Pogo
Diamond Member
- Dec 7, 2012
- 123,708
- 22,749
What part of, "not the least qualified," do you not understand?Let's go over his qualifications shall we?
1) Was a Senator from Illinois, served on seven different senate committees
2) A Constitutional Professor/Scholar
3) Community Organizer
4) B.A. in international relations
5) J.D. from Harvard
6) Civil Rights lawyer
What, dare I ask are his leadership credentials?
As light as that resume is, Lincoln's was lighter.
Illinois General Assembly
1 term U.S. Representative
Lawyer
As far as "leadership credentials," Kennedy had none -- turned out to be a very good president.
Bush had "leadership credentials" as a two term governor -- turned out to be one of the worst presidents.
To the first,
Kennedy was a natural born leader. Hence why he made Lieutenant in the Armed Forces. He fought in World War II. This gave him invaluable foreign policy experience.
To the second,
Well then, Bush had more credentials than our current president. Funny how you couldn't find a flaw in his leadership, all you said was "he was one of the worst presidents." Oh yeah, he also fought in the military.
Wrong yet again. Bush never fought anywhere. And he had less, not more, experience in government that Barack O'bama at the time each took the Presidency. You could look it up in the link I gave Roo earlier.
And again -- none of this is the topic here. What part of "Texas Mother Election" isn't conveying here?