Global Warming Scientist Get Stuck in Growing Antartic Ice

[Theowl32]

Are you wishing death on people?


Jeez,what a laugh riot.

If they died in a frozen hell?

 

[jon_berzerk]

If they had been able to navigate without the ice, it would have been in all the journals just how much the Earth has warmed. Glad to see that the Earth handed them their asses.

"Warmers" needed to be rescued because of the "ice".

funny thing is a hundred years ago

the other folks had no problem with getting hopelessly stuck in the ice flows

did you see btw the Chinese ice breaker is also stuck in the ice

 

[jon_berzerk]

Global Warming Scientists get stuck in ice, why did they not predict the ice? Was this asked yet? The smartest people in the world and they can not see that in a few hours or in a day they would be helplessly stranded?

How are they credible, and as I read recent posts, this ice is just as the Scientist thereoized. So how do they not see the ice coming, its not like its a little bit of ice, its not like people have not died in these places since we have been exploring.

It is very apparent that these Scientists and all who support them, all who propagate their theories, are wrong.

These people have zero understanding of the real world and how it works. The proof is they are stuck.

why did they not predict the ice?

that among others is a good question

--LOL

 

[jon_berzerk]

So, they are in agreement then?

The ice expanse enlarges due to THE GLOBAL WARMING in the Antarctic.

Glaciers however, thins out in other regions of the world due to THE GLOBAL WARMING.

I mean that is what it would have to be. Why? Cause the ice in the Antarctic has trapped a bunch of Abraham types.

Hey, you know what? There is a distinct possibility that the ice is going to crush the hull of the Akademic Shokalskiy.

Interesting side note on this embarrassing situation for Abraham types.

Frozen Out: 98% of Stories Ignore That Ice-bound Ship Was On Global Warming Mission


A group of climate change scientists were rescued by helicopter Jan. 2, after being stranded in the ice since Christmas morning. But the majority of the broadcast networks’ reports about the ice-locked climate researchers never mentioned climate change.

The Russian ship, Akademic Shokalskiy, was stranded in the ice while on a climate change research expedition, yet nearly 98 percent of network news reports about the stranded researchers failed to mention their mission at all. Forty out of 41 stories (97.5 percent) on the network morning and evening news shows since Dec. 25 failed to mention climate change had anything to do with the expedition.

In fact, rather than point out the mission was to find evidence of climate change, the networks often referred to the stranded people as “passengers,” “trackers” and even “tourists,” without a word about climate change or global warming.

Chris Turney, the expedition’s leader, is a professor of climate change at the University of New South Wales. According to Turney’s personal website, the purpose of the expedition is to “discover and communicate the environmental changes taking place in the south.”

Twenty-two crew members stayed with the ship for the time being, as the scientists and researchers were rescued. According to CNN, the ship has enough supplies for “a very long time.”

Three rescue attempts had been thwarted by growing levels of sea ice and weather conditions.

"Outside, blizzard conditions packing an abnormal amount of ice in to the area for this time of the year, summer in the Antarctic," ABC News Correspondent Gio Benitez reported on “Good Morning America” Dec. 31.

On Jan. 2, all 52 passengers were airlifted to a nearby Australian icebreaker ship which had tried, and failed, to plow through the ice and free the Akademic Shokalskiy, on Dec. 30. “Good Morning America” said on Dec. 30, that “the ice could be as thick as 13 feet.”

According to Fox News, Turney admitted “we’re stuck in our own experiment.” They reported on Dec. 30, that a statement from the Australasian Antarctic Expedition said, “Sea ice is disappearing due to climate change, but here ice is building up.”

There was only one news story out of 41 that mentioned climate change. That was CBS “This Morning” Dec. 30. “Despite being frozen at a standstill, the team’s research on climate change and Antarctic wildlife is moving forward,” CBS News Correspondent Don Dahler said. That night, all three evening news programs still failed to make any mention of the group’s climate change research.

The MRC’s Business and Media Institute was unable to view a copy of CBS “Sunday Morning” for Dec. 29, so that broadcast had to be excluded from the tally.

Before their ship got stuck in ice, the researchers were following the trail of the explorer Douglas Mawson, who was stranded in Antarctica for more than a year, beginning in December 1912, according to the website about the expedition.


Read more: Frozen Out: 98% of Stories Ignore That Ice-bound Ship Was On Global Warming Mission | NewsBusters

Frozen Out: 98% of Stories Ignore That Ice-bound Ship Was On Global Warming Mission

yup that is the last thing they want to acknowledge at this point

but all you have to do is go to their original website

and you can see it was a global warming mission

--LOL

 

[Peterf]

Are you wishing death on people?

I really thought you were smarter than this.

Let's have a vote. How many of you believe that this ship getting stuck in the ice refutes anthropogenic global warming?

Or, that it would be funny if climate scientists who accept AGW were killed in the course of their research?

Jeez,what a laugh riot.

When arguments fail resort to phoney emotionalism.

No 'climate scientists' or their (and your) groupie soul-mates were killed or even injured. They were mildly inconvenienced and made to look ridiculous. Which I find very funny.

 

[Theowl32]

Are you wishing death on people?

I really thought you were smarter than this.

Let's have a vote. How many of you believe that this ship getting stuck in the ice refutes anthropogenic global warming?

Or, that it would be funny if climate scientists who accept AGW were killed in the course of their research?

Jeez,what a laugh riot.

When arguments fail resort to phoney emotionalism.

No 'climate scientists' or their (and your) groupie soul-mates were killed or even injured. They were mildly inconvenienced and made to look ridiculous. Which I find very funny.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Are you wishing death on people?

I really thought you were smarter than this.

Let's have a vote. How many of you believe that this ship getting stuck in the ice refutes anthropogenic global warming?

Or, that it would be funny if climate scientists who accept AGW were killed in the course of their research?

Jeez,what a laugh riot.

When arguments fail resort to phoney emotionalism.

No 'climate scientists' or their (and your) groupie soul-mates were killed or even injured. They were mildly inconvenienced and made to look ridiculous. Which I find very funny.

although by their actions they endangered many others

and cost some a bundle of money

 

[percysunshine]

Is there an emoticon for phoney emotionalism?

 

[mamooth]

So, they are in agreement then?

The ice expanse enlarges due to THE GLOBAL WARMING in the Antarctic.

Glaciers however, thins out in other regions of the world due to THE GLOBAL WARMING.

Yep. As was correctly predicted 22 years ago.

But, that information contradicts the 'tard mantras of your liars' cult, so you ran from it. It's a talent denialists have, ignoring any information that contradicts their religious dogma.

Since you can be counted on to run whenever any actual data is presented, why should anyone pay attention to you? You add nothing to the discussion, and you're not crazy enough to be amusing.

Cowardly, boring and stupid is no way to go through life, son.

 

[flacaltenn]

So, they are in agreement then?

The ice expanse enlarges due to THE GLOBAL WARMING in the Antarctic.

Glaciers however, thins out in other regions of the world due to THE GLOBAL WARMING.

Yep. As was correctly predicted 22 years ago.

But, that information contradicts the 'tard mantras of your liars' cult, so you ran from it. It's a talent denialists have, ignoring any information that contradicts their religious dogma.

Since you can be counted on to run whenever any actual data is presented, why should anyone pay attention to you? You add nothing to the discussion, and you're not crazy enough to be amusing.

Cowardly, boring and stupid is no way to go through life, son.

Why dont you repost that 22 yr old prediction and show me where more ice would form if it DIDNT get significantly warmer down there????? With 100 mm of precipt a year or less, you cant even FIND historical charts to Confirm that one prediction..

 

[asterism]

So, they are in agreement then?

The ice expanse enlarges due to THE GLOBAL WARMING in the Antarctic.

Glaciers however, thins out in other regions of the world due to THE GLOBAL WARMING.

Yep. As was correctly predicted 22 years ago.

But, that information contradicts the 'tard mantras of your liars' cult, so you ran from it. It's a talent denialists have, ignoring any information that contradicts their religious dogma.

Since you can be counted on to run whenever any actual data is presented, why should anyone pay attention to you? You add nothing to the discussion, and you're not crazy enough to be amusing.

Cowardly, boring and stupid is no way to go through life, son.

What exactly was predicted in your interpretation?

Was it a certain amount of increased Antarctic ice after a certain temperature level? Was it a reaction to CO2 concentrations with or without any global average temperature increase? Was it something else?

 

[Theowl32]

So, they are in agreement then?

The ice expanse enlarges due to THE GLOBAL WARMING in the Antarctic.

Glaciers however, thins out in other regions of the world due to THE GLOBAL WARMING.

Yep. As was correctly predicted 22 years ago.

But, that information contradicts the 'tard mantras of your liars' cult, so you ran from it. It's a talent denialists have, ignoring any information that contradicts their religious dogma.

Since you can be counted on to run whenever any actual data is presented, why should anyone pay attention to you? You add nothing to the discussion, and you're not crazy enough to be amusing.

Cowardly, boring and stupid is no way to go through life, son.

An uttetly ruined liberal. Your salty tears are tasty. Stop acting like the butthurt pile of brainwashed shit you are. Take your ball and go home.

You lose.


Again.

 

[Abraham3]

What's the weather like in Bizarro-World this time of year?

 

[Peterf]

What's the weather like in Bizarro-World this time of year?

Go on. Don't keep us in suspense. Tell us!

 

[Abraham3]

I haven't a clue. I was waiting to hear it from MrOwl, who was born and bred there by all appearances.

You people are familiar with Bizarro-World, are you not?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bizarro_World

 

[Peterf]

I haven't a clue. I was waiting to hear it from MrOwl, who was born and bred there by all appearances.

You people are familiar with Bizarro-World, are you not?

Bizarro World - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

But if you want to know what the weather is like in Bizarro World all you need to do is look out of the window?

 

[Abraham3]

I haven't a clue. I was waiting to hear it from MrOwl, who was born and bred there by all appearances.

You people are familiar with Bizarro-World, are you not?

Bizarro World - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

But if you want to know what the weather is like in Bizarro World all you need to do is look out of the window?

No, I'm afraid I've never been to the place. But, from his statements, I assumed that Mr Owl DID live there and COULD tell us the weather.

The whole thing was a sarcastic manner of telling Mr Owl that I thought his contentions were irrational and in complete opposition to the evidence. Was I too subtle?

 

[Meister]

I haven't a clue. I was waiting to hear it from MrOwl, who was born and bred there by all appearances.

You people are familiar with Bizarro-World, are you not?

Bizarro World - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

But if you want to know what the weather is like in Bizarro World all you need to do is look out of the window?

No, I'm afraid I've never been to the place. But, from his statements, I assumed that Mr Owl DID live there and COULD tell us the weather.

The whole thing was a sarcastic manner of telling Mr Owl that I thought his contentions were irrational and in complete opposition to the evidence. Was I too subtle?

What evidence.....your theory or contention?

 

[Abraham3]

Five IPCC reports and roughly 12,000 peer reviewed studies.

 

[elektra]

Are you wishing death on people?

I really thought you were smarter than this.

Let's have a vote. How many of you believe that this ship getting stuck in the ice refutes anthropogenic global warming?

Or, that it would be funny if climate scientists who accept AGW were killed in the course of their research?

Jeez,what a laugh riot.

Would it be funny if Climate Scientists died in the course of their research, the answer is:

Yes, it would be funny, funny ironic, like the Scientist who got ripped apart living with Polar Bears. The irony is as funny as funny gets, its about as funny an example of human behavior I can imagine.

Climate Scientists get stuck in Ice and freeze to death. That is funny on many levels, first the level of ignorance these scientist have is astounding, so ignorant they literally get stuck in ice while investigating why its warm. There can not be a better example of stupidity in light of reality.

How about the arrogance, thinking they were above all who went before them. These Scientists obviously arrogantly believe they are smarter than explorers who went before them, Scientist and Explorers who did die in the pursuit of real knowledge and understanding.

And in all seriousness, what kind of Scientist are on a boating trip to be Scientist. Did they not prepare themselves to actually go out onto the ice, like why were they not prepared to collect data hundreds of miles from the ship? What would the quality of the scientific research be withing reach of the shore, within site of ship babysitting them.

Were these Scientist not ready to explore and actually risk their lives to prove thier theories and if they are not how strongly do they actually believe in their own theories.

Seems this was another phony expedition to fake data, collect something they could apply a preconceived conclusion upon.

Real Scientist do not need to be rescued from the cold weather they do not believe in, these people were cowards out for a joy ride who got scarred and had to be rescued. Ill prepared for the reality, through arrogance and ignorance, at the least.