogether. It is the Progressives' desire to free bureaucratic agencies from the confines of politics and the law that allows us to trace the origins of the administrative state to their political thought. The idea of separating politics and administration--of grounding a significant portion of government not on the basis of popular consent but on expertise--was a fundamental aim of American Progressivism and explains the Progressives' fierce assault on the Founders' separation-of-powers constitutionalism.”
The Birth of the Administrative State Where It Came From and What It Means for Limited Government]




"....of grounding a significant portion of government not on the basis of popular consent but on expertise-..."



10. As I admitted, it is not possible to remove emotion from the equation. It was predicted so by the earliest Progressives....their voters were described as tools and as clay....
...and, they are.


In his 1890 essay, “Leaders of Men,” Wilson explained that a “true leader” uses the masses like “tools.” He must inflame their passions with little heed for the facts. “Men are as clay in the hands of the consummate leader.” “No doubt a lot of nonsense has been talked about the inalienable rights of the individual, and a great deal that was mere sentiment and pleasing speculation has been put forward as fundamental principle,” wrote Wilson, attacking the very individual rights that have made America great.

He rejected the principles of “separation of powers” and “checks and balances” that are the foundation of American government: “Government does now whatever experience permits or the times demand….”wrote Wilson in The State.

In the above we can see why no totalitarian system....and Progressivism is no less totalitarian than communism, fascism, Nazism,....has little concern for the millions oppressed and slaughtered.... “Men are as clay in the hands of the consummate leader.”
 
Hitler was a painter, a vegetarian, a former socialist and a patron of the Arts.

Mussolini was a Journalist, a Teacher and a socialist until he was kicked out of the party for supporting WWI.

Fascism is a DIRECT Descendant of socialism. People don't get that because, frankly, they're fucking stupid. They take the word of pathological liars -- the DISGUSTING FILTH.

In 1941, before we entered the War, most Newspapers referred to the Nazis by their proper name -- National Socialists. Stalin asked them to please stop calling them 'socialists' (even they were a variant of that sick, diseased cult) because it made his socialists look bad.

Mussolini was so impressed by FDR's actions in the mid-30s (which kept us in the Great Depression by at least 5 years longer than necessary) that he kept complimenting FDR in speeches and interviews.

FDR asked Mussolini to please stop complimenting him public. Made him look bad. IL Douche' obliged.

dimocrap scum are a short walk across the street from National Socialism AND Fascism.

But the average person in this Country has been lied to so much, so often and so thoroughly, they just don't know.

Some say the Biggest Lie in the History of Man is convincing people that Hitler wasn't a socialist.

I agree

He was.

People also don't realize that 'leftist' organizations INSIDE the dimocrap scum party have repeatedly stated that, when they take over the Country, they may have to 'eliminate' TENS OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE.

But the imbeciles in here wouldn't be the least bit familiar with that factoid.

They can name all the Kardashians, though
 

Forum List

Back
Top