Growing support for same sex marriages from all religions. (bar evangelicals)

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Just when we thought that Republicanscould not evolve!!

So homo's packing each others fudge is evolution?
Looney liberal science facts. ....

Clearly YOU have not evolved

Why would he evolve into a pillow poker? He's not like you.

Are you really so illiterate that you do not understand that the reference to evolution was about the Republicans who support marriage equality?

The problem with you boys is that all you think about is gay sex which has nothing to do with the issue of marriage

Agree. Marriage is a union of male and female. Queers aren't involved.

Apparently you have a tenuous grip on reality. Ever hear of Obergfell?

What does Obergfell have to do with the definition of marriage?

Holly shit! Really? Do you even know what Obergefell is? Have you read it? The more that you post, the more it becomes apparent that you are just not that smart.

The USSC doesn't define marriage, you iduot.

The fact that you have the need to call me an idiot, and are so rattled as to mispell it tells me all that I need to know about your confidence and level of emotional maturity.

SCOTUS ruled that marriage is between any two consenting adults regardless of their respective genders, in accordance with existing state laws that govern marriage. In short, they took gender out of the equasion. You can call that redfining marriage. That is just a word. The fact is that they did what they did, based on the 14th amendment and that is that.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Just when we thought that Republicanscould not evolve!!

So homo's packing each others fudge is evolution?
Looney liberal science facts. ....

Clearly YOU have not evolved

Why would he evolve into a pillow poker? He's not like you.

Are you really so illiterate that you do not understand that the reference to evolution was about the Republicans who support marriage equality?

The problem with you boys is that all you think about is gay sex which has nothing to do with the issue of marriage

Agree. Marriage is a union of male and female. Queers aren't involved.

Apparently you have a tenuous grip on reality. Ever hear of Obergfell?

What does Obergfell have to do with the definition of marriage?

Holly shit! Really? Do you even know what Obergefell is? Have you read it? The more that you post, the more it becomes apparent that you are just not that smart.

Holy butt dagger, buttman!

Why do you find it necessary to be so vulgar and juvenile? You are not impressing anyone. Is it possabile for you to have an adult conversation? Seem not

Now that's funny. You want an adult conversation about allowing kids to dictate their desires for adults to follow. Funny.

What the fuck are you blathering about now? Do you even know? That is incoherant at best and approaching boarderline psychotic

 

[Meriweather]

SCOTUS ruled that marriage is between any two consenting adults regardless of their respective genders, in accordance with existing state laws that govern marriage. In short, they took gender out of the equasion. You can call that redfining marriage. That is just a word. The fact is that they did what they did, based on the 14th amendment and that is that.

Would it have become an issue had it not been for States laws governing taxes and medical care?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Just when we thought that Republicanscould not evolve!!

So homo's packing each others fudge is evolution?
Looney liberal science facts. ....

Clearly YOU have not evolved

Why would he evolve into a pillow poker? He's not like you.

Are you really so illiterate that you do not understand that the reference to evolution was about the Republicans who support marriage equality?

The problem with you boys is that all you think about is gay sex which has nothing to do with the issue of marriage

Agree. Marriage is a union of male and female. Queers aren't involved.

Only in your 19th century world.

Oh yeah, taking it up the ass is soooo progressive, huh.

Is that all that it is about? It is about family, it is about love, it is about commitment, it is about status and dignity for all people. Apparently this are things that are beyond you ability to comprehentd

Go fuck yourself.

Poor benighted ludite. Go on about (think about) gay sex more than any gay person I know.

It's "luddite", you ignorant queer. And homosexuality is nothing new. It's been labeled as perversion by civilization for thousands of years.

Not every civilization. Do try to keep informed. Con-sider it an opportunity for you to think about and talk about gay sex........................again.

You mean not every culture. Not every culture is civilized. See, this is why education is so important and far different than indoctrination. Little gnomes like you and your pals often confuse indoctrination for education.

"Not every culture is civilized"..... And let me guess...............you want to be the judge of that.

Yep. I don't need anyone to tell me how to live my life. Fully equipped and capable .

Who is telling you how to live? But it seems like you are telling others how to live, or at the least passing judgement on them

You're confused. Marriage is defined as male and female and has been for thousands of years. I'm not the one forcing my views. Idiot.

Appeal to tradition logical fallacy. In various times and places, women were traditionally considered that property of men and not permitted to have property of their own. Men were traditionally allowed to have multiple wives. Men were traditionally allowed to marry young girls. I could go on but you get the idea. Should those thing not have changed?Traditions change and tradition is not an excuse for stagnation and oppression. Tell me, what harm has same sex marriage done aside from assailing your primative idea of tradition

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

SCOTUS ruled that marriage is between any two consenting adults regardless of their respective genders, in accordance with existing state laws that govern marriage. In short, they took gender out of the equasion. You can call that redfining marriage. That is just a word. The fact is that they did what they did, based on the 14th amendment and that is that.

Would it have become an issue had it not been for States laws governing taxes and medical care?

Yes. Taxes and medical were not the only issues. There was much more at stake

 

[Meriweather]

There was much more at stake

Such as?

 

[miketx]

They always want the children.

 

[BS Filter]

Just when we thought that Republicanscould not evolve!!

So homo's packing each others fudge is evolution?
Looney liberal science facts. ....

Clearly YOU have not evolved

Why would he evolve into a pillow poker? He's not like you.

Are you really so illiterate that you do not understand that the reference to evolution was about the Republicans who support marriage equality?

The problem with you boys is that all you think about is gay sex which has nothing to do with the issue of marriage

Agree. Marriage is a union of male and female. Queers aren't involved.

Only in your 19th century world.

Oh yeah, taking it up the ass is soooo progressive, huh.

Is that all that it is about? It is about family, it is about love, it is about commitment, it is about status and dignity for all people. Apparently this are things that are beyond you ability to comprehentd

Go fuck yourself.

Poor benighted ludite. Go on about (think about) gay sex more than any gay person I know.

It's "luddite", you ignorant queer. And homosexuality is nothing new. It's been labeled as perversion by civilization for thousands of years.

Not every civilization. Do try to keep informed. Con-sider it an opportunity for you to think about and talk about gay sex........................again.

You mean not every culture. Not every culture is civilized. See, this is why education is so important and far different than indoctrination. Little gnomes like you and your pals often confuse indoctrination for education.

"Not every culture is civilized"..... And let me guess...............you want to be the judge of that.

Yep. I don't need anyone to tell me how to live my life. Fully equipped and capable .

Who is telling you how to live? But it seems like you are telling others how to live, or at the least passing judgement on them

You're confused. Marriage is defined as male and female and has been for thousands of years. I'm not the one forcing my views. Idiot.

Appeal to tradition logical fallacy. In various times and places, women were traditionally considered that property of men and not permitted to have property of their own. Men were traditionally allowed to have multiple wives. Men were traditionally allowed to marry young girls. I could go on but you get the idea. Should those thing not have changed?Traditions change and tradition is not an excuse for stagnation and oppression. Tell me, what harm has same sex marriage done aside from assailing your primative idea of tradition

You're still confused. The Definition of marriage has always been a Male and female.

 

[miketx]

Just when we thought that Republicanscould not evolve!!

So homo's packing each others fudge is evolution?
Looney liberal science facts. ....

Clearly YOU have not evolved

Why would he evolve into a pillow poker? He's not like you.

Are you really so illiterate that you do not understand that the reference to evolution was about the Republicans who support marriage equality?

The problem with you boys is that all you think about is gay sex which has nothing to do with the issue of marriage

Agree. Marriage is a union of male and female. Queers aren't involved.

Only in your 19th century world.

Oh yeah, taking it up the ass is soooo progressive, huh.

Is that all that it is about? It is about family, it is about love, it is about commitment, it is about status and dignity for all people. Apparently this are things that are beyond you ability to comprehentd

Go fuck yourself.

Poor benighted ludite. Go on about (think about) gay sex more than any gay person I know.

It's "luddite", you ignorant queer. And homosexuality is nothing new. It's been labeled as perversion by civilization for thousands of years.

Not every civilization. Do try to keep informed. Con-sider it an opportunity for you to think about and talk about gay sex........................again.

You mean not every culture. Not every culture is civilized. See, this is why education is so important and far different than indoctrination. Little gnomes like you and your pals often confuse indoctrination for education.

"Not every culture is civilized"..... And let me guess...............you want to be the judge of that.

Yep. I don't need anyone to tell me how to live my life. Fully equipped and capable .

Who is telling you how to live? But it seems like you are telling others how to live, or at the least passing judgement on them

You're confused. Marriage is defined as male and female and has been for thousands of years. I'm not the one forcing my views. Idiot.

Appeal to tradition logical fallacy. In various times and places, women were traditionally considered that property of men and not permitted to have property of their own. Men were traditionally allowed to have multiple wives. Men were traditionally allowed to marry young girls. I could go on but you get the idea. Should those thing not have changed?Traditions change and tradition is not an excuse for stagnation and oppression. Tell me, what harm has same sex marriage done aside from assailing your primative idea of tradition

You're still confused. The Definition of marriage has always been a Male and female.

He's not confused he's just another lying pole puffer.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

It's funny how TheOppressiveFaggot is trying to bring “evolution” into this discussion.

Evolution is based on natural selection, which causes organisms to evolve in the direction that is most conducive to preserving the species.

Homosexuality, transgenderism, pedophilia—every part of the whole LGBpbiWTF?!?!? package—are deleterious to preserving a species. These are defects which natural selection weeds out, which the evolutionary process rejects.

Just when we thought that Republicans could not evolve!!

So homo's packing each others fudge is evolution?

Clearly YOU have not evolved

Why would he evolve into a pillow poker? He's not like you.

Are you really so illiterate that you do not understand that the reference to evolution was about the Republicans who support marriage equality?

If being a perverted homo is somehow considered being evolved?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Apparently you have a tenuous grip on reality. Ever hear of Obergfell?

What does Obergfell have to do with the definition of marriage?

It has as much to do with any rational or otherwise valid definition of marriage, as Nix v. Hedden, 149 U.S. 304 (1893) has to do with botany.

No court, no part of any government, no mortal authority, has any more power to define marriage to include a homosexual mockery thereof, than it has to define a tomato as not being a fruit.

 

[Meriweather]

No court, no part of any government, no mortal authority, has any more power to define marriage

Why must government play a part in marriage at all? My vows are to my husband, made before God. Government has nothing to do with my marriage other than it insisted upon intruding into it by having it registered.

My question is why anyone would want the government meddling in any union? It is not government business. I am still wondering why homosexuals thought it would be a great idea to involve government in their unions. Vows before each other with appropriate witnesses is not enough?

Personally, I move to kick government out of all marriage; I am wondering why some want government involvement in marriage.

 

[miketx]

No court, no part of any government, no mortal authority, has any more power to define marriage

Why must government play a part in marriage at all? My vows are to my husband, made before God. Government has nothing to do with my marriage other than it insisted upon intruding into it by having it registered.

My question is why anyone would want the government meddling in any union? It is not government business. I am still wondering why homosexuals thought it would be a great idea to involve government in their unions. Vows before each other with appropriate witnesses is not enough?

Personally, I move to kick government out of all marriage; I am wondering why some want government involvement in marriage.

Queers need affirmation.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Apparently you have a tenuous grip on reality. Ever hear of Obergfell?

What does Obergfell have to do with the definition of marriage?

It has as much to do with any rational or otherwise valid definition of marriage, as Nix v. Hedden, 149 U.S. 304 (1893) has to do with botany.

No court, no part of any government, no mortal authority, has any more power to define marriage to include a homosexual mockery thereof, than it has to define a tomato as not being a fruit.

Brilliant Bobby, just fucking brilliant. Unfortunatly for you and your ilk, the court has don just that and after 6 years there have been no successful challanges to it. Get over it Bobby boy. How has same sex marriage changed your life? How has it changed society.? What evil has it bestowed upon the nation/the world?

 

[Meriweather]

need affirmation.

Possibly. But I was wondering if there was something more.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

It's funny how TheOppressiveFaggot is trying to bring “evolution” into this discussion.

Evolution is based on natural selection, which causes organisms to evolve in the direction that is most conducive to preserving the species.

Homosexuality, transgenderism, pedophilia—every part of the whole LGBpbiWTF?!?!? package—are deleterious to preserving a species. These are defects which natural selection weeds out, which the evolutionary process rejects.

​

Just when we thought that Republicans could not evolve!!

​

So homo's packing each others fudge is evolution?

​

Clearly YOU have not evolved

​

Why would he evolve into a pillow poker? He's not like you.

​

Are you really so illiterate that you do not understand that the reference to evolution was about the Republicans who support marriage equality?

​

If being a perverted homo is somehow considered being evolved?

Get a grip Bobby boy. The species is doing just fine. A little to much so actually. If you are so concerned about the survial of the species, you should be railing against climate change, nuclear proliferation and the rise of fascism.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Just when we thought that Republicanscould not evolve!!

So homo's packing each others fudge is evolution?
Looney liberal science facts. ....

Clearly YOU have not evolved

Why would he evolve into a pillow poker? He's not like you.

Are you really so illiterate that you do not understand that the reference to evolution was about the Republicans who support marriage equality?

The problem with you boys is that all you think about is gay sex which has nothing to do with the issue of marriage

Agree. Marriage is a union of male and female. Queers aren't involved.

Only in your 19th century world.

Oh yeah, taking it up the ass is soooo progressive, huh.

Is that all that it is about? It is about family, it is about love, it is about commitment, it is about status and dignity for all people. Apparently this are things that are beyond you ability to comprehentd

Go fuck yourself.

Poor benighted ludite. Go on about (think about) gay sex more than any gay person I know.

It's "luddite", you ignorant queer. And homosexuality is nothing new. It's been labeled as perversion by civilization for thousands of years.

Not every civilization. Do try to keep informed. Con-sider it an opportunity for you to think about and talk about gay sex........................again.

You mean not every culture. Not every culture is civilized. See, this is why education is so important and far different than indoctrination. Little gnomes like you and your pals often confuse indoctrination for education.

"Not every culture is civilized"..... And let me guess...............you want to be the judge of that.

Yep. I don't need anyone to tell me how to live my life. Fully equipped and capable .

Who is telling you how to live? But it seems like you are telling others how to live, or at the least passing judgement on them

You're confused. Marriage is defined as male and female and has been for thousands of years. I'm not the one forcing my views. Idiot.

Appeal to tradition logical fallacy. In various times and places, women were traditionally considered that property of men and not permitted to have property of their own. Men were traditionally allowed to have multiple wives. Men were traditionally allowed to marry young girls. I could go on but you get the idea. Should those thing not have changed?Traditions change and tradition is not an excuse for stagnation and oppression. Tell me, what harm has same sex marriage done aside from assailing your primative idea of tradition

You're still confused. The Definition of marriage has always been a Male and female.

He's not confused he's just another lying pole puffer.

Where is the lie??.......
"Appeal to tradition logical fallacy. In various times and places, women were traditionally considered that property of men and not permitted to have property of their own. Men were traditionally allowed to have multiple wives. Men were traditionally allowed to marry young girls. I could go on but you get the idea. Should those thing not have changed?Traditions change and tradition is not an excuse for stagnation and oppression. Tell me, what harm has same sex marriage done aside from assailing your primative idea of tradition"

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

No court, no part of any government, no mortal authority, has any more power to define marriage

Why must government play a part in marriage at all? My vows are to my husband, made before God. Government has nothing to do with my marriage other than it insisted upon intruding into it by having it registered.

My question is why anyone would want the government meddling in any union? It is not government business. I am still wondering why homosexuals thought it would be a great idea to involve government in their unions. Vows before each other with appropriate witnesses is not enough?

Personally, I move to kick government out of all marriage; I am wondering why some want government involvement in marriage.

Queers need affirmation.

Bigots need affirmation but they are finding it increasingly hard to come by, while LGBT people are increasingly accepted as part of the fabric of society

 

[Polishprince]

No court, no part of any government, no mortal authority, has any more power to define marriage

Why must government play a part in marriage at all? My vows are to my husband, made before God. Government has nothing to do with my marriage other than it insisted upon intruding into it by having it registered.

My question is why anyone would want the government meddling in any union? It is not government business. I am still wondering why homosexuals thought it would be a great idea to involve government in their unions. Vows before each other with appropriate witnesses is not enough?

Personally, I move to kick government out of all marriage; I am wondering why some want government involvement in marriage.

Queers need affirmation.

Bigots need affirmation but they are finding it increasingly hard to come by, while LGBT people are increasingly accepted as part of the fabric of society

Men who get a thrill out of wearing womens' clothes are always been accepted as part of the fabric of society.

But it was always understood that being a she-male was deviate behavior, and people did it on their own time on nights and weekends, standing on the street corner hanging out at gay bars and bath houses, etc. And when they reported to work on Monday morning, they were wearing suit and neck tie and acted normative.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

No court, no part of any government, no mortal authority, has any more power to define marriage

Why must government play a part in marriage at all? My vows are to my husband, made before God. Government has nothing to do with my marriage other than it insisted upon intruding into it by having it registered.

My question is why anyone would want the government meddling in any union? It is not government business. I am still wondering why homosexuals thought it would be a great idea to involve government in their unions. Vows before each other with appropriate witnesses is not enough?

Personally, I move to kick government out of all marriage; I am wondering why some want government involvement in marriage.

Queers need affirmation.

Bigots need affirmation but they are finding it increasingly hard to come by, while LGBT people are increasingly accepted as part of the fabric of society

Men who get a thrill out of wearing womens' clothes are always been accepted as part of the fabric of society.

But it was always understood that being a she-male was deviate behavior, and people did it on their own time on nights and weekends, standing on the street corner hanging out at gay bars and bath houses, etc. And when they reported to work on Monday morning, they were wearing suit and neck tie and acted normative.

What the fuck are you blathering about??!! You make no sense at all and nothing here has anything to do with the topic. It is in fact it is downright idiotic. Your portrayal of gay people behavior is moronic and out dated.

Why don't you stick to what you know best and tell us more about man on man sex in the big house and how you fought for your manhood. Somehow, I don't think that you won.