Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You've got that turned around. It's not that AGW deniers tend to be racist bigots. It's that racist bigots tend to be AGW deniers. And, of course in this instance, we have the poster's attitude towards President Obama to put the icing on the cake.There it is. If you don’t subscribe to the climate change (used to be global warming) dogma you’re racist and a bigot. There primitive defects don’t even hide it
Something I never thought about with added plant life is added oxygen to the atmosphere. Does cruck ever state if the amount of O is increasing or decreasing?next ask him how much new plant life that tiny CO2 increase has created.
I just posted this in another threadnext ask him how much new plant life that tiny CO2 increase has created.
science.nasa.gov
so, has oxygen levels increased?I just posted this in another thread
CO2 is making Earth greener—for now - NASA Science
A quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide.
of course not, he is a puppet of the left wing climate morons.Something I never thought about with added plant life is added oxygen to the atmosphere. Does cruck ever state if the amount of O is increasing or decreasing?
The people I listen to on the topic of global warming do not discuss politics, they discuss science. As far as science goes, you, quite obviously, would be the moron.of course not, he is a puppet of the left wing climate morons.
who do you listen to?The people I listen to on the topic of global warming do not discuss politics, they discuss science. As far as science goes, you, quite obviously, would be the moron.
The people I listen to on the topic of global warming do not discuss politics, they discuss science. As far as science goes, you, quite obviously, would be the moron.
still waiting on who you listen to? why do you hate providing your sources names?Wow. That is about as stupid as stupid can get. When you pull up your blanket on a cold night, do you get colder? Because your radiated spectrum is going to look exactly like that one he was showing.
What the fuck is wrong with you? I've provided them a hundred times. www.ipcc.chstill waiting on who you listen to? why do you hate providing your sources names?
that's a company, I asked for your sources, the people. I already debunked your IPCC bullshit. No names could I find in their work that were climate scientists. So asked you many months ago for one name. and here we are. I provide names, you call bullshit to the people I provide and yet you can't provide one name. so typical of someone pushing bullshit.What the fuck is wrong with you? I've provided them a hundred times. www.ipcc.ch
Crick , here cuck back in November 2023!!! come on cuck. give us a name, been almost a year.that's a company, I asked for your sources, the people. I already debunked your IPCC bullshit. No names could I find in their work that were climate scientists. So asked you many months ago for one name. and here we are. I provide names, you call bullshit to the people I provide and yet you can't provide one name. so typical of someone pushing bullshit.
Go ahead and challenge my statement and I will pull the mthr fking thread cuck
Back at you, only one will do, name a climate scientist who signed the IPCC report! You sure want but never fking give you wanker
