Global sea ice at historic HIGHS!!!!

[depotoo]

Hudson Bay Ice Coverage

 

[depotoo]

Baffin Bay Ice Coverage

 

[depotoo]

All the above graphs are from Canadian Ice Service, Environment Canada.

Interesting to note is most claims for less ice start with 'since 1981', rather than going back to 1968, as these do. 1968 to 71 doesn't fit the agenda?
These graphs are for the week of 12/25 ice each year

 

[Billy_Bob]

All the above graphs are from Canadian Ice Service, Environment Canada.

Interesting to note is most claims for less ice start with 'since 1981', rather than going back to 1968, as these do. 1968 to 71 doesn't fit the agenda?
These graphs are for the week of 12/25 ice each year

Davis Straight is an area that is first to be affected by ocean circulations and wind driven storms evidenced by wide swings. Notably the last two years which have seen rapid ice increase as the circulations have gone cold.

 

[mamooth]

All the above graphs are from Canadian Ice Service, Environment Canada.

And the pre-1979 data -- that is, pre-satellite -- is just a flat out guess, and taken seriously by nobody. Except deniers, of course. They adore bad data, because it's the only data they can find that agrees with them.

 

[skookerasbil]

All the above graphs are from Canadian Ice Service, Environment Canada.

And the pre-1979 data -- that is, pre-satellite -- is just a flat out guess, and taken seriously by nobody. Except deniers, of course. They adore bad data, because it's the only data they can find that agrees with them.

Who's taking AGW seriously?

Seriously?

Please get off your lazy feminist bulldog ass and provide some links instead of the parade of opinions shit!!!

 

[mamooth]

Skook, how about you stop spamming and stick to the topic?

The topic, of course, being how badly you failed with the OP. Arctic sea ice is very low for the date. You got nearly everything wrong, and now you're left humiliated and crying. Don't you feel some anger at your cult leaders for the way they always leave you twisting in the wind?

And you're actually asking for a link that satellite observations began in 1979? Just because you're ignorant of the basics doesn't mean that everyone has to link back to the basics yet another time. We don't link to the round earth theory each time we talk about the round earth.

 

[jc456]

Of course I would, given that Einstein wasn't a climate scientist, and that he was notably wrong about some things, such as quantum mechanics. We here in the reason-base community just don't do blind hero worship. It's always about whether the science is good, regardless of who did it.

sure you do, you ain't got an experiment yet to prove anything you blab about! Zip LoSiNg.....................

 

[skookerasbil]

HiStOrIC hIgHs s0ns