Governor Palin Comes Out As The Better Mother When Compared To Wendy Davis Of Texas

Doesn't Alaska redistribute the Oil Company profits to all it's citizens? What other state redistributes wealth like that? When Governor, what did Mrs. Palin do to stop that uber-socialist program of Wealth Redistribution?

lol, Alaska shares the wealth from the natural resource of the state and give back to the people who live there

A socialist program is taking money FROM THE PEOPLE and giving it to others...

Too bad your states don't care about you huh

Based on the concept that the wealth owned by the State also belongs to the residents of the state. Any earnings of state holdings also belong (in part) to the residents of the State. We get our cut of the goodies. I'd challenge residents of any blue states to claim the same.
 
And again a failure to own up.

I've demonstrated your hypocrisy. You claimed "trashing Palin like a two-bit whore"; you couldn't produce. I posted trashing of Davis like a two-bit whore, you ignored it.

If that ain't blatant hypocrisy, there ain't no such thing. And by the way, pointing out hypocrisy is not ad hominem; ad hom attacks the person. Hypocrisy attacks the argument. We just did this the other day where you made the same error and apparently ran away when called on it. Well, you tell me what that's called.

Hypocrite this, hypocrite that. Where's your argument? I never run away, not even when I'm losing Pogo. Why else would I be here? OTOH, Wendy Davis deserves to be trashed. She didn't mind making fun of a paraplegic. In my mind, you forfeit any type of respect due you when you attack someone for having a disability... oh wait, just like Democrats did to Trig Palin.

There were comments by some referring to her as "scum" a "failure", and "unelectable" just to name a few. Too bad you were cherrypicking the entire way.
 
Both of them did.

Ooops, there went your trap question.

It wasn't a trap question, you moron. TARP didn't violate the Constitution. :eusa_doh:

But you just accused Bush of violating the Constitution, idiot. Isn't that what you liberals do? :eek:

No I didn't, you flaming rightard. :cuckoo: I asked you if you thought Bush violated the Constitution since he was the one who actually signed the bill you were claiming was unconstitutional.

I never said TARP was unconstitutional.

By the way, who'd you vote for in 2008?
 
obama may be an inept president, but he is better than palin. she is a quitter and she rolls her eyes at school teachers.

Palin was not running for president.

Nor is she running for Texas Momgod, which makes this entire thread kind of silly.

Nor is Wendy Davis black, which really makes one wonder if Steve McRacist is branching out to new areas. Hell, I even searched for the word "fornicator" and it doesn't exist in the thread. What next.
 
Being a better mother than Wendy Davis is setting the bar awfully low.


I'm just sayin...

Being a better liar would make more sense? Bitch lies like a rug, but her lies fit the "Narrative". God, are Dems/liberals so incredibly stupid...or lacking in anything resembling morals that they would prefer Davis?
 
And you don't have to worry about smearing your lipstick


Wendy Davis: Hey sugar daddy, watch the kids while I go to school - I should be back in 4 years or so! Oh, and I'm sending you the bill....

Prostitution: I fuck you for money. Thanks. Davis is still better than most Dem pols...they fuck for nothing... making them pure whores.
 
Last edited:
I can't be too upset with Sarah Palin.

When I was in my late teens/early 20s I loved that there were bad mothers who didn't teach their daughters not to be sluts - easy pussy!!!

Thanks, Sarah! Your type was an inspiration to me!
 
And again a failure to own up.

I've demonstrated your hypocrisy. You claimed "trashing Palin like a two-bit whore"; you couldn't produce. I posted trashing of Davis like a two-bit whore, you ignored it.

If that ain't blatant hypocrisy, there ain't no such thing. And by the way, pointing out hypocrisy is not ad hominem; ad hom attacks the person. Hypocrisy attacks the argument. We just did this the other day where you made the same error and apparently ran away when called on it. Well, you tell me what that's called.

Hypocrite this, hypocrite that. Where's your argument? I never run away, not even when I'm losing Pogo. Why else would I be here? OTOH, Wendy Davis deserves to be trashed. She didn't mind making fun of a paraplegic. In my mind, you forfeit any type of respect due you when you attack someone for having a disability... oh wait, just like Democrats did to Trig Palin.

There were comments by some referring to her as "scum" a "failure", and "unelectable" just to name a few. Too bad you were cherrypicking the entire way.

Ah, so Sarah Palin doesn't deserve to be "trashed like a two-bit whore" (which you can't produce) but Wendy Davis does (which I did).

Prosecution rests.
 
So you're saying "articles published in the review" (again, whatever the fuck that means) IS a qualification for President?

Of what country?

This one's Constitution sez:
"No person except a natural born citizen, .

And Obama fails that qualification since his birth was governed by the British Act Of 1948.

I don't believe the British Act of 1948, or any British Act Ever, trumps the United States Constitution, McRacist.
No. It just makes him a dual citizen (if he was truly born in the United States) and not a constitutional natural born Citizen eligible for Article 2 Section 1.
 
Last edited:
Except he's not. You can cry over and over he was but no matter how hard you pound sand, it will not make him the least qualified. All you're doing is exhibiting how retarded you are by insisting your delusions are reality.

Let's go over his qualifications shall we?

1) Was a Senator from Illinois, served on seven different senate committees
2) A Constitutional Professor/Scholar
3) Community Organizer
4) B.A. in international relations
5) J.D. from Harvard
6) Civil Rights lawyer

What, dare I ask are his leadership credentials?
What part of, "not the least qualified," do you not understand?

As light as that resume is, Lincoln's was lighter.

Illinois General Assembly
1 term U.S. Representative
Lawyer

As far as "leadership credentials," Kennedy had none -- turned out to be a very good president.

Bush had "leadership credentials" as a two term governor -- turned out to be one of the worst presidents.

I'm sorry, experience or not, Obama is a good speaker, terrible leader. Clinton, Kennedy, Reagan and Nixon, were good leaders. Johnson, Ford, Carter, were not.
 
Elaborate how he is better?

he didn't quit his position.
She put the state of Alaska first when she stepped down instead of letting the governors office be consumed by frivolous lawsuits by democrats. That's courage and she showed dignity doing it. When she stepped down the lawsuits stopped. Why can't you people look at the broader picture of the events that was happening to her with the lawsuits and how it tied up her duties as governor?

Are you in Alaska? She did best for the state, as you note. The freakin' libtards had even stooped low enough to attack Palin's poor child. What a bunch of shitbags. Shannon Moore is at the top of the list, IMHO.
 
"Shares the Wealth"



LOL

from the profits off a natural resource in the state

why does that chap your ass so much

It's not a government program that take money from the people and gives to others

It doesn't chap my ass at all. I think it's great. She was the head of a state the "Shares the Wealth" and I find that somewhat amusing. If only the whole Country could benefit like that from the natural resources of the country........instead of just the few.

Talk to your congressional reps.
 
And just to pick apart some random tidbits of the more bizarre on this list, since I'm asked to stand around waiting for a bullshit sandwich that is apparently backordered:


4) Negotiated treaties with other nations without approval of the Senate. Meaning the UN Small Arms Treaty.

That still needs Congressional ratification.



No President is obligated to pursue Fox Noise fantasies.



What the fuck does a foreign head of state's opinions have to do with the Constitution?
:dunno:



You really need to learn how our system works. It's the POTUS' job to sign or veto bills. It ain't his job to decide their Constitutionality. That's what SCOTUS is for. In fact you've already cited SCOTUS as affirming ACA. Now suddenly you've got amnesia.


21. Negotiated the UN Small Arms Treaty without Senate Approval (Article 2, Section 2, Clause 2)

...and counting

And counting twice, since we just did this above. Nothing like repetition to make your post look bigger than it is. Nothing like repetition to make your post look bigger than it is. Nothing like repetition to make your post look bigger than it is. Nothing like repetition to make your post look bigger than it is. Nothing like repetition to make your post look bigger than it is. Nothing like repetition to make your post look bigger than it is.

Most of the rest are just not enumerated enough to even discern what they're about. The Calerón reference for example: no reference given whatsoever. Further, this entire list is entirely off the topic here, which is the upcoming Texas election for Mother-In-Chief. Nothing in any of this is remotely related to Wendy Davis, Sarah Palin, or Texas. Or mothering. Or even racism, taking the OP into account. There's no basis for this post even showing up at all.

1) John Kerry signed the UN Small Arms Treaty.

Kerry signs UN arms treaty, senators threaten to block it | Fox News

And how, pray, could those Senators block it, if what I just said were not true that it has to be Congressionally ratified?
Think about it.


Sure does. Two people talking? :dunno: and you want the President of the United States to take a train up to Philly to do .... what?

3) Perhaps you forgot that the President swears an oath to "protect and defend the Constitution" of the United States. He should know what is and isn't Constitutional from the advice he gets , or in Obama's case, his knowledge from being a Constitutional Professor.

Perhaps you forgot how to read. Once again it is not the President's job to decide what laws are Constitutional. That is the role of the judicial branch.

What do you think the role of the judicial branch is?

4) Your ad baculum argument is pitiful. Perhaps you should address your liberal friends for trying to derail the topic before lambasting me, Pogo. Good night.

Where the fuck do you see baculum? And again tread lightly when traipsing into unfamiliar Latin; I trained to be an altar boy. So um, caveat emptor. And dingum et justum est.
 
Last edited:
From what we know right now and what we are learning about Texas gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis, Governor Sarah Palin wins hands down as the better mother and the way she pursued her career. Sarah Palin had her first child Trak at age 25 in 1989 but she did not abandon him or her husband who she married a year before. She stuck with him and helped him out with his small commercial salmon fishing business. Palin went on to have Bristol in 1990 and became a city council member in 1992. Still working as a council woman, she had Willow in 1994 and became mayor of Wasilla in 1996. She was juggling 3 kids while Todd was away for weeks on end on Alaska's north slope working in the oil fields. In her second term as mayor she had her 4th child Willow in 2001 and she didn't let her pregnancy get in the way of her duties. As governor she found out she was pregnant with a down baby. She never aborted it despite the complications and conditions that could arise. Instead, she went through a full term pregnancy as she was doing her duties as governor and had Trig in 2008 while maintaining a whopping 89 to 93% approval rating. In all, as a mother, Sarah Palin raised 5 kids during her working career. She did this working as a city council member, campaigning and becoming mayor for two terms, being chairperson of the Alaska Oil & Gas Conservation Commission and finally campaigning against 2 powerful experienced politicians by the names of Governor Tony Knowles and incumbent Governor Frank Murkowski beating them both becoming governor herself. I call that ethical and moral courage. She stood by her man and never abandoned her family.




Now what we know about Wendy Davis from this past week and a half, I would say she doesn't even come close being a mother with good moral character and ethical standards. In Wendy Davis, we have a woman who put herself/career first over family, especially her two kids abandoning both after using her husbands 401k money to pay for her college expenses.

Dude...Palin is a loser. She had to go to five different colleges to find one that would let her graduate with a degree in journalism. Palin wasn't even married when she conceived Trak. She also admitted to premarital sex, did a shitty job raising her daughters - one who preached abstinance but fucked her way out of high school into pregnancy while sharing booze with her other underage sister as they spewed homophobic slurs and "fuck" all over the internet.

Her son's a drug addict forced to join the military by a Wasilla judge - or go to prison.

So cut the crap about what a great person Palin is. :cuckoo::cuckoo:

And Wendy's a Harvard Law graduate. Palin can't spell Harvard, but apparently she can see it from her front porch.

Oh. Popularity? Puhleeze! SHE WALKED AWAY FROM HER JOB AS GOVERNOR OF ALASKA, PISSED OFF THE ENTIRE STATE WITH HER CRONYISM AND BRIBES, AND IS DESPISED IN WASILLA!

While we're at it, did Wendy ever advocate civil war or secession of the state she lived in?

And Wendy paid for her Haaahvaahd degree by being some rich lawyers fuck. Prostitution, plain and simple. She's a whore, and the worst kind of "mother".
 
And Obama fails that qualification since his birth was governed by the British Act Of 1948.

I don't believe the British Act of 1948, or any British Act Ever, trumps the United States Constitution, McRacist.
No. It just makes him a dual citizen (if he was truly born in the United States) and not a constitutional natural born Citizen eligible for Article 2 Section 1.

Horseshit.

United States citizens are not subject to British laws. Nor are Brits to ours.
 
Last edited:
Wendy Davis is a pile of shit that used her second husband's money to get ahead in life then left him....all the while losing custody of her 2 kids from two different men.

Wendy Davis is a user whore who does not deserve the appellation "mother". She's nothing more than a "donor". But what the hell...makes her a hero to the Left.
 
Wendy Davis is a pile of shit that used her second husband's money to get ahead in life then left him....all the while losing custody of her 2 kids from two different men.

Wendy Davis is a user whore who does not deserve the appellation "mother". She's nothing more than a "donor". But what the hell...makes her a hero to the Left.

What the fuck does any of this have to do with the governorship of Texas, a position which by the way Sarah Palin is in no way running for?
 
Doesn't Alaska redistribute the Oil Company profits to all it's citizens? What other state redistributes wealth like that? When Governor, what did Mrs. Palin do to stop that uber-socialist program of Wealth Redistribution?

lol, Alaska shares the wealth from the natural resource of the state and give back to the people who live there

A socialist program is taking money FROM THE PEOPLE and giving it to others...

Too bad your states don't care about you huh

Based on the concept that the wealth owned by the State also belongs to the residents of the state. Any earnings of state holdings also belong (in part) to the residents of the State. We get our cut of the goodies. I'd challenge residents of any blue states to claim the same.

Too bad Stephanie's got her definition ass-backward too. MOF I was just watching Sarah's CPAC speech where she went over all this. It's good socialism.
But once again, none of this has squat to do with running for governor in Texas.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top