Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They don't have to open up all of that. If you sue someone for defamation, you only have to demonstrate that they willfully or negligently promoted a falsehood without good reason. Then you have to show injury. When the news networks cant produce a shred of evidence for their claims, that is step one.Dominion doesn't want to sue...they just want a headline...if they sue they play right into Rudy's hands...they will have to turn over whatever and how ever many machines for investigation that Rudy wants...
I think it is a very safe bet that if their bluff is called, they will fold well before getting into the discovery phase. As it is now, everyone knows what they did, but it cannot easily be proven. To proceed with the lawsuit, they are going to have to open up all the details about how their voting machines and software worked, which will provide solid proof of their cheating and fraud, and blow any case for defamation completely out of the water.
The problem with that theory is Trump has been saying the presidential elections have been rigged since 2016.It was an early strategy of Trump to not allege fraud, a mistake in retrospect, in favor of procedural crimes
(like by passing state legislatures in making pre election law) but that strategy was discarded pretty quickly.
US election 2016: Trump says election 'rigged at polling ...
www.bbc.com › news › election-us-2016-37673797
Oct 17, 2016 — US Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has said the election is "absolutely rigged" by the "dishonest media" and "at many polling ...
Dominion doesn't want to sue...they just want a headline...if they sue they play right into Rudy's hands...they will have to turn over whatever and how ever many machines for investigation that Rudy wants...
I think it is a very safe bet that if their bluff is called, they will fold well before getting into the discovery phase. As it is now, everyone knows what they did, but it cannot easily be proven. To proceed with the lawsuit, they are going to have to open up all the details about how their voting machines and software worked, which will provide solid proof of their cheating and fraud, and blow any case for defamation completely out of the water.
They don't have to open up all of that. If you sue someone for defamation, you only have to demonstrate that they willfully or negligently promoted a falsehood without good reason. Then you have to show injury. When the news networks cant [sic] produce a shred of evidence for their claims, that is step one.I think it is a very safe bet that if their bluff is called, they will fold well before getting into the discovery phase. As it is now, everyone knows what they did, but it cannot easily be proven. To proceed with the lawsuit, they are going to have to open up all the details about how their voting machines and software worked, which will provide solid proof of their cheating and fraud, and blow any case for defamation completely out of the water.
Dominion doesn't want to sue...they just want a headline...if they sue they play right into Rudy's hands...they will have to turn over whatever and how ever many machines for investigation that Rudy wants...
I think it is a very safe bet that if their bluff is called, they will fold well before getting into the discovery phase. As it is now, everyone knows what they did, but it cannot easily be proven. To proceed with the lawsuit, they are going to have to open up all the details about how their voting machines and software worked, which will provide solid proof of their cheating and fraud, and blow any case for defamation completely out of the water.
There is zero. You can't produce a shred of evidence, nor can rudy or the white wing bubble networks. That's why you didn't, and that is why they haven't.There is plenty of reason for any rational person to assume that a very large part of what has been said against Dominion is true.
That is no concern to the impeached president trump. His unconscionable greed has ruined many innocent bystanders. Blaming Dominion for his loss in the November 3rd election was a means to a crooked end. It is how that orange-toned criminal has operated his entire life.Dominion could lose $100 million in contracts due to Giuliani and others alleging their systems are defective.To...bring a defamation case? They hired them for this case.Rudy is named in a defamation suit brought by Dominion Voting Systems’ attorneys. They specialize in defamation cases...
Why would a company which provides voting machines and associated software need lawyers which specialize in defamation cases?
LOL no one tells someone to be prepared to be sued. If they do sue Rudy everything becomes discoverable including why dominion shipped votes out of the USA.
Giuliani told to prepare for 'imminent' legal action
However, the memo to prepare for 'imminent' legal action wasn’t from any of the impeached president trump’s associates.
Rudy is named in a defamation suit brought by Dominion Voting Systems’ attorneys. They specialize in defamation cases, and on Wednesday, sent letters to both lawyers on the impeached president trump’s crack(pot) legal team “warning them of ‘imminent’ legal action on behalf of Dominion Voting Systems.”
Both Giuliani and White House counsel Pat Cipollone were also told to “preserve all documents related to Dominion.”
It would appear Dominion executives have a strong case, as no evidence has been found to “support the claims by Trump allies about Dominion, or any widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election.”
In the near future, poor old senile Giuliani is going to see real attorneys in action, with real evidence to prove their assertions, not the goofy tall tales he’s been presenting.
A presidential pardon can’t get you off the hook for this one, Rudy. Are your malpractice insurance premiums up to date? Will your malpractice insurance even cover knowingly lying about evidence that does not exist. That seems like criminal perjury, not a mistake that would be covered by malpractice insurance. This could cost you… millions. Do you have that kind of cash laying around? You can bet the impeached president trump isn’t going to offer you a cent of his “skim”.
Not to worry, Dominion’s attorneys, Tom Clare and Megan Meier, will hash all that out with you. Unlike you and the impeached president trump, they appear quite knowledgeable in their profession.
Perhaps an out of court settlement would be best for you? But, don’t decide now, first, find a good attorney. (Hint: Not anyone recommended by the impeached president trump or any member of his criminal organization.)
https://www.yahoo.com/news/giuliani-told-prepare-imminent-legal-183900567.html
.
Yes they do, in order to tell them to preserve documents. And no, dominion does not have to disprove the lies. What a stupid post, Franniesock.LOL no one tells someone to be prepared to be sued. If they do sue Rudy everything becomes discoverable including why dominion shipped votes out of the USA.
Giuliani told to prepare for 'imminent' legal action
However, the memo to prepare for 'imminent' legal action wasn’t from any of the impeached president trump’s associates.
Rudy is named in a defamation suit brought by Dominion Voting Systems’ attorneys. They specialize in defamation cases, and on Wednesday, sent letters to both lawyers on the impeached president trump’s crack(pot) legal team “warning them of ‘imminent’ legal action on behalf of Dominion Voting Systems.”
Both Giuliani and White House counsel Pat Cipollone were also told to “preserve all documents related to Dominion.”
It would appear Dominion executives have a strong case, as no evidence has been found to “support the claims by Trump allies about Dominion, or any widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election.”
In the near future, poor old senile Giuliani is going to see real attorneys in action, with real evidence to prove their assertions, not the goofy tall tales he’s been presenting.
A presidential pardon can’t get you off the hook for this one, Rudy. Are your malpractice insurance premiums up to date? Will your malpractice insurance even cover knowingly lying about evidence that does not exist. That seems like criminal perjury, not a mistake that would be covered by malpractice insurance. This could cost you… millions. Do you have that kind of cash laying around? You can bet the impeached president trump isn’t going to offer you a cent of his “skim”.
Not to worry, Dominion’s attorneys, Tom Clare and Megan Meier, will hash all that out with you. Unlike you and the impeached president trump, they appear quite knowledgeable in their profession.
Perhaps an out of court settlement would be best for you? But, don’t decide now, first, find a good attorney. (Hint: Not anyone recommended by the impeached president trump or any member of his criminal organization.)
https://www.yahoo.com/news/giuliani-told-prepare-imminent-legal-183900567.html
.
Bring it on
Bring it on, this is the case that the deep state supreme court refused.Yes they do, in order to tell them to preserve documents. And no, dominion does not have to disprove the lies. What a stupid post, Franniesock.LOL no one tells someone to be prepared to be sued. If they do sue Rudy everything becomes discoverable including why dominion shipped votes out of the USA.
Giuliani told to prepare for 'imminent' legal action
However, the memo to prepare for 'imminent' legal action wasn’t from any of the impeached president trump’s associates.
Rudy is named in a defamation suit brought by Dominion Voting Systems’ attorneys. They specialize in defamation cases, and on Wednesday, sent letters to both lawyers on the impeached president trump’s crack(pot) legal team “warning them of ‘imminent’ legal action on behalf of Dominion Voting Systems.”
Both Giuliani and White House counsel Pat Cipollone were also told to “preserve all documents related to Dominion.”
It would appear Dominion executives have a strong case, as no evidence has been found to “support the claims by Trump allies about Dominion, or any widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election.”
In the near future, poor old senile Giuliani is going to see real attorneys in action, with real evidence to prove their assertions, not the goofy tall tales he’s been presenting.
A presidential pardon can’t get you off the hook for this one, Rudy. Are your malpractice insurance premiums up to date? Will your malpractice insurance even cover knowingly lying about evidence that does not exist. That seems like criminal perjury, not a mistake that would be covered by malpractice insurance. This could cost you… millions. Do you have that kind of cash laying around? You can bet the impeached president trump isn’t going to offer you a cent of his “skim”.
Not to worry, Dominion’s attorneys, Tom Clare and Megan Meier, will hash all that out with you. Unlike you and the impeached president trump, they appear quite knowledgeable in their profession.
Perhaps an out of court settlement would be best for you? But, don’t decide now, first, find a good attorney. (Hint: Not anyone recommended by the impeached president trump or any member of his criminal organization.)
https://www.yahoo.com/news/giuliani-told-prepare-imminent-legal-183900567.html
.
Bring it on
Well there you have it! Haha...desperate jackasses...Synonyms for dominion
Synonyms
Hardly a good choice of a name for voting machines, unless you're a tyrant.
- ascendance
- (also ascendence),
- ascendancy
- (also ascendency),
- dominance,
- domination,
- hegemony,
- imperium,
- predominance,
- predominancy,
- preeminence,
- reign,
- sovereignty
- (also sovranty),
- supremacy
There is zero. You can't produce a shred of evidence, nor can rudy or the white wing bubble networks. That's why you didn't, and that is why they haven't.There is plenty of reason for any rational person to assume that a very large part of what has been said against Dominion is true.
Well that was easy.
Yes they do, in order to tell them to preserve documents. And no, dominion does not have to disprove the lies. What a stupid post, Franniesock.
No evidence in court. The authorities have no evidence. Cartoons arent going to cut it. But i sure do hope they keep you nutballs busy.There is zero. You can't produce a shred of evidence, nor can rudy or the white wing bubble networks. That's why you didn't, and that is why they haven't.There is plenty of reason for any rational person to assume that a very large part of what has been said against Dominion is true.
Well that was easy.
View attachment 433464
Which has to be shown by the liars. Since they have not a shred of evidence, that isn't going to happen. Stop wasting your energy with these silly falsehoods and lane changes. They won't work for the white wing liars, and they won't work for you.The ultimate defense against being sued for defamation/slander/libel is that what one said was true.
Our fight against Dominion will continue outside the courthouse. We’re taking them out back. They don’t get to throw out our evidence, change the rules in the middle of the game, and plant their evidence on the table without a fight.It would appear Dominion executives have a strong case, as no evidence has been found to “support the claims by Trump allies about Dominion, or any widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election.”
Trump had made claims of voter fraud before the 2020 election. He had made claims of voter fraud before the 2016 election.I don't know about you, but if I was paying an attorney $20,000 a day and there is evidence enough to at least raise a "genuine issue of material fact" and my attorney failed to bring this is to the attention of the court, then he's not doing his job properly.The state of Michigan actually preformed a forensic study of the Dominion vote changing machineWhere is the evidence and why has no one, particularly the courts seen it?.the evidence of fraud is so massive that this election may be turned
and found it to be wildly inaccurate and incapable of giving a true vote count. Forensic auditors find shocking 68% error rate in one Michigan county’s votes
Of course Michigan has disputed it's own independent study and have sued to suppress it.
So who are you going to believe? Gretchen Whitmer and her partisan flunkies or an independent auditor by experts in their field? The corruption runs a mile deep in Michigan and the other three criminal states.
Not all cases are winnable but to my understanding your attorney's main job is to plead your case in a manner so that it survives the oppositions attempt to get the case thrown out on summary judgement prior to the merits of the case ever being heard or for that matter the evidence becoming a matter of public record.
I understand what you're saying but it's very hard to believe that there is evidence of massive voter fraud if the alleged "best people" that Trump employs cannot get it in front of a judge or jury to be considered.
On the other hand, while there may have been some cases of voter irregularities, perhaps it was not enough to ultimately change the outcome of the election. The implication when one claims "massive voter fraud" is that the fraud was significant enough that "had it not occurred" the outcome of the election would have been different. If something of this nature had occurred then I don't see how it's possible that it wasn't brought to the attention of the court. Even if the lower court mistakenly or willfully disregarded the claims alleged and evidence referenced, I find it hard to believe that an appellate court would let a blatant violation of the law or legal proceedings stand, but that's exactly what has happened in each one of Trump's cases that attempted to overturn the election results.
So to answer your question, I don't doubt that there may have been irregularities found however I don't believe that it was on the order of magnitude alleged nor that it was significant enough to change the election results.
Trump is just exceedingly bad at math. He doesn't understand that an 85% lead (or even a 100% lead) of only one third of the ballots (in person ballots) is not enough to win an election when two-thirds of the mail-in/absentee ballots hadn't yet been accountable for.
Which has to be shown by the liars. Since they have not a shred of evidence, that isn't going to happen. Stop wasting your energy with these silly falsehoods and lane changes. They won't work for the white wing liars, and they won't work for you.The ultimate defense against being sued for defamation/slander/libel is that what one said was true.
Oh shut up. These people stealing your money will abandon you fools the moment their court actions cease.Our fight against Dominion will continue outside the courthouse. We’re taking them out back. They don’t get to throw out our evidence, change the rules in the middle of the game, and plant their evidence on the table without a fight.It would appear Dominion executives have a strong case, as no evidence has been found to “support the claims by Trump allies about Dominion, or any widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election.”
