Greatest Economy Ever at 1.9% GDP

[Toddsterpatriot]

since Trump was elected than it did under Obama.

You need to look at Obama from 1/20/2009 - 11/07/2016
You need to look at Trump from 11/08/2016 - 10/30/2019

LOLOL

No, I don't need to look at how Bush's Great Recession dragged down Onama's numbers just to make Trump look better.

I understand, because you'd have to admit the market performed better since Trump was elected.

Sorry, my bad,

since Trump was elected than it did under Obama.

You need to look at Obama from 1/20/2009 - 11/07/2016
You need to look at Trump from 11/08/2016 - 10/30/2019

LOLOL

No, I don't need to look at how Bush's Great Recession dragged down Onama's numbers just to make Trump look better.

I understand, because you'd have to admit the market performed better since Trump was elected.

LOL

It still didn't. Not even if you want to give credit to Trump for gains made under Obama.


DJIA
01/20/2009 ...... 7949.09
11/07/2016 ... 18,259.60
10/30/2019 ... 27,186.69

NASDAQ
01/20/2009 ...... 1,520.76
11/07/2016 ...... 5,166.17
10/30/2019 ...... 8,303.98

S&P500
01/20/2009 ......... 849.64
11/07/2016 ...... 2,131.52
10/30/2019 ...... 3,046.77

Obama:

• DJIA: UP 130%
• NASDAQ: UP 240%
• S&P500: UP 151%

Trump:

• DJIA: UP 49%
• NASDAQ: UP 61%
• S&P500: UP 43%

So in your moment of desperation, trying to shift numbers in favor of Trump, your idiotic claim that the market did better under Trump than Obama still remains bullshit.

Even with your skewed dates, Obama still did roughly 3 times better than Trump.

Not even if you want to give credit to Trump for gains made under Obama

Why would Obama deserve credit for the nearly 6% gain in the S&P between Trump's election and his inauguration? Was lame duck Obama, with a Republican House and Senate doing something good for the market or the economy?

your idiotic claim that the market did better under Trump than Obama still remains bullshit.

You still can't do the math, can you?

Even with your skewed dates, Obama still did roughly 3 times better than Trump.

Hilarious!

What was Obama's annual return? Use 7.8 years.

What was Trump's annual return? Use 3 years.

"Why would Obama deserve credit for the nearly 6% gain in the S&P between Trump's election and his inauguration?"

Because Obama was still president and the economy was still driving under his policies. Whereas Trump had not passed a single one of his policies. Even worse for your ridiculous nonsense, there isn't a poster on this forum who knows you'd be blaming Obama, and not Trump, had the market gone down during that period.

"Hilarious! What was Obama's annual return? Use 7.8 years. What was Trump's annual return? Use 3 years."

What's hilarious is your utter desperation to keep shifting the parameters, hoping to find some algorithm to get Trump ahead of Obama.

But guess what? You fail yet again.

Even using you're skewed date range and even using your math, Obama still comes out ahead....

Obama:

• DJIA: UP 17%
• NASDAQ: UP 31%
• S&P500: UP 19%

Trump:

• DJIA: UP 16%
• NASDAQ: UP 20%
• S&P500: UP 14%

Time for you to think up something new. This one's failed you 3 times now.

Obama:

• DJIA: UP 17%
• NASDAQ: UP 31%
• S&P500: UP 19%

Are you serious? LOL!

Show your work.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And far short of what’s needed to pay for the tax cuts. Remember the growth that was promised? You like huge deficits?

We'd have been there too had the Fed not chocked off the economy with their spikes in interest rates.

The fed rate is at historical lows and has been for trumps whole term. You live in fantasy land.

The fed rate is at historical lows and has been for trumps whole term.

View attachment 287341

DURR

Wow, lotta history you grabbed there. Are you always such a joke? They lower rates during a recession...

Wow, lotta history you grabbed there.

I grabbed enough to show proof of your lie.

They lower rates during a recession...

Yup. Probably why the rate was 0.25% for 7 years under Obama.

 

[Faun]

What .8% growth?

Real GDP growth under Obama from after Bush's Great Recession ended:

2.4%

Real GDP growth under Trump:

2.6%

https://www.bea.gov/system/files/2019-10/gdplev_0.xlsx

If you want the GDP, why not post all the facts?

Since you wanna compare Bush with Obama, let's.....

Using the BEA's most current spreadsheet.....

https://www.bea.gov/system/files/2019-10/gdplev_0.xlsx

Annualized real GDP growth

Q4-2000: 13,260.50
Q4-2008: 15,328.00 - Bush ...... 1.95
Q4-2016: 17,824.20 - Obama ... 2.04

 

[Weatherman2020]

GDP slows slightly to 1.9% in the third quarter
The Fed will step in again, most likely. Markets will expect it now.

Did you complain about Obama's .8 % growth?

Probably not (although it was quite a bit higher, as you know). But then, I was just thankful that we were getting out of the historic fucking mess he inherited.

And of course, he wasn't running around making stupid promises like 5% and 6% growth. Because he's not a buffoon like Trump.
.

Dufus thinks Obama is an economic genius.

 

[Weatherman2020]

What .8% growth?

Real GDP growth under Obama from after Bush's Great Recession ended:

2.4%

Real GDP growth under Trump:

2.6%

https://www.bea.gov/system/files/2019-10/gdplev_0.xlsx

If you want the GDP, why not post all the facts?

Since you wanna compare Bush with Obama, let's.....

Using the BEA's most current spreadsheet.....

https://www.bea.gov/system/files/2019-10/gdplev_0.xlsx

Annualized real GDP growth

Q4-2000: 13,260.50
Q4-2008: 15,328.00 - Bush ...... 1.95
Q4-2016: 17,824.20 - Obama ... 2.04

Let’s not put 9-11 into the economic picture. You Leftards require bullshit.

 

[Mac1958]

GDP slows slightly to 1.9% in the third quarter
The Fed will step in again, most likely. Markets will expect it now.

Did you complain about Obama's .8 % growth?

Probably not (although it was quite a bit higher, as you know). But then, I was just thankful that we were getting out of the historic fucking mess he inherited.

And of course, he wasn't running around making stupid promises like 5% and 6% growth. Because he's not a buffoon like Trump.
.

Dufus thinks Obama is an economic genius.

And another lie.

You guys just make it up as you go, because your cult trains you to.

I wonder if you even realize it.
.

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

No, I don't need to look at how Bush's Great Recession dragged down Onama's numbers just to make Trump look better.

I understand, because you'd have to admit the market performed better since Trump was elected.

Sorry, my bad,

LOLOL

No, I don't need to look at how Bush's Great Recession dragged down Onama's numbers just to make Trump look better.

I understand, because you'd have to admit the market performed better since Trump was elected.

LOL

It still didn't. Not even if you want to give credit to Trump for gains made under Obama.


DJIA
01/20/2009 ...... 7949.09
11/07/2016 ... 18,259.60
10/30/2019 ... 27,186.69

NASDAQ
01/20/2009 ...... 1,520.76
11/07/2016 ...... 5,166.17
10/30/2019 ...... 8,303.98

S&P500
01/20/2009 ......... 849.64
11/07/2016 ...... 2,131.52
10/30/2019 ...... 3,046.77

Obama:

• DJIA: UP 130%
• NASDAQ: UP 240%
• S&P500: UP 151%

Trump:

• DJIA: UP 49%
• NASDAQ: UP 61%
• S&P500: UP 43%

So in your moment of desperation, trying to shift numbers in favor of Trump, your idiotic claim that the market did better under Trump than Obama still remains bullshit.

Even with your skewed dates, Obama still did roughly 3 times better than Trump.

Not even if you want to give credit to Trump for gains made under Obama

Why would Obama deserve credit for the nearly 6% gain in the S&P between Trump's election and his inauguration? Was lame duck Obama, with a Republican House and Senate doing something good for the market or the economy?

your idiotic claim that the market did better under Trump than Obama still remains bullshit.

You still can't do the math, can you?

Even with your skewed dates, Obama still did roughly 3 times better than Trump.

Hilarious!

What was Obama's annual return? Use 7.8 years.

What was Trump's annual return? Use 3 years.

"Why would Obama deserve credit for the nearly 6% gain in the S&P between Trump's election and his inauguration?"

Because Obama was still president and the economy was still driving under his policies. Whereas Trump had not passed a single one of his policies. Even worse for your ridiculous nonsense, there isn't a poster on this forum who knows you'd be blaming Obama, and not Trump, had the market gone down during that period.

"Hilarious! What was Obama's annual return? Use 7.8 years. What was Trump's annual return? Use 3 years."

What's hilarious is your utter desperation to keep shifting the parameters, hoping to find some algorithm to get Trump ahead of Obama.

But guess what? You fail yet again.

Even using you're skewed date range and even using your math, Obama still comes out ahead....

Obama:

• DJIA: UP 17%
• NASDAQ: UP 31%
• S&P500: UP 19%

Trump:

• DJIA: UP 16%
• NASDAQ: UP 20%
• S&P500: UP 14%

Time for you to think up something new. This one's failed you 3 times now.

Obama:

• DJIA: UP 17%
• NASDAQ: UP 31%
• S&P500: UP 19%

Are you serious? LOL!

Show your work.

I already did, dumbfuck. I posted the market amounts for the dates you wanted in post #329 along with the percentage of growth. Then in post #338, I divided the results for Obama by 7.8 and Trumps by 3.0, just as your desperation begged.

It's not my problem you're a desperate liar who doesn't like the results.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I understand, because you'd have to admit the market performed better since Trump was elected.

Sorry, my bad,

I understand, because you'd have to admit the market performed better since Trump was elected.

LOL

It still didn't. Not even if you want to give credit to Trump for gains made under Obama.


DJIA
01/20/2009 ...... 7949.09
11/07/2016 ... 18,259.60
10/30/2019 ... 27,186.69

NASDAQ
01/20/2009 ...... 1,520.76
11/07/2016 ...... 5,166.17
10/30/2019 ...... 8,303.98

S&P500
01/20/2009 ......... 849.64
11/07/2016 ...... 2,131.52
10/30/2019 ...... 3,046.77

Obama:

• DJIA: UP 130%
• NASDAQ: UP 240%
• S&P500: UP 151%

Trump:

• DJIA: UP 49%
• NASDAQ: UP 61%
• S&P500: UP 43%

So in your moment of desperation, trying to shift numbers in favor of Trump, your idiotic claim that the market did better under Trump than Obama still remains bullshit.

Even with your skewed dates, Obama still did roughly 3 times better than Trump.

Not even if you want to give credit to Trump for gains made under Obama

Why would Obama deserve credit for the nearly 6% gain in the S&P between Trump's election and his inauguration? Was lame duck Obama, with a Republican House and Senate doing something good for the market or the economy?

your idiotic claim that the market did better under Trump than Obama still remains bullshit.

You still can't do the math, can you?

Even with your skewed dates, Obama still did roughly 3 times better than Trump.

Hilarious!

What was Obama's annual return? Use 7.8 years.

What was Trump's annual return? Use 3 years.

"Why would Obama deserve credit for the nearly 6% gain in the S&P between Trump's election and his inauguration?"

Because Obama was still president and the economy was still driving under his policies. Whereas Trump had not passed a single one of his policies. Even worse for your ridiculous nonsense, there isn't a poster on this forum who knows you'd be blaming Obama, and not Trump, had the market gone down during that period.

"Hilarious! What was Obama's annual return? Use 7.8 years. What was Trump's annual return? Use 3 years."

What's hilarious is your utter desperation to keep shifting the parameters, hoping to find some algorithm to get Trump ahead of Obama.

But guess what? You fail yet again.

Even using you're skewed date range and even using your math, Obama still comes out ahead....

Obama:

• DJIA: UP 17%
• NASDAQ: UP 31%
• S&P500: UP 19%

Trump:

• DJIA: UP 16%
• NASDAQ: UP 20%
• S&P500: UP 14%

Time for you to think up something new. This one's failed you 3 times now.

Obama:

• DJIA: UP 17%
• NASDAQ: UP 31%
• S&P500: UP 19%

Are you serious? LOL!

Show your work.

I already did, dumbfuck. I posted the market amounts for the dates you wanted in post #329 along with the percentage of growth. Then in post #338, I divided the results for Obama by 7.8 and Trumps by 3.0, just as your desperation begged.

It's not my problem you're a desperate liar who doesn't like the results.

I posted the market amounts in post #329 along with the percentage of growth. Then in post #338, I divided the results for Obama by 7.8 and Trumps by 3.0,

You divided. Because you're a moron.

 

[Faun]

What .8% growth?

Real GDP growth under Obama from after Bush's Great Recession ended:

2.4%

Real GDP growth under Trump:

2.6%

https://www.bea.gov/system/files/2019-10/gdplev_0.xlsx

If you want the GDP, why not post all the facts?

Since you wanna compare Bush with Obama, let's.....

Using the BEA's most current spreadsheet.....

https://www.bea.gov/system/files/2019-10/gdplev_0.xlsx

Annualized real GDP growth

Q4-2000: 13,260.50
Q4-2008: 15,328.00 - Bush ...... 1.95
Q4-2016: 17,824.20 - Obama ... 2.04

Let’s not put 9-11 into the economic picture. You Leftards require bullshit.

LOLOLOL

Damn, you rightards are fucking desperate. Aside from the fact that Bush did nothing to prevent 9.11, It hurt our economy far less than Bush's Great Recession. Yet you bitch about including 9.11 but not Bush's Great Recession.

 

[Weatherman2020]

GDP slows slightly to 1.9% in the third quarter
The Fed will step in again, most likely. Markets will expect it now.

Did you complain about Obama's .8 % growth?

Probably not (although it was quite a bit higher, as you know). But then, I was just thankful that we were getting out of the historic fucking mess he inherited.

And of course, he wasn't running around making stupid promises like 5% and 6% growth. Because he's not a buffoon like Trump.
.

Dufus thinks Obama is an economic genius.

And another lie.

You guys just make it up as you go, because your cult trains you to.

I wonder if you even realize it.
.

Now you deny claiming Obama is smarter than Trump with the economy.

 

[Markle]

Utter nonsense. Trust me, you have no idea what you are talking about.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

And far short of what’s needed to pay for the tax cuts. Remember the growth that was promised? You like huge deficits?

We'd have been there too had the Fed not chocked off the economy with their spikes in interest rates.

The fed rate is at historical lows and has been for trumps whole term. You live in fantasy land.

No it's not. Stop lying

 

[Faun]

Sorry, my bad,
LOL

It still didn't. Not even if you want to give credit to Trump for gains made under Obama.


DJIA
01/20/2009 ...... 7949.09
11/07/2016 ... 18,259.60
10/30/2019 ... 27,186.69

NASDAQ
01/20/2009 ...... 1,520.76
11/07/2016 ...... 5,166.17
10/30/2019 ...... 8,303.98

S&P500
01/20/2009 ......... 849.64
11/07/2016 ...... 2,131.52
10/30/2019 ...... 3,046.77

Obama:

• DJIA: UP 130%
• NASDAQ: UP 240%
• S&P500: UP 151%

Trump:

• DJIA: UP 49%
• NASDAQ: UP 61%
• S&P500: UP 43%

So in your moment of desperation, trying to shift numbers in favor of Trump, your idiotic claim that the market did better under Trump than Obama still remains bullshit.

Even with your skewed dates, Obama still did roughly 3 times better than Trump.

Not even if you want to give credit to Trump for gains made under Obama

Why would Obama deserve credit for the nearly 6% gain in the S&P between Trump's election and his inauguration? Was lame duck Obama, with a Republican House and Senate doing something good for the market or the economy?

your idiotic claim that the market did better under Trump than Obama still remains bullshit.

You still can't do the math, can you?

Even with your skewed dates, Obama still did roughly 3 times better than Trump.

Hilarious!

What was Obama's annual return? Use 7.8 years.

What was Trump's annual return? Use 3 years.

"Why would Obama deserve credit for the nearly 6% gain in the S&P between Trump's election and his inauguration?"

Because Obama was still president and the economy was still driving under his policies. Whereas Trump had not passed a single one of his policies. Even worse for your ridiculous nonsense, there isn't a poster on this forum who knows you'd be blaming Obama, and not Trump, had the market gone down during that period.

"Hilarious! What was Obama's annual return? Use 7.8 years. What was Trump's annual return? Use 3 years."

What's hilarious is your utter desperation to keep shifting the parameters, hoping to find some algorithm to get Trump ahead of Obama.

But guess what? You fail yet again.

Even using you're skewed date range and even using your math, Obama still comes out ahead....

Obama:

• DJIA: UP 17%
• NASDAQ: UP 31%
• S&P500: UP 19%

Trump:

• DJIA: UP 16%
• NASDAQ: UP 20%
• S&P500: UP 14%

Time for you to think up something new. This one's failed you 3 times now.

Obama:

• DJIA: UP 17%
• NASDAQ: UP 31%
• S&P500: UP 19%

Are you serious? LOL!

Show your work.

I already did, dumbfuck. I posted the market amounts for the dates you wanted in post #329 along with the percentage of growth. Then in post #338, I divided the results for Obama by 7.8 and Trumps by 3.0, just as your desperation begged.

It's not my problem you're a desperate liar who doesn't like the results.

I posted the market amounts in post #329 along with the percentage of growth. Then in post #338, I divided the results for Obama by 7.8 and Trumps by 3.0,

You divided. Because you're a moron.

LOLOL

so when I showed the results of 7.8 years of Obama's growth and 3.0 years of Trump's growth, what operation other than division would you use to calculate average annual growth...?

 

[Brain357]

And far short of what’s needed to pay for the tax cuts. Remember the growth that was promised? You like huge deficits?

We'd have been there too had the Fed not chocked off the economy with their spikes in interest rates.

The fed rate is at historical lows and has been for trumps whole term. You live in fantasy land.

The fed rate is at historical lows and has been for trumps whole term.

View attachment 287341

DURR

Wow, lotta history you grabbed there. Are you always such a joke? They lower rates during a recession...

Wow, lotta history you grabbed there.

I grabbed enough to show proof of your lie.

They lower rates during a recession...

Yup. Probably why the rate was 0.25% for 7 years under Obama.

You grabbed rates starting with a recession and showed they went up from there. No shit. Again, they were over 5% for much of Clinton. They are historically very low now. If you realize there is history before Obama. Haha

 

[Weatherman2020]

What .8% growth?

Real GDP growth under Obama from after Bush's Great Recession ended:

2.4%

Real GDP growth under Trump:

2.6%

https://www.bea.gov/system/files/2019-10/gdplev_0.xlsx

If you want the GDP, why not post all the facts?

Since you wanna compare Bush with Obama, let's.....

Using the BEA's most current spreadsheet.....

https://www.bea.gov/system/files/2019-10/gdplev_0.xlsx

Annualized real GDP growth

Q4-2000: 13,260.50
Q4-2008: 15,328.00 - Bush ...... 1.95
Q4-2016: 17,824.20 - Obama ... 2.04

Let’s not put 9-11 into the economic picture. You Leftards require bullshit.

LOLOLOL

Damn, you rightards are fucking desperate. Aside from the fact that Bush did nothing to prevent 9.11, It hurt our economy far less than Bush's Great Recession. Yet you bitch about including 9.11 but not Bush's Great Recession.

Yeah, I’m desperate. 6 issues you claimed Trump would be impeached for and now you think Americans are open to communism.

 

[Brain357]

And far short of what’s needed to pay for the tax cuts. Remember the growth that was promised? You like huge deficits?

We'd have been there too had the Fed not chocked off the economy with their spikes in interest rates.

The fed rate is at historical lows and has been for trumps whole term. You live in fantasy land.

No it's not. Stop lying

Does being a righty require denying all facts? It’s so sad.

Highest and Lowest Interest Rates and Why They Changed

 

[Brain357]

What .8% growth?

Real GDP growth under Obama from after Bush's Great Recession ended:

2.4%

Real GDP growth under Trump:

2.6%

https://www.bea.gov/system/files/2019-10/gdplev_0.xlsx

If you want the GDP, why not post all the facts?

Since you wanna compare Bush with Obama, let's.....

Using the BEA's most current spreadsheet.....

https://www.bea.gov/system/files/2019-10/gdplev_0.xlsx

Annualized real GDP growth

Q4-2000: 13,260.50
Q4-2008: 15,328.00 - Bush ...... 1.95
Q4-2016: 17,824.20 - Obama ... 2.04

Let’s not put 9-11 into the economic picture. You Leftards require bullshit.

LOLOLOL

Damn, you rightards are fucking desperate. Aside from the fact that Bush did nothing to prevent 9.11, It hurt our economy far less than Bush's Great Recession. Yet you bitch about including 9.11 but not Bush's Great Recession.

Yeah, I’m desperate. 6 issues you claimed Trump would be impeached for and now you think Americans are open to communism.

You are. You love gov managed trade and trillion dollar deficits. Huge socialist bailouts for farmers...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I understand, because you'd have to admit the market performed better since Trump was elected.

Sorry, my bad,

I understand, because you'd have to admit the market performed better since Trump was elected.

LOL

It still didn't. Not even if you want to give credit to Trump for gains made under Obama.


DJIA
01/20/2009 ...... 7949.09
11/07/2016 ... 18,259.60
10/30/2019 ... 27,186.69

NASDAQ
01/20/2009 ...... 1,520.76
11/07/2016 ...... 5,166.17
10/30/2019 ...... 8,303.98

S&P500
01/20/2009 ......... 849.64
11/07/2016 ...... 2,131.52
10/30/2019 ...... 3,046.77

Obama:

• DJIA: UP 130%
• NASDAQ: UP 240%
• S&P500: UP 151%

Trump:

• DJIA: UP 49%
• NASDAQ: UP 61%
• S&P500: UP 43%

So in your moment of desperation, trying to shift numbers in favor of Trump, your idiotic claim that the market did better under Trump than Obama still remains bullshit.

Even with your skewed dates, Obama still did roughly 3 times better than Trump.

Not even if you want to give credit to Trump for gains made under Obama

Why would Obama deserve credit for the nearly 6% gain in the S&P between Trump's election and his inauguration? Was lame duck Obama, with a Republican House and Senate doing something good for the market or the economy?

your idiotic claim that the market did better under Trump than Obama still remains bullshit.

You still can't do the math, can you?

Even with your skewed dates, Obama still did roughly 3 times better than Trump.

Hilarious!

What was Obama's annual return? Use 7.8 years.

What was Trump's annual return? Use 3 years.

"Why would Obama deserve credit for the nearly 6% gain in the S&P between Trump's election and his inauguration?"

Because Obama was still president and the economy was still driving under his policies. Whereas Trump had not passed a single one of his policies. Even worse for your ridiculous nonsense, there isn't a poster on this forum who knows you'd be blaming Obama, and not Trump, had the market gone down during that period.

"Hilarious! What was Obama's annual return? Use 7.8 years. What was Trump's annual return? Use 3 years."

What's hilarious is your utter desperation to keep shifting the parameters, hoping to find some algorithm to get Trump ahead of Obama.

But guess what? You fail yet again.

Even using you're skewed date range and even using your math, Obama still comes out ahead....

Obama:

• DJIA: UP 17%
• NASDAQ: UP 31%
• S&P500: UP 19%

Trump:

• DJIA: UP 16%
• NASDAQ: UP 20%
• S&P500: UP 14%

Time for you to think up something new. This one's failed you 3 times now.

Obama:

• DJIA: UP 17%
• NASDAQ: UP 31%
• S&P500: UP 19%

Are you serious? LOL!

Show your work.

I already did, dumbfuck. I posted the market amounts for the dates you wanted in post #329 along with the percentage of growth. Then in post #338, I divided the results for Obama by 7.8 and Trumps by 3.0, just as your desperation begged.

It's not my problem you're a desperate liar who doesn't like the results.

Even with your skewed dates, Obama still did roughly 3 times better than Trump.

Obama:​

• DJIA: UP 17%
• NASDAQ: UP 31%
• S&P500: UP 19%

Trump:​

• DJIA: UP 16%
• NASDAQ: UP 20%
• S&P500: UP 14%

17% isn't 3 times better than 16%, 31% isn't 3 times better than 20% and 19% isn't 3 times better than 14%.

If Obama really saw a 17% annual increase in the Dow, over 7.8 years,
the Dow would have gone from 7949 to 27049.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

And far short of what’s needed to pay for the tax cuts. Remember the growth that was promised? You like huge deficits?

We'd have been there too had the Fed not chocked off the economy with their spikes in interest rates.

The fed rate is at historical lows and has been for trumps whole term. You live in fantasy land.

No it's not. Stop lying

Does being a righty require denying all facts? It’s so sad.

Highest and Lowest Interest Rates and Why They Changed

The rates were just lowered...think hard you lying left tard

Good fcking grief

 

[Faun]

What .8% growth?

Real GDP growth under Obama from after Bush's Great Recession ended:

2.4%

Real GDP growth under Trump:

2.6%

https://www.bea.gov/system/files/2019-10/gdplev_0.xlsx

If you want the GDP, why not post all the facts?

Since you wanna compare Bush with Obama, let's.....

Using the BEA's most current spreadsheet.....

https://www.bea.gov/system/files/2019-10/gdplev_0.xlsx

Annualized real GDP growth

Q4-2000: 13,260.50
Q4-2008: 15,328.00 - Bush ...... 1.95
Q4-2016: 17,824.20 - Obama ... 2.04

Let’s not put 9-11 into the economic picture. You Leftards require bullshit.

LOLOLOL

Damn, you rightards are fucking desperate. Aside from the fact that Bush did nothing to prevent 9.11, It hurt our economy far less than Bush's Great Recession. Yet you bitch about including 9.11 but not Bush's Great Recession.

Yeah, I’m desperate. 6 issues you claimed Trump would be impeached for and now you think Americans are open to communism.

Umm, the public impeachment hearings were just approved today. I think it's gonna take more than a day.

Oh, and I've only ever said he should be impeached for 2 things .... 1) soliciting campaign contributions from a foreign national; and 2) abuse of power. Who knows what you imagined for the other 4?