GAO U.S. corporations pay average effective tax rate of 12.6 - Jul. 1 2013
I don't care what party does what.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Greece Runs Out of Other People's Money
- Thread starter The Rabbi
- Start date
I don't care what party does what.
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
"Minimize tax liabilities" Billy, just give me lower taxes and it'll trickle down, I promise!Loopholes, corporations not paying taxes, off shore havens...since 2000 all we have done is cut rich people's taxes. Who am I kidding since Reagan. so why aren't the job creators creating jobs?
since 2000 all we have done is cut rich people's taxes. Who am I kidding since Reagan.
When Reagan left office, the top rate was 28%.
I know you failed math, but trust me, 39.6% is larger than 28%.
Off shore havens? Are you telling me that people arrange their affairs to minimize their tax liabilities? Are you serious? Liberals have been whining for decades that the opposite is true.
Hike taxes on the rich and corporations, they'll just line up to pay more, I promise.
The truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing, here, read up on some solutions, trust me, lower taxes does not equal benefits for working people, if you're seriously trying to defend trickle down economics, you're delusional and insane."Minimize tax liabilities" Billy, just give me lower taxes and it'll trickle down, I promise!Loopholes, corporations not paying taxes, off shore havens...since 2000 all we have done is cut rich people's taxes. Who am I kidding since Reagan. so why aren't the job creators creating jobs?
since 2000 all we have done is cut rich people's taxes. Who am I kidding since Reagan.
When Reagan left office, the top rate was 28%.
I know you failed math, but trust me, 39.6% is larger than 28%.
Off shore havens? Are you telling me that people arrange their affairs to minimize their tax liabilities? Are you serious? Liberals have been whining for decades that the opposite is true.
Hike taxes on the rich and corporations, they'll just line up to pay more, I promise.
Annual income of richest 100 people enough to end global poverty four times over Oxfam International
"
Hobbs said: “We need a global new deal to reverse decades of increasing inequality. As a first step world leaders should formally commit themselves to reducing inequality to the levels seen in 1990.
“From tax havens to weak employment laws, the richest benefit from a global economic system which is rigged in their favour. It is time our leaders reformed the system so that it works in the interests of the whole of humanity rather than a global elite.”
Closing tax havens – which hold as much as $32 trillion or a third of all global wealth – could yield an additional $189bn in additional tax revenues. In addition to a tax haven crackdown, elements of a global new deal could include:
- a reversal of the trend towards more regressive forms of taxation;
- a global minimum corporation tax rate;
- measures to boost wages compared with returns available to capital;
GAO U.S. corporations pay average effective tax rate of 12.6 - Jul. 1 2013who raise their taxes? I know Bush got in trouble for no new taxes so it could have been him could have sworn Clinton cut corporate taxes and Bush certainly did. so good I'm glad they're paying their fair share but don't forget the loopholessince 2000 all we have done is cut rich people's taxes. Who am I kidding since Reagan. so why aren't the job creators creating jobs?
since 2000 all we have done is cut rich people's taxes. Who am I kidding since Reagan.
When Reagan left office, the top rate was 28%.
I know you failed math, but trust me, 39.6% is larger than 28%.
who raise their taxes?
Well, it's very complicated and based on your low IQ, I'm not sure I could dumb down the explanation enough for a moron like you to understand.
could have sworn Clinton cut corporate taxes and Bush certainly did
Wrong on both counts. Idiot.
I don't care what party does what.
they have no choice there in our country don't make me go Hugo Chavez on them"Minimize tax liabilities" Billy, just give me lower taxes and it'll trickle down, I promise!Loopholes, corporations not paying taxes, off shore havens...since 2000 all we have done is cut rich people's taxes. Who am I kidding since Reagan. so why aren't the job creators creating jobs?
since 2000 all we have done is cut rich people's taxes. Who am I kidding since Reagan.
When Reagan left office, the top rate was 28%.
I know you failed math, but trust me, 39.6% is larger than 28%.
Off shore havens? Are you telling me that people arrange their affairs to minimize their tax liabilities? Are you serious? Liberals have been whining for decades that the opposite is true.
Hike taxes on the rich and corporations, they'll just line up to pay more, I promise.
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
The truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing, here, read up on some solutions, trust me, lower taxes does not equal benefits for working people, if you're seriously trying to defend trickle down economics, you're delusional and insane."Minimize tax liabilities" Billy, just give me lower taxes and it'll trickle down, I promise!Loopholes, corporations not paying taxes, off shore havens...since 2000 all we have done is cut rich people's taxes. Who am I kidding since Reagan.
When Reagan left office, the top rate was 28%.
I know you failed math, but trust me, 39.6% is larger than 28%.
Off shore havens? Are you telling me that people arrange their affairs to minimize their tax liabilities? Are you serious? Liberals have been whining for decades that the opposite is true.
Hike taxes on the rich and corporations, they'll just line up to pay more, I promise.
Annual income of richest 100 people enough to end global poverty four times over Oxfam International
"
Hobbs said: “We need a global new deal to reverse decades of increasing inequality. As a first step world leaders should formally commit themselves to reducing inequality to the levels seen in 1990.
“From tax havens to weak employment laws, the richest benefit from a global economic system which is rigged in their favour. It is time our leaders reformed the system so that it works in the interests of the whole of humanity rather than a global elite.”
Closing tax havens – which hold as much as $32 trillion or a third of all global wealth – could yield an additional $189bn in additional tax revenues. In addition to a tax haven crackdown, elements of a global new deal could include:
"
- a reversal of the trend towards more regressive forms of taxation;
- a global minimum corporation tax rate;
- measures to boost wages compared with returns available to capital;
The truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing
My comments were about taxes on rich people, not corporations.
Try reading for comprehension.
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
GAO U.S. corporations pay average effective tax rate of 12.6 - Jul. 1 2013who raise their taxes? I know Bush got in trouble for no new taxes so it could have been him could have sworn Clinton cut corporate taxes and Bush certainly did. so good I'm glad they're paying their fair share but don't forget the loopholessince 2000 all we have done is cut rich people's taxes. Who am I kidding since Reagan. so why aren't the job creators creating jobs?
since 2000 all we have done is cut rich people's taxes. Who am I kidding since Reagan.
When Reagan left office, the top rate was 28%.
I know you failed math, but trust me, 39.6% is larger than 28%.
who raise their taxes?
Well, it's very complicated and based on your low IQ, I'm not sure I could dumb down the explanation enough for a moron like you to understand.
could have sworn Clinton cut corporate taxes and Bush certainly did
Wrong on both counts. Idiot.
I don't care what party does what.they have no choice there in our country don't make me go Hugo Chavez on them"Minimize tax liabilities" Billy, just give me lower taxes and it'll trickle down, I promise!Loopholes, corporations not paying taxes, off shore havens...since 2000 all we have done is cut rich people's taxes. Who am I kidding since Reagan.
When Reagan left office, the top rate was 28%.
I know you failed math, but trust me, 39.6% is larger than 28%.
Off shore havens? Are you telling me that people arrange their affairs to minimize their tax liabilities? Are you serious? Liberals have been whining for decades that the opposite is true.
Hike taxes on the rich and corporations, they'll just line up to pay more, I promise.
don't make me go Hugo Chavez on them
You mean you'll tank the economy so much that we can't get toilet paper?
Yet another socialist success story. LOL!
http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/11/24/its-good-to-be-rich-you-get-a-lower-tax-rate/?_r=0The truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing, here, read up on some solutions, trust me, lower taxes does not equal benefits for working people, if you're seriously trying to defend trickle down economics, you're delusional and insane."Minimize tax liabilities" Billy, just give me lower taxes and it'll trickle down, I promise!Loopholes, corporations not paying taxes, off shore havens...
Off shore havens? Are you telling me that people arrange their affairs to minimize their tax liabilities? Are you serious? Liberals have been whining for decades that the opposite is true.
Hike taxes on the rich and corporations, they'll just line up to pay more, I promise.
Annual income of richest 100 people enough to end global poverty four times over Oxfam International
"
Hobbs said: “We need a global new deal to reverse decades of increasing inequality. As a first step world leaders should formally commit themselves to reducing inequality to the levels seen in 1990.
“From tax havens to weak employment laws, the richest benefit from a global economic system which is rigged in their favour. It is time our leaders reformed the system so that it works in the interests of the whole of humanity rather than a global elite.”
Closing tax havens – which hold as much as $32 trillion or a third of all global wealth – could yield an additional $189bn in additional tax revenues. In addition to a tax haven crackdown, elements of a global new deal could include:
"
- a reversal of the trend towards more regressive forms of taxation;
- a global minimum corporation tax rate;
- measures to boost wages compared with returns available to capital;
The truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing
My comments were about taxes on rich people, not corporations.
Try reading for comprehension.
Poor Families Pay Double The State And Local Tax Rate As The Rich Study
Warren Buffett says the super-rich pay lower tax rates than others PolitiFact
all rich people are incorporated dummyThe truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing, here, read up on some solutions, trust me, lower taxes does not equal benefits for working people, if you're seriously trying to defend trickle down economics, you're delusional and insane."Minimize tax liabilities" Billy, just give me lower taxes and it'll trickle down, I promise!Loopholes, corporations not paying taxes, off shore havens...
Off shore havens? Are you telling me that people arrange their affairs to minimize their tax liabilities? Are you serious? Liberals have been whining for decades that the opposite is true.
Hike taxes on the rich and corporations, they'll just line up to pay more, I promise.
Annual income of richest 100 people enough to end global poverty four times over Oxfam International
"
Hobbs said: “We need a global new deal to reverse decades of increasing inequality. As a first step world leaders should formally commit themselves to reducing inequality to the levels seen in 1990.
“From tax havens to weak employment laws, the richest benefit from a global economic system which is rigged in their favour. It is time our leaders reformed the system so that it works in the interests of the whole of humanity rather than a global elite.”
Closing tax havens – which hold as much as $32 trillion or a third of all global wealth – could yield an additional $189bn in additional tax revenues. In addition to a tax haven crackdown, elements of a global new deal could include:
"
- a reversal of the trend towards more regressive forms of taxation;
- a global minimum corporation tax rate;
- measures to boost wages compared with returns available to capital;
The truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing
My comments were about taxes on rich people, not corporations.
Try reading for comprehension.
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
all rich people are incorporated dummyThe truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing, here, read up on some solutions, trust me, lower taxes does not equal benefits for working people, if you're seriously trying to defend trickle down economics, you're delusional and insane."Minimize tax liabilities" Billy, just give me lower taxes and it'll trickle down, I promise!Off shore havens? Are you telling me that people arrange their affairs to minimize their tax liabilities? Are you serious? Liberals have been whining for decades that the opposite is true.
Hike taxes on the rich and corporations, they'll just line up to pay more, I promise.
Annual income of richest 100 people enough to end global poverty four times over Oxfam International
"
Hobbs said: “We need a global new deal to reverse decades of increasing inequality. As a first step world leaders should formally commit themselves to reducing inequality to the levels seen in 1990.
“From tax havens to weak employment laws, the richest benefit from a global economic system which is rigged in their favour. It is time our leaders reformed the system so that it works in the interests of the whole of humanity rather than a global elite.”
Closing tax havens – which hold as much as $32 trillion or a third of all global wealth – could yield an additional $189bn in additional tax revenues. In addition to a tax haven crackdown, elements of a global new deal could include:
"
- a reversal of the trend towards more regressive forms of taxation;
- a global minimum corporation tax rate;
- measures to boost wages compared with returns available to capital;
The truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing
My comments were about taxes on rich people, not corporations.
Try reading for comprehension.
I don't know what's dumber, you or the gum on the bottom of my shoe.
It's a close call.
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/11/24/its-good-to-be-rich-you-get-a-lower-tax-rate/?_r=0The truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing, here, read up on some solutions, trust me, lower taxes does not equal benefits for working people, if you're seriously trying to defend trickle down economics, you're delusional and insane."Minimize tax liabilities" Billy, just give me lower taxes and it'll trickle down, I promise!Off shore havens? Are you telling me that people arrange their affairs to minimize their tax liabilities? Are you serious? Liberals have been whining for decades that the opposite is true.
Hike taxes on the rich and corporations, they'll just line up to pay more, I promise.
Annual income of richest 100 people enough to end global poverty four times over Oxfam International
"
Hobbs said: “We need a global new deal to reverse decades of increasing inequality. As a first step world leaders should formally commit themselves to reducing inequality to the levels seen in 1990.
“From tax havens to weak employment laws, the richest benefit from a global economic system which is rigged in their favour. It is time our leaders reformed the system so that it works in the interests of the whole of humanity rather than a global elite.”
Closing tax havens – which hold as much as $32 trillion or a third of all global wealth – could yield an additional $189bn in additional tax revenues. In addition to a tax haven crackdown, elements of a global new deal could include:
"
- a reversal of the trend towards more regressive forms of taxation;
- a global minimum corporation tax rate;
- measures to boost wages compared with returns available to capital;
The truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing
My comments were about taxes on rich people, not corporations.
Try reading for comprehension.
Poor Families Pay Double The State And Local Tax Rate As The Rich Study
Warren Buffett says the super-rich pay lower tax rates than others PolitiFact
No you don't.
No they don't.
Warren is wrong.
Thanks for the moronic links that have nothing to do with my earlier comments.
Oh jesus christ, are you really that blind? The achievements of hugo are evident, all Hugo did was take oil profits and invest them into social programs, unlike what the venezuelan leadership was doing previously, (Keeping the oil money for the upper classes) the economy there would have tanked either way with the oil prices. Now, poverty is reduced, healthcare is better for the majority, people aren't starving..GAO U.S. corporations pay average effective tax rate of 12.6 - Jul. 1 2013who raise their taxes? I know Bush got in trouble for no new taxes so it could have been him could have sworn Clinton cut corporate taxes and Bush certainly did. so good I'm glad they're paying their fair share but don't forget the loopholessince 2000 all we have done is cut rich people's taxes. Who am I kidding since Reagan.
When Reagan left office, the top rate was 28%.
I know you failed math, but trust me, 39.6% is larger than 28%.
who raise their taxes?
Well, it's very complicated and based on your low IQ, I'm not sure I could dumb down the explanation enough for a moron like you to understand.
could have sworn Clinton cut corporate taxes and Bush certainly did
Wrong on both counts. Idiot.
I don't care what party does what.they have no choice there in our country don't make me go Hugo Chavez on them"Minimize tax liabilities" Billy, just give me lower taxes and it'll trickle down, I promise!Loopholes, corporations not paying taxes, off shore havens...
Off shore havens? Are you telling me that people arrange their affairs to minimize their tax liabilities? Are you serious? Liberals have been whining for decades that the opposite is true.
Hike taxes on the rich and corporations, they'll just line up to pay more, I promise.
don't make me go Hugo Chavez on them
You mean you'll tank the economy so much that we can't get toilet paper?
Yet another socialist success story. LOL!
Facts scare you, don't they? Well, regarding your earlier comments, which one are you talking about?http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/11/24/its-good-to-be-rich-you-get-a-lower-tax-rate/?_r=0The truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing, here, read up on some solutions, trust me, lower taxes does not equal benefits for working people, if you're seriously trying to defend trickle down economics, you're delusional and insane."Minimize tax liabilities" Billy, just give me lower taxes and it'll trickle down, I promise!
Hike taxes on the rich and corporations, they'll just line up to pay more, I promise.
Annual income of richest 100 people enough to end global poverty four times over Oxfam International
"
Hobbs said: “We need a global new deal to reverse decades of increasing inequality. As a first step world leaders should formally commit themselves to reducing inequality to the levels seen in 1990.
“From tax havens to weak employment laws, the richest benefit from a global economic system which is rigged in their favour. It is time our leaders reformed the system so that it works in the interests of the whole of humanity rather than a global elite.”
Closing tax havens – which hold as much as $32 trillion or a third of all global wealth – could yield an additional $189bn in additional tax revenues. In addition to a tax haven crackdown, elements of a global new deal could include:
"
- a reversal of the trend towards more regressive forms of taxation;
- a global minimum corporation tax rate;
- measures to boost wages compared with returns available to capital;
The truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing
My comments were about taxes on rich people, not corporations.
Try reading for comprehension.
Poor Families Pay Double The State And Local Tax Rate As The Rich Study
Warren Buffett says the super-rich pay lower tax rates than others PolitiFact
No you don't.
No they don't.
Warren is wrong.
Thanks for the moronic links that have nothing to do with my earlier comments.
well when you have the Bush regime trying to murder you and take your economy into the s****** is it any wonder? My point was Venesuelian companies or any corporation that got too powerful and greedy he just took their s*** over and threw them out of the country.GAO U.S. corporations pay average effective tax rate of 12.6 - Jul. 1 2013who raise their taxes? I know Bush got in trouble for no new taxes so it could have been him could have sworn Clinton cut corporate taxes and Bush certainly did. so good I'm glad they're paying their fair share but don't forget the loopholessince 2000 all we have done is cut rich people's taxes. Who am I kidding since Reagan.
When Reagan left office, the top rate was 28%.
I know you failed math, but trust me, 39.6% is larger than 28%.
who raise their taxes?
Well, it's very complicated and based on your low IQ, I'm not sure I could dumb down the explanation enough for a moron like you to understand.
could have sworn Clinton cut corporate taxes and Bush certainly did
Wrong on both counts. Idiot.
I don't care what party does what.they have no choice there in our country don't make me go Hugo Chavez on them"Minimize tax liabilities" Billy, just give me lower taxes and it'll trickle down, I promise!Loopholes, corporations not paying taxes, off shore havens...
Off shore havens? Are you telling me that people arrange their affairs to minimize their tax liabilities? Are you serious? Liberals have been whining for decades that the opposite is true.
Hike taxes on the rich and corporations, they'll just line up to pay more, I promise.
don't make me go Hugo Chavez on them
You mean you'll tank the economy so much that we can't get toilet paper?
Yet another socialist success story. LOL!
Last edited:
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Oh jesus christ, are you really that blind? The achievements of hugo are evident, all Hugo did was take oil profits and invest them into social programs, unlike what the venezuelan leadership was doing previously, (Keeping the oil money for the upper classes) the economy there would have tanked either way with the oil prices. Now, poverty is reduced, healthcare is better for the majority, people aren't starving..GAO U.S. corporations pay average effective tax rate of 12.6 - Jul. 1 2013who raise their taxes? I know Bush got in trouble for no new taxes so it could have been him could have sworn Clinton cut corporate taxes and Bush certainly did. so good I'm glad they're paying their fair share but don't forget the loopholes
who raise their taxes?
Well, it's very complicated and based on your low IQ, I'm not sure I could dumb down the explanation enough for a moron like you to understand.
could have sworn Clinton cut corporate taxes and Bush certainly did
Wrong on both counts. Idiot.
I don't care what party does what.they have no choice there in our country don't make me go Hugo Chavez on them"Minimize tax liabilities" Billy, just give me lower taxes and it'll trickle down, I promise!Off shore havens? Are you telling me that people arrange their affairs to minimize their tax liabilities? Are you serious? Liberals have been whining for decades that the opposite is true.
Hike taxes on the rich and corporations, they'll just line up to pay more, I promise.
don't make me go Hugo Chavez on them
You mean you'll tank the economy so much that we can't get toilet paper?
Yet another socialist success story. LOL!
Facts scare you, don't they? Well, regarding your earlier comments, which one are you talking about?http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/11/24/its-good-to-be-rich-you-get-a-lower-tax-rate/?_r=0The truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing, here, read up on some solutions, trust me, lower taxes does not equal benefits for working people, if you're seriously trying to defend trickle down economics, you're delusional and insane.Hike taxes on the rich and corporations, they'll just line up to pay more, I promise.
Annual income of richest 100 people enough to end global poverty four times over Oxfam International
"
Hobbs said: “We need a global new deal to reverse decades of increasing inequality. As a first step world leaders should formally commit themselves to reducing inequality to the levels seen in 1990.
“From tax havens to weak employment laws, the richest benefit from a global economic system which is rigged in their favour. It is time our leaders reformed the system so that it works in the interests of the whole of humanity rather than a global elite.”
Closing tax havens – which hold as much as $32 trillion or a third of all global wealth – could yield an additional $189bn in additional tax revenues. In addition to a tax haven crackdown, elements of a global new deal could include:
"
- a reversal of the trend towards more regressive forms of taxation;
- a global minimum corporation tax rate;
- measures to boost wages compared with returns available to capital;
The truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing
My comments were about taxes on rich people, not corporations.
Try reading for comprehension.
Poor Families Pay Double The State And Local Tax Rate As The Rich Study
Warren Buffett says the super-rich pay lower tax rates than others PolitiFact
No you don't.
No they don't.
Warren is wrong.
Thanks for the moronic links that have nothing to do with my earlier comments.
The achievements of hugo are evident,
Price controls and scarcity force Venezuelans to turn to the black market for milk and toilet paper
It is ironically because of those government-imposed fair prices that the goods often aren’t available at supermarkets at fair prices as it’s simply not profitable to import them. This is thanks to economic policies dating back more than a decade.
Price controls and scarcity force Venezuelans to turn to the black market for milk and toilet paper Global Development Professionals Network The Guardian
The Achievements of Hugo Chavez CounterPunch Tells the Facts Names the NamesOh jesus christ, are you really that blind? The achievements of hugo are evident, all Hugo did was take oil profits and invest them into social programs, unlike what the venezuelan leadership was doing previously, (Keeping the oil money for the upper classes) the economy there would have tanked either way with the oil prices. Now, poverty is reduced, healthcare is better for the majority, people aren't starving..GAO U.S. corporations pay average effective tax rate of 12.6 - Jul. 1 2013who raise their taxes?
Well, it's very complicated and based on your low IQ, I'm not sure I could dumb down the explanation enough for a moron like you to understand.
could have sworn Clinton cut corporate taxes and Bush certainly did
Wrong on both counts. Idiot.
I don't care what party does what.they have no choice there in our country don't make me go Hugo Chavez on them"Minimize tax liabilities" Billy, just give me lower taxes and it'll trickle down, I promise!
Hike taxes on the rich and corporations, they'll just line up to pay more, I promise.
don't make me go Hugo Chavez on them
You mean you'll tank the economy so much that we can't get toilet paper?
Yet another socialist success story. LOL!
Facts scare you, don't they? Well, regarding your earlier comments, which one are you talking about?http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/11/24/its-good-to-be-rich-you-get-a-lower-tax-rate/?_r=0The truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing, here, read up on some solutions, trust me, lower taxes does not equal benefits for working people, if you're seriously trying to defend trickle down economics, you're delusional and insane.
Annual income of richest 100 people enough to end global poverty four times over Oxfam International
"
Hobbs said: “We need a global new deal to reverse decades of increasing inequality. As a first step world leaders should formally commit themselves to reducing inequality to the levels seen in 1990.
“From tax havens to weak employment laws, the richest benefit from a global economic system which is rigged in their favour. It is time our leaders reformed the system so that it works in the interests of the whole of humanity rather than a global elite.”
Closing tax havens – which hold as much as $32 trillion or a third of all global wealth – could yield an additional $189bn in additional tax revenues. In addition to a tax haven crackdown, elements of a global new deal could include:
"
- a reversal of the trend towards more regressive forms of taxation;
- a global minimum corporation tax rate;
- measures to boost wages compared with returns available to capital;
The truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing
My comments were about taxes on rich people, not corporations.
Try reading for comprehension.
Poor Families Pay Double The State And Local Tax Rate As The Rich Study
Warren Buffett says the super-rich pay lower tax rates than others PolitiFact
No you don't.
No they don't.
Warren is wrong.
Thanks for the moronic links that have nothing to do with my earlier comments.
The achievements of hugo are evident,
Price controls and scarcity force Venezuelans to turn to the black market for milk and toilet paper
It is ironically because of those government-imposed fair prices that the goods often aren’t available at supermarkets at fair prices as it’s simply not profitable to import them. This is thanks to economic policies dating back more than a decade.
Price controls and scarcity force Venezuelans to turn to the black market for milk and toilet paper Global Development Professionals Network The Guardian
Sorry that facts scare you by the way:Oh jesus christ, are you really that blind? The achievements of hugo are evident, all Hugo did was take oil profits and invest them into social programs, unlike what the venezuelan leadership was doing previously, (Keeping the oil money for the upper classes) the economy there would have tanked either way with the oil prices. Now, poverty is reduced, healthcare is better for the majority, people aren't starving..GAO U.S. corporations pay average effective tax rate of 12.6 - Jul. 1 2013who raise their taxes?
Well, it's very complicated and based on your low IQ, I'm not sure I could dumb down the explanation enough for a moron like you to understand.
could have sworn Clinton cut corporate taxes and Bush certainly did
Wrong on both counts. Idiot.
I don't care what party does what.they have no choice there in our country don't make me go Hugo Chavez on them"Minimize tax liabilities" Billy, just give me lower taxes and it'll trickle down, I promise!
Hike taxes on the rich and corporations, they'll just line up to pay more, I promise.
don't make me go Hugo Chavez on them
You mean you'll tank the economy so much that we can't get toilet paper?
Yet another socialist success story. LOL!
Facts scare you, don't they? Well, regarding your earlier comments, which one are you talking about?http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/11/24/its-good-to-be-rich-you-get-a-lower-tax-rate/?_r=0The truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing, here, read up on some solutions, trust me, lower taxes does not equal benefits for working people, if you're seriously trying to defend trickle down economics, you're delusional and insane.
Annual income of richest 100 people enough to end global poverty four times over Oxfam International
"
Hobbs said: “We need a global new deal to reverse decades of increasing inequality. As a first step world leaders should formally commit themselves to reducing inequality to the levels seen in 1990.
“From tax havens to weak employment laws, the richest benefit from a global economic system which is rigged in their favour. It is time our leaders reformed the system so that it works in the interests of the whole of humanity rather than a global elite.”
Closing tax havens – which hold as much as $32 trillion or a third of all global wealth – could yield an additional $189bn in additional tax revenues. In addition to a tax haven crackdown, elements of a global new deal could include:
"
- a reversal of the trend towards more regressive forms of taxation;
- a global minimum corporation tax rate;
- measures to boost wages compared with returns available to capital;
The truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing
My comments were about taxes on rich people, not corporations.
Try reading for comprehension.
Poor Families Pay Double The State And Local Tax Rate As The Rich Study
Warren Buffett says the super-rich pay lower tax rates than others PolitiFact
No you don't.
No they don't.
Warren is wrong.
Thanks for the moronic links that have nothing to do with my earlier comments.
The achievements of hugo are evident,
Price controls and scarcity force Venezuelans to turn to the black market for milk and toilet paper
It is ironically because of those government-imposed fair prices that the goods often aren’t available at supermarkets at fair prices as it’s simply not profitable to import them. This is thanks to economic policies dating back more than a decade.
Price controls and scarcity force Venezuelans to turn to the black market for milk and toilet paper Global Development Professionals Network The Guardian
"Actually, venezuela has doubled the amount of cereals it produces in just 10 years, as have milk, eggs and pork. Child malnutrition has dropped by 2/3 in 10 years, too. So, are there food shortages? Look at this anti-Chavez blogger's post. He shows that food shortages mean the most popular mayonnaise is gone, but there are clearly 4 or 5 other brands still available. Again, white sugar is gone but there is plenty of brown left. Only one brand of powdered milk is left. The reason for this is Chavez instituted price-controls and gave people jobs, increasing their purchasing power. This meant for the first time in their lives, ordinary people can afford dairy produce. If you think about the logic behind this, you can find out a lot about how the media see ordinary people. In the 1990s when children were dying from malnutrition, there were no stories of food shortages, but now that rich people like themselves can't find Kraft mayonnaise and have to settle for Hellmans, that is a shortage."
and our numbers have gone down haven't they? We went from first in the world to being 10-15 or even 20th in some categories. sure in a lot of ways this is still the greatest country in the world but in many ways it's not anymore. and I blame you stupid ass clowns will go along with what the Rich say we should doSorry that facts scare you by the way:Oh jesus christ, are you really that blind? The achievements of hugo are evident, all Hugo did was take oil profits and invest them into social programs, unlike what the venezuelan leadership was doing previously, (Keeping the oil money for the upper classes) the economy there would have tanked either way with the oil prices. Now, poverty is reduced, healthcare is better for the majority, people aren't starving..GAO U.S. corporations pay average effective tax rate of 12.6 - Jul. 1 2013
I don't care what party does what.they have no choice there in our country don't make me go Hugo Chavez on themHike taxes on the rich and corporations, they'll just line up to pay more, I promise.
don't make me go Hugo Chavez on them
You mean you'll tank the economy so much that we can't get toilet paper?
Yet another socialist success story. LOL!
Facts scare you, don't they? Well, regarding your earlier comments, which one are you talking about?http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/11/24/its-good-to-be-rich-you-get-a-lower-tax-rate/?_r=0The truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing
My comments were about taxes on rich people, not corporations.
Try reading for comprehension.
Poor Families Pay Double The State And Local Tax Rate As The Rich Study
Warren Buffett says the super-rich pay lower tax rates than others PolitiFact
No you don't.
No they don't.
Warren is wrong.
Thanks for the moronic links that have nothing to do with my earlier comments.
The achievements of hugo are evident,
Price controls and scarcity force Venezuelans to turn to the black market for milk and toilet paper
It is ironically because of those government-imposed fair prices that the goods often aren’t available at supermarkets at fair prices as it’s simply not profitable to import them. This is thanks to economic policies dating back more than a decade.
Price controls and scarcity force Venezuelans to turn to the black market for milk and toilet paper Global Development Professionals Network The Guardian
"Actually, venezuela has doubled the amount of cereals it produces in just 10 years, as have milk, eggs and pork. Child malnutrition has dropped by 2/3 in 10 years, too. So, are there food shortages? Look at this anti-Chavez blogger's post. He shows that food shortages mean the most popular mayonnaise is gone, but there are clearly 4 or 5 other brands still available. Again, white sugar is gone but there is plenty of brown left. Only one brand of powdered milk is left. The reason for this is Chavez instituted price-controls and gave people jobs, increasing their purchasing power. This meant for the first time in their lives, ordinary people can afford dairy produce. If you think about the logic behind this, you can find out a lot about how the media see ordinary people. In the 1990s when children were dying from malnutrition, there were no stories of food shortages, but now that rich people like themselves can't find Kraft mayonnaise and have to settle for Hellmans, that is a shortage."
Meathead
Diamond Member
The fruits of socialism are apparent in Greece today. Only the very rich countries can afford socialism. Elsewhere it is a full-blown catastrophe.
martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 83,004
- 34,329
- 2,300
Sorry that facts scare you by the way:Oh jesus christ, are you really that blind? The achievements of hugo are evident, all Hugo did was take oil profits and invest them into social programs, unlike what the venezuelan leadership was doing previously, (Keeping the oil money for the upper classes) the economy there would have tanked either way with the oil prices. Now, poverty is reduced, healthcare is better for the majority, people aren't starving..GAO U.S. corporations pay average effective tax rate of 12.6 - Jul. 1 2013
I don't care what party does what.they have no choice there in our country don't make me go Hugo Chavez on themHike taxes on the rich and corporations, they'll just line up to pay more, I promise.
don't make me go Hugo Chavez on them
You mean you'll tank the economy so much that we can't get toilet paper?
Yet another socialist success story. LOL!
Facts scare you, don't they? Well, regarding your earlier comments, which one are you talking about?http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/11/24/its-good-to-be-rich-you-get-a-lower-tax-rate/?_r=0The truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing
My comments were about taxes on rich people, not corporations.
Try reading for comprehension.
Poor Families Pay Double The State And Local Tax Rate As The Rich Study
Warren Buffett says the super-rich pay lower tax rates than others PolitiFact
No you don't.
No they don't.
Warren is wrong.
Thanks for the moronic links that have nothing to do with my earlier comments.
The achievements of hugo are evident,
Price controls and scarcity force Venezuelans to turn to the black market for milk and toilet paper
It is ironically because of those government-imposed fair prices that the goods often aren’t available at supermarkets at fair prices as it’s simply not profitable to import them. This is thanks to economic policies dating back more than a decade.
Price controls and scarcity force Venezuelans to turn to the black market for milk and toilet paper Global Development Professionals Network The Guardian
"Actually, venezuela has doubled the amount of cereals it produces in just 10 years, as have milk, eggs and pork. Child malnutrition has dropped by 2/3 in 10 years, too. So, are there food shortages? Look at this anti-Chavez blogger's post. He shows that food shortages mean the most popular mayonnaise is gone, but there are clearly 4 or 5 other brands still available. Again, white sugar is gone but there is plenty of brown left. Only one brand of powdered milk is left. The reason for this is Chavez instituted price-controls and gave people jobs, increasing their purchasing power. This meant for the first time in their lives, ordinary people can afford dairy produce. If you think about the logic behind this, you can find out a lot about how the media see ordinary people. In the 1990s when children were dying from malnutrition, there were no stories of food shortages, but now that rich people like themselves can't find Kraft mayonnaise and have to settle for Hellmans, that is a shortage."
The ministry of Plenty has decreed that the Chocolate ration has gone up from 10 grams to 5 grams.....
Meathead
Diamond Member
The "majority of people" never starved in Venezuela. The Generalismo's stupidity was in not taking the oil dollars and investing them in ways to guarantee a reasonable future for his country. Instead, as the populist socialist,he was, spent them on buying support for his government and marginalizing the forces that could support the state once the windfall was gone.Oh jesus christ, are you really that blind? The achievements of hugo are evident, all Hugo did was take oil profits and invest them into social programs, unlike what the venezuelan leadership was doing previously, (Keeping the oil money for the upper classes) the economy there would have tanked either way with the oil prices. Now, poverty is reduced, healthcare is better for the majority, people aren't starving..GAO U.S. corporations pay average effective tax rate of 12.6 - Jul. 1 2013who raise their taxes? I know Bush got in trouble for no new taxes so it could have been him could have sworn Clinton cut corporate taxes and Bush certainly did. so good I'm glad they're paying their fair share but don't forget the loopholes
who raise their taxes?
Well, it's very complicated and based on your low IQ, I'm not sure I could dumb down the explanation enough for a moron like you to understand.
could have sworn Clinton cut corporate taxes and Bush certainly did
Wrong on both counts. Idiot.
I don't care what party does what.they have no choice there in our country don't make me go Hugo Chavez on them"Minimize tax liabilities" Billy, just give me lower taxes and it'll trickle down, I promise!Off shore havens? Are you telling me that people arrange their affairs to minimize their tax liabilities? Are you serious? Liberals have been whining for decades that the opposite is true.
Hike taxes on the rich and corporations, they'll just line up to pay more, I promise.
don't make me go Hugo Chavez on them
You mean you'll tank the economy so much that we can't get toilet paper?
Yet another socialist success story. LOL!
Facts scare you, don't they? Well, regarding your earlier comments, which one are you talking about?http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/11/24/its-good-to-be-rich-you-get-a-lower-tax-rate/?_r=0The truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing, here, read up on some solutions, trust me, lower taxes does not equal benefits for working people, if you're seriously trying to defend trickle down economics, you're delusional and insane.Hike taxes on the rich and corporations, they'll just line up to pay more, I promise.
Annual income of richest 100 people enough to end global poverty four times over Oxfam International
"
Hobbs said: “We need a global new deal to reverse decades of increasing inequality. As a first step world leaders should formally commit themselves to reducing inequality to the levels seen in 1990.
“From tax havens to weak employment laws, the richest benefit from a global economic system which is rigged in their favour. It is time our leaders reformed the system so that it works in the interests of the whole of humanity rather than a global elite.”
Closing tax havens – which hold as much as $32 trillion or a third of all global wealth – could yield an additional $189bn in additional tax revenues. In addition to a tax haven crackdown, elements of a global new deal could include:
"
- a reversal of the trend towards more regressive forms of taxation;
- a global minimum corporation tax rate;
- measures to boost wages compared with returns available to capital;
The truth about what corporations actually pay in taxes is extremely low and nothing like the bullshit you're spewing
My comments were about taxes on rich people, not corporations.
Try reading for comprehension.
Poor Families Pay Double The State And Local Tax Rate As The Rich Study
Warren Buffett says the super-rich pay lower tax rates than others PolitiFact
No you don't.
No they don't.
Warren is wrong.
Thanks for the moronic links that have nothing to do with my earlier comments.
One of the things I enjoy the most about rarely visiting this site is avoiding the constant reminder that there are people like you in this country.You clearly do not know what you are talking about.It takes 8.4 million dollars to enter the 1% club. That's not average - that's the minimum wealth of the group. In a country of 300 milllion people there are 3 million 1 percenters. 3 million x 8.4 million = 25.2 trillion dollars. They have on average way more than 8.4 million dollars so yeah, you could take everything they own and have way more than you'd need to pay off the debt. Nice talking point though.I found this hilarious cartoon detailing this issue..grease like the United States is going broke because the rich are not paying their fair share of taxesAnd the Grexit I predicted back in January comes one step closer. What did those assholes think? They could stick their thumbs in Europeans' eyes and say fuck you but still continue to get bailout money? I dont think so.
Greece and creditors fail in last attempt to reach deal - Yahoo Finance
You could take everything the Top 1% has and it still wouldn't pay off our debt ... Keep on pretending you have any answers worth listening to.
.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 18
- Views
- 441
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 145
- Replies
- 321
- Views
- 6K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 106
- Views
- 367
- Replies
- 8
- Views
- 30
- Replies
- 241
- Views
- 4K
- Replies
- 278
- Views
- 2K
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8491
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 481
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-