Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
According to Rudi "the Pride of New York" Giuliani there were no attacks carried out in the US by Islamic terrorists until President Obama was elected. Off the top of my head, I came up with two (2); 1993 world Trade Center bombing and the calamitous Twin towers attack on 9/11/2001 when that IDIOT Giuliani was Mayor of New York! He even ran for president waving his credentials of leadership reminding everyone of his mayoral prowess by repeating 9/11 several hundred times daily!
Here is what he claimed while on the stump for trump:
"“Before Obama came along, we didn’t have any successful radical Islamic terrorist attack inside the United States,” Giuliani said at an event for Donald Trump in Ohio."
Giuliani Claims No Successful 'Radical Islamic' Attacks in US Before Obama
Such are the type of people Trump and his campaign obtain to endorse their "efforts".
EVERYONE ignored the 1998 W.I.F. fatwa authored by guess who ! Clinton and his entire administration and Bush, Cheney & Co. and their entire administration were responsible in varying degrees for ignoring all the warnings and not preparing. Remember the Aug 6, 2001 PDB and the curt dismissal to the messenger by Bush?Isn't it interesting how much the left changes itself. Before Obama 911 was caused by Bush because Bush did something evil like get elected into office. When it was pointed out that terrorism by Islam occurred before that so it couldn't be caused by Bush the left just kept up with its narrative to the point where a lot of people actually believe that Bush provoked 911. Now that the left can use actual facts to attack a republican they use it. How does anyone keep up with what is true in leftist world?
No one ever claimed Bush caused Islamic terrorism, liar.
Poor Rudy. Like most deranged propagandists, he tried to frame his bullshit ever so carefully into a frame which he thought was airtight. Notice the use of certain words to frame his lie just right for the tards to gobble down.
"Before Obama came along, we didn’t have any successful radical Islamic terrorist attack inside the United States."
It was a masterful piece of propaganda writing, but he still failed miserably.
No one ever claimed Bush caused Islamic terrorism, liar.
Depends on how you describe "Al Qaeda," If a small orphanage in Afghan takes credit for "terror" by Mossad and CIA, is that "ISlamic Terror?"
for ignoring all the warnings and not preparing.
Trump's surrogates are perpetuating this bizarro alternate universe thing.
for ignoring all the warnings and not preparing.
NOT A PLANE.... not even close...
Bush gave up the worst terrorist attack in history killing almost 3000 in four separate attacks
To claim he kept us safe is a sham. We were not safe....we were openly attacked
Next Republicans will claim that there was nothing Bush could have done. There is no evidence that Bush did anything to improve our defensive posture against terrorist attacks. He did not even meet with his top anti-terrorism advisors. Bush/Cheney considered terrorism a distraction and had bigger fish to fry....the country paid the price
To make matters worse, Bush's response to 9-11 was to get us involved in two unprovoked wars that cost an additional 7000 American lives
But Republicans will try to convince you that the less than 100 dead under Obama was worse
Trump's surrogates are perpetuating this bizarro alternate universe thing.
Yes, indeed they are. And the weirdest one of all is Ms. Katrina Pierson. She spends more time in make up than her entire on air interviews....combined.
Bush gave up the worst terrorist attack in history killing almost 3000 in four separate attacks
To claim he kept us safe is a sham. We were not safe....we were openly attacked
Next Republicans will claim that there was nothing Bush could have done. There is no evidence that Bush did anything to improve our defensive posture against terrorist attacks. He did not even meet with his top anti-terrorism advisors. Bush/Cheney considered terrorism a distraction and had bigger fish to fry....the country paid the price
To make matters worse, Bush's response to 9-11 was to get us involved in two unprovoked wars that cost an additional 7000 American lives
But Republicans will try to convince you that the less than 100 dead under Obama was worse
Ms. Rice ignored the PDB in August 2001, probably because she knew Mr. Bush wouldn't pay any attention to it anyway. Can you imagine how hard it would be to get Mr. Trump to pay attention for more than 5 minutes?
Yup, That's what the neocons were after and that was made manifest even before 9/11 in the "letters" produced by PNAC! Their New American Century included control of the entire ME!Bush gave up the worst terrorist attack in history killing almost 3000 in four separate attacks
To claim he kept us safe is a sham. We were not safe....we were openly attacked
Next Republicans will claim that there was nothing Bush could have done. There is no evidence that Bush did anything to improve our defensive posture against terrorist attacks. He did not even meet with his top anti-terrorism advisors. Bush/Cheney considered terrorism a distraction and had bigger fish to fry....the country paid the price
To make matters worse, Bush's response to 9-11 was to get us involved in two unprovoked wars that cost an additional 7000 American lives
But Republicans will try to convince you that the less than 100 dead under Obama was worse
Ms. Rice ignored the PDB in August 2001, probably because she knew Mr. Bush wouldn't pay any attention to it anyway. Can you imagine how hard it would be to get Mr. Trump to pay attention for more than 5 minutes?
Bush/Cheney were concerned about their legacy. They did not consider fighting terrorism to be a big enough legacy. Iraq was always in their sights and including Iraq in their "War on Terror" was their way of getting the target they wanted from the beginning
Bush gave up the worst terrorist attack in history killing almost 3000 in four separate attacks
To claim he kept us safe is a sham. We were not safe....we were openly attacked
Next Republicans will claim that there was nothing Bush could have done. There is no evidence that Bush did anything to improve our defensive posture against terrorist attacks. He did not even meet with his top anti-terrorism advisors. Bush/Cheney considered terrorism a distraction and had bigger fish to fry....the country paid the price
To make matters worse, Bush's response to 9-11 was to get us involved in two unprovoked wars that cost an additional 7000 American lives
But Republicans will try to convince you that the less than 100 dead under Obama was worse
proven wrong so you throw a fit and pretend that everyone else has the problemwow. even when presented with clear proof that gulianni was wrong you keep insisting he was rightsure.Zero content to back that up, your usual fare. So name some
2002 l.a. airport shooting
2002 beltway sniper
2006 UNC-Chapel hill suv driver
2006 seattle jewish federation shooting
need more?
Gulianni's point exactly, you have a total of 12 deaths, and only one of those within six years of Obama taking over. Compare that to what has happened since. You're not doing very well
have you no shame?
Right, I have no shame. The guy who doesn't grasp that Gulianni was referring to 9/11 and who thinks one death proves Giuliani wrong. This is the ridiculous black and white extreme that you leftist morons are. I'm not engaging anymore in your eight year old tantrum
And the missile theory has been debunked.
for ignoring all the warnings and not preparing.
NOT A PLANE.... not even close...
Sorry Mr. Dexter, but this is video tape that has a timer that skips every 1-2 seconds and a camera focused on the gates. It wasn't a digital recording.
And the missile theory has been debunked. Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report - The Pentagon
Having said that, I don't believe the Bush administration has come clean or were clean in what happened. The Bush family was and is TOO CLOSE to the House of Saud.
