GOP jobs agenda

[Dad2three]

So you've got an Administration actively working to STOP something from happening...yet you want to give them credit for the increase in oil and natural gas production that occurred BECAUSE of fracking?

The libturds have never answered this question. They also gave Clinton credit for the internet boom, but they can't explain what he did to foster it.

"Clinton's 1993 budget cuts, which reduced projected red ink by more than $400 billion over five years, sparked a major drop in interest rates that helped boost investment in all the equipment and systems that brought forth the New Age economy of technological innovation and rising productivity."
— Business Week, May 19, 1997



One of the reasons Goldman Sachs cites for the "best economy ever" is that "on the policy side, trade, fiscal, and monetary policies have been excellent, working in ways that have facilitated growth without inflation. The Clinton Administration has worked to liberalize trade and has used any revenue windfalls to reduce the federal budget deficit."
— Goldman Sachs, March 1998

The only problem with your quotes is that Clinton didn't cut the budget. He demanded that every budget the Republicans in Congress submitted to him be increased.

Got it, you can't be honest once

ONCE MORE BUBBA:

"Clinton's 1993 (DEM party without ONE GOP vote) budget cuts, which reduced projected red ink by more than $400 billion over five years, sparked a major drop in interest rates that helped boost investment in all the equipment and systems that brought forth the New Age economy of technological innovation and rising productivity."
— Business Week, May 19, 1997


"The deficit has come down, and I give the Clinton Administration and President Clinton himself a lot of credit for that. [He] did something about it, fast. And I think we are seeing some benefits." — Paul Volcker, Federal Reserve Board Chairman (1979-1987), in Audacity, Fall 1994



The package features a four-year, $493 billion plan evenly divided between tax increases and spending cuts, including a freeze on the pay of federal workers next year and lower raises than scheduled in the following years.

Two-thirds of the money is to go to deficit reduction – bringing the deficit in 1997 down $140 billion from current projections – and the rest to about $160 billion in new spending that Clinton describes as investment. Clinton also is calling for an immediate $30 billion stimulus program to help create jobs in the short run.

Washingtonpost.com Asking American to Face Facts Clinton Presents Plan to Raise Taxes Cut Deficit



EVERY GOPer VOTED AGAINST IT AND MANY SAID IT WOULD LEAD TO A RECESSION, LOL

 

[RKMBrown]

So you've got an Administration actively working to STOP something from happening...yet you want to give them credit for the increase in oil and natural gas production that occurred BECAUSE of fracking?

The libturds have never answered this question. They also gave Clinton credit for the internet boom, but they can't explain what he did to foster it.

"Clinton's 1993 budget cuts, which reduced projected red ink by more than $400 billion over five years, sparked a major drop in interest rates that helped boost investment in all the equipment and systems that brought forth the New Age economy of technological innovation and rising productivity."
— Business Week, May 19, 1997



One of the reasons Goldman Sachs cites for the "best economy ever" is that "on the policy side, trade, fiscal, and monetary policies have been excellent, working in ways that have facilitated growth without inflation. The Clinton Administration has worked to liberalize trade and has used any revenue windfalls to reduce the federal budget deficit."
— Goldman Sachs, March 1998

The only problem with your quotes is that Clinton didn't cut the budget. He demanded that every budget the Republicans in Congress submitted to him be increased.

Got it, you can't be honest once

ONCE MORE BUBBA:

"Clinton's 1993 (DEM party without ONE GOP vote) budget cuts, which reduced projected red ink by more than $400 billion over five years, sparked a major drop in interest rates that helped boost investment in all the equipment and systems that brought forth the New Age economy of technological innovation and rising productivity."
— Business Week, May 19, 1997


"The deficit has come down, and I give the Clinton Administration and President Clinton himself a lot of credit for that. [He] did something about it, fast. And I think we are seeing some benefits." — Paul Volcker, Federal Reserve Board Chairman (1979-1987), in Audacity, Fall 1994



The package features a four-year, $493 billion plan evenly divided between tax increases and spending cuts, including a freeze on the pay of federal workers next year and lower raises than scheduled in the following years.

Two-thirds of the money is to go to deficit reduction – bringing the deficit in 1997 down $140 billion from current projections – and the rest to about $160 billion in new spending that Clinton describes as investment. Clinton also is calling for an immediate $30 billion stimulus program to help create jobs in the short run.

Washingtonpost.com Asking American to Face Facts Clinton Presents Plan to Raise Taxes Cut Deficit



EVERY GOPer VOTED AGAINST IT AND MANY SAID IT WOULD LEAD TO A RECESSION, LOL

What a moron.

 

[Dad2three]

So you've got an Administration actively working to STOP something from happening...yet you want to give them credit for the increase in oil and natural gas production that occurred BECAUSE of fracking?

The libturds have never answered this question. They also gave Clinton credit for the internet boom, but they can't explain what he did to foster it.

"Clinton's 1993 budget cuts, which reduced projected red ink by more than $400 billion over five years, sparked a major drop in interest rates that helped boost investment in all the equipment and systems that brought forth the New Age economy of technological innovation and rising productivity."
— Business Week, May 19, 1997



One of the reasons Goldman Sachs cites for the "best economy ever" is that "on the policy side, trade, fiscal, and monetary policies have been excellent, working in ways that have facilitated growth without inflation. The Clinton Administration has worked to liberalize trade and has used any revenue windfalls to reduce the federal budget deficit."
— Goldman Sachs, March 1998

The only problem with your quotes is that Clinton didn't cut the budget. He demanded that every budget the Republicans in Congress submitted to him be increased.

Got it, you can't be honest once

ONCE MORE BUBBA:

"Clinton's 1993 (DEM party without ONE GOP vote) budget cuts, which reduced projected red ink by more than $400 billion over five years, sparked a major drop in interest rates that helped boost investment in all the equipment and systems that brought forth the New Age economy of technological innovation and rising productivity."
— Business Week, May 19, 1997


"The deficit has come down, and I give the Clinton Administration and President Clinton himself a lot of credit for that. [He] did something about it, fast. And I think we are seeing some benefits." — Paul Volcker, Federal Reserve Board Chairman (1979-1987), in Audacity, Fall 1994



The package features a four-year, $493 billion plan evenly divided between tax increases and spending cuts, including a freeze on the pay of federal workers next year and lower raises than scheduled in the following years.

Two-thirds of the money is to go to deficit reduction – bringing the deficit in 1997 down $140 billion from current projections – and the rest to about $160 billion in new spending that Clinton describes as investment. Clinton also is calling for an immediate $30 billion stimulus program to help create jobs in the short run.

Washingtonpost.com Asking American to Face Facts Clinton Presents Plan to Raise Taxes Cut Deficit



EVERY GOPer VOTED AGAINST IT AND MANY SAID IT WOULD LEAD TO A RECESSION, LOL

What a moron.

I get it Bubba, when conservatives AND their policies have been wrong so often, ALL you have are insults.

 

[RKMBrown]

The libturds have never answered this question. They also gave Clinton credit for the internet boom, but they can't explain what he did to foster it.

"Clinton's 1993 budget cuts, which reduced projected red ink by more than $400 billion over five years, sparked a major drop in interest rates that helped boost investment in all the equipment and systems that brought forth the New Age economy of technological innovation and rising productivity."
— Business Week, May 19, 1997



One of the reasons Goldman Sachs cites for the "best economy ever" is that "on the policy side, trade, fiscal, and monetary policies have been excellent, working in ways that have facilitated growth without inflation. The Clinton Administration has worked to liberalize trade and has used any revenue windfalls to reduce the federal budget deficit."
— Goldman Sachs, March 1998

The only problem with your quotes is that Clinton didn't cut the budget. He demanded that every budget the Republicans in Congress submitted to him be increased.

Got it, you can't be honest once

ONCE MORE BUBBA:

"Clinton's 1993 (DEM party without ONE GOP vote) budget cuts, which reduced projected red ink by more than $400 billion over five years, sparked a major drop in interest rates that helped boost investment in all the equipment and systems that brought forth the New Age economy of technological innovation and rising productivity."
— Business Week, May 19, 1997


"The deficit has come down, and I give the Clinton Administration and President Clinton himself a lot of credit for that. [He] did something about it, fast. And I think we are seeing some benefits." — Paul Volcker, Federal Reserve Board Chairman (1979-1987), in Audacity, Fall 1994



The package features a four-year, $493 billion plan evenly divided between tax increases and spending cuts, including a freeze on the pay of federal workers next year and lower raises than scheduled in the following years.

Two-thirds of the money is to go to deficit reduction – bringing the deficit in 1997 down $140 billion from current projections – and the rest to about $160 billion in new spending that Clinton describes as investment. Clinton also is calling for an immediate $30 billion stimulus program to help create jobs in the short run.

Washingtonpost.com Asking American to Face Facts Clinton Presents Plan to Raise Taxes Cut Deficit



EVERY GOPer VOTED AGAINST IT AND MANY SAID IT WOULD LEAD TO A RECESSION, LOL

What a moron.

I get it Bubba, when conservatives AND their policies have been wrong so often, ALL you have are insults.

Fucking moron.

 

[rdean]

"Clinton's 1993 budget cuts, which reduced projected red ink by more than $400 billion over five years, sparked a major drop in interest rates that helped boost investment in all the equipment and systems that brought forth the New Age economy of technological innovation and rising productivity."
— Business Week, May 19, 1997



One of the reasons Goldman Sachs cites for the "best economy ever" is that "on the policy side, trade, fiscal, and monetary policies have been excellent, working in ways that have facilitated growth without inflation. The Clinton Administration has worked to liberalize trade and has used any revenue windfalls to reduce the federal budget deficit."
— Goldman Sachs, March 1998

The only problem with your quotes is that Clinton didn't cut the budget. He demanded that every budget the Republicans in Congress submitted to him be increased.

Got it, you can't be honest once

ONCE MORE BUBBA:

"Clinton's 1993 (DEM party without ONE GOP vote) budget cuts, which reduced projected red ink by more than $400 billion over five years, sparked a major drop in interest rates that helped boost investment in all the equipment and systems that brought forth the New Age economy of technological innovation and rising productivity."
— Business Week, May 19, 1997


"The deficit has come down, and I give the Clinton Administration and President Clinton himself a lot of credit for that. [He] did something about it, fast. And I think we are seeing some benefits." — Paul Volcker, Federal Reserve Board Chairman (1979-1987), in Audacity, Fall 1994



The package features a four-year, $493 billion plan evenly divided between tax increases and spending cuts, including a freeze on the pay of federal workers next year and lower raises than scheduled in the following years.

Two-thirds of the money is to go to deficit reduction – bringing the deficit in 1997 down $140 billion from current projections – and the rest to about $160 billion in new spending that Clinton describes as investment. Clinton also is calling for an immediate $30 billion stimulus program to help create jobs in the short run.

Washingtonpost.com Asking American to Face Facts Clinton Presents Plan to Raise Taxes Cut Deficit



EVERY GOPer VOTED AGAINST IT AND MANY SAID IT WOULD LEAD TO A RECESSION, LOL

What a moron.

I get it Bubba, when conservatives AND their policies have been wrong so often, ALL you have are insults.

Fucking moron.

You're doing what?

 

[RKMBrown]

The only problem with your quotes is that Clinton didn't cut the budget. He demanded that every budget the Republicans in Congress submitted to him be increased.

Got it, you can't be honest once

ONCE MORE BUBBA:

"Clinton's 1993 (DEM party without ONE GOP vote) budget cuts, which reduced projected red ink by more than $400 billion over five years, sparked a major drop in interest rates that helped boost investment in all the equipment and systems that brought forth the New Age economy of technological innovation and rising productivity."
— Business Week, May 19, 1997


"The deficit has come down, and I give the Clinton Administration and President Clinton himself a lot of credit for that. [He] did something about it, fast. And I think we are seeing some benefits." — Paul Volcker, Federal Reserve Board Chairman (1979-1987), in Audacity, Fall 1994



The package features a four-year, $493 billion plan evenly divided between tax increases and spending cuts, including a freeze on the pay of federal workers next year and lower raises than scheduled in the following years.

Two-thirds of the money is to go to deficit reduction – bringing the deficit in 1997 down $140 billion from current projections – and the rest to about $160 billion in new spending that Clinton describes as investment. Clinton also is calling for an immediate $30 billion stimulus program to help create jobs in the short run.

Washingtonpost.com Asking American to Face Facts Clinton Presents Plan to Raise Taxes Cut Deficit



EVERY GOPer VOTED AGAINST IT AND MANY SAID IT WOULD LEAD TO A RECESSION, LOL

What a moron.

I get it Bubba, when conservatives AND their policies have been wrong so often, ALL you have are insults.

Fucking moron.

You're doing what?

Calling you and your socks out as crybaby pos morons.

IRONY: a bunch of morons living in their mom's basement screaming about gop jobs plans 6 years after their master is elected and still hasn't done a single effing thing about jobs. You wimps don't want jobs you want handouts.

 

[Dad2three]

Got it, you can't be honest once

ONCE MORE BUBBA:

"Clinton's 1993 (DEM party without ONE GOP vote) budget cuts, which reduced projected red ink by more than $400 billion over five years, sparked a major drop in interest rates that helped boost investment in all the equipment and systems that brought forth the New Age economy of technological innovation and rising productivity."
— Business Week, May 19, 1997


"The deficit has come down, and I give the Clinton Administration and President Clinton himself a lot of credit for that. [He] did something about it, fast. And I think we are seeing some benefits." — Paul Volcker, Federal Reserve Board Chairman (1979-1987), in Audacity, Fall 1994



The package features a four-year, $493 billion plan evenly divided between tax increases and spending cuts, including a freeze on the pay of federal workers next year and lower raises than scheduled in the following years.

Two-thirds of the money is to go to deficit reduction – bringing the deficit in 1997 down $140 billion from current projections – and the rest to about $160 billion in new spending that Clinton describes as investment. Clinton also is calling for an immediate $30 billion stimulus program to help create jobs in the short run.

Washingtonpost.com Asking American to Face Facts Clinton Presents Plan to Raise Taxes Cut Deficit



EVERY GOPer VOTED AGAINST IT AND MANY SAID IT WOULD LEAD TO A RECESSION, LOL

What a moron.

I get it Bubba, when conservatives AND their policies have been wrong so often, ALL you have are insults.

Fucking moron.

You're doing what?

Calling you and your socks out as crybaby pos morons.

IRONY: a bunch of morons living in their mom's basement screaming about gop jobs plans 6 years after their master is elected and still hasn't done a single effing thing about jobs. You wimps don't want jobs you want handouts.

1. 
   Why are cons ALWAYS on the wrong side of history?

Why are cons ALWAYS on the wrong side of history Page 8 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[Oldstyle]

Got it, you can't be honest once

ONCE MORE BUBBA:

"Clinton's 1993 (DEM party without ONE GOP vote) budget cuts, which reduced projected red ink by more than $400 billion over five years, sparked a major drop in interest rates that helped boost investment in all the equipment and systems that brought forth the New Age economy of technological innovation and rising productivity."
— Business Week, May 19, 1997


"The deficit has come down, and I give the Clinton Administration and President Clinton himself a lot of credit for that. [He] did something about it, fast. And I think we are seeing some benefits." — Paul Volcker, Federal Reserve Board Chairman (1979-1987), in Audacity, Fall 1994



The package features a four-year, $493 billion plan evenly divided between tax increases and spending cuts, including a freeze on the pay of federal workers next year and lower raises than scheduled in the following years.

Two-thirds of the money is to go to deficit reduction – bringing the deficit in 1997 down $140 billion from current projections – and the rest to about $160 billion in new spending that Clinton describes as investment. Clinton also is calling for an immediate $30 billion stimulus program to help create jobs in the short run.

Washingtonpost.com Asking American to Face Facts Clinton Presents Plan to Raise Taxes Cut Deficit



EVERY GOPer VOTED AGAINST IT AND MANY SAID IT WOULD LEAD TO A RECESSION, LOL

What a moron.

I get it Bubba, when conservatives AND their policies have been wrong so often, ALL you have are insults.

Fucking moron.

You're doing what?

Calling you and your socks out as crybaby pos morons.

IRONY: a bunch of morons living in their mom's basement screaming about gop jobs plans 6 years after their master is elected and still hasn't done a single effing thing about jobs. You wimps don't want jobs you want handouts.

Dad posts 24/7 so it's obvious he either doesn't work or is the most useless employee ever! He's listed his location as Monterey, California which is about as highbrow as they come so my guess is that he does indeed live in his rather wealthy parents basement. In all likely hood he's a major disappointment to Mom & Dad after flunking out of Community College and not having a real job in his entire life.

 

[rightwinger]

I had no idea it was the gov'ts job to create jobs in the private sector.

That's a new one on me.

Common conservative meme...

Government creates jobs all the time

 

[zeke]

Dad23 kicking your all's ass AGAIN,

"Clinton's 1993 (DEM party without ONE GOP vote) budget cuts, which reduced projected red ink by more than $400 billion over five years, sparked a major drop in interest rates that helped boost investment in all the equipment and systems that brought forth the New Age economy of technological innovation and rising productivity."
— Business Week, May 19, 1997

Here you go oldstyle. One simple paragraph from Business Week. Did Clinton sign budget cuts with NO Republicans going along that reduced projected red ink by 400 billion over 5 years.

For some reason the writers at Business Week believed that he (Clinton) did do that. D23 believes that. I believe that.

So you should be able to easily prove both D23 and Business Week wrong. Like you all say D23 is wrong all the time. Piece of cake. You are gonna do it, right? Prove what he posted about Clinton was wrong.

 

[Flash]

The way to "create" jobs is for the friggin government to get out of the way of business. Stop taxing them and regulating them out of business.

The US has become a nation hostile to business and then the stupid people that made it hostile wonders why we have low employment and why successful American businesses flee the country, duh.

The Republicans are a party of big government and not that much different than the Democrats. However, they are slightly better at stimulating capitalism and we generally do better when they are in charge. The Republicans are always better than the Democrats but that is not saying much because the Democrats are so terrible. It doesn't take much to be better than those butt pirates.

As long as we have this corrupt incompetent big bloated government that collects over 40% of the GNP (combined fed, state and local) this country is never going to live up to its potential.

 

[airplanemechanic]

What?

Gov't had no INVOLVEMENT WITH YOUR SUCCESS RIGHT? No laws, education, roads, etc

You Klowns did it ALL on your own, lol

The Republican sham of lower taxes and less regulation doesn't help anyone but the richest Americans and Big Business and kill jobs and opportunity for almost everyone, especially in the middle class and poor.


"The only orthodox object of the institution of government is to secure the greatest degree of happiness possible to the general mass of those associated under it."

Thomas Jefferson

You really do shock me sometimes, and not in a good way.

Yes, without gov't intervention. The gov't played no part in us hiring new people, buying old companies that were dying and deciding to keep their workers on rather than fire them. We did that.....hold onto your hats, WITHOUT GOV'T INTERVENTION.

Don't tell me you support Obama's you didn't build it crap, right? We pay taxes out of our asses for those fucking roads, they BETTER be there. You act like the fucking roads are a privilege to own and I owe the gov't thanks for them existing. If they tax my ass at gunpoint for the money to build them, they better fucking be there.

 

[Oldstyle]

Dad23 kicking your all's ass AGAIN,

"Clinton's 1993 (DEM party without ONE GOP vote) budget cuts, which reduced projected red ink by more than $400 billion over five years, sparked a major drop in interest rates that helped boost investment in all the equipment and systems that brought forth the New Age economy of technological innovation and rising productivity."
— Business Week, May 19, 1997

Here you go oldstyle. One simple paragraph from Business Week. Did Clinton sign budget cuts with NO Republicans going along that reduced projected red ink by 400 billion over 5 years.

For some reason the writers at Business Week believed that he (Clinton) did do that. D23 believes that. I believe that.

So you should be able to easily prove both D23 and Business Week wrong. Like you all say D23 is wrong all the time. Piece of cake. You are gonna do it, right? Prove what he posted about Clinton was wrong.

Since I wasn't having that discussion with Dad, why would I need to prove something that I didn't state in the first place? I believe that's an argument that someone else was making.

 

[Oldstyle]

I asked Dad, who it was that signed NAFTA into law.

 

[Oldstyle]

Unlike Barack Obama...Bill Clinton understood economics and trended towards being a fiscal conservative rather than a tax and spend liberal. He was also an astute enough politician that when he took a beating at the polls two years into his first term he responded by moving to the right and working with Newt Gingrich and Republicans in Congress.

 

[Oldstyle]

What I find amusing are the folks on this board that seem to want to make the case that Barack Obama is in some way just like Bill Clinton. They are in fact almost polar opposites.

 

[RKMBrown]

Unlike Barack Obama...Bill Clinton understood economics and trended towards being a fiscal conservative rather than a tax and spend liberal. He was also an astute enough politician that when he took a beating at the polls two years into his first term he responded by moving to the right and working with Newt Gingrich and Republicans in Congress.

Bill, unlike Obama and Bill's frigid princess of a wife, actually gave a shit about this country. Obama's only mission in life is screwing this country over to get revenge for his father.

 

[Dad2three]

What?

Gov't had no INVOLVEMENT WITH YOUR SUCCESS RIGHT? No laws, education, roads, etc

You Klowns did it ALL on your own, lol

The Republican sham of lower taxes and less regulation doesn't help anyone but the richest Americans and Big Business and kill jobs and opportunity for almost everyone, especially in the middle class and poor.


"The only orthodox object of the institution of government is to secure the greatest degree of happiness possible to the general mass of those associated under it."

Thomas Jefferson

You really do shock me sometimes, and not in a good way.

Yes, without gov't intervention. The gov't played no part in us hiring new people, buying old companies that were dying and deciding to keep their workers on rather than fire them. We did that.....hold onto your hats, WITHOUT GOV'T INTERVENTION.

Don't tell me you support Obama's you didn't build it crap, right? We pay taxes out of our asses for those fucking roads, they BETTER be there. You act like the fucking roads are a privilege to own and I owe the gov't thanks for them existing. If they tax my ass at gunpoint for the money to build them, they better fucking be there.

Got it, I was wrong about YOU being a moderate, you are ANOTHER right wing extremist without honesty. Shocking

(Re-)Introducing: The American School of Economics

When the United States became independent from Britain it also rebelled against the British System of economics, characterized by Adam Smith, in favor of the American School based on protectionism and infrastructure and prospered under this system for almost 200 years to become the wealthiest nation in the world. Unrestrained free trade resurfaced in the early 1900s culminating in the Great Depression and again in the 1970s culminating in the current Economic Meltdown.

Frank Bourgin's 1989 study of the Constitutional Convention shows that direct government involvement in the economy was intended by the Founders


American School economics - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia



Libertarianism is one of those things that sounds good when you read about it in high school, or maybe your first year of college. But once you are out in the real world for say, five, or even six entire minutes, you quickly realize it's a narcissistic, child-like ideology that doesn't actually work and has no basis in reality

 

[Neil N. Blowme]

Obama is a Marxist. Case closed.

 

[Dad2three]

Dad23 kicking your all's ass AGAIN,

"Clinton's 1993 (DEM party without ONE GOP vote) budget cuts, which reduced projected red ink by more than $400 billion over five years, sparked a major drop in interest rates that helped boost investment in all the equipment and systems that brought forth the New Age economy of technological innovation and rising productivity."
— Business Week, May 19, 1997

Here you go oldstyle. One simple paragraph from Business Week. Did Clinton sign budget cuts with NO Republicans going along that reduced projected red ink by 400 billion over 5 years.

For some reason the writers at Business Week believed that he (Clinton) did do that. D23 believes that. I believe that.

So you should be able to easily prove both D23 and Business Week wrong. Like you all say D23 is wrong all the time. Piece of cake. You are gonna do it, right? Prove what he posted about Clinton was wrong.

Since I wasn't having that discussion with Dad, why would I need to prove something that I didn't state in the first place? I believe that's an argument that someone else was making.

"Since I wasn't having that discussion with Dad, why would I need to prove something that I didn't state in the first place?"


OLDIE:


You don't rely on "facts", Dad! You distort what's factual to fit your naive and uninformed views and then spam disinformation! You're the very ESSENCE of an internet "troll".

GOP jobs agenda Page 36 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum


OLDIE:

You come on here with utter nonsense from sites like "The Peoples View" and post their head in the sand propaganda like it's gospel. Why even bother?

GOP jobs agenda Page 36 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum



OLDIE TO ZEKE:

So you'd be happier if I spammed nonsense from biased right wing sites non-stop...as Dad does? Seriously?

The difference between Dad and myself is that I actually CAN think for myself and don't need to surf idiotic sites like that so I can reinforce some of the most idiotic conclusions I've ever seen!


GOP jobs agenda Page 37 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum



LOL