God Help Us All: Captain America Is Now A Negro!

[TemplarKormac]

Probably because they were in fact racist or said something that could be construed as racist.

What does the NAACP have to do with anything?

The same reason more than 60%+ of every other racial category voted for the POTUS except white people?

Keep you panties on. You are the one that brought up your inferiority complex.

Eh, no. You did.

Sorry guy you did. Please quote where I said anything to you before this.

As far as I see, liberals use the concept of race to make others feel inferior.

Note how your post mentioning inferiority comes before mine. Please, stop embarrassing yourself.

 

[JimH52]

And how dare you bring my personal life into this discussion?

When he gets cornered he always resorts to that type of "tactic" as a distraction.

That Temp guy cracks me up! I could care less what his personal life is, as tortured and bleak it must be..

 

[Rotagilla]

Actually, I have taken both you and Rota to task for your inaccuracies on race.

not really, ace...believe whatever you need to, though.

 

[Asclepias]

Of course he does. And if it weren't for his lack of rep, I would neg him.

Sorry you cant relieve your frustration. Thats specifically why its off. You have to actually confront me with something factual or quit talking to me.

Actually, I have taken both you and Rota to task for your inaccuracies on race.

And I will speak to whomever I wish, whenever I wish. You can put me on ignore if you cannot withstand my onslaught. Otherwise, quit making outrageous statements about my personal life and get with the program. Got it?

I wont put you on ignore. Its fun talking to you.

You seem to be rambling. I didnt tell you who to talk to.

I didnt make any outrageous statements about your personal life you didnt volunteer. Pull your head out of your posterior.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Pick any source you like. Here's one;
Neanderthal DNA And Modern Humans - Business Insider


By comparing the Neanderthal genome to modern human DNA, the authors of two new studies, both published on Wednesday, show how DNA that humans have inherited from breeding with Neanderthals has shaped us.

Modern humans, Neanderthals, and their sister lineage, Denisovans, descended from a common ancestor. The ancestors of modern humans broke off from this single branch more than 500,000 years ago. The Neanderthals split from the Denisovans some time later. The Neanderthals formed their own lineage that lived in Europe and Asia from around 200,000 years ago to 30,000 years ago.

Indigenous Africans have little or no Neanderthal DNA since their ancestors did not breed with Neanderthals who lived in Europe and Asia, according to researchers. The Harvard team determined that specific genetic material was passed down from Neanderthals if it appeared in some non-Africans and the Neanderthal sequence, but not the sub-Saharan Africans.

A related study published in Science, led by Benjamin Vernot from the University of Washington, used a different technique to draw similar conclusions. They estimate that any living human today who is not from Africa inherited 1% to 3% of their genomes from Neanderthals, while the total amount of Neanderthal genome that survived across all modern populations is 20%, the report says.

May I mention, as a neutral party in this discussion, that this article makes no mention of anyone being 'subhuman' due to the lack of Neanderthal DNA? There is no such thing as 'subhuman' other than for its derogatory and pejorative usage. It merely says that Indigenous Africans have little or no Neanderthal DNA because they did not breed with them. It says nothing about them being subhuman. I attribute this to you intentionally (or unintentionally) misreading the article, or any related case studies on the subject.

Word games?..Ok...

In the 2nd paragraph it refers to "modern humans" having neanderthal DNA.

If one can't be classified as a "modern human"...what word would you prefer? "almost human".."semi human".."pretty close to human"?..dress it up any way you like.

No word games. Actual anthropology. We are all modern humans, regardless of genetic makeup. Compare our base genomes and we are all human. There is no subhuman. Just human. Your concept on subspecies or 'subhumans' is flawed. The second paragraph does not refer to those without Neanderthal DNA as 'subhuman.' This leads me to believe you are deliberately misconstruing the meaning of that statement.

 

[Asclepias]

Eh, no. You did.

Sorry guy you did. Please quote where I said anything to you before this.

As far as I see, liberals use the concept of race to make others feel inferior.

Note how your post mentioning inferiority comes before mine. Please, stop embarrassing yourself.

Note how I was not talking to you. Please stop being butthurt. Its just pathetic at this point. Grow a pair.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Then, I would suggest for yours and liberals sakes, that you stop using race as a platform in campaigns. Clearly you believe in such a concept.

What are you talking about?

You are a liberal are you not? Did your party in fact use the concept of race to get Obama elected? Do they still not use the concept of race to bludgeon others on social issues? So, in turn, do you acknowledge that you belong to a group who believes in the concept of race, thusly betraying your positions on the subject? As far as I see, liberals use the concept of race to make others feel inferior.

No, they used the failed policies of the previous administration to get the president elected. Twice.

And no one used the 'concept of race' to 'bludgeon' anyone, conservatives fail on social issues because the voters correctly understand that many on the right are hostile to the civil liberties of gay Americans, women, and Hispanics – republicans have only the social right to blame for losing elections.

Where do you and other nitwits on the right come up with this idiocy?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Actually, I have taken both you and Rota to task for your inaccuracies on race.

not really, ace...believe whatever you need to, though.

All it takes is simple research to debunk your claims about subspecies. Really annoying that you think you know more than everyone else. Arrogance is no substitute for knowledge.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Sorry guy you did. Please quote where I said anything to you before this.

Note how your post mentioning inferiority comes before mine. Please, stop embarrassing yourself.

Note how I was not talking to you. Please stop being butthurt. Its just pathetic at this point. Grow a pair.

I don't give a flying rats ass who you were talking to. You post here, your posts are fair game. Your deflection is noted as well. It is you who needs to grow up and grow a pair.

 

[Asclepias]

Note how your post mentioning inferiority comes before mine. Please, stop embarrassing yourself.

Note how I was not talking to you. Please stop being butthurt. Its just pathetic at this point. Grow a pair.

I don't give a flying rats ass who you were talking to. You post here, your posts are fair game. Your deflection is noted as well. It is you who needs to grow up and grow a pair.

If you dont give a flying rats ass then dont get upset when you tell me you feel inferior. That was amusing how you tried to make is seem like I attacked you and you are the one that brought it up in our discussion. Mind your own business or dont leave your insecurities out there as fair game.

 

[Rotagilla]

Actually, I have taken both you and Rota to task for your inaccuracies on race.

not really, ace...believe whatever you need to, though.

All it takes is simple research to debunk your claims about subspecies. Really annoying that you think you know more than everyone else. Arrogance is no substitute for knowledge.

Human is a species, not a race. That fact can not be "debunked".

 

[Asclepias]

not really, ace...believe whatever you need to, though.

All it takes is simple research to debunk your claims about subspecies. Really annoying that you think you know more than everyone else. Arrogance is no substitute for knowledge.

Human is a species, not a race. That fact can not be "debunked".

Thats because race is a label we use handed down from 2 insecure white guys trying to prove white superiority. Humans are a species and a race. There is no "racial" feature in the world you cannot find in Africa. If so please please point it out.

 

[TemplarKormac]

not really, ace...believe whatever you need to, though.

All it takes is simple research to debunk your claims about subspecies. Really annoying that you think you know more than everyone else. Arrogance is no substitute for knowledge.

Human is a species, not a race. That fact can not be "debunked".

I never said anything about the human species being a 'race.' It is a species of mammalia.

 

[WinterBorn]

". (although negroids, due to the absence of neanderthal DNA are often considered subhumans.)

I would like to see any link providing scientific evidence of the quote above (in bold print).

Pick any source you like. Here's one;
Neanderthal DNA And Modern Humans - Business Insider


By comparing the Neanderthal genome to modern human DNA, the authors of two new studies, both published on Wednesday, show how DNA that humans have inherited from breeding with Neanderthals has shaped us.

Modern humans, Neanderthals, and their sister lineage, Denisovans, descended from a common ancestor. The ancestors of modern humans broke off from this single branch more than 500,000 years ago. The Neanderthals split from the Denisovans some time later. The Neanderthals formed their own lineage that lived in Europe and Asia from around 200,000 years ago to 30,000 years ago.

Indigenous Africans have little or no Neanderthal DNA since their ancestors did not breed with Neanderthals who lived in Europe and Asia, according to researchers. The Harvard team determined that specific genetic material was passed down from Neanderthals if it appeared in some non-Africans and the Neanderthal sequence, but not the sub-Saharan Africans.

A related study published in Science, led by Benjamin Vernot from the University of Washington, used a different technique to draw similar conclusions. They estimate that any living human today who is not from Africa inherited 1% to 3% of their genomes from Neanderthals, while the total amount of Neanderthal genome that survived across all modern populations is 20%, the report says.

Oh I am aware of the findings of the studies researching neanderthal DNA in modern humans, and the lack of the same in sub-Saharan Africans. What I am specifically looking for is any legitimate researcher calling the sub-Saharan Africans "sub-humans" because of it.

 

[Rotagilla]

All it takes is simple research to debunk your claims about subspecies. Really annoying that you think you know more than everyone else. Arrogance is no substitute for knowledge.

Human is a species, not a race. That fact can not be "debunked".

Thats because race is a label we use handed down from 2 insecure white guys trying to prove white superiority. Humans are a species and a race. There is no "racial" feature in the world you cannot find in Africa. If so please please point it out.

Human is a species not a race.
Race exists and there are physical and biological differences.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Note how I was not talking to you. Please stop being butthurt. Its just pathetic at this point. Grow a pair.

I don't give a flying rats ass who you were talking to. You post here, your posts are fair game. Your deflection is noted as well. It is you who needs to grow up and grow a pair.

If you dont give a flying rats ass then dont get upset when you tell me you feel inferior. That was amusing how you tried to make is seem like I attacked you and you are the one that brought it up in our discussion. Mind your own business or dont leave your insecurities out there as fair game.

I don't give a rats ass because I will speak to whomever I wish. Give it a rest. Stop lying. You know you mentioned the subject of inferiority first. I merely stated how you liberals use race as a means to make others feel inferior after you mentioned it. Stop mincing words, you impetuous, unnatural noise. Oh I also remember how you wanted to 'combat racism wherever it exists' too. Please. I have a semi-eidetic memory. I clearly remember you making such statements in a thread about a cashier/server who was the supposed victim of the word "******" scrawled on a receipt.

No match. Sit down.

 

[TemplarKormac]

I would like to see any link providing scientific evidence of the quote above (in bold print).

Pick any source you like. Here's one;
Neanderthal DNA And Modern Humans - Business Insider


By comparing the Neanderthal genome to modern human DNA, the authors of two new studies, both published on Wednesday, show how DNA that humans have inherited from breeding with Neanderthals has shaped us.

Modern humans, Neanderthals, and their sister lineage, Denisovans, descended from a common ancestor. The ancestors of modern humans broke off from this single branch more than 500,000 years ago. The Neanderthals split from the Denisovans some time later. The Neanderthals formed their own lineage that lived in Europe and Asia from around 200,000 years ago to 30,000 years ago.

Indigenous Africans have little or no Neanderthal DNA since their ancestors did not breed with Neanderthals who lived in Europe and Asia, according to researchers. The Harvard team determined that specific genetic material was passed down from Neanderthals if it appeared in some non-Africans and the Neanderthal sequence, but not the sub-Saharan Africans.

A related study published in Science, led by Benjamin Vernot from the University of Washington, used a different technique to draw similar conclusions. They estimate that any living human today who is not from Africa inherited 1% to 3% of their genomes from Neanderthals, while the total amount of Neanderthal genome that survived across all modern populations is 20%, the report says.

Oh I am aware of the findings of the studies researching neanderthal DNA in modern humans, and the lack of the same in sub-Saharan Africans. What I am specifically looking for is any legitimate researcher calling the sub-Saharan Africans "sub-humans" because of it.

There isn't, nor will you find any credible researchers who will.

 

[Rotagilla]

May I mention, as a neutral party in this discussion, that this article makes no mention of anyone being 'subhuman' due to the lack of Neanderthal DNA? There is no such thing as 'subhuman' other than for its derogatory and pejorative usage. It merely says that Indigenous Africans have little or no Neanderthal DNA because they did not breed with them. It says nothing about them being subhuman. I attribute this to you intentionally (or unintentionally) misreading the article, or any related case studies on the subject.

Word games?..Ok...

In the 2nd paragraph it refers to "modern humans" having neanderthal DNA.

If one can't be classified as a "modern human"...what word would you prefer? "almost human".."semi human".."pretty close to human"?..dress it up any way you like.

No word games. Actual anthropology. We are all modern humans, regardless of genetic makeup. Compare our base genomes and we are all human. There is no subhuman. Just human. Your concept on subspecies or 'subhumans' is flawed. The second paragraph does not refer to those without Neanderthal DNA as 'subhuman.' This leads me to believe you are deliberately misconstruing the meaning of that statement.

Word games.

Yes we are all "modern" humans..in the fact that we are alive today..

One of the least advanced races in the world has no neanderthal DNA like the rest of us "modern humans" is the point.

 

[WinterBorn]

Pick any source you like. Here's one;
Neanderthal DNA And Modern Humans - Business Insider


By comparing the Neanderthal genome to modern human DNA, the authors of two new studies, both published on Wednesday, show how DNA that humans have inherited from breeding with Neanderthals has shaped us.

Modern humans, Neanderthals, and their sister lineage, Denisovans, descended from a common ancestor. The ancestors of modern humans broke off from this single branch more than 500,000 years ago. The Neanderthals split from the Denisovans some time later. The Neanderthals formed their own lineage that lived in Europe and Asia from around 200,000 years ago to 30,000 years ago.

Indigenous Africans have little or no Neanderthal DNA since their ancestors did not breed with Neanderthals who lived in Europe and Asia, according to researchers. The Harvard team determined that specific genetic material was passed down from Neanderthals if it appeared in some non-Africans and the Neanderthal sequence, but not the sub-Saharan Africans.

A related study published in Science, led by Benjamin Vernot from the University of Washington, used a different technique to draw similar conclusions. They estimate that any living human today who is not from Africa inherited 1% to 3% of their genomes from Neanderthals, while the total amount of Neanderthal genome that survived across all modern populations is 20%, the report says.

May I mention, as a neutral party in this discussion, that this article makes no mention of anyone being 'subhuman' due to the lack of Neanderthal DNA? There is no such thing as 'subhuman' other than for its derogatory and pejorative usage. It merely says that Indigenous Africans have little or no Neanderthal DNA because they did not breed with them. It says nothing about them being subhuman. I attribute this to you intentionally (or unintentionally) misreading the article, or any related case studies on the subject.

Word games?..Ok...

In the 2nd paragraph it refers to "modern humans" having neanderthal DNA.

If one can't be classified as a "modern human"...what word would you prefer? "almost human".."semi human".."pretty close to human"?..dress it up any way you like.

Not word games at all. The research I have read refers to neanderthal DNA in modern humans except those of sub-Saharan Africa.

I have seen no researcher refer to them as "sub-human". Since the sub-Saharan Africans are still homo sapien sapien (modern humans), your claims of them being "sub-human" is simply wrong.

 

[Unkotare]

(although negroids, due to the absence of neanderthal DNA are often considered subhumans.)

By whom?