Saigon
Gold Member
Belief in the AGW hypothesis is based on one of two things, money in the case of scientists who depend on grant money for a living, or political leanings for those who don't. It isn't based on hard evidence, it isn't based on observable experiments, it isn't even based on real observation...it is based on an assumtion that correlation somehow constitutes causation.
Yeah, I have a hard time accepting that you believe that. Or that anyone else believes that.
If scientists working with coal or nuclear had never made any money out of their professions it still wouldn't make up a strong case.
It's just out-and-out nonsense to suggest that literally hundreds of research centres around the world all produce similar results as some giant conspiracy to get funding. No one believes that. Nobody.