Dadoalex
Gold Member
- Jan 11, 2021
- 15,114
- 6,457
- 208
The next MTG/BOBO KKKlone.He'll be a future politician with the party that has morals.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The next MTG/BOBO KKKlone.He'll be a future politician with the party that has morals.
So one can't make money and live properly?Some of us believe that living PROPERLY in this life will allow to exist more pleasantly in the next life.
Are you saying if you are a nuclear physicist, you can’t be a good wife and mother?Ya…why aspire to be a nuclear physicist?
Why can’t someone aspire for both? Why can’t someone aspire to raise a good family?Ya…why aspire to be a nuclear physicist?
Are you trying to use “jock” as an insult?----------------------------------------------------------------------
Notably, that jock focused only on women.
Notably, he did NOT say: "And to the men listening, I guess the majority of you are most excited about your marriage and the children you will bring into this world."
WTH? Does he think that only women get married?
That women bring children into this world and and raise them, all by themselves?
Where is this jock's awareness that men have a responsibility also ---to be good husbands, to be good fathers?
Then they should “choose” to not have children.Of course, it could. That doesn't automatically make it the better choice for all women, or even most women, as that guy implied.
Are you seriously this stupid? I always suspected it, now I know it’s true.I wonder if he tells Mahomes to ride in the back of the bus on way to stadium?
It’s not about the money. It’s about the role. It is the MAN’s role to be the leader, breadwinner, and head of the household. It is the woman’s role to support her Husband, do the domestic tasks, and be the primary parent.So one can't make money and live properly?
It is all about biology.It’s not about the money. It’s about the role. It is the MAN’s role to be the leader, breadwinner, and head of the household. It is the woman’s role to support her Husband, do the domestic tasks, and be the primary parent.
Biology. Psychology. The inherent strengths and weaknesses of each gender.It is all about biology
Maybe improve the conditions for families to be able to make choices. Better wages lower housing costs, that sort of thing. Maybe support unions. But you guys oppose all that.How do we fill those spots if everyone stops having kids?
The number of hours in a day says it can’t be done… Sleep - 8 hours. Work -10 hours. Housework - 6 hoursMothering - 8 hours. Wifeing - 4 hours. Overall - 32 hours. DOES NOT ADD UP.Are you saying if you are a nuclear physicist, you can’t be a good wife and mother?
Or maybe you reduce your standard of living. Do you NEED two vacations a year? Luxury cars? Heeelry? Neeest electronics? 2800 square foot house? Eating out 4-5 nights a week?Maybe improve the conditions for families to be able to make choices. Better wages lower housing costs, that sort of thing. Maybe support unions. But you guys oppose all that.
You support corporate elites and those things are not in their interests
Maybe improve the conditions for families to be able to make choices. Better wages lower housing costs, that sort of thing. Maybe support unions. But you guys oppose all that.
You support corporate elites and those things are not in their interests..
Or maybe you reduce your standard of living. Do you NEED two vacations a year? Luxury cars? Heeelry? Neeest electronics? 2800 square foot house? Eating out 4-5 nights a week?
Better wages happen when fewer people are competing for jobs. If only one household member works, wages rise naturally.
Problems solve themselves
If both spouses agree this is what they want then yes. If not, a different arrangement is the way to go.It’s not about the money. It’s about the role. It is the MAN’s role to be the leader, breadwinner, and head of the household. It is the woman’s role to support her Husband, do the domestic tasks, and be the primary parent.
“Things” vs Children.Right, people should give things up so others can continue their greed.
Not giving any voice to the child. TypicalIf both spouses agree this is what they want then yes. If not, a different arrangement is the way to go.
“Things” vs Children.
Things should always lose.