Global Warming Study Cancelled Because of ‘Unprecedented’ Ice

[basquebromance]

Ship of Fools

DELINGPOLE: Global Warming Study Cancelled Because of 'Unprecedented' Ice

 

[cnm]

Well, anyone is certainly a fool who reads Delingpole, the expert on everything and the master of nothing.

 

[Old Rocks]

Image 3 of 6 (play slideshow) Download

Image 6 of 6 (play slideshow) Download

Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis | Sea ice data updated daily with one-day lag

Really? Unprecedented ice? Both the Arctic and Anarctic are both below two standard deviations in the amount of sea ice.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Image 3 of 6 (play slideshow) Download

Image 6 of 6 (play slideshow) Download

Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis | Sea ice data updated daily with one-day lag

Really? Unprecedented ice? Both the Arctic and Anarctic are both below two standard deviations in the amount of sea ice.

Why do you focus on pack ice which can change by 15% in a few hours? Did you know that areas of greater than 30% ice coverage have increased by 1.3%. I know that DMI has stopped producing this graph because it shows your meme total bull shit..

What I find funny about your 15 % graphs is they are all approaching the 2 std barriers.. Which means the levels are statistically insignificant from the mean..

 

[Old Rocks]

Two standard 'barriers'? LOL Two standard deviations. Two standard deviations statistically insignificant from the mean? LOL You sure are some atmospheric physicist.

Standard deviation - Wikipedia

 

[RicO'Shea]

Ship of Fools

DELINGPOLE: Global Warming Study Cancelled Because of 'Unprecedented' Ice

You should learn to research shit before you shit it. What you post is FAKE NEWS... fool.

 

[mamooth]

Why do you focus on pack ice which can change by 15% in a few hours? Did you know that areas of greater than 30% ice coverage have increased by 1.3%.

You just made that up. Fudged it, that is. And everyone knows it.

I know that DMI has stopped producing this graph because it shows your meme total bull shit..

Nobody ever fell for your fraud, so why do you even bother?

Now, I do have a problem with the original article. Not because Delingpole lied about it. He lies about everything, so that's expected.

The article says multi-year ice moved into the Belle Isle Strait, between Newfoundland and mainland Canada. I think that's nonsense. The sea ice around Newfoundland, the Labrador Coast and Baffin Bay melts out completely each summer. There's no way multi-year ice could get that far south. It would have to come from north of Greenland or Ellesmere through the Nares Strait, then down Baffin Bay and the Labrador coast, all during the winter, when the seas are frozen hard and the sea ice is mostly immobile. That's not possible.

What did happens is that constant strong winds blew a lot of ice towards shore and piled it up high, and then winds continued and kept it pressed against the coast. Less surface area, less melt. And temperatures around Newfoundland have been cooler than average

 

[skookerasbil]

Who's not winning?

We weren't the ones saying now for years the ice would be all gone by now!!

Which is why in 2017, nobody gives a rats ass about the Arctic Ice except the uber-enviro k00ks!!

 

[skookerasbil]

C'mon now.........even the most staunch alarmist guy has to admit............this is pretty hysterical!!

 

[RicO'Shea]

Ship of Fools

DELINGPOLE: Global Warming Study Cancelled Because of 'Unprecedented' Ice

If less "Americans" (and I use that term loosely), would accept personal responsibility, fake news like Fox and Breitbart wouldn't exist. If you accept "news" at face value you're compromising your right to knowledge, with self inflicted malice. Right wing news is an American disgrace.

 

[The Irish Ram]

40,000 penguins died this year because there was so much ice they couldn't find the ocean. They starved to death. 2 chicks survived. Solar max is over. We are cooling now, in a solar minimum.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

We are cooling now

No, we're not.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

We weren't the ones saying now for years the ice would be all gone by now!!

No scientist said that. Dude, knowing less than nothing about this topic, despite prattling on about it endlessly, is quite an impressive feat of stupidity on your part.

 

[The Irish Ram]

We are cooling now

No, we're not.

Yes, we are.


Just as earth has cycles which we call seasons, the sun's energy output also changes on a roughly 11-year basis. We call these changes the solar cycle.
We are now at the ending point of solar maximum period number 24. During the last solar minimum, there were few
magnetic storms on the sun, sunspots were rare, and geomagnetic disturbances here on earth
were nearly nonexistent. Aurora watchers had to travel to the polar regions to see
the Northern Lights.

2016 and 2017 bring us decreasing sunspot numbers, lowered solar output, and the return to solar minimum:
"What does this mean? The solar cycle is like a pendulum, swinging back and forth between periods of
high and low sunspot number every 11 years. Today's [23 June 2016] blank sun is a sign that the pendulum is
swinging toward low sunspot numbers. In other words, Solar Minimum is coming.
Solar Maximum (and Solar Minimum) 2009-2020

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

We are cooling now

No, we're not.

Yes, we are.


Just as earth has cycles which we call seasons, the sun's energy output also changes on a roughly 11-year basis. We call these changes the solar cycle.
We are now at the ending point of solar maximum period number 24. During the last solar minimum, there were few
magnetic storms on the sun, sunspots were rare, and geomagnetic disturbances here on earth
were nearly nonexistent. Aurora watchers had to travel to the polar regions to see
the Northern Lights.

2016 and 2017 bring us decreasing sunspot numbers, lowered solar output, and the return to solar minimum:
"What does this mean? The solar cycle is like a pendulum, swinging back and forth between periods of
high and low sunspot number every 11 years. Today's [23 June 2016] blank sun is a sign that the pendulum is
swinging toward low sunspot numbers. In other words, Solar Minimum is coming.
Solar Maximum (and Solar Minimum) 2009-2020

Sorry, you're wrong, we're not cooling.

 

[westwall]

We are cooling now

No, we're not.

Yes, we are.


Just as earth has cycles which we call seasons, the sun's energy output also changes on a roughly 11-year basis. We call these changes the solar cycle.
We are now at the ending point of solar maximum period number 24. During the last solar minimum, there were few
magnetic storms on the sun, sunspots were rare, and geomagnetic disturbances here on earth
were nearly nonexistent. Aurora watchers had to travel to the polar regions to see
the Northern Lights.

2016 and 2017 bring us decreasing sunspot numbers, lowered solar output, and the return to solar minimum:
"What does this mean? The solar cycle is like a pendulum, swinging back and forth between periods of
high and low sunspot number every 11 years. Today's [23 June 2016] blank sun is a sign that the pendulum is
swinging toward low sunspot numbers. In other words, Solar Minimum is coming.
Solar Maximum (and Solar Minimum) 2009-2020

Sorry, you're wrong, we're not cooling.

Actually, we are. Most of the local weatehr stations show a cooling trend. it is only through the magic of computer models and their homolugation programs that cooling suddenly becomes warming. But you have to be honest to admit that and you're not honest.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Most of the local weatehr stations show a cooling trend. it is only through the magic of computer models and their homolugation programs that cooling suddenly becomes warming.

Haha..... ooookay. So, you're calling them liars or incompetent... which is it? Wait, nevermind, you just called them BOTH lying and incompetent.


Give me a break. You're delusional. That's why you are here, screaming into an echo chamber of ignorant deniers, and not publishing any science or debating any scientists. Go ahead, write your big paper on why the models are incompetent errors and how the process of "homlugation" (<-- not an actual English word) is a process by which scientists commit widespread, global fraud, using a huge network of scientists who all keep very good secrets.

you will be laughed out of the room.

 

[The Irish Ram]

We are cooling now

No, we're not.

Yes, we are.


Just as earth has cycles which we call seasons, the sun's energy output also changes on a roughly 11-year basis. We call these changes the solar cycle.
We are now at the ending point of solar maximum period number 24. During the last solar minimum, there were few
magnetic storms on the sun, sunspots were rare, and geomagnetic disturbances here on earth
were nearly nonexistent. Aurora watchers had to travel to the polar regions to see
the Northern Lights.

2016 and 2017 bring us decreasing sunspot numbers, lowered solar output, and the return to solar minimum:
"What does this mean? The solar cycle is like a pendulum, swinging back and forth between periods of
high and low sunspot number every 11 years. Today's [23 June 2016] blank sun is a sign that the pendulum is
swinging toward low sunspot numbers. In other words, Solar Minimum is coming.
Solar Maximum (and Solar Minimum) 2009-2020

Sorry, you're wrong, we're not cooling.

I'll pass that information along to NASA. They're all confused...
Solar Minimum is Coming | Science Mission Directorate

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

We are cooling now

No, we're not.

Yes, we are.


Just as earth has cycles which we call seasons, the sun's energy output also changes on a roughly 11-year basis. We call these changes the solar cycle.
We are now at the ending point of solar maximum period number 24. During the last solar minimum, there were few
magnetic storms on the sun, sunspots were rare, and geomagnetic disturbances here on earth
were nearly nonexistent. Aurora watchers had to travel to the polar regions to see
the Northern Lights.

2016 and 2017 bring us decreasing sunspot numbers, lowered solar output, and the return to solar minimum:
"What does this mean? The solar cycle is like a pendulum, swinging back and forth between periods of
high and low sunspot number every 11 years. Today's [23 June 2016] blank sun is a sign that the pendulum is
swinging toward low sunspot numbers. In other words, Solar Minimum is coming.
Solar Maximum (and Solar Minimum) 2009-2020

Sorry, you're wrong, we're not cooling.

I'll pass that information along to NASA. They're all confused...
Solar Minimum is Coming | Science Mission Directorate

You are confused. I did not dispute solar cycles. While a solar minimum can contribute a cooling factor in the form of less incoming energy, the planet can continue to warm during this short period. It would just warm more slowly than during the solar uptick. Which, by the way, is coming right afterward. So it issilly to look at these cycles as any relief from longer term trends.

 

[westwall]

We are cooling now

No, we're not.

Yes, we are.


Just as earth has cycles which we call seasons, the sun's energy output also changes on a roughly 11-year basis. We call these changes the solar cycle.
We are now at the ending point of solar maximum period number 24. During the last solar minimum, there were few
magnetic storms on the sun, sunspots were rare, and geomagnetic disturbances here on earth
were nearly nonexistent. Aurora watchers had to travel to the polar regions to see
the Northern Lights.

2016 and 2017 bring us decreasing sunspot numbers, lowered solar output, and the return to solar minimum:
"What does this mean? The solar cycle is like a pendulum, swinging back and forth between periods of
high and low sunspot number every 11 years. Today's [23 June 2016] blank sun is a sign that the pendulum is
swinging toward low sunspot numbers. In other words, Solar Minimum is coming.
Solar Maximum (and Solar Minimum) 2009-2020

Sorry, you're wrong, we're not cooling.

I'll pass that information along to NASA. They're all confused...
Solar Minimum is Coming | Science Mission Directorate

You are confused. I did not dispute solar cycles. While a solar minimum can contribute a cooling factor in the form of less incoming energy, the planet can continue to warm during this short period. It would just warm more slowly than during the solar uptick. Which, by the way, is coming right afterward. So it issilly to look at these cycles as any relief from longer term trends.

This is a laughable assertion. The whole meme that CO2 is the control knob for global temp has been totally refuted. When TSI drops, so does the global temp. There is loads of evidence to support this statement. There is none that supports yours.