HereWeGoAgain
Diamond Member
- Dec 15, 2010
- 87,359
- 37,494
The problem is that while some accusations of tape/sexual assault are demonstrably true, and some demonstrably false, there is a huge gray area, where something occurred, but there is not enough evidence to prosecute, and reasonable doubt cannot be overcome. But that doesn’t mean the charges are false. Or it could be the girl considers an act especially in one of the (to me) bizarre feminist interpretations of the law, but not technically a violation.
For a case such as the OP or the fake Tolling Stone article etc. the false accusers should be severely punished, but what about the accusations that are honest, in good faith, but can’t be proven?
How do we find s balance?
Rape kits.
They give an actual true representation as to whether the victim was sexually assaulted.
Barring that they need something other than her testimony.
Rape kits are only good if it was a rape/sexual intercourse.. Doesn't count for being improperly groped or any other touching or assault that is sexual in nature.
Unfortunately sometimes it is only he said/she said.
thankfully in this case the girls did confess to lying. Karma does have a way of making things right in the end.
The school & district are ultimately in the wrong by not punishing the girls. And what they don't see is that by their own admission......'to provide a safe learning environment for all students' and they failed to do so for the boy.
Lets not go full retard.....