Green New Deal

There are electric and ion drive planes.

Uh huh. And why is it that we haven't replaced all the fossil fuel-powered planes with those?
The big boys won't let it happen...Yeah they are not going to retire and say good luck..Plus is is in the development state.Look how long it took gasoline engines to be used solely by autos...

Solely by autos? Are you high or just incredibly stupid?

Do you know why Detroit is called "Motown"? Before they built cars there, it was where they built boat engines and it made sense to build the cars where the expertise in internal combustion engines was!
Yes you brainiac there were electric powered autos and gasification autos that burned trash for power, so why don’t you stfu for once.

Yes, and they did not succeed because they were inefficient! The same reasons why none of Occasional Cortex's ideas work either!

You just don't like people showing what an incredible dumbass you really are!

I used to get behind a Chevy Volt every morning going to work. The speed limit was mostly 55mph. That car might have made it to 55 mph going downhill with a strong tailwind maybe once or twice. I once thought to try to flag down the driver to see if he needed a push to get the damn rubber band wound up! It would cruise at about 45-50 mph most of the time until it came to a hill and depending of the grade would drop down to 25-30 mph. Of course, being on a hill I couldn't pass! If I would up behind that car it would adda good 15 minutes to my commute because the car was simply a $40,000 piece of shit that my taxes helped pay for!
They have plenty of power, that was just a slow driver. Yes now Europe and China know they have competition. Thank you Obama.
 
Yeah, like post birth "abortion," the dims don't really mean it.

Oh, wait...

Seriously Gutter, you should start dating AOC, she has the same level of intellect as you.

You let me know as soon as the green deal becomes law there my little statist buddy...I will be waiting for your notification!
 
I'm just waiting for somebody to go into her district with a microphone and a camera and start asking the people what they think of the fool they elected now that she's actually started proposing things.

I'm with you. I'd like to meet some of the people who voted for this idiot. They sure didn't investigate the dingbat before they voted for her. Unless, of course, they are socialist dingbats just like her.

To be honest, I think instead of the Democrats looking into Trump's financial background, they should look into hers. I really think she is a Republican plant. They seen this waitress, sweating it up and making nothing, and decided she would be a good candidate for their plan. They paid her to run not expecting her to win, but get enough media attention to say all these stupid things. After she surprisingly won, she went from a waitress to a six figure earner, and still gets paid by some Republican for every stupid thing she says, maybe 5K each time. She should be a millionaire by now.

It's the only thing that would make sense about this situation.

It makes perfect sense to me that leftist voters in New York are droolingly pig-stupid and put Socialist Barbie in office because she was "a fresh, exciting face and we need women of color in office just because they're women and they're color and that's important for some reason we don't know". It also makes perfect sense to me that leftists around the country are droolingly pig-stupid and will cheer and agree with something that makes no frigging sense whatsoever because they didn't read it, don't understand it, and really don't give a damn anyway so long as it sounds "caring" and like it has "feelz".

It makes sense to me. It's just really sad.

It's like I've said repeatedly on USMB: Democrats vote in representatives on the same grounds they voted for their favorite American Idol. Don't worry about their policies, their record, their past, what they want to do in the future. Just vote if they look and dress good.

If this bimbo had the face of Elizabeth Warren, she'd barely get local media attention yet alone national. She'd still be where she belongs, waiting tables at a restaurant somewhere.

Another person who needs an eye exam immediately!

I would hardly call her ugly. She's just an average woman if you ask me. But for some, she is attractive.

I think she's one of those women that can look good sometimes and other times just the opposite. It depends on the shot.
 
That's exactly what you America haters want.
An end to 35 years of GOP screwing the country and giving it away to the rich? Right you are.
Sure they have but giving the liberals power is even more insane.
Republicans are a catastrophe everytime stupidest Wars ever and always a corrupt bubble and bust if they have eight years to screw things up. And they have brainwashed half the country with total garbage misinformation phony scandals and character assassination no one in the real world cares about --garbage.
Yet it's the democrats proposing this massive failure...liar.
The left side of the Democrats young ones, actually a good idea a good idea. Your brain washers and you don't even believe in global warming so of course you can't have a intelligent idea about this.
Notice how anyone that disagrees with these America hating liars is always uneducated?
 
Yeah, like post birth "abortion," the dims don't really mean it.

Oh, wait...

Seriously Gutter, you should start dating AOC, she has the same level of intellect as you.

You let me know as soon as the green deal becomes law there my little statist buddy...I will be waiting for your notification!

Well if it does happen, it will be too late by then.
 
Yeah, like post birth "abortion," the dims don't really mean it.

Oh, wait...

Seriously Gutter, you should start dating AOC, she has the same level of intellect as you.

You let me know as soon as the green deal becomes law there my little statist buddy...I will be waiting for your notification!

Well if it does happen, it will be too late by then.

If it does happen it will not be because of AOC, but the result of multiple elections.

I have faith it will not happen in my lifetime, what the younger generation chooses to do is up to them.
 
I'm with you. I'd like to meet some of the people who voted for this idiot. They sure didn't investigate the dingbat before they voted for her. Unless, of course, they are socialist dingbats just like her.

To be honest, I think instead of the Democrats looking into Trump's financial background, they should look into hers. I really think she is a Republican plant. They seen this waitress, sweating it up and making nothing, and decided she would be a good candidate for their plan. They paid her to run not expecting her to win, but get enough media attention to say all these stupid things. After she surprisingly won, she went from a waitress to a six figure earner, and still gets paid by some Republican for every stupid thing she says, maybe 5K each time. She should be a millionaire by now.

It's the only thing that would make sense about this situation.

It makes perfect sense to me that leftist voters in New York are droolingly pig-stupid and put Socialist Barbie in office because she was "a fresh, exciting face and we need women of color in office just because they're women and they're color and that's important for some reason we don't know". It also makes perfect sense to me that leftists around the country are droolingly pig-stupid and will cheer and agree with something that makes no frigging sense whatsoever because they didn't read it, don't understand it, and really don't give a damn anyway so long as it sounds "caring" and like it has "feelz".

It makes sense to me. It's just really sad.

It's like I've said repeatedly on USMB: Democrats vote in representatives on the same grounds they voted for their favorite American Idol. Don't worry about their policies, their record, their past, what they want to do in the future. Just vote if they look and dress good.

If this bimbo had the face of Elizabeth Warren, she'd barely get local media attention yet alone national. She'd still be where she belongs, waiting tables at a restaurant somewhere.

Another person who needs an eye exam immediately!

I would hardly call her ugly. She's just an average woman if you ask me. But for some, she is attractive.

I think she's one of those women that can look good sometimes and other times just the opposite. It depends on the shot.

Many people allow their political biases to affect even the judgment of physical beauty.

shitty way to live, but people love to be miserable.
 
it doesnt help they are editing things out like "unwilling to work" and saying the right put that there.

or aoc saying of course the government will be up your ass but later ays its a right fear tactic.
 
Last edited:
To be honest, I think instead of the Democrats looking into Trump's financial background, they should look into hers. I really think she is a Republican plant. They seen this waitress, sweating it up and making nothing, and decided she would be a good candidate for their plan. They paid her to run not expecting her to win, but get enough media attention to say all these stupid things. After she surprisingly won, she went from a waitress to a six figure earner, and still gets paid by some Republican for every stupid thing she says, maybe 5K each time. She should be a millionaire by now.

It's the only thing that would make sense about this situation.

It makes perfect sense to me that leftist voters in New York are droolingly pig-stupid and put Socialist Barbie in office because she was "a fresh, exciting face and we need women of color in office just because they're women and they're color and that's important for some reason we don't know". It also makes perfect sense to me that leftists around the country are droolingly pig-stupid and will cheer and agree with something that makes no frigging sense whatsoever because they didn't read it, don't understand it, and really don't give a damn anyway so long as it sounds "caring" and like it has "feelz".

It makes sense to me. It's just really sad.

It's like I've said repeatedly on USMB: Democrats vote in representatives on the same grounds they voted for their favorite American Idol. Don't worry about their policies, their record, their past, what they want to do in the future. Just vote if they look and dress good.

If this bimbo had the face of Elizabeth Warren, she'd barely get local media attention yet alone national. She'd still be where she belongs, waiting tables at a restaurant somewhere.

Another person who needs an eye exam immediately!

I would hardly call her ugly. She's just an average woman if you ask me. But for some, she is attractive.

I think she's one of those women that can look good sometimes and other times just the opposite. It depends on the shot.

Many people allow their political biases to affect even the judgment of physical beauty.

shitty way to live, but people love to be miserable.

With Democrats it's always appearance that's paramount in making a decision on representatives. Look at DumBama! What did he have to offer? Hope and Change? Sounds like something a five year old made up. But he looked good and spoke well; that and he was a Mulatto. That's all that mattered to the Democrats.
 
Yeah, like post birth "abortion," the dims don't really mean it.

Oh, wait...

Seriously Gutter, you should start dating AOC, she has the same level of intellect as you.

You let me know as soon as the green deal becomes law there my little statist buddy...I will be waiting for your notification!

Well if it does happen, it will be too late by then.

If it does happen it will not be because of AOC, but the result of multiple elections.

I have faith it will not happen in my lifetime, what the younger generation chooses to do is up to them.

Correct, it likely won't. But somebody leading the charge is how it all starts. Surveys show that our younger people are increasingly favoring Socialism to Capitalism. It's a very bleak future for this country.
 
only the right wing doesn't believe Capital must Circulate under any form of Capitalism.

any green new deal must include some green under capitalism.

solving simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States can make that happen in a market friendly manner.

equal protection of the law.

the right wing doesn't like it, Because the Poor may benefit.

the Poor in a First World must be "rich enough" for equal protection of the law and compensation for the capital convenience of capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.
 
it doesnt help they are editing things out like "unwilling to work" and saying the right put hat there.

or aoc saying of course the government will be up your ass but later ays its a right fear tactic.
unwilling to work on a for-profit basis doesn't mean no work is being done.

only the right wing alleges Individual Liberty while requiring cronyism for Capital under our form of Capitalism.
 
Yeah, like post birth "abortion," the dims don't really mean it.

Oh, wait...

Seriously Gutter, you should start dating AOC, she has the same level of intellect as you.

You let me know as soon as the green deal becomes law there my little statist buddy...I will be waiting for your notification!

How about post birth abortion, gutter? Can you say "New York?"

10 years ago, infanticide was something democrats desired, but didn't even talk about. You spent a decade softening up the public with television, mind raping children in the public schools, using the little Goebbels of the fascist press, and here we are, infanticide is now the law in several states.

That's how you Communists work. Today the demand to end fossil fuels and put a 100 million people out of work is just a dream for you, but the schools have already been busy destroying young minds so they think ending air travel for peasants is a great idea. The democrat press has already pushed the idea that gas engines are evil, with their bizarre cave man religion of global warming. You've spent 40 years assaulting manufacturing, moving industry and jobs to China and Mexico.

It will take you 10 years, but unless people like me stop people like you, the idiocy of AnotherObnoxiousCommunist will be law in a decade.
 
Last edited:
That's exactly what you America haters want.
An end to 35 years of GOP screwing the country and giving it away to the rich? Right you are.
Sure they have but giving the liberals power is even more insane.
Republicans are a catastrophe everytime stupidest Wars ever and always a corrupt bubble and bust if they have eight years to screw things up. And they have brainwashed half the country with total garbage misinformation phony scandals and character assassination no one in the real world cares about --garbage.
Yet it's the democrats proposing this massive failure...liar.
The left side of the Democrats young ones, actually a good idea a good idea. Your brain washers and you don't even believe in global warming so of course you can't have a intelligent idea about this.

Mind rapists in public schools have created a generation without any knowledge of actual history, who have had the ability to reason forcibly removed by the swine who pervert them, Who have been harshly punished at any sign of critical thought to the point that they are mindless automatons. America's mal-educational system is guilty of crimes against humanity.
 
Preliminary cost estimates are in, $7 Trillion. As with all government programs that estimate, no doubt, will double or triple.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is calling for a Green New Deal as the 'moonshot' of our generation. Here's everything we know about it so far.
First generating all electric from solar wind and hydroelectric power for a nation our size is pretty well a pipe dream yea sounds great do do it in 10 years she needs to pass the bowel of tide pods

For the fourth year in a row, new US electricity capacity from renewable energy sources surpassed those from natural gas, and accounted for half of all new capacity additions, according to recent figures published by the country’s Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

New electricity capacity from renewable energy sources — including biomass, geothermal, hydropower, solar, and wind — accounted for 49.85% of all new capacity installed during 2017, which totaled 24,614 MW (megawatts), meaning that there was 12,270 MW worth of new renewable energy capacity. New natural gas capacity accounted for 48.67%, with the remaining new capacity being served by waste heat (0.89%), nuclear (0.41%), and oil ( 0.16%). There was no new coal capacity added during 2017.

These are the key statistics from Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) latest issue of its “Energy Infrastructure Update” (PDF) which includes data through to the end of 2017. Ken Bossong’s Sun Day Campaign highlighted these statistics in an email on Wednesday.

While renewable energy capacity was down on 2016’s impressive 16,124 MW, it nevertheless retained its position as the dominant new form of energy, outpacing natural gas for the fourth year in a row.

“Notwithstanding a year-long effort by the Trump Administration and its congressional allies to prop up coal, nuclear, and natural gas at the expense of renewable energy sources, clean energy technologies have proven themselves to be amazingly resilient,” noted Ken Bossong, Executive Director of the SUN DAY Campaign. “The unmistakable lesson to be drawn from the past five or more years of FERC data is that solar, wind, and the other renewable energy sources are carving out a large and rapidly-expanding share of the nation’s electrical generation.”

Technology-specific statistics were similarly impressive. By the end of last year, utility-scale solar had reached 30.30 GW (gigawatts) — approximately eight times greater than what FERC had reported five years ago. Solar now makes up 2.55% of the total US utility-scale generating capacity — an inherently underrated figure, considering FERC does not include distributed solar in its statistics.

Over the past five years, renewable energy generating capacity has increased across the board in the United States. On top of solar’s 7.77% increase, wind energy grew by 53.88%, biomass by 11.20%, geothermal by 3.51%, and hydropower by 2.79%. In fact, the generating capacity of all non-hydro renewable energy sources is 73.89% greater than it was five years ago, and renewables together account for 20.21% of the United States’ installed generating capacity. Five years ago this figure stood at only 15.40%. Unsurprisingly, given its popularity and economic viability, wind energy stands out from the pack for the moment, accounting for 7.45% of total US generating capacity.

On the other side of the energy generating street, natural gas has only increased its share of generating capacity by 5.14% over the past five years, and oil by only 5.35%. Most importantly, however, is the state of coal, which over the past five years has seen its share of total generating capacity decline by 17.83%.

https://www.ferc.gov/legal/staff-reports/2017/dec-energy-infrastructure.pdf

Were you rightards parents as stupid as you mental midgets are?
 
The green swoon deal.

But it has danielpalos all in, free money for refusing to work. That's all it takes for much of America that has been mind raped by schools to the point that thought is something alien to them.

What these scum don't grasp is that when we are reduced to eating zoo animals, it will be those like me who get to eat.
any good first world doesn't need to "steal from the Poor" merely so the Richest can get richer faster.
 
The green swoon deal.

But it has danielpalos all in, free money for refusing to work. That's all it takes for much of America that has been mind raped by schools to the point that thought is something alien to them.

What these scum don't grasp is that when we are reduced to eating zoo animals, it will be those like me who get to eat.
in right wing fantasy,

Tax Cut economics is always fine and wonderful.
 

Forum List

Back
Top