bodecea
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2009
- 185,066
- 66,558
Oh Ho! From one who is all in on legalizing 12 year olds getting married.You're mentally ill.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh Ho! From one who is all in on legalizing 12 year olds getting married.You're mentally ill.
We DO bring that out in you, I see.I love it when you and Bo show up. It's like Dumbassery Day and free cocktails.
Lol you are all so full of shit. If a democrat made the exact same suggestion instead you would not shut the fuck up about it. It’s impossible to take you people seriously as adults. You literally defend anything the GOP says or does.
Quit pretending you actually care about the well being of children. It’s not like you express any concern about them outside of LGBT politics. Your faux outrage is so transparent lol
Who knew it would be impossible for MAGAts on this forum to speak up against 12 year olds getting married. That was NOT on my "Crazy MAGAt Beliefs" card.Wrong.
I see it more applicable to the 14-18 range, but we haven't been able to change the fact people can procreate after puberty, which can mean as young as 12.
Should we ban them having sex to make sure they don't have a reason to get married?
Lol god you are so full of shit. Again, you would not be examining the nuance ofWrong.
I see it more applicable to the 14-18 range, but we haven't been able to change the fact people can procreate after puberty, which can mean as young as 12.
Should we ban them having sex to make sure they don't have a reason to get married?
Who knew it would be impossible for MAGAts on this forum to speak up against 12 year olds getting married. That was NOT on my "Crazy MAGAt Beliefs" card.
How do you feel about children at 12 years old being allowed legally to get married?I'm a pro-life father. You're a baby killer and a pedo-enabler.
Lol god you are so full of shit. Again, you would not be examining the nuance of
This whatsoever if a democrat said this instead. You know it’s true. It would be pathetic to deny it.
Your deflection is noted....as it always is. Keep on defending legalized pedo-marriage. We see you.Who knew progs would be upset about it while they approve of drugging them with hormones and puberty blockers at the same age.
I guess we need to ban sex entirely before a person is 18 to avoid situations like this....
Such foul sexually infused language................all in defense of legalized pedo-marriage.Same post as the first, but just as stupid.
Go peg yourself with Kamala's AID's infested Dildo
How do you feel about children at 12 years old being allowed legally to get married?
Your deflection is noted....as it always is. Keep on defending legalized pedo-marriage. We see you.
Such foul sexually infused language................all in defense of legalized pedo-marriage.
Again, stop using the term pedo when it doesn't apply.
Reported for lying repeatedly.
It is legalized pedo-marriage....stop trying to sugarcoat it.Again, not pedo. Stop using that word wrong.
GOP Approved.What is the proper term for an adult marrying a 12 year old bride?
What is the proper term for an adult marrying a 12 year old bride?
It is legalized pedo-marriage....stop trying to sugarcoat it.
Seems a 12 year old is old enough to agree to get married but not old enough to agree to gender treatments
![]()
GOP Lawmaker Defends Supporting 12-Year-Olds’ Right To Legally Marry
Missouri state Sen. Mike Moon suggested letting young kids marry while pushing a bill that would block gender-affirming care for transgender minors.www.huffpost.com
When pressed by state Rep. Peter Meredith (D) about a different bill Moon voted against in the past, which would make it illegal for adults to marry children, the GOP lawmaker doubled down on his support for underage marriage.
“Do you know any kids who have been married at age 12? I do. And guess what? They’re still married,” Moon responded
Haven't you read the OP? Why are you here if you can't even be bothered to read the OP?