Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How about a link to your hyperbole?They are getting sick of it. That's why you see record gun sales. They want to be able to protect themselves.
A gun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill a member of the household than a bad guy.
What are you protecting yourself from?
As Pogo said, "We have met the enemy and he is us!"
(That's Pogo the cartoon character, not Pogo the poster.)
Prove it...IN fact, unarmed people have stopped more mass shootings than armed civilians have.
They are getting sick of it. That's why you see record gun sales. They want to be able to protect themselves.
A gun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill a member of the household than a bad guy.
What are you protecting yourself from?
As Pogo said, "We have met the enemy and he is us!"
(That's Pogo the cartoon character, not Pogo the poster.)
Joey does not want people having the right to protect themselves...he wants big gov to protect them, but he isn't intelligent enough to understand this isn't possible. Even though all of human history screams at him.They are getting sick of it. That's why you see record gun sales. They want to be able to protect themselves.I suspect he like Obama, wants more mass shootings. What better way to cede more power to big gov?
I love Libertarians... they are like paranoid retarded children.
we have 33,000 gun deaths a year in this country. Eventually, people are going to get sick of that.
According to those who support gun free zones, safe means there won't be guns there. I know that's not true because criminals don't abide by the laws. You, however, haven't figured that out yet.
Prove it...IN fact, unarmed people have stopped more mass shootings than armed civilians have.
Sure- here you go. From the FBI.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/20...r-incidents-in-the-u.s.-between-2000-and-2013
■ In 37 incidents (23.1%), the shooter committed suicide at the scene before police arrived.
■ In 21 incidents (13.1%), the situation ended after unarmed citizens safely and successfully restrained the shooter. In 2 of those incidents,24 3 off-duty law enforcement officers were present and assisted.
■ Of note, 11 of the incidents involved unarmed principals, teachers, other school staff and students who confronted shooters to end the threat (9 of those shooters were students).
■ In 5 incidents (3.1%), the shooting ended after armed individuals who were not law enforcement personnel exchanged gunfire with the shooters. In these incidents, 3 shooters were killed, 1 was wounded, and 1 committed suicide. ■
WHAT??!!! Then WHY do we have them?Gun free zones are not meant to stop mass shooters.
Joey does not want people having the right to protect themselves...he wants big gov to protect them, but he isn't intelligent enough to understand this isn't possible. Even though all of human history screams at him.
As a typical leftist, he wants fewer rights for the people and more power to the central government.
WHAT??!!! Then WHY do we have them?Gun free zones are not meant to stop mass shooters.
That's the problem... you DIDN'T explain it. What you think is an explanation is pure horse dung.WHAT??!!! Then WHY do we have them?Gun free zones are not meant to stop mass shooters.
I explained that in the next sentence... Can you not read more than once sentence at a time?
Gun free zones are meant to stop casual shooters who escalate an argument into a tragedy- which actually does describe most of our 11,000 gun homicides. Mass shooting, as bad as they are, are the tip of a very nasty iceberg.
Let me spell it out for you, since you apparently don't get it.,Joey does not want people having the right to protect themselves...he wants big gov to protect them, but he isn't intelligent enough to understand this isn't possible. Even though all of human history screams at him.
As a typical leftist, he wants fewer rights for the people and more power to the central government.
All of human history? Really? Oh, wait you are one of those loons who thinks the Nazis banned guns. (they didn't).
Here's the thing. Most of the world limits who can own guns. Most of the world has nowhere near our crime rates.
Most of the world doesn't have mass shootings being such a common thing that we have to invent terms like "Active Shooter' to describe them.
Let me spell it out for you, since you apparently don't get it.,Joey does not want people having the right to protect themselves...he wants big gov to protect them, but he isn't intelligent enough to understand this isn't possible. Even though all of human history screams at him.
As a typical leftist, he wants fewer rights for the people and more power to the central government.
All of human history? Really? Oh, wait you are one of those loons who thinks the Nazis banned guns. (they didn't).
Here's the thing. Most of the world limits who can own guns. Most of the world has nowhere near our crime rates.
Most of the world doesn't have mass shootings being such a common thing that we have to invent terms like "Active Shooter' to describe them.
When gov has all the guns, the people die and suffer. This is true whether government is a monarchy, dictatorship, or whatever.
You might do some research on your heroes, Stalin and Mao for starters.
According to those who support gun free zones, safe means there won't be guns there. I know that's not true because criminals don't abide by the laws. You, however, haven't figured that out yet.
Nobody ever made that claim. So you are tearing down a straw man.
Gun free zones are not meant to stop mass shooters. They are meant to stop the drunk at a bar who doesn't like hearing that the Cubbies Suck. they were meant to stop the co-worker who flips out one day.
The determined mass shooter... not much of anything will stop him other than not letting him have a gun to start with.
You clearly do not understand.Let me spell it out for you, since you apparently don't get it.,Joey does not want people having the right to protect themselves...he wants big gov to protect them, but he isn't intelligent enough to understand this isn't possible. Even though all of human history screams at him.
As a typical leftist, he wants fewer rights for the people and more power to the central government.
All of human history? Really? Oh, wait you are one of those loons who thinks the Nazis banned guns. (they didn't).
Here's the thing. Most of the world limits who can own guns. Most of the world has nowhere near our crime rates.
Most of the world doesn't have mass shootings being such a common thing that we have to invent terms like "Active Shooter' to describe them.
When gov has all the guns, the people die and suffer. This is true whether government is a monarchy, dictatorship, or whatever.
You might do some research on your heroes, Stalin and Mao for starters.
That is correct whatever government. However what made you think you will stand a chance defending yourself if or whatever reason the government will come and get you.
Or give them a warm, fuzzy feeling.With liberals, it doesn't have to be rational.....it just has to sound good.He bans the very thing that if someone would have had in that classroom, could have possibly stopped or limited the carnage.
The stupid runs deep.
According to those who support gun free zones, safe means there won't be guns there. I know that's not true because criminals don't abide by the laws. You, however, haven't figured that out yet.
Nobody ever made that claim. So you are tearing down a straw man.
Gun free zones are not meant to stop mass shooters. They are meant to stop the drunk at a bar who doesn't like hearing that the Cubbies Suck. they were meant to stop the co-worker who flips out one day.
The determined mass shooter... not much of anything will stop him other than not letting him have a gun to start with.
